Surveillance State notes something very, very important:
Hezbollah and Israel have been at war for some time. In an effort to stop Hezbollah's guerrilla fighters from communicating, Israel has in the past jammed the cell phone towers in the Hezbollah-controlled areas in southern Lebanon. Eager to make sure that didn't happen again, Hezbollah has covertly built out a fiber-optic network throughout the areas it controls.
He then goes on to note that the last crisis between Lebanon's government and Hezbollah was over the government trying to shut down that fiber-optic network. Hezbollah regarded that as an act of war:
(Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah) said the government's decision to shut down Hezbollah's fiber-optic communications network was tantamount to a declaration of war. For the (central) government, the network represented an intolerable example of Hezbollah's efforts to set up an Iranian- and Syrian-backed state within Lebanon. Hezbollah justifies the network, which carried its communications during a 2006 war with Israel, as a vital security asset.
The interesting thing is that during the 2006 war, Hezbollah won the information war. Their communications remained secure, but Israeli soldier carrying cell phones made calls which Hezbollah tracked. Even if they couldn't listen in, being able to triangulate where some Israeli soldier is making a call from gives some very interesting, and useful, information.
Americans, Israelis and the West in general are used to assuming they'll win the surveillance, electronic and information war. But Hezbollah defeated or drew Israel in all three. A network of tunnels, pre-prepared camouflage positions for missile launchers and the use of civilian clothes when troops were traveling made aerial surveillance and satellites virtually useless. The Israelis were never able to shut down the majority of Hezbollah's missile launchers, any more than they've been able to find those of the Palestinians.
Hezbollah's army is a secret one. It's like an old fashioned spy agency.
It doesn't exist.
If you're enrolled in it, you don't tell anyone. The war was rife with stories of soldiers being killed, and their families finding out for the first time that they were even in Hezbollah's army. This, of course, is to make it impossible to use assassination, mostly aerial assassination, to take out key leaders.
Hezbollah is an almost perfect Darwinian organization. Israel uses informants and assassination? Great - we'll keep even our membership secret. Israel uses air power? We'll dig tunnels and set up aeriel blinds for our missile launchers. Israel doesn't like taking heavy infantry casualties - fine then, we'll set up overlapping bunkers which simply cannot be cleared without taking losses.
Hezbollah has created the new model army, and a new model state. Call it the Hidden Army. An army that blends in with the population, that moves only when it cannot be seen, that sets up in the expectation of surveillance. An army that knows all the high tech games, and spent the time to figure out how to nullify them. It sounds like a guerilla army, and it is, but it's also much more: it's an army capable of engaging in strategic warfare and an army capable of engaging in full on attrition defense warfare against Israeli main battle forces. It's hard to overstate how impressive this is.
It's an unrecognized State with a hidden army. Oh, the UN says there's a Lebanese government with authority over Hezbollah. But everyone knows that the real government in southern Lebanon is Hezbollah. They pick up the garbage, they give out the pensions, heck, they have their own phone network. Crazy. When the Lebanese "government" picks a fight with Hezbollah, Hezbollah wins.
We are going to see many more of these unrecognized governments, with their hidden armies. Why? Because they work, and they work very well, both at providing government services to a population, and at frustrating much larger, more powerful and expensive conventional armies. As official governments fail, less recognized ones will pick up the pieces. And they will look to Lebanon to see how to do it, survive, and even win.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Hi, Ian.
One of the best articles I’ve read on the Hezzies. War Nerd has other good, earlier ones too.
http://www.exile.ru/articles/d.....LOCK_ID=35
BTW, unlike the U.S., the Hezzies don’t rely solely on military power. They also have a very well developed network of social services that, noteworthily, the govts don’t supply. That included rapid reconstruction after the 06 Israeli attacks. People tend to like you if you help them, and hate you if you bomb them..
Ian, do you foresee Hezbollah organizing to the point of separating from Lebanon entirely? And what do you think this would mean to the Western World at large? Another enemy in the Middle East? I can’t see Israel picking another fight with them, especially with the recently nullified cease-fire. They’ve got their hands full with the Palestinians. I guess I’m just trying to figure out what the recent military advancements for Hezbollah might mean to our foreign policy in the near future. Anybody have any ideas or talking points, let’s get it on.
They want a change to the Lebanese constitution for representation to be proportional to votes. I don’t see them seperating formally from Lebanon.
What I don’t understand is why, if you’re a self-sustaining governmental institution, you’d continue to live under another flag. They have their own military, govt services, social services, fiber-optic network, etc. Why continue to be part of a country that, in the opinion of their leadership, doesn’t represent what they stand for?
Are most Hezbollahs native Lebanese — or did they migrate in?
What would be the point of separating from Lebanon? The Hezzies function well in the niche they’re in and Nasralleh recognizes that. That’s part of the way an intelligent insurgency works. Take advantage of opportunities and go to ground when the situation is adverse.
Eventually they’ll take over the whole country of Lebanon, courtesy of demographics, intelligence, and gang character of other Lebanese power bases that are becoming increasingly irrelevant. (Read my linke above.)
But Hizballah is no enemy of the U.S. so not to worry.
i think because they’d rather change the leadership so that it does represent them and the people of lebanon more fairly.
Sounds much like Sadr.
They don’t really control the capital, plus trying to seperate would cause a horrible civil war. No one there wants that, been there, done that, lost the relatives to prove it. Also the Hezbollah army is not that large. It’s very good, but it’s not an occupation army, it’s meant to work with the support of the population.
If the Iraqis ever get this efficient our military is going to take major losses worse than now.
Hizballah cares about its own constituency, the Lebanese Shias, who are lower than dirt in the country. I think they don’t give a twit about Lebanon per se. They’ll take it over eventually, not because they want to, but because they seem to be the only intelligent force on the ground.
Yeah, demographics are on their side. Change the constitution so it’s properly proportional, wait 20 years.
Also mentioned in the article I liked to. Yes, indeedy doody. Not an accident. These folks learn from each other.
“linked” not “liked”
But Hizballah is no enemy of the U.S. …
What - they don’t get newspapers?
do you know that we were not involved in the assassination of Imad Mughniyah?
i am more worried about us being the enemy of hezbollah - in an effort to provoke an attack.
Exactly. Hezbollah is a legitimate government and a state within a state, because it provides all the services of a government. Hamas tries to do the same thing, and despite its problems still runs more clinics and schools than anyone else. It started a social services organization, not an armed movement. The ICU was well on its way before they were destroyed. The Taliban, medieval bastards that they were, also did provide the (most) basic services.
But Hezbollah in many ways is actually a good government. They are far more efficient, far less corrupt and far more responsive than the Lebanese government proper. After the last war they were rebuilding long before the “government” and made a point of helping anyone who asked, not just the Shia. That sort of thing wins you a ton of good will.
i was only referring the proportional representation that ian has mentioned.
To be sure. W must create enemies to justify his power.
You ain’t said the half of it… As Juan Cole notes…
Here’s the article he cites…
Thanks for the answers, all. Makes a lot more sense now. I wasn’t very familiar with the situation in Lebanon. Now I am! Again, thanks.
also the army you describe sounds mostly defensive.
Yep.
Lebanon is a basket case stuck in a time warp. So it’s not difficult to be better than the (laughingly-referred-to-as) Lebanese govt.
I once asked a Lebanese jeweler I know (he’s Orthodox Christian and family still lives there & owns expensive property) how the Lebanese civil war ended. Short verison: Saudi Arabia bought off the various parties. Sez a lot.
Great post, Ian. Do you suppose this fiber network had anything to do with the rash of undersea cable-cutting a couple of months ago? Specifically, could US forces have been trying to sever the communications link between Hezbollah and Iran?
The future of ‘organized’ mayhem delineated … when ‘crisis’ lifts these soldiers fade back into their regular lives.
We must realize that the reality of the ‘Minute Man’, of American Fable, of ‘necessity’, still resonates, among the oppressed.
Excellant!!!
Ian, congrats on your increased presence, and thanks for taking on a much larger load.
You now probably know more about Lebanon than ayone in the U.S. govt!
The Sadrists parallel Hezbollah actions in many ways, both step up and provide real help to the poor and disenfranchised in their respective countries…!
Drowsing out. See ya tomorrow.
It is. They aren’t capable of offensive operations beyond raids and some missile strikes.
… and both have more respect than the officials running their countries …
Evenin’ all !
That never occured to me. I don’t know. It seems unlikely, in that they were public lines, but I could be wrong.
G’nite eCahn, as always your insights were very informative.
that’s the kind of army i don’t object to.
Yeah. They aren’t nearly as militarily captable, but they’re trying to learn. Hezbollah has the advantage of long time patronage, and years of peace which they used very very well to build fortifications, comm networks, tunnels, train men and so on.
Sadr’s real problem is that he has no real patronage. The Iranians don’t much like him, neither do the Sunni princes, he has no one to provide him with money and arms. It wouldn’t take a lot to make a big difference.
It’s an intriguing model. I don’t think I’d much like living under Hezbollah, but for what they are they’re pretty damn good. Leaving aside the poverty, which isn’t their fault, I think they’re probably better to live under than most official Mideast governments. Not that that’s saying a great deal.
But the model is going to spread. Beating the Israelis was an unbelievable prestige boost, and they’ve done it twice now.
Yeah, just noodling around here, but some people over at Emptywheel were wondering at the time if the cuts also were to mask installation of monitoring equipment. That might make even more sense here and would explain the location of most of the cuts being between Lebanon and Iran.
Several articles today highlight the desperation of the GZG to postpone the provincial elections in Iraq, since they’re well aware that Maliki’s Dawa party and Hakim’s SIIC party, despite… or because of all the current ops, knows they’ll get their clocks cleaned by the Sadrist lists and Sunni Awakenings parties… Along the lines of the Repugs here seeing the same writing on the wall…!
Thank you Ian, for this fantastic post– wonderfully informative and on a little understood subject.
I am duly impressed and thankful.
i’m pretty sure i’d rather be living under hezebollah in lebanon than in gaza under the israeli occupation.
OT but speaking of assassinations (or an attempted one in this case)… this does not sound good (via moon of alabama):
that couldn’t have been a little revenge seeking, could it?
forgot to add:
thankful for not once finding the word “terrorist” thus far and an understanding that they, Hamas, etc. do provide security, goods and services that their governments do not!
Aloha, Petro! Lots more respect…!
Huh. Hot on the heels of Sy Hersh’s disclosure of increased US operations behind Iranian lines, no less.
Evenin’ all.
Aloha, Hmmm! It’s been awhile! How’s the Bay area doing…? ;-)
there must be a better country to live in than this one
http://www.news.com.au/heralds.....63,00.html
why sure it could!
it stinks to high heaven.
hey Tom Friedman sez the earth is flat..so is his brain imo
Aloha nui! Very well here, thank you, though strange weather: warm, sunny, and pleasant. (/snark) Wonderful to have the smoke gone. Hilo town treating you & yours well, I trust? Tolerable vog?
This is an important factor in the current “War” on “terror”. Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. have two important and often enmeshed components: a social services network, and a military arm. Now, in the case of the Bushies, this is a twofer: they hate, equally, uncontrollable military organizations, and social services networks. But to most of the world, social services networks are “good,” the militia– well, our own Supremes just reminded us of the right to bear (or is it bare?) arms is guaranteed by our own Constitution.
As we discovered in Afghanistan, sometimes the only difference between a “freedom fighter” and a “terrorist” is which side you’re on, and which decade it is (Back when the Soviets ruled Afghanistan, the mujaheddin were freedom fighers. Now they’re terrorists). Don’t forget that the State of Israel was established by Freedom fighters/terrorists, as was our own country.
Bob in HI
I pity the folks in Kailua town…! ;-)
well, friedman is #40 on foreign policy’s list of the world’s top 100 intellectuals, so he must know what he’s talking about. /sn
Ian, would you say Hezbollah’s techniques for invisibly maintaining a highly effective organization have antecedents in the long history of European organized crime? Guess I’m thinking mainly of the Families of Italy and their US descendants “The Mob” etc.
This is not to draw any moral parallel between the motives or missions, just to compare methods.
You know, it surely gives one something to think about…
How a group of people with relatively small/antiquated/makeshift weapon caches (compared to the behemoths that oppress/invade/occupy them) seem always to find the ingenuity/will/strength to fight back always and prevail a lot of the time.
How true! Here’s a fascinating read written by a Mich. Prof… Entitled; “Elite vs. People”
Here’s a snippet…
oh jeeeeeeeeeeeze my tortishell cat has far more sense and discernment than that doofus
As a conventional military it’s interesting that we have almost become like the old Bill Cosby joke about the Revolutionary war, and the “redcoats”. We all wear the same uniform, march in straight lines and are amazed with anyone shoots at us.
Hezzbollah’s success is probably the part of what was euphemistically called “Fourth Generation” warfare, I believe. It validates what some of Rummies planners talked about in 2001, but our military-industrial complex and ossified command and control structure could never believe it would happen, and thus can’t react to it well: field-grade initiative, decentralized control and simple missions with clear objectives (build a bunker which controls a field of fire, and man it until further notice). All things that the SEALS teams do well, but carrier strike forces do not for the most part
I’m sure that this concept will raise a lot of hackles in the “America No. 1!” crowd, but the military planners at places like the War Colleges have known about this for a long time, they just don’t get much attention until after the fact, because they are not sponsored by CheneyBurton or some other contracting company.
NAZIs were masterfull manipulators
We’ll be in Maui at the end of August. Would you Big Islanders mind running up to the volcano and sticking a cork in the vent for the duration? Thanks, we appreciate it.
we dont want to win,or even be sucessful,fire the million dollar missles so we can buy more.rinse latherrepeat.infinitum
*gasp* But, didn’t Betrayus write the COIN FM…? Shouldn’t he know…? ;-)
There is a very interesting passage in Shock Doctrine that turns that observation around. Klein notes that in true democracies, votes tend toward redistribution of wealth from the top down. So in other words, what is good for society is bad for elites.
And, piss off, Madame Pele…! Are you nuts…? ;-)
And yet, I don’t see the following people on this list:
Ian
Scarecrow
Marcy
Aw, you’re right, she don’t like dat stuff.
Nice pic of the flow into the ocean…!
late nite zed to claim upstairs
Hiya CT! Yeah, and you know, the COIN manual is probably considered an “interesting” document by everyone Barnacle and his crew. Massive firepower, more cruise missiles and higher-tech always win didn’t you know that? And always winning ensures that where the winner goes so go the “hearts and minds”… even when we really just kicked’em in the balls and slapped’em on a waterboard.
OT: Al-Haramain dismissed. Looks like the concept of unitary exec authority for warrantless wiretapping dissed in the process, though.
getting that ready for the news box… thanks
I Lv 2 Srv.
…and Fucking Hitchens hits #27
What’s wrong with this pitcher?
about 100 things.
want a list? *g*
Same idea, in a sense, I suppose. But I think it’s also the way that secret services used to be run. Was a time when the brits wouldn’t even admit MI5 existed.
It’s a crying shame…! This was the killer motion…
In some ways its very 4th gen. In others… well, bunker warfare is very old. It’s not hard to clear bunkers. But you have to be willing to take losses. Hezbollah troops sign up knowing they’ll probably die. Despite the BS about “making the other guy die for his country”, in fact, being willing to die gives you an advantage.
Another example is taking out Abrams on city streets. It takes 4 men, according to a military analyst I know. Two will die for sure.
The Iraqis are willing to make that sacrifice. It’s a no brainer. Hezbollah would make it in a heartbeat too.
I’d love a list.
I would add Azar Nafisi (Reading Lolita in Tehran) and Terry Pratchett (THUD!, etc.).
And they got up totally PO’d…! 8-(
horrors!
No Condi, Bolton, Powell, Cheney or Bush!
Sticky IED’s, think of ‘Saving Private Ryan’…!
Email to fpletters @ carnegie endowment dot org
Subject: Friedman? Hitchens?
Body: You gotta be fucking kidding me.
Try again
Thanks for playing
This is the dirty underside of the Rule of Law. Those who control the Rules hold the upper hand. That’s why in history, Law often serves as a tool by those in power to disenfranchise those who are not in power.
For example, Palestinians who have lived on family lands for generations have been kicked off because they could not produce a proper “deed” for their property- and this in a country that changed administrative hands and governing “laws” a number of times in the past 200 years (Turks, British, Israel, among others).
Bob in HI
Hi Ian. That was fascinating. Do you suppose our own military academies are teaching this stuff? Is this being examined and taught say at West Point? If not, how come?
It’s being taught, but whether it’s really being taken seriously… That I don’t know. Also, the problem is imperial hubris… to admit this stuff requires admitting to yourself that Hezbollah aren’t just terrorists by have legitimacy. And that’s a hard thing for most people to admit in the US.
Hate to interrupt this party, but we’re putting a little something together for Darcy Burner upstairs.
Of course that’s true, Ian. But you’re telling me that the Pentagon is so arrogant that they’d discount in any manner these tactics and strategies, etc.? That is just unbelievable. I’m not a history buff, but I don’t recall every hearing about Rome making that mistake.
Well, I’m sure lots of bright young lads are learning lessons, and Petraeus isn’t a fool, even if he is a hack. But then you’d think that Vietnam had taught them something too.
The conclusion Vietnam taught is “let’s not fight these types of wars”.
But that’s not the military’s decision to make.
That’s good stuff, and a new link which I appreciate . . . thanks!
Someone must have made this comment. The post implies that Hezbollah is some kind of genius guerilla army that simply invents brilliant plans purely through their wits.
Iran funds Hezbollah. This is partly a proxy war. I’m not exactly sure what the point of the post is, but if the point is that resisters are ingenious in their resistance, that is often true. I’m not sure exactly what the point is in giving Hezbollah ‘credit’ for their ingenuity. But if you think of Hezbollah as some kind of ragtag group of MacGuyvers, that’s pretty naive.
Is this some kind of lefty romanticizing of the violent because we don’t like who they are violent against thing? Or what? Guerilla chic? This is a proxy war and unfortunately, Iran is not all that chic. Although they do wear a lot of black.
Anyway, widespread generalizations cannot be made about states vs. shadow armies from the case of Lebanon. Lebanon is a very weak government. But of course, many of these countries are. I’d put down the successful rise of extremist groups to the weakness of the state, not to some sort of new innovation in these groups. They are not dissimilar to the mafia in weak or corrupt countries. It’s not that hard to subvert the state in those cases. Or maybe that’s your point?
I was certainly impressed with how fast Hezbollah was in there with bulldozers and aid, clean-up and AID, whatever was needed after the war in 06. I wish I’d read something like that about the U.S.
Thanks for this Ian. I wish you’d do some more Middle Eastern history. I know it’s all over the place on-line, but accounts and lessons, history is slanted. I like your style of writing, and you’re really interesting enough to cruise through the material. You’d be a great one to teach that stuff.
ooops,
i hope you get back to read this.
hehe
Thanks!
Hezbollah exists because Israel invaded and occupied Southern Lebanon. I point out in comments that they get money from Iran, but so what? Israel gets a ton more money from the US. It’s not about how much money you get, it’s about how well you use it.
5,000 Hezbollah soldiers held off what was widely considered one of the best militaries in the world. Understanding how they did that is important (and, actually, I’ve written that article elsewhere).
States within states, governments outside governments arise where there are voids, yes. That’s something I’ve pointed out in other articles, to the point where regular readers at the Agonist probably get nauseated when I bring it up.
But there are a lot of places where governments are weak, as you point out. In those places these sorts of organizations can take root. And once they do, they become resilient enough to survive years of occupation or assault by a first world army.
That’s interesting. What’s especially interesting is that what happened between Israel and Hezbollah wasn’t classic guerilla warfare. Hezbollah held them off on the ground. They held Israeli advances down to a crawl and made them pay for them. If they had lost that essentially conventional war, then they would have gone to guerilla warfare and rejoined the population.
And government is withdrawing in many places. It isn’t just Middle Eastern governments that aren’t doing their jobs.
If you won’t do the jobs of government, then eventually someone else will step in to do them. And the people who fill those voids generally wind up with a fair bit of power. The bigger the void and the better they fill it, the more power.
I’ve got me a feeling that the US is going to recognize some of these in the future. There are some that already more or less exist in a proto-state. Can you name one of them?