In October of 2007, US forces handed over control of Karbala governate to Iraq. On Friday, US forces conducted a dawn raid in the town of Janaja – killing one civilian – with no notice or coordination with Iraqi local, national or military. Janaja is a town “populated mostly by members of the Mailiki tribe.”
Raed Shakir Jowdet, the Iraqi military commander of Karbala operations, said that four Apache helicopters and a jet fighter soared over the area. About 60 U.S. soldiers then stormed the town, "terrifying the families," he said.
Jowdet said that an unarmed civilian named Ali Abdulhussein was killed in his home …
"Not one Iraqi soldier took part in the airdrop, and the operation was not coordinated with any Iraqi authority," he said. "We are still looking for an answer as to why this has taken place, and we still have no logical explanation from the American forces."
Khazaali, the U.S.-allied governor, denounced the operation at a news conference, saying the U.S. military hadn’t coordinated in advance with Iraqi forces, who assumed control of Karbala security in October 2007….
Khazaali said the raid was based on false intelligence and that the U.S. military should "submit a report to clarify all the circumstances and to point out the killers and hand over the names of everyone who participated in the military operation in order for them to appear before the Iraqi judicial system."
It’s worth noting that Governor Khazaali has been a strong ally of the US. Whether this was just a chance selection of target or a message to Al Maliki, is it any wonder Iraqis are not embracing the Status of Forces Agreement?
And this is just one of the recent incidents where US forces have again killed civilians. Of course, when you hit Prime Minister Maliki’s own tribe and family it’s harder to cover up. The same war crimes occur day in and day out in Iraq but neither the US press or Maliki and friends paid much attention on Wednesday when our forces bombed the town of Samra:
This is Khalid Mohammed, he’s nine years old. The village he’s from is called Samra and it is 15 Kilometres north of Tikrit. Today Wednesday June 25th 2008 the Americans bombed his uncle’s house — those are the ruins you can see Khalid sitting on and crying. The American killed, Khalid’s uncle, his aunt, and four of their children who were aged between four and 11, 3 other children are seriously wounded.
As Tom Englehardt writes today in his The Urge to Surge:
As a result, cratered Iraq — a land with at least 50% unemployment, still lacking decent electricity, potable water, hospitals with drugs (or even doctors, so many having fled), or courts with judges (40 of them having been assassinated and many more injured since 2003) or lawyers, many of whom joined the more than two million Iraqis who have gone into exile — is, today, modestly quieter. But don’t be fooled. So many years later, Iraqis are still dying in prodigious numbers, and significant numbers of those dying are doing so at the hands of Americans.
It’s not just the family, including possibly four children under the age of 12, who died last week when a U.S. jet blasted their house in Tikrit (after their father, evidently believing thieves were about, fired shots in the air with a U.S. patrol nearby); or the manager and two female employees of a bank at Baghdad International Airport ("three criminals," according to a U.S. military statement) killed when their car was shot up by soldiers from a U.S. convoy; or the unarmed civilian, a relative of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who died in an early morning American raid in the southern town of Janaja; or the men, woman, and child in a car "which failed to stop at a [U.S.] checkpoint on the outskirts of Mosul because, according to a U.S. military statement, the two men were armed and one man inside the car made ‘threatening movements’"; or, according to the U.N., the estimated 1,000 dead in Baghdad’s vast, heavily populated Shiite slum of Sadr City, mostly civilians, 60% women and children, in fighting in April and May in which U.S. troops and air power played a significant role.
And while the war on the people of Iraq continues, so does the failure of the Democrats in Congress to act on the clear will of the US people to stop it. On the same day as we attacked Janaja and killed Ali Abdulhussein, the latest Iraq Supplemental “was approved by 92 to 6, with most Republicans joining all of the Senate’s Democrats in favor of the measure.”
Meaning – more “non-permanent” bases, more troops heading to Iraq, and more Iraqi families devastated by the US raids and air strikes – but thanks to the new Supplemental the Iraqis now also get to pay for the cost of all this grand reconstruction.
Thanks Harry, Nancy and our so-called representatives.
—————
Links worth checking:
Evangelical Grunts – Matthew Harwood’s Comment is Free on the influence of right wing evangelicals on the military (h/t markfromireland)
Sy Hersh’s latest – and Emptywheel’s thoughts on Iran.
Youtube – This is a very good interview with Tom Englehardt of TomDispatch covering permanent bases, the SOFA, the air war, and more.
Related posts:
- Torture: Obama Heeded Maliki on Abuse Photos, Says McClatchy; What That Says for Our Occupation
- Changing of the Guard: US Troops Withdraw from Iraqi Cities; Maliki Declares “Sovereignty Day”
- In Iraq, As in So Many Contexts, Withdrawal is Victory
- Remember Iraq or Ray Odierno is Still Wrong
- US Contractors Held in Iraqi Jail for Green Zone Murder





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Buck Fush!
Jus Cogens!
This is vietnam redux. We lost.. but we destroyed the country and left it in chaos with lots of angry people with lots of weapons which we flooded the region with.
W,Cheney and the oil fella wanted at Iraq oil and look what they did to get it.
I don’t know why the rest of the world even trades with us. We are a rogue nation.
I wonder that myself Sander …
Oopsie! My bad!
while the war on the people of Iraq continues, so does the failure of the Democrats in Congress to act on the clear will of the US people to stop it.
The question I often find myself asking is WHY?
Good evening, siunshine. The chaos continues to excellerate on so many fronts. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran. Cheney is far from retiring.
I would like to know whether this attack was a mistake, a who-cares-they’re-just-Iraqis, or a direct message to Maliki who has been acting slightly difficult about the SOFA…
All too true Eureka … and why should he retire when the Ds do nothing to discourage him?
Which leads to tbsa’s question of “Why?”
I have my suspicions and would be interested in hearing other’s answers.
But, but we’re winning and the surge is a success.
ducks and runs…..
So that the representatives of the 28%ers won’t call the Dems weak on national security, commonly referred to as terrah.
Good point. You can’t be cynical enough with this administration.
You know, I just don’t buy that anymnore. Most especially because no matter what the dems do those asshats are going to say we are soft of National Security.
FUCK BUSH!
I keep going back to the secret new map.
Oil control.. as well as natural gas and other resources throughout the region.
The question is, can this control be achieved /maintained in a constant state of chaos?
At some point, no matter how profitable no bid MIC spending may be now, we will run out of credit and perhaps lose the dollar altogether.
The above from Wikipedia.
From Emptywheel’s “But What About Congressional Oversight”
Whoever thinks Colby’s Phoenix Program in Viet Nam has ceased to exist doesn’t know the mythology. It’s just taken different shapes over the years. It operates in Iraq, Iran and anywhere Cheney decides to use it, under whatever guise.
Of course, if we gained control over the major oil supplies … the dollar might look good again? or so they think…
You are correct but that doesn’t mean it’s not part of the leadership’s concerns, rightly or not.
I think the minute he leaves office, Cheney should be arrested and stuffed into a hole in Guantanamo. He’s the biggest war criminal since Eichmann.
Good point SD
I’m not saying they aren’t concerned about it. I’m saying it shouldn’t paralyze all reaction from the dems. The dear in the headlights is old. The republics impeached clinton over a lie about a blow job, bush lied about war and upwards of a million people are dead. What would motivate someone to say we aren’t going to address this?
It’s paralyzed them for years. What makes you think that mindset disappeared with the 06 election?
Janaja must be a Strategic Hamlet.
Impeachment is the cure.
What I see – over and over – is a complete lack of concern or attention to what our occupation means to the people of Iraq and therefore no particular interest in taking action. After all, the Ds too seem interested in control of other regions rather than a just foreign policy.
A recipe for madness indeed. (Tom Dispatch) Great video. Siun, thanks for all of your work. I respect you for being able to stay with this so much.
The fear of what the Rs say is – I think – just an excuse we offer them rather than realizing the Ds are as imperialistic as the Rs – just more polite in talking about it.
I’m not dillusional enough to think the mindset disappeared. I just want the mindset to get replaced with another way of thinking. Backed by the Constitution of the United States, a document they take an oath to support and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Ding.
I would recommend Chalmers Johnson’s “The Sorrows of Empire” to all. We live in an imperialistic nation. The sooner we admit that to ourselves the sooner it will change. It is in the leadership’s best interest, both Rethug and Dem, to deny it and they will continue to do so unless and until we force them to admit their addiction to imperial policies with imperialistic goals.
Within empires, citizens have what rights the ruling class say they have. We have learned that under Bu’ush/Cheney, have we not?
delusional rather.
good cop / bad cop?
or:
“The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist. McDonald’s cannot flourish without McDonnell-Douglas.” – Thomas Friedman
Yes definitely. Why I said they need to go. Lock, stock, and barrel.
We live in a nation whose actions on foreign affairs are in the interest of multinational corporations and their shareholders, with one exception Israel. Here we have an army of lobbyists who for “religious reasons” have aligned the US interests with those of Israel… and we can sell them some weapons too.
We really need to not meddle in the affairs of other nations for the benefit of multinationals.
Aloha, Siun! I really was torn about posting on that today, I’m glad you did! Instead, I concentrated on the Sons of Iraq program and the LA Times article…! 8-)
The monarchy and upper class of England grew wealthy from the East India Trading Company. Multinationals are nothing more than the modern version of the East India Co. The ruling class grows wealthy from the bribes of the multinationals. Same old, same old, just a new face.
Can I quotes something at lenghth? Related to that Englehardt article:
Perhaps the most confounding element in the report is the sharp disagreement between the accountability office and the administration over the value of basic indicators of progress.
For example, in an analysis based on a classified study of Iraqi Army battalions, the office concludes that just 10 percent of them are capable of operating independently in counterinsurgency operations and that even then they rely on American support.
But the Pentagon, as stated in Straub’s letter, maintains that 70 percent of Iraqi units are in the lead in counterinsurgency operations. The difference may be partly semantics: Are the Iraqi units in the lead, with Americans close at hand, or are they able to operate on their own? But the office essentially concludes that the Pentagon is claiming that units with far lower readiness grades are ready to lead than it did in the past.
Similarly, by looking at official figures, the office was unable to substantiate American claims that Iraq had spent and committed more than 60 percent of its reconstruction budget in 2007. Instead, the number was 28 percent, the report said.
Didn’t Bush once say that Iraqi troopps would be on their own by last October or November?? This is pathetic. 10% of Iraqi troops can operate independently? Ya know this is such bullshit that McCain is really not called on much. he says that he meant we should stay in Iraq 100 years, you know, lik Korea or Germany. Haven’t heard many people ask him how in the hell that’ll ever happen if the Iraqis don’t have an army or police.
Exactly.
But this is not about our security and threats to our people. It’s all about making some folks very rich. But they use all the fear buzzwords.
The Russians are Coming .. the Russians are Coming.
yea right
Well if the US withdraws I’d bet the violence would end… If so, what does that tell you?
Replying to myself, this is the link where I got that quote — which was a link in the Englehardt article — which is a link in Siun’s post.
if we withdraw from iraq? it’d probably be very violent. nuthin’ new there. no reason for us to stay.
All the credible reporting I’ve seen says Yes to the first and No to the second, BFL! They’re extremely reliant on us holding their hand while they went on the 4 ops in Basra, Sadr City, Mosul and Amara…!
If and when the US leaves Irak there will be internal power struggles. Period. Whether it turns out like Algeria is open to debate but you can bet it will be ugly. No matter what configuration the US leaves Irak in, there will be chaos. All we’re doing is delaying the inevitable. The US is bound and determined to control the petroleum resources of the Middle East. What the US wants is a compliant puppet government in Baghdad that will limit oil exports to whatever countries the US mandates. They would also like to reinstate a puppet government in Iran. That’s what this whole Iran thing is about. The Shah did what the US told him to do, the current govt in Tehran, not so much.
Siun, are you still around? In my post yesterday I pointed out the discrepancies in reporting of the Samra bombing… In particular the refusal of the US to admit there were even casualties…!
I think thats a tricky question … Iraq was a very powerful military force for a long time and has solid military talent. Attempting to create a force without that leadership … and made up more of Badr’s militia … leads to a lot of problems. And we have no desire – as seen in the raid in Janaja – to have the Iraqis actually lead or coordinate on their own …. we do find it useful to complain about their “incompetence”
My guess is that there is a very competent Iraqi military force evolving – just not in the GZG forces – and we may see their abilities rather soon.
See, al_Mailik said Iraqi forces would be “fully ready” to take over by June, 2006.
Then Bush said, when he announced da Surge that: “To establish its authority, the Iraqi government plans to take responsibility for security in all of Iraq’s provinces by November.” That was November 2007. And 10% of Iraqi forces are ready, now? Pathetic.
Jus Cogens!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=f8LquNy3fd8
As Dr. iRack points out there’s major internal battles going on as we speak…
Don’t get me wrong here, OK. I’m not equating your word with Bush’s. By when you say we may see the abilities of the Iraqi military very soon, we’ve been hearing that for a very long time. Or maybe you’re talking about something less than full control, which we’ve been (over)promised repeatedly in the past.
My guess, and it’s a guess off the top of my head, is that it may come shortly before the election. Irak is postponing it’s elections I think in large part because of al Sadr. Maliki thinks he can overcome Sadr’s forces using US troops. I wouldn’t put any money on that.
ah … but I am not talking about an Iraqi military under our control or in support of the Green Zone Government.
I agree with much of what you’re saying, particularly in regards to the Badr integration… What I’d like to point out is the fact that Saddam’s army was largely secular, if they can get to true integration they’d be a powerful entity once again…!
Yep. The US has got a tiger (not one of mine) by both ears and doesn’t know what to do next.
There is a continuing growth of coordination amongst resistance forces – and it is important to remember not to buy into the “secular” v “sectarian” talk used in the US
I’m not sure I’m understanding you. Do you think it’s fair to say Iraq is in a state of civil war? Or that one is bubbling under the surface? If so, how can it hope to have a cohesive military in the near future? Maybe I’m just not understanding. And another good job. I look forward to finding out about Iraq every Sunday night.
I put the blame more squarely on Maliki, than the US, in the fragility of the security situation now. He’s bound and determined to exclude the Sadrists, Sunni, and even the Kurds, to a certain degree…!
I used the term secular loosely… What I was getting at was an integrated force which is what is happening as you aptly point out…! ;-)
Excellent point, Suin.
When the shit goes down the Irakis will be equal opportunity resistance fighters.
…on the resistance side! I meant to add…!
Civil war – no. Evolving nationalist resistance – yes.
The sectarian violence – we need to remember – was encouraged and influenced by us – with the leading death squads being tied to our allies.
I operate on the assumption that Maliki does and says what Washington tells him to do and say. Any Iraki worth his/her salt would be negotiating with every tribe and group in the country to form a government with the first order of business being to rid the country of the infidel invader. By whatever means necessary.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080707/story
Bugliosi writes, “4000 young Americans decomposing in their grave today died for George Bush and Karl Rove and Dick Cheney.” His book is not only a scathing indictment of the President and his Administration but also a blueprint for holding him criminally accountable. Bugliosi accuses Bush of taking the nation to war in Iraq under deliberately false pretenses and thus holds him culpable for thousands of subsequent deaths, detailing in The Prosecution the legal basis for such a case and laying out what he argues is the requisite evidence for a murder conviction….
So a cohesive iraqi military is not good for us. If there was one, sounds like we’d really have to turn tail. We couldn’t stay and fight our friends, could we? Shoulda just declared victory and gotten out along time ago. But i guess some people have their own reasons for wanting to stick around Iraq. Like oil and stuff.
How you doing CT?
edit –
SuinSiunPreview is mah fren
Too damned true!
Were the people of this nation a bit more conscious of history and the destructive aspects of certain mythologies, that is, ever so slightly more ‘mature’ and ‘responsible’ and possessed of the ability to recognize fallacious argument when they’ve been clubbed over the head with it, well …
Our nation has wrapped itself in comfy comfort and extolled the virtue of studied ignorance to such an extent that the suffering going on in Irak is of little concern or interest for most.
At bottom, Bu$h Co simply took advantage of these things.
As do most of the Democrats.
And it doesn’t take a great deal of real effort on their part
Even though ‘the people’ spoke out in 2006, ‘the powers that be’could care less.
So?
Guess where the ‘buckskin’ really stops?
A peaceful Revolution, as Southern Dragon often reminds us, is our only way forward. As long as it takes, however hard it may be …
Hint; Likely we cannot move forward, morally or spiritually as a society until we leave Irak to its own people, whom we owe a thousand years of debt, and hie our sorry asses hither …
Thank you, Siun for your Sunday evening ‘Sessions of Conscience’.
I never use it. or spell check. too damn lay-Z
Honestly, Maliki is just as beholden to the Iranians as much as the US… He is being prodded to integrate the Sunni SOI’s by us, but, he’s not doing it, or rather he’s stalling the process and the Sunnis are growing disillusioned with each passing day…
So a cohesive iraqi military is not good for us.
No, just not good for the neocons in this Maladministration… ;-)
Gotcha. Heard some of Obama’s remarks to the Latino government officials and his commenst on Iraq were a bit weasley. said we can’t stay 10 years or 50 years or 100 years. i hope for a little better than that.
Sadly, that has the ring of truth.
That’s true and I think it’s a mistake for Maliki to allow Iran as much influence as he has. That said, Sadr has deep ties with Iran as well. We’ve created quite a dilemma for the Irakis.
Ironically, Obama may not have to make that choice…
That quote is from Juan Cole citing an Arabic version of Dar Alhayat…!
Sadr and his trend are not closely aligned with Iran … remember that the Sadrists are the ones who did not leave for Iran but who stayed in Iraq in the past. And Sadr has warned Iran to keep hands off.
Our media however loves to miss that fact.
It will be interesting to read about what happens when Obama visits Irak next month.
I really get perturbed with that ‘Urban Myth’! Sadr’s father fought vigorously against the Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war, whereas, the Badr Brigades fought against the Iraqis during the war, so whom is more beholden… Sadr has only said he accept any help from all quarters that doesn’t imply he’s beholden to the Iranians…!
hi siun, just arriving so haven’t read all of the comments yet–
has it leaked who ordered the attack on janaja?
I really wish they would all stop these visits to Iraq … they see nothing except the Petraeus slideshow and quick visit with appropriately bribed “allies” …
Heh, ya beat me to the punch…! ;-)
You are correct.
Not yet … not sure we’ll ever know.
Well, maybe I’m delusional, but I was thinking Obama may talk with people other than the ones he is “assigned” to speak with. Irakis and Americans.
I never said he was beholden. I just said he had deep ties, which may have been a bit strong. If he were dealing with Iran we would have seen some real evidence of it before now. He certainly doesn’t another war with them in his future.
and siun, are elections going to be as scheduled?
Teddy has Late Nite upstairs!
Sunday Late Nite: LGBT vs. McCain
I suspect the “schedule” will change until Maliki is either forced or gives up.
Badger has the best info on the incident that I’ve seen…
loo hoo at 80– i wish that were possible, but i bet he will be the most protected and guarded person to ever go to irak ever…….
I saw Badger’s report … and it makes some sense but is but one of many rumours I suspect.
Having worked with SF troops (10th SFG) it makes a lot of sense…! ;-)
Thanks, Siun, for another excellent post! I’m headed upstairs…! ;-)
I suspect, though I hope I’m wrong, that any visit by Obama to Irak will be tightly controlled (in every respect), the Ultimate Tourist Itinerary.
Thanks, again, Siun, for your posts and your moral compass.
What precious little I really know of what is going on in Irak I gain from you and those who gather at your Sunday Sessions.
;~D
I’m thinking it’s dangerous and he’s been bullied into it.
Thank you DWB for joining in – we learn together.
Great piece. What a fucked up country, America.
Thank you, I was just about to jump in and ASK about that.
My understanding is that Al Sadr is a FIERCELY Iraqi Nationalistic person, as was his father. And he’s NOT pro Iranian, by ANY means.