Rep. Robert Wexler's new book is called "Fire-Breathing Liberal: How I Learned to Survive (and Thrive) in the Contact Sport of Congress."
Even before it was released, it rose to the top of the Amazon political best-seller list on the basis of pre-orders by Wexler's large base of netroots fans who admire his willingness to fight for his - and our - political beliefs.
But Wexler doesn't just preach to the choir. This week, Wexler appeared both on FOX News and on the Colbert Report, where he was famously embarrassed with questions about cocaine and prostitutes.
And Wexler doesn't mince words - he called for impeaching George Bush even on FOX.
Obviously the timing is right for Wexler's book. Two years ago, Democrats took over both houses of Congress by winning 30 seats in the House and 5 seats in the Senate. This year, Democrats could pick up another 15-30 seats in the House, 5-10 more in the Senate, and elect Wexler's close friend Barack Obama as President.
So the real question isn't why Robert Wexler wrote a book promoting liberal Democratic politics, but why is he the only Congressman who has?
Perhaps it's because Congressional Democrats don't understand why they won in 2006 and why they are heading for victory again in 2008.
Democrats won because George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the Republican Party steered America so fast and far to the right that we all went sailing over the cliff, yet they still have their pedal to the metal and the steering wheel jammed to the right.
Congressional Democrats seem to think Americans just want the country to turn right more slowly. But Americans want a real turn to the left, not a slower turn to the right.
Americans want economic growth. Bush's pro-oil policies have tripled the price of oil, and this is killing our economy - not just at the gas pump, but also in the grocery store. Bush's pro-rich tax cuts have created a massive gap between rich and poor, and emptied the federal treasury so we can't fix our roads or pay our teachers. Our economy is being strangled by powerful corporations, and we need to break that stranglehold to unleash entrepreneurship and grow once again.
Americans want affordable, accessible health care for everyone. We know we're paying for it through premiums and taxes that are higher than any country in the world. But we know that much of our health care money is lost in insurance and hospital bureaucracies that spend our money looking for ways to deny us the care we paid for, not to provide that care. We need a single-payer system like other industrialized nations have.
Americans want to solve our energy and environmental crises, which share a common cause: our dependence on fossil fuels. We want solar energy, wind power, and electric cars. And we want them now, so we need a massive, focused effort like the Manhattan Project to bring it about.
Americans want to restore our moral leadership in the world. We want to bring peace to Afghanistan, which we thought we solved in 2001. We want to bring our troops home from Iraq, where Bush sent them on the basis of lies. We want to negotiate with Iran, not start an even wider war with nuclear bombs. And we want to end torture and close our own Gulag Archipelago of secret prisons around the world.
Finally, Americans want our Constitution back. We don't want our President to be a Dictator who can start wars for oil, give massive no-bid contracts to his friends, wiretap all our emails and calls, lock people away without trial, corrupt every agency in the executive branch, and ignore Congress or lie to its face. And if we end up with that kind of President, we want to see him impeached - and then indicted and jailed.
On all of these issues, Americans know Republicans want to go in the wrong direction. So they are voting for Democrats in the hope that we will bring about the kinds of changes we have fought for since FDR.
But we're not seeing those kinds of changes. The Democratic Congress led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid has been a disaster. None of our nation's problems have been fixed, and some have been made even worse.
At the top of the list is Iraq. We've already wasted over 4,000 American lives and over $562 billion in our tax dollars, and 70% of Americans want to bring our troops safely home. But Congress just voted to give Bush another $163 billion so he can keep our troops there for another full year. Why did 80 Democrats in the House and every Democrat in the Senate vote with George Bush?
Ditto on Bush's illegal wiretapping. Newspaper reports and Congressional hearings show that Bush started wiretapping law-abiding Americans in defiance of the Constitution and FISA long before 9/11. Only a few Members of Congress have the vaguest clue how extensive the wiretapping is, and they cannot tell another soul what little they know. Yet 105 Democrats in the House and 30 Democrats in the Senate voted to let Bush continue wiretapping us without a warrant - and gave immunity to Bush and the telco's who flagrantly defied the law. Why?
Robert Wexler is right in the middle of these fights. He serves on both the Judiciary and Foreign Affairs Committees, so he deals with domestic and foreign disasters. When TV lights are on, he gets to grill White House officials like Alberto Gonzales, Scott McClellan, and Condi Rice. And when TV lights go off, he gets to privately urge Democratic leaders to stand and fight, not surrender and retreat.
So let's welcome Robert Wexler to Firedoglake and find out why he - almost alone among Democrats - is willing to fight the most corrupt and dangerous President America has ever had. And let's find out whether Wexler's friend Barack Obama is willing to fight for real progressive change, or whether he will cave under pressure from Big Corporations as he did on wiretapping this week.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Welcome!
Representative Wexler, Welcome to the Lake.
Bob, Thank you for Hosting this Book Salon.
Welcome Congressman Wexler - and everyone from FireDogLake!
Happy to be here and thanks so much for hosting me. Also hello to my good friend Bob Fertik.
Rep.Wexler, I’m crazy about your spunk and willingness to speak truth. What’s scaring your pals whom we elected with such expectation?
Let me ask the first question: so how did it go on the Colbert Report this time?
Dearie’s question is excellent :)
I won’t lie - I was a bit nervous this time around - but overall I thought the interview went great. The funny thing about the show is that Stephen is playing a crazy right wing lunatic - but he really isn’t that far from the real right wingers dominating radio and a certain cable television network.
Dearie, thanks for the question. I have a fundamental disagreement with many of my colleagues on our governing philosophy. I think we should play to our base - just as the GOP did for 12 years. Instead too often we are cautious to a fault and too often play to a middle of the road moderation that doesn’t deliver the change that we need.
Interesting. I thought you really bested Colbert……and I figured it was because he was on your side.
Congressman,
To build on other questions, how do we elect more Robert Wexlers and Barney Franks and fewer Rahm Emmanuels and Steny Hoyers?
A huge and warm welcome Senator Wexler. You have given me such hope and courage and reason to rally with your work in the Senate, your words and actions. I want to thank you for all you’ve done and I want you to know you have a wide and enthusiastic following, not only in the “lefty blogs” but from other segments of the population as well. Everyone I talk to KNOWS who you are. Any chance you’ll consider a cabinet position or some placement in an Obama administration?
Thank you for being here.
Congressman,
From where you are, what do you see really happening with FISA in July?
First of all, let me say that I have great respect for both Rahm and Steny and I think they did a great job in pointing out the terrible GOP policies and thus delivering us a majority. But there is no question we often disagree on policy and tactics. Electing proud liberals at the local level from school boards all the way up to Senate will put us on the path to building a powerful liberal coalition. By the way there will only be one Barney Frank - to use a cliche - they broke the mold.
Colbert isn’t as vicious as the attack rats of wingnuttyland.
Rep. Kucinitch(sp?) is after impeachment too. Are your approaches different or the same?
Siri,
I love my job period and I am not looking to do anything more than working as hard as I can to turn Florida blue in 08 and deliver the White House for Barack Obama.
I respect that response, but would certainly love to see you in a top position in DOJ. There’s so much repair and restoration to be done there. You, Senator’s Kucinich, Whitehouse and a couple of others are the only ones in the Senate showing any kind of real appetite for that gigantic job. I’ll continue to hold my hopes.
AZ Matt,
Rep. Kucinich has been leading this charge for a long time. I am trying to play a complementary role to his efforts. As many of you are aware I have been trying to establish a national movement to hold impeachment hearings for President Bush and Vice President Cheney and my website www.wexlerwantshearings.com has garnered over a quarter million supporters. I will work with Dennis until we get accountably.
So is there a chance that our activism will help turn the tide against FISA or are they determined to ram this through no matter how much it hurts them back home? Why are they so scared?
Welcome Congressman Wexler, and Mr. Fertick,
a lot of us have been looking forward to this conversation.
BevW,
As you may know, I voted against the so-called FISA compromise as we can’t compromise away our constitutional rights. I think Chris Dodd’s Senate speech on FISA recently was bold and right on. I hope he continues the fight with Senator Feingold.
Congressman,
What did you think of the Yoo/Addington hearings? And do you think Mukasey will fork over any of items on the subpoena Conyers wants him to turnover?
Thanks for keeping up the good fight. Is there a rationale for why Rep. Pelosi took impeachment off the table? It kind of gave the bad guys the go-ahead to keep trashing the Constitution of the United States of America.
I noticed that since my Rep. John Yarmuth changed his position about FISA and voted for it this time that he’s brought back a lot of pork to our district. Was there a lot of pressure on you guys to vote for FISA?
Wecome, Congressman;
Do you actaully think there will be accountability?
If so, what might this accountability look like?
A lot or a little?
pmorlan,
We should not give up this fight. The Republicans in the Senate manage to stop every good piece of legislation that has come forward - such as the recent oil company legislation. We need some brave Democrats to do the same and hold strong.
To be honest with you Congressman, to many of us out here, it appears that Rahm and Steny are far more beholden to the corporations that they are to the voters. As witness Steny’s so-called “compromise” on FISA.
And they act like we’re too stupid to notice when they are asking us to bend over and take it.
For myself, I think the taking of the House back in ‘06 had far more to do with Dr Dean’s fifty state strategy and the recognition that the Republicans had no clue on Irak than it had to do with Rahm’s “strategies.”
Saw you on Colbert’s show, and the rules committee meeting weeks ago.
It’s creepy to have to say that I’m delighted to see elected representatives fulfilling their oath of office to defend the Constitution, but here it is, God bless you, sir.
8-)
Maybe you could add your voice to mine next time your run into my 2 Republican senators Brownback and Roberts to remind them of their sworn duty.
.
Do you think the ad that ran in the Washigton Post about Hoyer, FISA and civil liberties caught anyone’s attention on Capitol Hill?
Don’t worry Congressman Wexler I certainly have no intention of giving up the fight. While my Senators McConnell and Bunning will no doubt vote for FISA I will still be contacting Obama and others on this issue. I will also be working to defeat McConnell.
Cong. Wexler,
When I get discouraged at some of the incomprehensible actions and votes by some of your democratic colleagues, you and a few others remind me there is still hope. Please continue your fight and know there are many citizens supporting your stance.
My question is why did the dems do an about face on retroactive immunity when there is NO PUBLIC SUPPORT for it?
Dearie and DWBartoo,
Speaker Pelosi “took impeachment off the table” because she believed that it would distract us from our other goals on energy, health care, Iraq, ect. My only dispute with this theory is that President Bush has blocked us on all of these goals. I think if we get serious about accountability and put real political pressure on Bush and Cheney it will actually help us force them to compromise on these other critical issues.
Regarding whether I think there will be genuine accountability - I still have genuine hope. However I have been dismayed by the reluctance of even good and otherwise liberal Democrats to join my efforts.
Why do you think there is such reluctance?
hwmnbn,
Regarding retroactive immunity and the decision by House Democrats. I was discouraged and I think my party is too often willing to compromise on issues of national security and defense because we are paranoid about being portrayed as weak on terrorism. We need to stick to our guns (no pun intended) on these issues.
It’s enormously cheering to have people like you stand up for us.
Thank you! I look forward to reading your book.
To quote the right wing, “Why do they hate America?” I am so frustrated with the weak-kneed Dems that I could just spit. Do they not know that some of us are working hard to throw them out? Tell them for us, if you will! Thanks.
Welcome Congressman Wexler, huge fan of yours in Toronto, Canada !
We were stumped by Obama’s support of FISA, is it realistic to think that a Dem majority in Congress will stand up to Bush and remove telecom immunity?
We’re greatly displeased with Steny, Rahm and Reid for bring this Bill up when the other one was more to our liking.
pmorlan,
Keep up the good work. Early political prediction: McConnell goes down in Kentucky this year - he will be the big Senate surprise.
Congressman Wexler, lately Senator Obama has been observed moving more to the right in his positions supposedly because the conventional wisdom is that moving to the center will enable him to win. I know that you are a supporter of Obama so I hope if you get a chance you can get a copy of Glenn Greenwald column to him so that maybe he will see the folly of listening to those in his campaign who urge him to do this.
The baseless, and failed, “Move to the Center” cliche
http://www.salon.com/opinion/g.....print.html
Yes, WHY? Those sent to the Senate in the 06 elections were elected with specific mandates, and they all knew/know it. Their refusal to effectively deal with those mandates means we need to select others to replace them. They act like they are either unaware of or really don’t care about representing us, once they land in WashDC. How do they explain, justify, answer to that??? I’d really like an insider’s take on this. REPRESENTATIVES are sent to WashDC to represent us, and they are patently not doing so. Is it that they don’t care, aren’t interested in anything but their own personal agendas, forgot, or WHAT? We are all so disheartened after accomplishing the 06 change.
Interesting:
One would think, in a sane America, that the trashing of the Constitution and accountability would cross most ideological spectrums and Party lines. This is what I find so amazing about today’s government. One shouldn’t have to be “liberal” to want that…though being liberal is a wonderful thing. :)
Thank you for keeping up the good work, Congressman Wexler. Love what you do.
pmorlan,
As many of you know, I am an enthusiastic supporter of Barack Obama. I truly believe he will be a transformational figure for our nation and the world. None of us will agree with all of his positions but I can predict that we will be gratified and thrilled with the positions he takes as President almost every time. His election will allow us to accomplish the change we need - in health care, foreign policy, ect.
On accountability, I fear Bush will destroy all incriminating documents before he leaves the White House. He already destroyed 6 million emails! What can Congress do to prevent this?
Does it not occur to those who are “scared” that they are portraying themselves as weak in the face of party opposition, not weak on the subject of National Security. Why aren’t they getting that? We will not vote for anyone who can’t stand up to the current assault on the Constitution. That’s paramount, and secondary to the National Security excuse.
Preview is my friend. I meant: One would think, in a sane America, that the trashing of the Constitution and accountability would concern our elected officials across most ideological spectrums and Party lines.
Congressman Wexler, what will Congress do to stop War with Iran ?
Our own Marcy has an excellent post up, which I would ask you to read and forward to your fellow Congresspersons - Link
Audrey,
Isn’t it amazing. Ten years ago the mainstream media was obsessed with the Clinton impeachment that pale when compared to the crimes of this cabal. During the 90’s the economy was prospering and we were in such peaceful times that the GOP used impeachment to polarize the entire country. Now with President Bush and Vice President Cheney committing genuine High Crimes the mainstream media couldn’t be bothered. So much for a liberal bias.
welcome cong wexler…. just boated onto the lake…. a hearty amen to what you said!!!
I think he will go down too. I only wish the Democratic leadership in Kentucky had backed Greg Fischer instead of Lunsford. While Lunsford will certainly be better than McConnell he is no Robert Wexler. Greg Fischer was a much better candidate. He got 34% of the vote despite the fact that the Democratic leadership and the states main paper endorsed Lunsford. Another missed opportunity for Kentucky.
Congressman Wexler, welcome to the Lake.
Thanks to you and Bob Fertik for joining us here today (and to Bev Wright for her work with our Book Salons).
Congressman, thanks for standing up against FISA amnesty. I’m grateful for you and the other Congressman who oppose corporate sovereignty.
Bob,
This is a genuine concern that you raise. I am open to suggestions - legislative or otherwise to prevent such actions. There are certainly laws preventing such actions and this further makes the case why we should be acting now on impeachment - rather than waiting before he escapes back to Crawford.
Dugg
Senator, I think that the ‘reluctance’ is directly related to complicity, and I would appreciate your most candid response to these concerns, otherwise I am left with the conviction that far too many of your colleages have more their own, selfish, and self-serving interests at heart than they do anything else, including the rise of dangerous, even fascistic tendancies at the very top of this government (including a far too cozy relationship with corporations) not to mention the use of “Cruel and Inhuman” methods to “extraxct information”.
The American Empire has become the major destructive force on the planet, and not by accident.
The mainstream media are owned by corporations….and have been. The American people didn’t want the Clinton impeachment, but pulling it off was shear genius on the part of the Republican goons. The insulated what they had in the planning once they figured out how to elect their strawman. But Pelosi played right into their hands when she got a chance to speak. Shameful.
Petrocelli,
Regarding Iran - I think Senator Obama has the best policy on this issue. We need to directly and aggressively engage diplomatically. We must use all economic, political, and diplomatic tools. Just look what has happened in North Korea when we engaged in a reasonable manner rather than invading unilaterally.
Congressman Wexler,
Unfortunately, I have to leave, but wanted to express my admiration. I’m an old timer who remembers many fine liberal Democrats. It’s been a long dry spell for us, and we have a lot of Republican eye wash to overcome concerning government being the enemy of the people (although they’ve made it that way), but I believe we have a chance now. Keep your chin up. I’m looking forward to reading your book.
My apologies, Senator Wexler, if I sound angry or demanding. I’m frustrated and I am passionate about my country. I am asking you questions here that my own Senator (Salazar) will not respond to.
Thank you again, for all that you are doing, for being one of the “lone voices” for justice in the United States Senate in these times!
Sir: What are some steps we can take? Knowing we were lied into the Iraq debacle, we are hearing more noise and threats about Iran. Many think these people will definitely go forward against Iran before the end of this term. Practically and realistically, what are the ways to stop any such reckless action that will be for a new President?
RRRRAAAAAWWWWW!!!!!1111
Welcome Rep.Wex!
Crosstimbers,
Thanks for your kind words. In my book I am trying to re-build the term “liberal” because it is time Democrats stood strong without any shame or reluctance to pursue our goals. I call myself “Liberal” in the title of my book for just this reason. Lets turn the tables on our opposition and send the term “conservative” into the political wilderness!
True that. Aside from working to elect more and better Democrats, we also push back against the corporate right wing media and their outright fibs and misrepresentations. It sometimes seems to me that a lot information our Democratic elected officials get is from that source, which really makes it harder to get the message to them. We’re constantly being dismissed as rabid fringe far left lunatics when we really are cross spectrum here.
Welcome, Congressman Wexler. I’m having trouble reconciling your statement that Dems should play to their base with your praise for Rahm and Steny’s efforts during the 2006 elections.
Could you give a more concrete example of how they helped deliver a majority?
Thx.
I just wanted to shout out to the Congressman and tell him how much I appreciate him! Your efforts are really appreciated! Thanks for everything and please don’t let up on this gang!
Amen. Although I would also settle for making the term mean what it is supposed to mean. There is certainly nothing remotely conservative about the Cheney/Bush/Rumsfeld/Rove/Norquist/et al cabal. Nothing!
I would like just The Facts sir. I am not concerned with labels.
I’ve have been glad to hear your voice on the issuse as of late!
I have never had a problem with the word liberal. Too long the Rethugs have defined the word with a sneer and contempt.
Congressman Wexler, glad to see you here, welcome.
This morning Ariana Huffington and Christina vanden Heuval were on This Week with George, and they said they think Barack Obama is damaging his brand by his recent flip-flops on FISA, on Nafta and several other recent changes of heart he seems to have had in order to indicate his move to the middle in defiance of the left. What’s your take on this?
Dearie, you are correct. Which party is for fiscal discipline - a traditionally “conservative” policy. Not the GOP . . .
imo dems who were considered liberal were browbeaten by wingers in congress and on the airwaves…… hopefully they have learned to take the liberal label back with the help of the progressives on the internet.
As many of you know, I am an enthusiastic supporter of Barack Obama. I truly believe he will be a transformational figure for our nation and the world. None of us will agree with all of his positions but I can predict that we will be gratified and thrilled with the positions he takes as President almost every time. His election will allow us to accomplish the change we need - in health care, foreign policy, ect.
Congressman Wexler, while your high opinion of him is reassuring for me I still hope that you will pass along the Greenwald piece to him. We all know that during presidential campaigns that the conventional wisdom pushed by consultants is that you have to move to the center in order to win. I’d sure like to know that Senator Obama at least see’s the flip side of that argument and Greenwald’s piece today does a very good job of doing that.
Thanks.
Ann,
I answered a similar question before and I will try again. In my opinion, never in my adult lifetime have we had a Democratic nominee who is most likely able to deliver on the issues that we care about than Senator Obama. You will agree with him the overwhelming majority of the time. Obama’s brand is that he will work with a real coalition in Congress and deliver on desperately needed changes.
pmorlan,
I will certainly pass along the Greenwald article.
Hi Bob, and welcome Congressman Wexler –
As much as I’d like to see the Bush Cheney den of thieves Impeached and removed from office, that seems unlikely at this point.
But there is another reason why Impeachment Hearings have value — Article II Section 2 of the Constitution:
By the very act of holding Impeachment hearings, there is a Strict Constructionist case to be made that the power of the Presidential Pardon is nullified; GW Bush would lose the power to pardon himself or any one else that is investigated for Offenses Against the United States by an Impeachment Subcommittee.
Of course, the Right Wing Jurists use Strict Constructionism as a fig leaf, to hide their radical agenda — but turning the argument against them, to prevent Bush from issuing blanket pardons for all of the crimes he’s perpetrated would be a first step towards restoring the rule of law.
Congressman Wexler, have you or anyone else made this argument to your colleagues?
Congressman,
I think part of the problem is not so much that we don’t understand there will be disagreements, but we see him caving on core, constitutional issues and that is extremely troubling to many of us.
Thank you. By the way I look forward to reading your book. Can you give us a brief description of what we might expect from it?
I so agree about the term liberal. Political “gamesmanship” has replaced ethics-based statesmanship in our government, and the corporate-owned MSM runs with the commentary on the gaming.
And there is a trap I fear the party and its leadership is falling into … so exhausted and dispirited by Republican longevity. Playing by their rules and being cautious and second-guessing. Reactive not proactive. We got the constitution on our side. We have the Geneva convention on our side. We got the rest of the world on our side. We need leadership like yours, Feingold’s, Dodd’s now, Kucinich’s, JR Edwards … that needs to be stand-up bold speakers. I hope BO joins in sooooooon.
Also, do you have a large staff or do you go without a lot of sleep?
rosalind,
Why you may not agree politically with Reps. Hoyer and Emanuel - they were vital in our efforts to take back the house. Rahm put together an unprecedented DCCC operation that put the financial resources in the right places and allowed us to win back the majority.
Now the question is - what do we do with our majority. Here is where you and I see eye to eye. We need to breath more fire (to quote my book) and provide stark choices to the American people. If people are given a true liberal choice on health care for example, we will win every time.
Thanks, ckis, for bringing that to the fore. Too important to overlook. Send Nancy a note, too!
Congressman Wexler, thanks for coming by and responding in real time with us.
You are a cosponsor of H. Con. Res 362, which among other things calls for an active quasi-blockade of the nation of Iran:
Could you please tell us what you’ve seen to convince you, and your cosponsors, that our country should be trusting this President with the kind of discretion and judgment needed to carry out such actions?
This is great. Congressman, I too believe that we need to take back the term “Liberal” and I look forward to reading your book. I know there are some tough questions here to answer, but our level of earnestness over these issues is pretty strong. Your answers are much appreciated. Thank you.
The President shall … have power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Boy - that can be read *several* different ways…
BTW, if being a “liberal” means being a fan of The Bill of Rights, being anti-torture, and being in favor of Separation of Powers - I’d guess that about 85% of Americans are “liberal”.
I love your sign on name - you are with me on the vanguard of bringing liberal back to the fore.
I have about 15 members of my staff who work in both Florida and Washington DC. You may have seen them if you watched The Hill on Sundance.
Congressman Wexler, welcome and thank you for your outstanding work on issues we care about so much!
Can you explain how your constituents welcome your forthright fire-breathing while so many of your colleagues fear their own constituents’ wrath, and cower before the threats of the right? I simply don’t understand how one Congressman can be such an unapologetic liberal while others remain so afraid of both the label and the policies that go with it.
I write this inquiry as someone who feels he has lost his own representative in Congress, as she’s been promoted to Speaker and must now accommodate much more moderate views. What can others do to help their Congresspersons understand that it is okay to be a proud liberal?
Thanks again for all you do, sir.
Please comment on Iran. Why should we trust these people to show any restraint (ie., diplomacy) and what is the pushback or prevention?
congressman wexler - first i want to thank you for the many good things you’ve been doing. but i do have some serious questions about what has been going on with regard to fisa and iran, and you’re here at a critical time on both of these issues.
first, so many of the fisa vote in the House look to be charades - where the outcome is predetermined and the votes are staged. twice this past year, it appears that some members of the progressive caucus have stood up even against their own leadership to try to block bad legislation.
on october 17 the the house leadership pulled the RESTORE Act (version 1) when, among other things, some progressives and rush holt withheld their support until improvements were made via a manager’s amendment. were you part of this group?
on feb 13, 2008 a group of mostly progressives against a 21 day extension of the PAA. blocking this extension was key to derailing the rockefeller/bond SSCI bill. why did you vote for the extension?
hope you will give us some insight into the behind the scenes kabuki on these votes. thank you.
thank you for your reply, i appreciate it very much.
Ditto that sentiment, Audrey! How wonderful it is to have a Congress Person here at the Lake, actually talking to us. We surely could do well with more of that. Thank you again and again, Senator.
:)
Isn’t that the truth! How is it that we’re having so much trouble getting that message across?
As a liberal member of the House what advice would you give to the rest of us liberals who want to do something to support a liberal agenda in the House other than electing more liberals (we are already trying to do that)? How can we get the most bang for our buck in moving your less liberal colleagues to move your way?
You are a cosponsor of H. Con. Res 362, which among other things calls for an active quasi-blockade of the nation of Iran:
Not good. Aren’t blockades considered to be acts of war, Congressman?
Congressman. It is my recollection that you only won 8 of the races that were targeted by Rahm in the 2006 election. The rest were a result of the 50 state strategy. Perhaps you should check that stat.
Also it would be very helpful to refute the talking point that Obama has the most liberal voting record. He is not nearly the most liberal Senator and the right and the media should not be allowed to get away with that lie.
And do the rest of the Congresspeople sit with you and Kucinich in the lunchroom? Do you ever hang with Feingold? Are they CLOSE to going along… or repelled by the idea of it? What are the real chances of impeachment before January 2009? I just get overwhelmed watching CSpan and hearing the flag waving we must continue the war to SUPPORT the troops propaganda. Hard to keep hearing that go on for you I bet. What is your secret for spirit?
You meant earlier the real Colbert is liberal but his character is close to the real man on the street wingnuts….. at first I thought you meant Stephen was conservative.
The resolution you cite is a non-binding resolution which is only a statement of Congress without any force of law.
I am not willing to give President Bush congressional approval for the use of force in Iran. This resolution could not be clearer on this point and it is one of the main reasons I cosponsored this resolution.
The goal of the resolution is to place additional economic, political and diplomatic pressure on Iran instead of giving this President any authority to use force. Given my distrust of the President I am also a sponsor of another resolution (H. R. 3119) which if passed into law would prohibit the use of funds for military operations in Iran unless authorized by Congress.
No doubt Howard Dean’s 50 State strategy deserves tremendous credit and I believe that it will perform even better for Senator Obama in November 2008.
Isn’t that the 2nd non-binding resolution that Congress has passed? Didn’t you also pass the non-binding resolution to call the Revolutionary Guard terrorists? It would seem that Bush would have no trouble at all using both of these “non-binding” resolutions to bomb Iran. Why hand him something that he can use against the Congress when it isn’t necessary?
congressman wexler, i hope you will answer prof. foland’s question at 79. why are you co-sponsoring H.Con.Res. 362?
i’m no lawyer, but it sure reads to me as though it calls for a naval blockade of iran - wouldn’t that be an act of war.
BRAVO, Sir. I have friends from college who are Iranian Nationals and this will be of great cheer to them.
Incidently, those friends of mine, one here and the other in Shiraz are equally nervous about Bush Administration (as we ALL are) and they are also saddened by the turn in national policy of this last eight years. One keeps asking me if I thought America would ever “come back”. She’s actually somewhat heartbroken, again, as we all are.
Thanks for your kind words and regarding Colbert - his portrayal of a conservative blowhard is brutal and hilarious. He has the best and quickest wit of all all contemporary comics.