We’ve formed a new PAC, called Accountability Now (a name suggested by cbl2 and voted on by our readers). We’re going to be splitting off our positive, candidate-supportive activities that BlueAmerica engages in from the accountability campaigns which will now be handled out of Accountability Now.
With that in mind, we’ve joined together with the BreaktheMatrix folks, Trevor Lyman and Rick Williams (who did the Ron Paul money bombs) in a campaign to fund it. We’re coming together as liberals and conservative libertarians (a la Bob Barr) because we’re extremely concerned about our eroding civil liberties, and the politicians in Washington DC who seem consumed with protecting their own power and not very worried about what’s happening to American right to privacy.
It was covered today in the Wall Street Journal:
The fight over immunity for telecom companies in domestic-spying legislation is creating an unexpected side effect: unity among liberal bloggers and Ron Paul supporters.
Liberal activists and supporters of the Texas Republican and former presidential candidate plan to join forces Thursday and begin a "money bomb" protest of lawmakers who support telecom immunity in the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act. During a "money bomb," grassroots activists donate money during a short period of time — usually a day — to create buzz and raise money for their candidate.
The effort is timed to coincide with a planned Senate vote on the bill. Libertarians and liberal activists have blasted Democratic lawmakers, including presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, for supporting the legislation.
Both groups are upset about a provision in the bill that would provide retroactive immunity from civil actions for telecom companies alleged to have provided information to the government as part of its secret, warrantless wiretapping program. The House passed the legislation on June 20 and a Senate vote could come as soon as Thursday.
"There’s entrenched power in Washington that protects itself and there are people on both sides who don’t feel like they’re having their rights protected," says Jane Hamsher, one of the organizers behind the effort and founder of the popular Democratic blog Firedoglake. "It’s really about right and left coming together to fight the entrenched power and take their power away."
The fund-raiser represents a novel partnership between the two groups, which have separately proven themselves adept at organizing activists and readers to take action. If it goes well, organizers say it could mark the beginning of a more far-reaching partnership between the two groups, which agree on issues from ending the Iraq war to protection of civil liberties.
"For us, it’s a natural alliance," says Trevor Lyman of BreaktheMatrix.com, and one of the organizers behind the famous Ron Paul "money bombs" which stunned the political establishment by raising about $14 million total for the Texas congressman’s now-suspended presidential campaign.
"When it comes to civil liberties, we’re absolutely aligned" with liberal activists, he says, although he notes the two groups remain far apart on other matters such as economic issues. "We stand so closely on this issue."
Mr. Paul missed the recent House vote on the domestic-spying legislation but later released a statement that he "strongly opposed every previous FISA overhaul attempt and I certainly would have voted against this one as well."
Discussions between the liberal bloggers and Mr. Paul’s supporters for a joint venture only began about a week ago, but took off as anger about the telecom immunity increased in both communities. The two groups agreed to form a bipartisan political action committee, Accountability Now, and to use the Democratic fund-raising site ActBlue.com to handle the paperwork involved in legally processing political donations.
As Glenn Greenwald has written before, there’s a similar global movement already afoot — in England, the labor government is trying to extend the amount of time they can hold someone with no charges whatsoever, based on powers they got in the wake of the subway attack. The far left of the Labor Party and the libertarian wing of the Tory Party are coming together to fight it.
Much the same thing is happening with this effort. We plan to hold both Democrats and Republicans accountable on this front who have become more responsive to the lobbyist money pouring into their coffers than they are to the interests of their constituents. (An article in The Hill this morning talks about how the Blue Dogs have more money than they can spend, and are essentially looking for a Senator to buy — things are only getting worse.)
This is a problem that transcends party identification. If you’d like to be part of the money bomb, you can pledge to give money here. We’ll be working with Trevor and Rick to pick a day for the bomb to go off (when the money actually gets donated, which we’ll be doing through the highly reliable ActBlue).
Related posts:
- Can white liberals keep their eye on the prize when racism comes a knockin?
- Rahm Goes Apeshit on Liberals in the Veal Pen
- Late Night: Baked Potato Frontrunner for 2012 GOP Nomination; Liberals Vow to Destroy Potato, MSM Reaches for Sour Cream, Chives
- Liberals Help Rahm and Blue Dogs Get Off the Hook with “Opt-Out”
- Liberals Need a 12 Step Program – We Ask Taibbi What We Should Do Next





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Hi, Jane. I pledged, which brought the total to 21. Strange bedfellows, indeed!
I think that building coalitions of groups on specific issues is a powerful tool. It’s hard to believe that any group would not want to protect our rights and our constitution. If fighting for this means working with conservatives on this issue it should be done. Cudos to Jane for getting this going.
I hope that the next D administration repeals all the bushco nonsense AND holds these crooks accountable with criminal trials. It’s pretty obvious that many of them will not be able to travel in the EU without getting arrested.
Lot’s of work to do to regain the world’s respect… and human rights is a good place to start.
Pledges: I’m in
A liberal/libertarian coalition…Sounds good to me!
I onece heard the phrase uttered” libertarians have just as much in common ideologically with liberals as they do with conservatives. You may even say that libertarians are the common denominator!”
If the Bush admin and congress keeps up this business of reducing our liberties, liberals and libertarians will have a strong coalition. And thats not to be taken lightly by conservatives. I remember reading back at cato some time ago that ideologically, 15-20% of the US Population is ideologically libertarian.
I wonder what conservatives think of all this
#23!
That is if course calculating in what was said about some Democrats switching their position on fisa and receiving an average of $8k.
I’ll be after my list for $$$.
I look forward to the day when scum like Hoyer and Pelosi are no longer members of the party of FDR.
Make that 24.
Jane,
Kudos to you and everyone who organized this effort. the more we can focus on issues instead of “take-it-or-leave-it” ideology, the better off this country will be.
Now if we could only get the religious community to lobby the government to protect and stop destroying “God’s Creations”, then we might have a planet to live on for the rest of the millennium.
This is really exciting! As I was trying to say downstairs, taking back the constitution is something everyone can get behind regardless of party affiliation.
Steny’s re-election calculus certainly makes no sense ie let’s take away defense of civil liberties as an election issue so we can keep our jobs. Uh what about your employment oath there, Steny?
GREAT JOB JANE!
Question:
Do I donate at Accountability Now or the Strange Bedfellows?
Sorry! If no answer, I will join A.N.
this is funny, I remember an ad we looked at over here and I said I thought we could co-opt ron paul and libertarians to climb on board
it is interesting we can work together with groups who we would otherwise be on oposite sides of the fence
man I would love to have a real conversation with ron paul and see how he justifies allowing corporations to get others to pay for their costs
anyway, this is good stuff, hopefully the REAL ” republicans and concervatives” will co-opt with this movement as well
I’m in. Pledges up to 25.
it is remarkable to listen to some of the libertarian positions and see the degree of familiarity …
the other ironic thing is that the bulk of the libertarians I personally know work for the feds or for large gov’t contractors.
Wonder if this is the kind of unity and/or bipartisanship the Village Elders had in mind?
Be careful what you wish for, Washington…keep posturing about democracy and you just might get it.
The critters all have legislative assistants to explain the nuances and impacts of a proposed bill. Seem that they are not getting it or are ignoring it. Please call the Judiciary committee and ask the hard questions to them. Fiengold and Dodd asked us to call our senators. Any strategy Jane?
LOL. I was thinking about what a great uniter Bush is going to be after all…ew, did I really say that?
Never mind, I reread more closely and found my answer. sigh.
Fantastic!
the problem with libertarians is they treat industry and corporations as if they’re people, they get people to agree with certain principles but then extend those principles to the corporate world
when you can jail a corporation they might be able to get the same rights as people
or not even then
That should be the itelligence committee and they do feel it believe me.
Hey, I’m number 28.
keep it going pups.
Just had to pull Cbl off of the ceiling. Thanks to all the pups that voted for Accountability Now, and thank you, Jane. Y’all have made Cbl very happy.
Mr.Cbl
I guess that’s what they mean when they say you go so far left you end up right.
But think of the great contract for privatized prisons!
Have you no vision?
I’ve said it before, in a country of misogynists and bigots, it would have taken quite some time to elect a black man or a women to the highest office in the land
thanx to this president we could have elected either and both
When I click on the link it only shows 1 supporter – $20…?
Congratulations Cbl family!
Yay Cbl!!!
A friend of ours who belongs to a union in the trades says that he an his friends feel that this country is close to a revolution. People are mad and scared. They are concerned not only about gas but where our food will come from. They know that we are boxed in regarding food. Big Ag and Big Oil have us by the short hairs.
This new PAC should also organize a fund to help people who will be increasingly in need.
Click on the “here” link in the next to last line of Jane’s post.
I did that too. I think if you want to participate in the partnered money bomb you click on the strangebedfellows link above in the sentence above…
Can’t really afford to cough up $100 like that but I have pledged anyway.
Bomb’s away!
Click here.
Ooops. My 34 was for you, not perris.
Zimbabwe Days: turn in your vote to get food.
I agree with that sentiment. The good news is that your friends are seeing it and experiencing it. that’s real.
when it’s that real, it leads to action. so in a strange way it gives me hope that people are paying attention.
i have trouble with the “i’ve got mine, you don’t have yours” attitude … i don’t any problem w/ the notion that people should take responsibility for their own lives or that private lives should stay private …
are those far left or far right positions?
I’m #32. I would have preferred to do it now, as this means I have to pay attention to my email–which is getting impossible. Too many Viagra and other drug ads, with too many other scams. Every day I get over 100 emails and I hope Firedog Lake will have something that says “Money Bomb Time: Donate against Steny and Nancy for selling out the Constitution”. Unlike my email, I glance at FDL every day!
thanks! :]
again, this is really exciting. It’s not a “left wing” to stand up for the constitution, fgs. It’s for everybody. The Constitution is who we are, not those people who got elected.
” We’re coming together as liberals and conservative libertarians (a la Bob Barr) because we’re extremely concerned about our eroding civil liberties”
This is the beginning of the “People Party”. the Money Party is in power. The People Party is the new, true opposition.
I gave.
I can see a TV ad now — playing off that “Beef, it’s what’s for dinner” ad. “The Constitution — it’s who we are.”
I realize the idea is to make a big splash in a hurry but, if the intent is to keep this wonderful idea going, will there be a snail mail address available for those who don’t make cash transactions on-line (for a variety of reasons)?
Any of this “money bomb” $$ going to support whoever is running against FancyNancy in her district? A good challenge would certainly wake her cathartic ass up, if not perhaps kick her out of her nice, comfy office.
“As Glenn Greenwald has written before, there’s a similar global movement already afoot — in England, the labor government is trying to extend the amount of time they can hold someone with no charges whatsoever, based on powers they got in the wake of the subway attack. The far left of the Labor Party and the libertarian wing of the Tory Party are coming together to fight it.”
David Davis, Tory MP recently resigned over this law extending length of time a detainee may be held.
I plan on contributing as soon as I get my printer hooked up.
“Your world delivered”…to the NSA
That’s how I see it. There’s no difference between career dems and career repubs as I see it. vote out the incumbents…
the current party affiliations are meaningless.
Did anyone see the story at C&L and/or Politico about house dems receiving donations from telecoms? Big surprise.
What is internet protocol for posting the strangebedfellows invitation in the comments there? Can I do that–invite them to pledge?
This is really exciting. Of course, by forming this radically constitutional group, none of us can ever expect to be appointed to justice positions.
I suspect that selecting targets will have to await determination of the size of the payload. In the very target-rich environment that is Congress, the bigger the $$ bomb, the more targets can be included in its detonation, so to speak.
A big enough load and Nancy-the-Nazi can be included in the target list (she is most definitely at the top of my list of targets) – I have given to Cindy Sheehan and let Nancy-the-Nazi know about it.
Click the link at the end of Jane’s piece that says “here”. It’s up to 36 now.
Whoo HOO!
– This new PAC should also organize a fund to help people who will be increasingly in need. –
The government does not take competition in good humor. “Helping the people” is a government function. Send more money to the government, so it can help the needy.
Thanks!
OT: McCain was interviewed about N. Korea on his magic bus, and he sort of burped during the interview..looked like he was having indigestion. Anyone see that? He spoke really slowly with zero energy.
#38
And this is different how . . . ?
lol…this was a strange interview….he looked strange.
yeah.. what’s going on with N. Korea? Shrub said today he’s takin’ ‘em off the ‘Axis of Idiocy’ right? What? they’re not brown enough for ‘em? Doesn’t that mean Iran alone is still in the axis? Definitionally, can one have only one party in an axis?
I’m a little confused too. Accountability Now or Strange Bedfellows?
You’re assuming that Dubya has the first clue about geometry.
Perhaps it should be the “monopole of evil”. Or perhaps, to keep the axis nature of the thing, Pakistan should be added. Can’t have a singularity “axis”.
Hmmm… Maybe if it were changed from “axis of evil” to “axiom of evil” he could get away with having just one? An axle would need 2 wheels…
I thought he looooooathed North Korea. Loathes. Heavy loooooooathing, acc. to Bob Woodward.
We fear al Qaeda and loathe North Korea. that’s what my cliff notes say.
Accountability Now.
Accountability When?
or Sudan. But how much do you want to bet that in listing his maladministration’s achievements he’s going to say that he managed to defeat two of the three members of the Axis in the course of his presidency? Victory in Iraq (despite the fact that the country will be left a smoldering black hole) and victory in North Korea (despite the fact that they’re still ruled by the world’s worst thugocracy). But hey, neither of ‘em will threaten us with WMDs!
But that’s only showing 2 donations. Strange Bedfellows has 41 pledges.
Loathing doesn’t sell in shrub’s America. These days we respond only to fear. Shrub knows this better than anybody.
Yep.
Officially? in this house? we have fear of the domestic terrorism residing in the WH. It’s doing more real damage to us now than the threat of a mushroom cloud later.
pledged
i like the choice “accountability now” cause i always picture jerry stiller bellowing the phrase a la frank constanza’s “serenity now!” on seinfeld.
makes for a good war cry.
I pledged….I’m #44.
44 = $4400 (at least)
More wisdom from Scarecrow
Scarecrow upstairs on Guns (and lawyers)
Well done, Jane!
I like your can-do spirit. We should partner with like minded people that want to hold elected officials accountable to the ONLY oath they take –
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”
Preserve.Protect.Defend – the Constitution. That’s it. Nothing less.
The Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments means a shredding of the Constitution. All the politicians who have voted to destroy the Constitution are derelict in their duty. We the people are obligated to hold them accountable.
Accountability Now will definitely receive a contribution from me.
Plus there were two more at ActBlue….I popped over there to see how the FISA fundraiser is going. Climbing slowly. Hope this doesn’t drain the momentum from that too much.
You’re right. Pledge here.
I really do believe we’re seeing the beginning of an insurrection…and a death rebirth of this country.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”
see schedule 1 for definition of “affirm,” including secret annexes
see schedule 2 for definition of “faithfully,” including secret annexes
“execute” shall be defined as follows: to put into effect or carry out subject to the direction, oversight, and veto authority of Code Name Barnacle (see secret annexes)
see schedule 3 for definition of “best,” including secret annexes
use of the the word “Ability” shall not be construed to require the presence of any particular aptitude on the part of the holder of the Office of the President
“preserve, protect and defend” shall be defined as follows, “execute the pleasure of the Unitary Executive in the manner specified by Code Name Barnacle with respect to,” such pleasure to be considered secret
Bob Barr and Progressive Democrats are no strangers. Back on MLK day in 2006, Al Gore gave a wonderful speech in which he noted, basically, that President Bush was daring Congress to impeach him.
You can see the speech and read the transcript here.
Bob in HI
looks like the bud of a 3rd Party to me … great work!
Good news for those in favor of civil rights and against imperialistic war and occupation – terrible news for least worsters.
Someday we may have real alternatives to vote for in even numbered years – yay!
ok. If there is to be a third party, I don’t want it to be a partnership between progressives and libertarians. Period. Not acceptable. One-off alliances, maybe. But I don’t play with the government in bathtub, drowned club. Ever.
Pledged — #46.
Blub: there’s libertarians, and then there’s Norquist.
There’s a big difference. I have a libertarian on my team that I would trust implicitly.
But Norquist? He’s not a real libertarian; he’s a selfish, self-centered bastard and Shock Doctrinaire.
Just look at how he makes his money; that will tell you all you need to know.
A real libertarian WORKS for a living instead of inciting chaos and sucking down donations from rich benefactors who thrive like vampires on the chaos he sows.
Norquist would be more accurately called a Randian with libertarian tendencies purely by accident.
sorry. I know what a libertarian is, and I still don’t play with them. Ron Paul’s every bit as loony as Norquist. We need government activism and leadership in all areas, to protect our rights and to promote the development of our economy, culture and country (but in a manner consistent with our civil and human rights). We need to be able to manage our corporations, our economy, our race relations, our environment, our schools, etc, etc through the application of governmental authority backed up by governmental force (so long as that authority emerges legimately out of democratically and accountably selected and empowered leaders subjefct to grassroots oversight by empowered citizens). We need progressive taxation to pay for these programs and initiatives.
in a time when change is badly needed – hey even Obama’s pollsters thought its a great word – you may have to change some preconceptions to get things done.
a new polarity could be neo-cons, and anti-neo-cons.
Old Right, and traditional libertarians are natural allies with an anti-war, social justice Left.
The (D) party is rife with neo-cons at the top, and the many (R)’s are now regretting what has been done to their party.
therefore, a viable anti-neo-con formation could draw from both, and the (D)’s could choose to evolve away from their ‘better managed’ imperialism, or wither away.
#50 – Woo hoo!
blub
thats great in theory, but when is the last time Government has ever really served as the faithful butler of we the people?
the Libertarians may have some wack-a-doodle ideas about privatized sidewalks and fire departments, but the obliging, responsive, Officer Friendly nanny state is a thing of Liberal fiction.
I think I was pledge #45.
Desperately need mailing address for new PAC Accountability Now so I can send check.
Just in case Blue America PAC cannot transfer my check earmarked for “FISA Fight.”
not my fiction :).. we’ll just have to agree to disagree here. My idea of good government is big, strong, friendly, accountable, and responsive.
reply to blub @ 85
Ron Paul will not be an officer of the Accountability Now PAC, I would bet my large dollar check on that. Ron Paul *is* truly a looney-bird, but his “money-bomb” activist supporters are very effective, non-looney, pro-civil liberties, anti-tyrrany web engineers. Jane gave their names and links. They are the ones we are allied with, not Ron Paul.
true that, it is an ancient debate.
It’s my belief that we’re heading into a period when strong, progressive government will be necessary. Climate change and all of its consequences, flooding, crop failure, out-of-control commodity markets, etc, etc, will require strong/big-government solutions on a scale we’ve not seen since the 1930s, possibly ever. The energy crisis will require directed government-sponsored leadership to redirect resources toward mass transit, new patterns of urban development, and new state-subsidized R&D and economic development incentives for new technologies. The attendant social disruptions, which will see both internal and cross-border population displacements on a scale not seen since the Dust Bowl (at least), will require a powerful, benign state to manage relief and resettlement efforts, social disruptions and inevitable tensions, education and training, and so forth. This isn’t the time to experiment with libertarian models.
I repeat my plea for an email address or mailing address for Accountability Now PAC, so I can send a check. Even better, will the new PAC take PayPal? Tell all of us, maybe in a new thread.
do you believe it in your heart?
more than anything.
yes, true to all that, I’ve been following the same trends leading up to this.
But, the (D) party is fully captured by the rich, powerful corporations who have the most to lose from real reform.
I mean, you see this, right?
so, where is this powerful benign state going to come from? The state you describe would have to appear ex nihilo.
rather, see Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine, favorably referenced by frontpagers here.
The shocks you describe will likely simply be exploited by those with the most to gain. They don’t care if they have to buy (D) or (R) politicians, and they do not have settle for the least worst – they are in a position where it is always better or best.
well, just relax and accept the jesus, bless ur heart.
then don’t we have to fix the problem and reclaim our party and our government? shouldn’t that be the priority? I believe that what the libertarian populists offer is a little like crack cocaine — an addictive panacea that will leave us dependent, more exploitable, and ultimately physically destroyed. If our party is broken, then we need to find ways to fix it… that’s the hard way, but I do believe that it is the only way.
its not my party, k?
take it back? it never was a party of peace, social justice and the environment.
I mean, pick a decade to take it back to?
1990’s? thats when David Brower, a founder of the Sierra club, said:
the 1960’s? progressive changes of that decade were forced by outside social movements. Vietnam was the (D)’s war, remember?
the 1930’s? the New Deal, FDR? again, forced on the (D) by outside social movements, not ‘reform from within’.
but anyway, its been fun, but I gotta get back to work. This stuff is like chess openings, its all been played out before, so cheers.
I’m number 54.