This is really frightening. First, America’s workers lose their homes. Or the equity in their homes, or their ability to take out second mortgages to pay for unexpected expenses like a health care crisis. So they turn to credit cards. Now, those cards increasingly are maxed out.
What’s left?
Retirement funds.
Remember back when 401(k) plans were introduced as the promised land of personal control over our retirement destiny? While many workers who otherwise would have no retirement income have benefited from them, the proliferation of these defined-contribution plans gave employers more impetus to jettison the defined-pension plans that have helped ensure retirees don’t have to work until they die. And unlike the funds in traditional employer pension plans, 401(k) plans provide ready access to cash—a $3 trillion pool our declining middle class now is tapping into.
CitiStreet, Fidelity Investments and Vanguard Group Inc., the nation’s largest administrators of 401(k) retirement savings plans, all have reported increased early withdrawals from these accounts in 2007—the number of hardship withdrawals rose as much as 16 percent and 17 percent. To qualify for a hardship withdrawal, applicants must show financial adversity such as high medical or educational bills, facing foreclosure or repairing a home damaged by a natural disaster.
So why the cash drain?
For the past 30 years, wages have not kept up with productivity—and, in fact, productivity has soared while wages have flat-lined. To pay the bills, middle-income workers increasingly borrowed money to make it. Author Barbara Ehrenreich puts it this way:
Easy credit became a substitute for decent wages in this country. Twenty years ago, people earned money to buy a house. Now, you couldn’t make money on that scale—but you could borrow money.
For millions of us, debt has replaced the robust wages that U.S. workers, many with union jobs, were paid in the post-World War II years.
Access to these loans literally has papered-over the nation’s massive structural shift from the 1960s, when we were paid enough to live on, to today, when we can’t survive without going into debt.
If you’re George W. Bush, you think it’s great people are working three jobs. In fact, as he puts it, it’s uniquely American.
If you’re John McCain, you say families who want to keep their mortgages, should work harder and do without. Here’s what McCain had to say about the millions of families losing their homes to foreclosure:
Of those 80 million homeowners, only 55 million have a mortgage at all, and 51 million are doing what is necessary—working a second job, skipping a vacation, and managing their budgets—to make their payments on time.
And if you’re among the nation’s nattering nabobs of neocons, you trash those who can’t afford to get by as living beyond their means. (McDonald’s is a luxury, after all.)
But as Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren repeatedly has pointed out, when most people file for bankruptcy, it’s because they lost their job or have suffered from a health care emergency—not because they went to the beach for one too many family vacations.
The papering-over of a U.S. economy based on low wages for workers and massive profits for corporate CEOs is unraveling. Pundits are comparing today’s current economic crisis with that of the 1970s based on such superficial similarities as high gas prices and rising inflation. But this is not another cyclical economic go-around. This is the crumbling of an unsustainable system built on the smoke and mirrors of a corporate-run economy.
Somewhere between the 1970s and today, while we were producing far more than we were paid, there was a corporate takeover of our government. And now Exxon Mobil and Co. run the show. Corporations have succeeded in electing to public office those who, like Bush, push the corporate agenda: policies that encourage corporations to send U.S. jobs overseas and that privatize service and deregulate industries, bust unions and give the wealthy massive tax breaks that don’t trickle down to the rest of us.
When the economy melted down in the 1970s and early 1980s, personal savings shored up working families and along with loans, helped them survive. Writes Donald Grimes, a senior research associate for the University of Michigan Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations:
In 1980 and 2005, the middle class was able to substantially increase its spending despite stagnant (manufacturing workers) or slowly increasing wages (nonmanufacturing workers).
But since 2005, middle-class workers have not been able to draw down their savings rate to support their spending. So their spending, not their income, is being squeezed now in a way that it has not been previously.
In 1980, our personal savings rate was 10 percent of our income. Now, it’s dead. Between 2006 and 2008, savings averaged .5 percent of personal disposable income. But that figure actually is much worse. An average rate includes the savings of the very wealthiest—meaning the savings rate for 90 percent of us likely is in the negative range.
We have no savings. Our homes have little or no equity—if we still have them. Nothing is left on our credit cards, so we’re robbing from our retirement future to survive. And this is not the fault of the plasma TV in the living room. It’s because we aren’t getting paid for what we produce.
New York Times columnist Bob Herbert wrote a sobering piece last week in which he quoted from letters written to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I). Sanders asked his constituents to describe their economic situations. He was stunned at the response. And this in Vermont, where "economically distressed" has up to now not been a phrase to describe the state’s residents. Writes Herbert:
A 55-year-old man who said his economic condition was "very scary," wrote: "I don’t live from paycheck to paycheck. I live day to day." He has no savings, he said. His gas tank is never more than a quarter full, and he can’t afford to buy the "food items" he would like.
His sense of his own mortality was evident in every sentence, and he wondered how long he could continue. "I am concerned as gas prices climb daily," he said. "I am just tired. The harder that I work, the harder it gets. I word 12 to 14 hours daily, and it just doesn’t help."
This is not uniquely American. This is a situation we see in countless other economic dictatorships. But unlike many countries, we still have the opportunity to turn around America.



24 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Hey!
I gotta go back and read this, but I wanted to say here and now that I just watched Donna Edwards on the House Floor and SHE SO ROCKS!!!
We need to all feel really good about her being there, pups.
That was momentous! And I HOPE a real eye opener to Pelosi!!!
hehe
must read this post now,
sorry for the OT, but it was a great moment!
Thanks, for your understanding and patience, Tula.
:)
pax
Great and timely post…
Duggggg :)
Related…
‘The Royal Bank of Scotland has advised clients to brace for a full-fledged crash in global stock and credit markets over the next three months as inflation paralyses the major central banks.
“A very nasty period is soon to be upon us – be prepared,” said Bob Janjuah, the bank’s credit strategist.’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/mon…..rbs118.xml
Tula -
from FDL newsbox -
http://firedoglake.com/2008/06…..on-unions/
SCOTUS decides in favor of US Chamber of Commerce and strikes down CA law on employers using state funds to ’deter’ union membership
this is a great post and it demonstrates where we are thanks to reagan and his tax giveaways to the wealthy
these were NOT ”tax cuts” and reagan was NOT a tax cutting president, in fact he RAISED taxes more then any previous peace time president
however what he DID do was demonize the union worker so the majority of americans actually think unions are BAD for the economy
he also redistribute the tax burdon where the wealthiest among us were given gifts at the expesne of the middle class and our infrastructure
this is one of the things that has to be made clear, that a responsible economic program will NOT be ”raising taxes but rather will be RECLAIMING the middle class assets which were taken from our infrastructure and put into the hands of the wealthiest people on the planet
and we also need to make it CLEAR, we CANNOT allow trade to countries that do not allow for collective bargaining for their workforce
if a country allows for slave and child labor, we MUST add a levy onto that product to compensate for the unequal playing field, if they allow their industry to pollute our skies then those products must face a levy to help pay for the mess these companies produced.
but the first thing, we NEED to educate the masses and inform them that reagan was NOT a tax lowering politician.
their heads will explode
Hi Tula,
Have you noticed that any program other than military contracts, defense, etc. isn’t “fiscally responsible”?
schip, gi bill, anything that actually benefits ordinary c.i.t.i.z.e.n.s. gets voted down, or threatened with veto or is actually vetoed. This is BS.
It is a dictatorship for sure. It’s like Poppa Bear saying when you need clothes “you’re asking for designer jeans and that’s not responsible, so you get no jeans at all.” when you just need something to wear, they’ll have you go naked in the name of fiscal responsibility, sending your inheritance to the death machine.
What middle class?
This is the reality of the ”workin’ for the man every night and day.”
We are all another day older and a-deeper in debt now that America the democracy has been recreated as America the corporatocracy.
Thanks Jackie:>) I dugg your digg. Folks remember you are supporting the Lake when you digg the post. I brings new people to the Lake and those people are clicks that the Lake gets paid for. so come on and digg the post!
Hi Tula great post!
I for one do feel the pinch having been laid off on 2001. What with my age and the IT world in Silicone Valley just completely bottoming out. In all this time I have only been able to get two interviews! we get by on my wife’s income and I do computer repairs by advertising on the web…. don’t earn very much but every $$ helps keep us in our home. Just waiting until I can start getting my SS. But of course the government wants their share. But Hopefully we can just keep above water unlike those along the Mississippi!
devil’s advocate here:
“how can we (US business) stay competitive?”
BTW, I’m on your side.
Yes, we’re looking at it now. One good part: The Court made clear that three parallel fed statues are no improper, that is, the decision is a narrow one.
‘“how can we (US business) stay competitive?”’
First thing to do is to stop setting unrealistic profit goals. And American companies should focus on America first and the rest of the world second…
Lets tie together a few of today’s topics:
What are the odds that if the Hoyer FISA bill passes today, the president can get the AG to issue “National Defense Permits” that override drilling bans and allow Big Oil to drill wherever they please? Its a widely-used talking point that energy independence is a national security issue, and with the FISA bill as a precedent and the Prez having the ability to designate anyone an “enemy combatant” from the Marsupial Commissions Act, there would be no room for Greenpeace and the like to take action.
There is a huge pay gap between what CEOs make in the US and what they make in Europe. Yet, the Europeans still are competitive. The wealth is there now in US corps–it’s just concentrated at the top, with workers unfairly shafted.
What jackie said! If they want to do business here they need to be supporting this country in every way they can… if not send them overseas and don’t let their products back in to be sold here. No support no market to sell their products in this country!! They want their cake and to be able to eat it also WTF!
answer to dosido since my java resonse is not working
we stay competitive with them by adding a levy to products that are not produced on a level playing field
this is simple stuff
when a company produces a product on an unequatl playing field that product MUST face a tariff
if they allow for slave labor, tariff the differance, if they allow for child labor, tariff the differance
if their workforce is 50 hours tariff
no health care, tariff
no vacation, tariff
no public education, tariff
no retirement, tariff
you create an equal playing field so laborers world wide reap the benfits of a global economy, not just the ceo’s
is everyone’s tubes fubar or just mine?
We haven’t taken a vacation in three years because we refuse to finance it on credit. I work ten hours a day, so does my husband. I don’t know what planet these republic bastards live on but it damn sure isn’t planet earth. I wish they’d have to walk a mile in our shoes for one week to show them how uniquely fucking American that is.
they need to walk far more then a mile, if they walk a mile they will laugh out loud at you
these are robber barons, these are federalists, these are libertarians
they are the very thing we were trying to avoid when we formed this nation
they are the very thing we were trying to avoid when we formed this nation
Agreed. Is the genie out of the bottle forever?
Well put together post, Tula. Thank you.
Thanks, Mr. Cbi!
Thanks for the responses, everyone. It really helps because I hear this a lot…now I know how to counter. Sorry I didn’t get it before.
Dugg. Good post, Tula. Thanks.
Yeah, I took too many vacations and crap. My daughter and I started a business in 2005. We worked 60-80 hours per week at it. Built it up and were providing jobs for 18 other people too. Then the housing crash hit – took our business down with it. We lost her house, my property, and both of us are in bankruptcy. I’m living on SSDI and the Bankruptcy Trustee is getting almost one-fifth of the pittance I get. I am taking in sewing to try to supplement my income even though I’ve been in the hospital seven times since December 1, 2007.
Vacations, yeah right. I have trouble buying food, and have borrowed money from my 80-year-old mother to pay the power bills this winter (in Montana).
Just what exactly is it that I’m supposed to give up? I have no retirement, no credit cards, no house, and I do have a car that I already paid for once but because it is still worth money – I have to pay for it again to the Bankruptcy Court.