This is an ongoing FDL series from the national tour for THE UPRISING. You can order The Uprising at Amazon.com or through your local independent bookstore.
SEATTLE – This week on my national book tour, I had the opportunity to debate conservative leader Grover Norquist on KUOW – Seattle’s NPR affiliate. The topic of the debate was my new book, THE UPRISING, and specifically the rise of populism in American politics. You can listen to the debate here – it begins about half way into the interview.
Norquist, one of the architects of the original conservative uprising of the 1980s and 1990s, is a good indicator of where the conservative movement is today. As you can hear, the Right is angry with the Bush administration for not being more conservative on a whole host of issues – and you can sense from Norquist how ideologically bankrupt conservatives really are today.
For a generation or so, the Right has dynamically adapted its reactionary ideas to sound like a populist, anti-Establishment, for-the-little-guy agenda. But thanks to all the crises we now face from those ideas – an energy crisis, stagnant wages, national security catastrophes, a global warming emergency – it has become much easier for progressives to unmask the Right as what I called Norquist: Fake populists.
The concept of fake populism is an important one as we move into the superheated general election campaign. Just as Norquist tries in the debate to package environmental degradation, oil industry handouts and tax cuts for billionaires as policies designed to help us regular folks, so will John McCain try to present more NAFTA-style trade deals and more war in Iraq as populism. And the more we label it for what it is – fake populism – the more we will show the country the difference between a true majority agenda and the Beltway elitism of the Right.
What struck me most about the debate with Norquist is how truly out of touch with ordinary people he really is. This is a person who in the face of $4.50 gasoline and $40 billion in ExxonMobil profits tells us that we should give away more policy goodies to the oil companies. This is a person who in the face of polls showing the public thinks the tax system is fundamentally unfair in the wake of the Bush tax cuts, says we should nonetheless push forward with even more regressive tax cuts. This is a person who in the face of massive budget deficits and social service cuts, says we should slash corporate tax rates, even though our effective corporate tax rate is among the lowest in the industrialized world. This is, in short, a person who is so insulated inside the Beltway and so coddled by the Big Money interests that have financed his career that he quite literally has no idea that there’s an uprising going on throughout the country – and no official photos of him with statues of Ronald Reagan can hide that reality. He seems genuinely unaware of the trends on both the Right and Left that I report on in my book.
Of course, I praise Norquist at the beginning of the debate for his tactical brilliance in building a movement (and he is featured in my book because of this). The pressure he has put on Republicans from the Right has been remarkably effective – and progressives could learn a thing or two about the value of a more confrontational attitude towards Democrats on our own issues for our own uprising. That said, I think this debate shows that the conservative movement is indeed buckling under the bankruptcy of its ideas. And as we continue building our uprising and exposing their fake populism, we are getting closer to the truly exponential change that has marked other uprising moments in American history.
Listen to the full debate here, and then go pick up THE UPRISING at Amazon.com or through your local independent bookstore. Also, make sure to check the book tour schedule at www.davidsirota.com/uprising – I hope to see you on the trail!
Related posts:
- Why is Obama Debating Cheney About the Rule of Law?
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Michael Huttner and Jason Salzman, 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America
- Whitehouse and the Corpus Delicti Leading to Cheney
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jonathan Tasini, “The Audacity of Greed: Free Markets, Corporate Thieves and the Looting of America”
- Under Pressure, The Federal Reserve Goes Populist





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Aloha, David!
I had the pleasure of hearing David Sirota speak in San Francisco last week. He wove in some new connections between past Uprisings and energy crises, while showing the current linkage as well. I hope everyone will take a moment to check out his schedule and take an opportunity to see him if he is coming to your community. His presentation is like a new chapter of his book.
It’s worth the time and effort, and you will likely find yourself surrounded by like-minded folks ass well!
(It was great to meet you, David — thanks for signing my book!)
Thanks Teddy – we’re working on getting a digitized version of the presentation right now!
well, I guess I had an epiphame the other day while discussing ron paul with a friend as if ron paul had some legitimate ideas concerning the economy, this from a friend of mine who was only a year ago “liberal” believe it or not
at any rate, the epiphame is as follows;
the “republican” or “concervative party” does not exist anymore, they have co-opted the economic principles of “libertarians”
they all want no regulation for industry when it affects profit, however they do want plenty of government when it protects their profit…go figure, “libertarians” want the regulations they like and they don’t want the regulations they don’t like…who’da thunk it?
but the point is, bush, mccain, and all of these republican politicians are simply co-opting the libertarian economic principles
by the way, there is no such thing as a real libertarian agenda, what they want will allow them to defer all their costs onto everyone else, they just don’t admit that’s what they mean when they say “there should be no regulation”
anyway, there it is
so the libertarian seems to most to be masquerading as “populism”, they are pulling the strings of individuals because we really do want government out of our lives and we should ahve government out of our lives so long as we aren’t cuasing issues for anyone else
they get to seduce the populace into believing the “libertarian” is for persoan rights and individual freedom when in fact all they really want is unregulated industry…they are masqeurading as “pupulists”, they are not
HI
Always a pleasure to read/listen to you. I can’t wait to catch in on the net
Thanks
jo6pac
I go into this in the book. Libertarians are tapping into the Marlboro Man Myth – the idea that everyone is their own Marlboro Man (or woman) out on the range, going it alone.
Next time you meet a Libertarian, ask them if they drove on a street to where you are. Then tell them their libertarianism is a joke.
I think it’s down to Buckley. I think he seriously believed that he could construct a platform that would pull in enough splinter groups that they could rule by the force of numbers. Unfortunately for him, it turned out that the people he brought into the movement didn’t share his assumption that the gently-born were going to be in charge.
It was interesting, his last years, watching him try to find something nice to say about the people who were running his party (and for that matter his magazine).
Actually, I’ve got to hand it to Bob Barr, tho, he’s trying to bring them back to the true ‘libertarian’ fold… I think one of the biggest obstacle’s to his initial candidacy was his libertarian views on Drug Laws…!
I know all about libertarianism, they are anarchists and the very term is derived from the word
they want no goverment when it affects their bottom line, they want oodles of government when it helps they keep their profit
That works with people who screech about “socialized medicine.” I tell them that they’re driving around on socialized highways. It’s been effective in my experience… at least it shuts them up!
And who do they think should look after the food supply, risky drugs, falling down bridges, or say, Katrina. Never mind the highly favorable tax treatment. Some folks think the schools are in trouble with a declining graduation rate. Is anyone paying attention?
New word! pupulists. I recommend we here at the lake steal that word before the libertarians take notice. *s*
this is from the “libertarian wiki”;
you would really love the discussion I had with this former believer in ron paul and those rediculous principles, here’s some of it;
it was a grand discussion let me tell you
I made the purchase & I am greatly enjoying “The Uprising”, planning for this very Book Salon. Unfortunately, I came across a copy of the ” Common Sense, The Rights of Man and the Essential Writings of Thomas Paine”. He’s really not too bad in his in right. I fully agree that a much more confrontational attitude towards the majority of the Democrats in general is required. The 110th Congress has failed us dramatically, they can serve as an example for all matter of sins. From rootstrapping to “Inoperative campaign rhetoric” to Nancy’s table setting, or lack thereof, with pitifully few exceptions, they will be an exemplar of selling their constituents short. Harry Reid and Henny Stoyer have deliberately short circuited us, too.
Norquist is to honest like Bush is to competent.
I cut people who “think” they are “libertarians” down with one simple;
“so, you are saying if an industry dumps their cancer in your kids air, they DON’T have to clean up their crap?…is THAT what you are saying?”
shut’s them right down
like cheney is to a marksman?
like shwartzeneger is to linguistics?
I would hate to let him trump W on linguistics..or manners. Ive heard more than once his telling the Pope, You’re looking good (man) while meeting in the prayer garden. Did Barb teach this kid anything?
I’m really looking forward to reading “The Uprising”.
It boggles the mind that people like Norquist support the “government” spying on you and tightening up and taking away your rights…on one side of their mouths, and espouse policies that give big corporations free rein and authority over the population and government in exchange for less taxes in people’s meager paychecks. Then, when they are talking out of the other side of their mouths, they spew out the ideology that big government is bad…the thing is…what they promote is virtual fascism….corporations with control over the people and the government.
People fall for the “less taxes” scam…over and over, and over….
People should study the Norwegian government for ideas to prosper and take care of the citizens.
That’s a good reply. We need to be ready for all the new libertarians. Many former Bush Republicans (they’re humiliated and embarrassed by Bushco) are now referring to themselves as libertarians. From whom (other than Neil Boortz) are they getting this sound byte which they now regurgitate so readily?
Jon Stewart left Norquist looking like a deer in the headlights by commenting about trying to
build his own road. I don’t know how to do that linky thing or how to get to youtube, but if someone does, it was priceless. Thanks, David Sirota, for keeping up the good fight.
Sure would help matters if Dems would fight against illegal surveillance and illegal war etc.
The Daily Show March 11, 2008. Sorry I don’t know how to haul it over here.
“Drowning the government in a bathtub…” The problem is that the bathtub would be built by some government contractor on a no-bid basis, and once again all the well-placed republican cronies would get rich on yet another no-bid deal.
Halliburton builds the tub, Brown&Root supplies the gags, Blackwater heaves the baby. Overrun costs up 80%.
subversion of the constitution.
Kucinich is ok.
Olbermann effusively praised Tim Russert. Springsteen dedicated a song to Russert. Russert was no friend to the common man, nor a proponent of liberal principles. But here we are. Its very odd.
2008 is the year to shrink the Republican party until it’s small enough to drown in the bathtub.
Exactly right. Norquist was smart enough to isolate “hot button” sound-bite issues and exploit them to the benefit of his patrons on the right. Between his ideas and Frank Luntz being able to identify words that sum up those ideas in less than 10 seconds, they have done well at creating not only a poisonous, but socially regressive atmosphere that has damaged us all over the last 30 years.
Ding.
I have to give Mr. Sirota a great deal of kudos – The only debate I would be interested in having with Grover is how many taps on his noggin with a cluestick would be required for him to begin shedding his outlandish faux zealotry and begin his poltroon’s journey toward a centrist reality consensus.
;>)
Don’t get me started!
It really is ironic that at this time in history, when our rights are being violated, when our government is acting separately from the will of the people, when our troops are overseas in a war based on lies….we end up with two ineffectual, insipid characters in this play…Pelosi and Reid.
Sometimes I feel like an animal in the process of the realization that it is trapped…standing on its hindlegs from wall to wall, corner to corner…looking for the way out…not quite realizing that it is trapped…not quite yet, but slowly realizing.
We have to stop this. Now.
David, I’ve got your interview running in the background. Wonderful. You are an excellent speaker — clear and sure. I can’t wait to read your book. Ordering it now.
It is an illusion created by their presentation of the reality they want us to experience.
We are all free. We just don’t know it for sure…and they are counting on that.
We are free. Screw Norquist, and screw Bushco.
There’s a fatman in the bathtub.
-G
Did you see this asshat? Peter and his book were guests on liberal media’s book tv:
Makers and Takers: Why Conservatives Work Harder, Feel Happier, Have Closer Families, Take Fewer Drugs, Give More Generously, Value Honesty More, Are Less Materialistic and Envious, Whine Less…And Even Hug Their Children More Than Liberals
Author: Peter Schweizer
About the Author
Peter Schweizer is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His previous books include “Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.”
Right: the money party and the people party. Succinct.
O.k. I’m still in a good mood. Lets hear it for the F.D.Lakers!
I wish there were someway to make tax-exempt entities like AEI, Heritage or Stanford pay for the damage
they have done to the U.S. But, it’s not as if they have $15 billion lying around. Oh, wait…
venal blood coursing through the body politic.
On the power of the fluid
Great song!
:D
No.
(This has been another case of simple answers…)
Oooh, nice play on words!
I just listened to the entire debate. The failures of the policies that Norquist has championed for so many years are in his face and he doesn’t admit that they’re there. He just keeps on spouting the same crap he’s always spouted. Good on you David. People listening to that live and since learned a lot about what’s really happening in their world while Grover sits in his office in DC dreaming up ways to cut more taxes for the wealthy, totally oblivious to reality. It’s worked quite well for him all these years and he sees no reason to change his mind.
Thanks, David.
My god, did you see Tiger Woods?
Uh, what about Tiger Woods?
He made such a great shot on the 18th, so there will be a play off tomorrow. Amazing….
On NCB, a Saturday Night Live special. what a night.
zed duce
While everyone is busy debating, there are millions of people out there who have to delicately balance gasoline, food and rent/mortgage costs hoping against hope that the meager salaries they make will be enough to cover their expenses. I’m sorry to say that arguing with people like Norquist serves no purpose at all. Fools like Norquist will forever spout their nonsense and they’ll do it with both a chortle and a shit-eating grin. This guy and others like him have figured out a way to have their hands in the till, helping themselves to millions while others starve.
Yes, I know it’s a struggle but I’d like to think that I will gain some benefit from it rather than be the one who sees the promised land but never gets there. No thank, I want mine now.
There’s always the hope that letting people who are getting screwed know that they’re not alone by arguing with trash like Norquist will give them enough hope to fight.
First, it has taken close to 5 minutes for this page to load, so I can post this message. There is absolutely no reason as this page is all text except about a 2″ header. What is it loading from blip.tv, tribalfusion rmxads and all the others? There’s nothing like that on this page?
You want posters you’d better change your scripts to let me write without having to wait 5 minutes first.
On ‘Libertarians’: I had a similar experience with an acquaintance recently. He once, several years ago referred to himself as ‘to the right of Genghis Khan’ and then a few days ago he said he was a Conservative. I smiled and asked him, “What do you mean? You’re one of the least Conservative people I know.”
He went quiet real quick.
There’s a lot of cognitive dissonance out there and this year is a good time to shake it up and realign them.
Saturday night SNL had John McCain on as a guest and one of his skits referred to his tight-fisted anti-earmarks policy and how it has shrunk paved roads and the number of post offices in Arizona since he’s been senator. I think it’s stupid of him to show people pictorally what he is saying. They might begin to believe he really means that crap. He said he hasn’t brought pork to Arizona despite bringing billions in military pork to Arizona corporations.
His anti-earmarks anti-pork position is as fake as his anti-lobbyist position.
However, since there actually is an infrastructure bill in the making this could be a great time to put that question to the American people. Do they want ‘pork’ in their district? Do they want their roads fixed? Do they want bridges fixed? Or would they rather take a pass?
Put the question to them in Iowa and see how they feel about the disastrous flooding they’re facing and whether they’d like flood walls, help from FEMA and perhaps better service from the Army Corps of Engineers? Do they want that pork from earmarks or not?
I wonder if people in Mississippi and Louisiana are still enjoying the lack of recovery-from-Katrina help from the federal government?
They may call themselves Libertarians or ’small government’ Republicans, but when it comes to jobs and natural disaster relief and highway funds and post offices there are probably a lot of those people who would think twice before saying “NO, we don’t want your money.”
Being kind thoughtful people it behooves Democrats to offer to those people the option of turning away the money!
Dave, how come there is nothing about Edwards campaign in your book? I would think with all the fire power aimed at him by the MSM that his campaign would have been included?
The Uprising is on my Must-Read list (which is now swamped, thanks to these FDL Book Salons!).
A few years ago I believed that Norquist really was as Sirota describes — a “fake populist” and as described in thread, someone who’s co-opted libertarian ideology.
But after researching this bete noire — or researching matters in which he popped up like a prairie dog, here and then there, and over there — we are looking at something far, far worse.
Norquist and his equally disturbing counterpart Howie Rich at Americans for Limited Government are the very worst elements of something for which I don’t even have a name. They are actively undermining state governments across the entire country, while simultaneously pushing the envelope on public discourse so far to the right that we can barely recognize it as conservatism. Norquist and Rich are not merely finding ways to downsize government, but to completely bankrupt it and lay waste to the state’s ability to govern, in such a way that corporate interests can move in and prey readily upon a desperate or ill-prepared state.
Look at the ballot initiatives in many states that support not only TABOR (taxpayer bill of rights) but school vouchers, pro-marriage, anti-affirmative action, eminent domain, part-time legislatures, term limits as starters; nearly all of these have roots in the same front organizations, as do subsequent recall organizations when these measures fail as legislation (generally a first attempt before pushing as ballot initiatives). The ballot initiatives are often pursued in a manner that approaches outright fraud, while costing the taxpayers a lot of money for handling; the recalls, too also cost taxpayers money. The damage these initiatives and legislation cause also damages the state; Michigan’s budget crisis was prolonged by nearly a year because of the inexperience of legislators mandated by newer term limits sold to the public by these hooligans, as one concrete example.
These are fascists at work; they are profiting from this locust-like process, and we’re not looking at how they are rewarded for their efforts. These are the shock doctrinaires, setting in motion disaster capitalism by laying waste to our system of government and in turn create conditions ripe for corporations to take over our commons.
Fixed it for you!
speaking of drowning in a bathtub…
Grover Norquist does indeed come to mind.
I’d like to see his entire agenda drown.
Government handouts for the very wealthy and for very large corporations… That’s what Grover and the boys truly believe in.
Why their views gain purchase in the marketplace of ideas I don’t know. What I do know is that I’m tired of hearing their mendacity.
Harpers Magazine has a very interesting discussion on the final days of the Republicans.
The piece is a bit more elegant than your phrase of “drowning in the toilet bowl”, just not as succint and to the point. It’s a bit more like [Republicans] decomposing in the septic tank…