Comments on: Michael Reagan: ‘Take Them Out And Shoot Them’

By: datadave

datadave — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:25:20 +0000

Personally, I believe the Fairness Doctrine would have been a good thing to prevent this from happening. Sadly, Democratic congressman gave into to Corporate America’s demand for greater controversy and Reagan’s (Republican’s) desire for an obvious Right ward tilt to our broadcast media).

This should be on Obama’s agenda if he should get elected (still a distant ‘if’)

By: Valley Girl

Valley Girl — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:55:48 +0000

I agree with you.

By: TexasVietVet

TexasVietVet — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:43:30 +0000

The only thing Michael Raygun is got going for himself is his name. RAYGUN. ~~~ModNote: Edited for content.~~~

The conservanazis, like Raygun, are losing grip on power AGAIN. They will become more vicious in their attacks on Democrats and anyone else they view as their mortal enemies. I’m glad to know now that most conservanazi christians view hate as a christian virtue. Or am I getting confused listening to their nazi propaganda?

Conservanazi republikans are subtly racist and overtly anti-feminist. Now, with a black man running for President as a Democrat, the conservanazis will be more overtly racist.
They will be showing their TRUE COLORS.

BTW, buck fush!

By: KayInMaine

KayInMaine — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:03:17 +0000

So when a right winger can’t stand the truth and can’t stand the fact that our troops are hearing the truth, then the right winger’s answer is to shoot the messenger? Wow. I bet the right wingers when they were babies would drop to the floor and throw hissy fits of rage until they passed out.

By: john in sacramento

john in sacramento — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:45:54 +0000

[This is a response to Matt Taibbi’s comment @ 55 which I was going to post on his Book Salon thread, but decided not to, because it has nothing to do with his book, which I think is applicable here]

Matt:

… Coming from me this sounds strange, but we need to reinject some civility into our politics …

I agree with that. And also this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmj6JADOZ-8

I usually read this blog for reasoned, rational debate and acceptance of other points of view, with a back and forth intellectual exchange, but sadly I’m getting a condescending, mocking tone through the last two threads that is to put it mildly, disheartening. Much of the mocking tone is sadly the same type as freeper types use to debunk issues by labeling them as “conspiracy theories” such as the Plame Affair; voting machines irregularities (2000 and 2004 editions); Iraq … and so on

I think I’ll have to go outside and get some fresh air, and come back when a more reasoned, less mocking tone is the rule

By: Ian Welsh

Ian Welsh — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:41:57 +0000

Well, the truthers writing to Iraq troops are right about one thing - the Iraq war was sold as being payback for 9/11 and Iraq didn’t do 9/11.

But if someone wants to take them to court, why don’t they?

“Discovery”.

By: Phoenix Woman

Phoenix Woman — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:28:20 +0000

Voltaire!

By: bobschacht

bobschacht — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:31:13 +0000

The following statements would also be considered psychopathic and deranged and conspiratorial.

“Kick ass!” he quotes the president as saying. “If somebody tries to stop the march to democracy, we will seek them out and kill them!

And we are battling the “terrorists” because they are bloodthirsty killers, right? Is this what “projection” is?

Bob in HI

By: mls78

mls78 — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:30:37 +0000

Radio America

By: serge

serge — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:23:17 +0000

Michael Reagan must be an endless embarrassment to his step-family. Even his own sister is probably spinning in her grave. I can take some comfort only in the knowledge that he is one of the dumbest of the anti-intellectual bloviators and perhaps has gone so far that maybe he gets fired. I won’t hold my breath.

The Rwanda reference is too on point, j’ai peur