[Editor's note: Please welcome David Sirota to Firedoglake. He'll be posting irregularly over the next several weeks as part of an ongoing blog series from the national book tour of The Uprising. I'll be posting these at OpenLeft and Firedoglake for the next few weeks as the tour continues. You can order The Uprising at Amazon.com or through your local independent bookstore. -- dn]
WASHINGTON, D.C. - What you see here is a slide from the audiovisual presentation about THE UPRISING that I unveiled yesterday at a Campaign for America's Future event in Washington, D.C. It is a graph showing Gallup's survey that documents Americans confidence in different institutions - and, as my new newspaper column today shows, it is an image that should give us hope that today's populist uprising is, in fact, a progressive opportunity...if we seize it.
In my presentation (which you can come see at many of the events I am doing all over the country in the next month), I make the case that today's political topography resembles that of the late 1970s - just like back then, we are facing a Mideast crisis, a financial crisis, a potential inflationary crisis and an energy crisis (incidentally, the Washington Post's front-page this week actually noted some of the similarities).
As you can see from the Gallup polling graph above, Americans had little confidence in Congress in the late 1970s - and that helped the Right use an anti-government message to take the uprising of that age channel it into the full-fledged conservative movement that has now dominated our country for the last generation.
Today, Americans have lost further confidence in Congress, which would seem to bode well for conservatives and their anti-government ideology. Except other factors have also changed - namely, Americans' confidence in Big Business and the financial system. While in the late 1970s Americans were relatively confident in those economic institutions, today we are not, meaning progressives critique of corporate power and economic inequality can compete against the Right's anti-government rhetoric.
But that's only the beginning of why today's populist uprising - though occurring on both the Right and Left - favors progressives.
Republicans have spent the last three decades handing over the government to Big Business, while making the GOP synonymous with those economic interests that the public is outraged at. Put another way, the graph suggests that progressives' argument against BOTH corruption and unfair economic policies is precisely where the public is at this populist moment.
As I say in THE UPRISING, it remains unclear whether progressives will seize this moment and transform it into a moment of historic change. Today, the Democratic Party still hasn't fully decided whether to cast its lot with the Bob Rubins and Wall Streeters who ran the country into the ground, or with the mass public that wants an end to money politics. That goes for Barack Obama as well.
As I told the New York Sun today, Obama has one foot firmly planted inside the establishment and has presented himself as having one foot outside the establishment, and the question remains whether he is a candidate who used the pretense of insurgency to be another establishment stooge or whether he is the real deal? I think he's the real deal - but we will need a full-fledged social movement to make sure of it.
You can read the whole column at Creators Syndicate, Denver Post, Ft. Collins Coloradoan, In These Times, TruthDig or Credo Action. The column relies on grassroots support, so if you'd like to see my column regularly in your local paper, use this directory to find the contact info for your local editorial page editors. Get get in touch with them and point them to my Creators Syndicate site. Thanks, as always, for your ongoing readership and help contacting local editors. This column couldn't be what it is without your help.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Welcome, David
Fitz!
Now More Than Ever
Sirota in da house!
Could this be the first episode of ‘Dueling Statisticians’?
I am a statistician.
My goal in life is to be wrong only 5% of the time.
;)
707!
Which makes me an “alpha male” btw.
;)
Welcome to FireDogLake, David!
Looking forward to your CREDO visit next Tuesday in San Francisco.
Digg It!
You Standard Deviant You
Everyone remain calm.
George W. Bush has a strong dollar policy, he knows what he’s doing.
The GOP is on the threshold of a permanent Republican majority, Kark Rove told me so.
-G
OT
Amazon.Com is down
Thank you, David. My question is, when will the upswelling of disaffection being captured now in the media turn into real action. When do Americans hit the streets in the type of numbers were last saw in the ’60s and early ’70s? Disaffection with one thing, but I suspect that only open and massive protest will effect the type of soulsearching and consequent change that this country so desperately needs.
I’m watching David live on FSTV right now.
www.freespeech.org
He’s talking about the book.
Hi David, great that you’ll be an irregular here! And we’ll do what we can to promote your column.
Hope the book tour is going well, am interested in the vibe you are getting from the people you are meeting at your stops.
What if we don’t get Obama elected? Will we roll up our populist uprising and move to Canada? We will surely be steamrolled by another Repthuglican Administration and Joe Likuderman of the Democrat Party.
Now, he’s on the panel. I think it will be awhile before he comes onto this thread.
It’s not just Presidential politics — there are lots of Blue America congressional candidates who represent The Uprising as well. The best insurance against a McCain presidency (shudder!) is a veto-proof Senate and a progressively-tilted House.
more and better elected officials from the DEMOCRATIC Party.
Oh yeah, I forgot. I hope we can get Obama elected and a Democratic supermajority in Congress.
Wow. The Pentagon just issued a statement smacking Israel for talking about attacking Iran.
According to CNBC.
-G
Where did Isr*el get the idea that they could issue that hawkish rhetoric and not get scolded by Don Rumsfeld’s Pentagon?
And that the only vestiges of the Bush family are found in South America.
I think that unlike the 70’s Congress when Democrats got in after Nixon just in time to take the blame we are getting in later. The voters know that Texas oilman and war for oil are behind the spike in oil prices which is now greater in inflation adjusted Dollars than during the 70’s.
Every economic downturn since the 70’s has been preceded by if not directly caused by a spike in oil prices.
The last time this happened the GOP blamed us.
I, too, am a statistician of sorts, and my goal is to be wrong no more than 5% of the time. Thus, there is a 95% chance that this statement is correct!
Bob in HI
which means its either political cover for the inevitable attack or a few more generals will be “retired” by Monday.
The Bush dollar simply has little value compared to the other currencies in the World. Oil’s going to remain expensive until the US gets off the Bush dollar.
Hehe on your “Likuderman.” Anybody else see Uncle Joe’s delightful comment today that China should work actively to bring “Democratic Society” to Myanmar. China being so experienced with that Democracy thing.. ‘course, whatever Joe calls Democracy…
I wonder if the varied reasons for a lack of confidence in our institutions will prevent Americans from finding common cause against the oligarchs. Many on the right are dissatisfied with Congress, for instance, because they haven’t allowed Arctic Reserve drilling or haven’t yet made their Bush tax cuts permanent.
It’ll be some politicians’ tough job to corral the motives for The Uprising into a movement. I’m looking to see if Obama is that politician.
It’s becoming obvious that the current system is unable to mask or slow its ongoing collapse before the November election. While Obama does seem to have his feet in both camps he is also pragmatic enough to realize that his own success will depend on choosing which side will actually lead him and the country somewhat out of the growing morass. He will favor progressive solutions.
I recall a promise he made a few months ago to establish some some of web-based feedback mechanism tied directly to the White House. Perhaps this will be the basis of direct grassroot involvement.
Put another way, the graph suggests that progressives’ argument against BOTH corruption and unfair economic policies is precisely where the public is at this populist moment.
The question then what are we going to do about it? We need real growth in this country not banks making money lending to the hedgefunds who then buy bank debt. We need real products bought and paid for with real money and not margin.
We don’t need the Bush family getting government contracts for questionable products.
Tax the rich (real money) rebuild America (real jobs for real Americans) its time to go with free and clean green power.
Either we do these things or we can just raise interest rates like President Carter did without stimulating the economy in which case Obama will also be a one term President. A new Reagen will run against everyhing left and yes then I will be going to Canada.
Well,it is like John McCain was saying only a few weeks ago:
The fundamentals of the economy are strong.
-G
The Dollar is weak because interest rates are low and the debt is high if we end the war for oil that would be the first step to reducing the price of oil.
bubububut the war’s gonna pay for itself in all that oil we’re gonna steal, remember? Shrub promised. Whaaaa.
We need music for this movement. All we have is Neil Young’s “Let’s Impeach the President.”
Course Bob Dylan endorsed Obama. Maybe he has something up his sleeve.
Dow closed down 411 pts. All futures markets were up this morning. Oil was up too, however. Dow, Nasdaq, S&P all got a good ass kicking today.
The Fundies are strong. Jeebus is coming.
Former Sen Phil Gramm McCain’s economics adviser once predicted that Clinton’s tax increase would cause a recession, depression? He was wrong. although the GOP rode to victory with Newt in the House with that issue.
We need to remind voters of that we need to pledge to only increase taxes on the rich.
You must not have seen “I’m Not There”!
Nope
For the rich. Let’s just raise ‘em on rethugs. We can start by expropriating a few Texas-based companies…. don’t conspiracy laws enable Federal seizure of ill-gotten gains? :)
I actually thought that would work then Bush over ruled General Shinseki about troop levels, who knows history will wonder maybe Bush could have won in Iraq if he did not do that.
But of course a win in Iraq for Bush would have led to a war with Iran the man likes upping the stakes until he loses or the betting is done.
Hi David. Welcome to FDL.
I think that your work shows just how the Bushies will have managed to crush the Presidential dreams of John McCain, not once, but twice.
He’s not there.
(Actually you should see it, 6 different people play him, Cate Blanchett is wonderful).
Hi LooHoo.
The wonky server,(god bless the mods), got in my way of saying nice to meet you, too, the other day.
Have a good weekend.
That’s true. However, no steps can be taken while Republics hold any power. They will do all they can to block changes that will end their plunder train.
the real method to convey when talking about progressive programs is to point out that these programs are simply forcing industry to pay their own bills
when industry pours their garbage in our water and crap in our air they need to clean it up, that’s THEIR expense not ours and they MUST be regulated otherwise they will REFUSE to pay their own bill
when we use roads to get to a business that’s THEIR expense and they need to pay for those roads
when they hire a laborer they are REQUIRED to pay the wage that makes it possible to put food on the table for a family and provide the health care necessary for their kids
they need to pay the wage that makes it possible to educate our children through college if they want to go and qualify and they need to pay the wage that makes it possible to retire when we are no longer productive and possible to take vacation so we remain productive as long as we can
these are clear expenses of industry and it is clear they do not want to pay these expenses, THUS progressive programs that insure these expenses are met
simple stuff with the proper framing
Plunder train is for sure the word for it.
I think with a good accountant we could find lots of funny Bush family contracts with the government maybe Arthur Anderson has a few employees free.
Welcome David.
in addition we need to point out that we will NOT be ‘raising taxes’, we will be LOWERING taxes
we will lower these taxes by “reclaiming the assets which were missapropriated from the middle class infrastructure”
that’s the way to deal with paying down for these programs, we can NOT say we will be “taxing the wealthy” because that is NOT what we will be doing
rather then “tax the wealthy” we MUST SAY;
“re-aquiring assets missapropriated”
bing
I certainly understand what they and their friends got from going into Iraq but am trying to grasp what the benefit to them would be if we bomb Iran. Just don’t get it.
Don’t forget the delightful “Dear Mr. President” by Pink
Also, Eliza Gilkyson’s “Man of God”
Pearl Jam’s “World Wide Suicide” and “Marker in the Sand”
even Jewel’s “America”
I’m still not ready to make nice.
I suppose it is beyond the pale that they believe what they say about Iran?
They may sincerely believe that starting a new war would galvinize the American people to backing a war president (McShame). Or they are grasping at straws for any means possible to divert public attention away from the total failure that is this presidency. Or maybe Dick just wants to go out with a bang.
awwwww. I actually like that trio.
It’s probably a scheduling blip, but, I think it works better for the commenters to have the writer of a thread around for Comments and Questions.
I’m not pointing fingers, eh ye-up, it happens to the best.
It’s just that in my experience, it’s a more fulfilling thread if the writer is here. And, that means all ya’ll…except for Christy, when she get the odd morning off to sleep in. Ha!
I just RSVP’d to David Sirota’s event in Sherman Oaks. I’m looking forward to it.
You too!
no, they think they will have an excuse for martial law, they have no delusions their war will unite us behind the republicans, the only purpose is to declare martial law and remain in power
crucial part of an actual free market. no externalizing costs outside the market, appropriate regulation to ensure fair playing field.
demi, I agree, it’s always best to have the author of the post around to talk; can bring about a real synergy. But I’m guessing Sirota’s got a pretty full schedule with his book appearances.
Teddy did host David’s Book Salon.
an instinctive ‘my-team-is-best’ response that will last 6-10 weeks. look for bombing on election-day - 8wks
this is great, just cleamed at think progress, clark is calling for the jailing of bushco and company, check this out;
clark has been a messenger of truth, please let it be so
jeez perris, do you think this has FINALLY reached critical mass?
I think that they would need a domestic crisis to do something like that.. another nineeleven or a catastrophic natural disaster. Also, have you taken a look at what our anti-drug policies are doing to Mexico lately? The country is arguably destablelizing. We see that here in SD. An incident on their precious wall could give them an excuse for more civil rights crackdowns on the immigration front. Anything’s possible, and they don’t need Iran to do it.
There needs to be some sort of game plan in place in the event that Bush/Cheney manufacture some event or incident to insure a McCain victory in Nov.. General strike?
New Dave Neiwert upstairs
Yep, I’m sure he has a really busy schedule, why I said it was probably a scheduling blip.
I really enjoyed his CSPAN this am. I do pay attention and I do know that writers who are on Book Tour have a hectic schedule.
(I said I wasn’t pointing fingers and I meant it, why I said it.
I did see that Teddy hosted that interview. Thanks, but, sadly, I wasn’t around to partake or join in.
Clark gets air time and has credibility beyond most, it is a shame he promised not to run for public office, I would not have minded a Clark vice president on either side of the aisle
let’s hope this has reached critical mass however if so we will see more depraved acts of desperation, the more exposed they are the more brazen they become
as I said, hang on to hat
On that front, at this point I’d settle for having Conyers lock Roven a closet under Capital Hill for a few weeks… or better yet, a stand-off when Rove tries to hide from his inherent contempt warrant in the WH.
the president needs nothing more then his “say so” to find ANY event a “catastropy”
he needs nothing, the mere fact that israel threatens Iran would be justification enough for this despot to declare martial law
FWIW, I believe a lot of that language allowing the President to make the declarations of martial law and such have been embedded in various Executive Orders since Truman days.
strike till he quits. It could come to that. ‘course if all the mortgage crisis evictees showed up on the Mall, shrub’ll probably Tiananmen Square ‘em.
somewhat I believe that is true however I do not believe too many presidents actually considered that power useable
this president (actually vice president) does
David “N” has a new post upstairs about the hatemongers.
((I’m with ya demi!))
Which is mainly why I have no fears that they will try to stay on and use these powers.
It may be naive on my part, but Cheney has long been on record that his goal is to “restore” powers to the Presidency that he felt had been abrogated by the Congress after H2Ogate and that those powers should be available regardless of the party holding the office.
yeah — me too. Much better if the poster can join the discussion. Otherwise, it becomes much more of us just riffing on the points and going any old place — which is fun. But, not much incentive to stay on topic, and not much chance to explore and deepen issues w/ the OP
Oh, good.
Since Loo Hoo brought up music…
That’s the way, uh, uh, I like it.
yes, it looks like critical mass is approaching and fast, check this out from c an L;
if roberts thinks throwing bush or cheney under the bus will save his seat of power then under the bus bush and cheney go
all we have to do now is find a way to convince roberts that giving bush up will increase his chances for the win
I believe this is indeed naive
I do not for one moment believe Chaney wants a democrat to have this power at their disposal, not for one moment, and don’t forget, long before Nixon lost office and power Chaney forged data to try to perpetuate unending war with Russia
no, this is not ideology this is the thirst for power
On this meme, interesting CNN article.. ‘08 is like ‘68
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITI.....index.html
Thanks!
Well, with all due respect, according to wiki, the author of that article, Campbell Brown, was born in June ‘68.
Somehow, I don’t think having her look at some old news tapes and photos for a few hours is really going to give her a full sense of what things were like in ‘68.
There are some superficial similarities between the two election years but only superficial.
As always, YMMV.
It’s a good question - and one my book tries to look at. The uprising is a state between disengaged chaos and a full-fledged movement. Getting that anger - that uprising - into a movement is the central challenge of the moment.
It’s been positive - I think people realize something’s going on in a big way.
I’ve been watching the Media Reform conference, and it has just been fantastic!! Great job!
Is it populism or just the awareness that we are circling the drain?
I think the massive demonstrations of the late 60s were counterproductive, as contrasted with the extremely disciplined civil rights demonstrations and sit-ins of the early 60s. I was there, and saw the difference. The late 60s demonstrations against the war were more emotional, less disciplined, and less instrumental. I think they may have delayed the turning of American opinion against the war. On the other hand, they were a good place to pick up women. I suppose there’s an upside to everything if you look for it.
I read in “Fast Food Nation” that when GM first started mass selling, they bought up all the electric trollys in a city in Ca. and then got rid of them so people had to buy a car. And they also got the govt to pay to build roads to drive their cars on with tax dollars. Corporate welfare, I am so sick of it. It’s time to investigate where our tax dollars go. It’s time to investigate companies that are subsidized with tax dollars to see if they need financial help. Surly, while Halliburton is making billions in profit, then they are too profitable to get tax dollars. The country can’t afford it any longer. We also need to tax mega churches and stop all these non profit organizations that politicians use to hide from paying taxes. It’s just unAmerican. I wouldn’t be surprised if 1/4 or more companies in the US are tagged “nonprofit” and escaping paying taxes. Lets make it a campaign issue. The right wants to get rid of programs that give dollars to the poor or disabled but yet still want to subsidize mega corporations. Also, CEO’s get paid too much. Like Michael Moore said, we need to pay as much attention to the CEO’s of the large corporations as we do politicians.