Donna Edwards, who you can watch live addressing the convention, is the organization’s first best example of how the SEIU plans to unseat conservative incumbents. The SEIU’s "Accountability Project" will identify problem politicians by, inter alia, relying on feedback from the locals in each district. Moreover, the SEIU will recruit members from within its own ranks to run for political office and will shortly be implementing a program to teach candidates how to address labor issues more effectively.
The first full day of the SEIU Convention was punctuated with standing ovations, cheers of "S-E-I-U!", and personal accounts from the janitors, the home care workers, the nurses, the security officers, of how union membership has been the best thing that has happened to them. Andy Stern, president of the international, reasserted in a fiery opening speech (complete with a glitzy graphics display) that the SEIU was determined to seek justice for all, not justice for some. It was a dazzling display of theater.
Going after the offenders in D.C. is an integral part of the union’s "Justice for All" program. The SEIU’s 2008 "Accountability Project” is a warning call to politicians to follow through on the promises upon which they campaigned. According to John Youngdahl and Stephanie Mueller of SEIU’s political division, the Project targets legislators who have reneged on their campaign promises and is one of their primary weapons in pushing through a progressive agenda.
The SEIU is committing $10 million to the Accountability Project for the post-November 2008 cycle. The program’s main goals include:
* $10 million fund to take on elected officials who fail to live up to their promises.
* Calls for SEIU members to make at least 10 million phone calls to members of Congress after the election to hold them accountable.
* At least 50 percent of the union’s organizing budget and 50 percent of its non-organizing staff at the national and local levels will be devoted to the effort.
* A commitment to jump start a much broader, permanent grassroots movement of working people by actively involving at least one million SEIU members in the "justice for all" effort by 2012, and creating leadership roles for at least 200,000 (or about 10 percent of the union’s membership).
There is, however, a shadow hanging over the Convention, and that’s the internecine war being waged between the UHW West, which seeks to maintain local control over its decision-making processes, and the SEIU, which wants to bring the local into the fold and centralize its power. More on that tomorrow.
[disclaimer: airfare and hotel paid for by SEIU]



33 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
WATERTIGER!!!
Hope you’re having a blast.
See (read) ya later
FunnyD
I am very interested in how the international union deals with the UHW–healthcare union in CA. UHW has been very successful in recruiting workers and organizing, especially by putting more HC workers under the UHW umbrella and by empowering local organizing efforts.
There is talk that the DC-based international will try to break up this union.
oh yeah mamma, that is what this dfh is talkin’ about.
. . .one ringy-dingy
Hi Watertiger!
Ooooh Donna Edwards. One of the classiest, smartest ladies ever to grace this planet!
sorry quick drive by
Call it the curse of Dick Grasso.
Marilynn K. Yee/The New York Times
Eliot Spitzer in 2004, pointing out what he said was evidence that Richard A. Grasso had received excessive compensation.
Five years after Richard A. Grasso flamed out as the chairman of the
New York Stock Exchange, his legal adversary and stock exchange directors have fallen even more spectacularly.
And now Mr. Grasso may be able to keep the staggering $185 million award that once made him a symbol of Wall Street greed — a package awarded to him by the A-list board members at the exchange who eventually fired him.
Two men who played central roles in the legal tumult, Eliot Spitzer and James E. Cayne, saw their careers and reputations implode within days of each other in March.
me not very bright, but quick with the errant fingers, wrong Edwards, thinking Eliz. – not that there’s anything wrong with that. *banging head on keyboard*
I assume it’s already been discussed that the AP is reporting that HRC is going to acknowledge Obama as The Candidate tonight?
I have to say, I have not heard any talk that anyone is trying to break up UHW in CA. Do you have any links to support that or is that just some scuttlebutt you picked up from someone somewhere? Because, honestly, that is one I have not heard from anyone connected on any side of the dispute…new one on me…and I wouldn’t put any stock in it as anything more than a passing rumor without knowing where it came from, how frequently, and on what grounds. So if you have some links or back-up information on that, I’d love to see them.
Hey, Adie,
Donna Edwards is a class act, too.
BC
First I’d heard. Here’s a linky to the AP story.
Sounds like not everybody is buying the story yet…
Haven’t checked CNN, but MSNBC still at least somewhat skeptical.
If ARG is right (Clain +26 in the SD primary) I doubt HRC will drop out. Caveats:
1. ARG has had problems in this whole campaign season; and,
2. The poll result is a pretty clear outlier in the SD polls, where most show Obama at plus a few.
My expectation is that SD will be close, and Hillary shuts it down tonight. She’s accomplished as much as she’s going to. But if SD goes heavily to her, well, she’s a Clinton and she’ll re-evaluate and stay put.
BC
CNN has picked up on AP’s report.
The advisers said Clinton has made a strategic decision to not formally end her campaign, giving her leverage to negotiate with Obama on various matters including a possible vice presidential nomination for her.
I’m in the minority here, I know. But I like HRC as a Veep. For
better orworse, the traditional do-nothing role of the V.P. has changed. I can envision HRC being a heck of an effective Congressional liaison/ramrod for a whole bunch of much-needed legislation. Huge questions still remaining, of course, as to whether she’s amenable to accepting the #2 slot, and/or whether she’d be a team player or a disruptive force.If she wants to do so, she could be a HUGE asset both in the election and in moving legislation during the first term.
Now MSNBC has it too. But this may be “echo-chamber” reporting…
Well, shit. Team Clinton now says AP report is incorrect.
AAAAGGHHHHHHH!!
It’s time, right now – today, for super-delegates to step in and put this thing to bed. Even Harold Ickes said that if Obama hits 2,118 delegates, she’ll concede.
I followed the link and read the first three paragraphs and then glazed over because there’s nothing new there that I haven’t been hearing all night last night and all morning on CNN, MSNBC and NBC. I lightly scanned the remainder of the article, and basically, it’s all the same stuff…the campaign is over and the workers are being sent home until or unless otherwise notified. Hill has asked all staff to turn in expense reports by Fri. Obama asked Hillary for a “summit” between the two at a place and time of her choosing to discuss what she wants in the wake of the campaign. Bill says this may be the last day he’s involved with a campaign like this. It sounds like she’s ready to face reality, but they also appear schizophrenic. This morning Terry McAuliffe sounded like when Obama hits the numbers Hillary will do what’s right but then follows that up with Hillary is the best candidate to be the next President. Personally, I don’t think that stuff is helpful; I don’t think I would use them to campaign for me after their small-minded and insulting language. How will anyone be able to believe them when they campaign for Obama after statements like that the day before the change.
I sure would like someone to refresh my memory about what the unions problems with Obama are, though. I thought Chris Dodd was the big union pull, and also John Edwards. Both support Obama. So…
Hillary statement just said that the AP story is 100% incorrect; she will not concede the election tonight.
I agree with you that she could be very effective as VP. But there are so many “buts” attached… If she and Obama can work in harness together without kicking and biting it might be the best solution.
It is. Hillary just made a written statement to the effect that the story is wrong!
Bill Clinton presents too much baggage for Hillary to be VP. The distractions would be massive.
Bill Clinton presents too much baggage for Hillary to be VP. The distractions would be massive.
How would he bring more baggage with HRC as the Veep than he would with HRC as the President?
It’s getting utterly ridiculous and making her look worse than ever IMO.
I agree. I don’t see that she has any choice other than to jump in and enthusiastically campaign for Obama. If she just sits back and lets all of the resisting resentments simmer, and Obama were to then lose the general, she’d become one of the most hated politicians in history, and her political career would be over.
You can almost feel some sympathy for her at this point – dreams die hard and she’s given this one every thing she could. Many mistakes were made and they cost her dearly and Obama was like the tide coming in. IMO
that should have read “existing resentments”.
Kay Bailey Hutchinson stepping in, just in the nick of time on MSNBC, to remind Americans that it’s not time to stop being afraid yet.
Thank you Senator. Buh-bye now.
So Clinton is going to give a non-concession concession where she will congratulate Obama in a non-congratulatory way and promise to support the Democratic nominee as unsupportively as possible? Sounds like your standard Clinton modus operandi to me.
Edited for clarity. Clinton not only made mistakes. She persisted in them. I think her complete failure to understand political activism on the web, to work with the netroots, and instead to surround herself with the most traditional, Establishment deadwood of the Democratic Party made her defeat both possible and desirable.
BTW are all the strange things going on on this site: weird formating, error messages, database errors, etc. the result of current software breaking down or new software bugs?
Taps mike. “Is this thing on?” Looks at empty hall. Heads for the door.
It’s as if my squirrely cats are in the there tangling things up.
Hillary is holed up at her home today. Would a still-serious candidate be sitting at home on the day that there are two primaries going on?
Thom Hartmann says that HRC’s campaign has told the workers that they have one more ticket on the campaign, and that they have to the end of the month to submit their final expense vouchers.
It’s over, folks. HRC might not formally withdraw tonight, but she’s suspending her campaign for-sure.
BC
This is in fact the case. Resolution #206a, which is slated to be voted on today at the convention, would approve the concept and establish a process to transfer the homecare and nursing-home workers out of UHW and into another local exclusively for long-term care workers. This would move 65,000 members out of their union.
The voting procedure being proposed is ”pooled voting”, where the 65,000 votes of UHW members would be grouped with the more than 150,000 votes of another local. This makes it possible to affect this transfer even if all UHW members vote against it.
From an article by Professor Dan Clawson of UM-Amherst: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/clawson200508.html If two locals are merged, the rules are if anything more undemocratic. Suppose a 10,000 member local has been a thorn in the national leadership’s side. If the national leadership proposes merging that 10,000 member local into a 50,000 member local, the vote on whether to do so pools the results from all 60,000 members. If every member of the 10,000 person local votes against the merger, it could still go through with a large majority, and the ”small” local would have been merged out of existence. Similar rules make it possible to move one unit of a local into another local — so a rebellious local could have a large fraction of its membership moved elsewhere. The national SEIU leadership has put in place a process that might lead to this result for the rebellious UHW local; one of UHW’s proposed convention resolutions is that mergers not take place unless approved by a majority of both the unit being moved and the unit receiving the transfer.
UHW’s position is that, rather than divide healthcare workers between hospital-based care and long-term care, all healthcare workers should be united in the same local union, as is the case for nearly every other SEIU Healthcare local.
(I am a UHW staff member.)