<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconciliation: Why We Need It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:33:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475402</link>
		<dc:creator>mui1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Reconciliation goes both ways. It’s really bizarre to see the blame put on one candidate and her supporters. It’s not even rational thinking. A family fights, some side with mom, some side with dad; who’s responsible? Really a therapist would tell you everyone is. It won’t further reconcilation to lay blame. It just increases feuding. I have seen Obama supporters who prefer righteous gloating to reconciliation. That is a problem. I have seen Clinton supporters venting like Harriet Christian. If we’re all democrats, we have issues in common. Anyone who’s worked on a campaign knows that . . . oh, ex: An antiabortion conservative democrat will vote for a prochoice dem candidat, because repblikans suck on education.  Again, its about finding common ground, and enough with the victorious jubilees and the blame.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reconciliation goes both ways. It’s really bizarre to see the blame put on one candidate and her supporters. It’s not even rational thinking. A family fights, some side with mom, some side with dad; who’s responsible? Really a therapist would tell you everyone is. It won’t further reconcilation to lay blame. It just increases feuding. I have seen Obama supporters who prefer righteous gloating to reconciliation. That is a problem. I have seen Clinton supporters venting like Harriet Christian. If we’re all democrats, we have issues in common. Anyone who’s worked on a campaign knows that . . . oh, ex: An antiabortion conservative democrat will vote for a prochoice dem candidat, because repblikans suck on education.  Again, its about finding common ground, and enough with the victorious jubilees and the blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libbyliberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475163</link>
		<dc:creator>libbyliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That’s interesting.  I think one of my backburner issues with HRC is not kicking Bill to the curb for his betrayals.  Yay, yay…. nobody died when he did that.  But personal character is a priority with me. I look at McCain and that factors in a lot, too.  Character.  His hairtrigger rage and disrespect.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How a person treats a waiter, shares an umbrella in the rain, handles tangled Christmas tree lights, honors his marriage vows, doesn’t use the “c” word on his wife.  Y’know.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s interesting.  I think one of my backburner issues with HRC is not kicking Bill to the curb for his betrayals.  Yay, yay…. nobody died when he did that.  But personal character is a priority with me. I look at McCain and that factors in a lot, too.  Character.  His hairtrigger rage and disrespect.  </p>
<p>How a person treats a waiter, shares an umbrella in the rain, handles tangled Christmas tree lights, honors his marriage vows, doesn’t use the “c” word on his wife.  Y’know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourlegsgood</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475155</link>
		<dc:creator>fourlegsgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475155</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a really thoughtful post, and yet you leave out something important. That Clinton herself has worked overtime to whip up this anger among her supporters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest responsibility for healing this rift lies with Clinton.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really thoughtful post, and yet you leave out something important. That Clinton herself has worked overtime to whip up this anger among her supporters.</p>
<p>The biggest responsibility for healing this rift lies with Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475150</link>
		<dc:creator>Margot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(((Petrocelli)))&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many blessings!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(((Petrocelli)))</strong><br />
Many blessings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftdcin72</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475085</link>
		<dc:creator>leftdcin72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475085</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Cintons are a waste of time and have no positive role to play in the Democratic Party. The Clintons ran a dysorganized, dystfunctional presidential campaign tied to their personal agenda.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time to move beyond and away from the Clintons, as much as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cintons are a waste of time and have no positive role to play in the Democratic Party. The Clintons ran a dysorganized, dystfunctional presidential campaign tied to their personal agenda.</p>
<p>Time to move beyond and away from the Clintons, as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475069</link>
		<dc:creator>mui1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475069</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now I am really leaving.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I am really leaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475067</link>
		<dc:creator>mui1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475067</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah associating Clinton with the term “bad woman” is a real turn-off, and almost why I couldn’t read the entire post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah associating Clinton with the term “bad woman” is a real turn-off, and almost why I couldn’t read the entire post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475066</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you beat me to it!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you beat me to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475065</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Even when I suggest that electing a &lt;b&gt;bad&lt;/b&gt; woman president will do more to set women back than not offering her as our nominee, my wife is unpersuaded.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow - that’d certainly get any reconciliation off to a great start. What about a bad (your term) black male president [in terms of setback]?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find your analysis simplistic. I don’t find the historical aspect of either a female or a black as president being sufficient reason to put &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; black or female in that office and with the current candidates I find no other reason to vote for them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am neither sexist nor racist but I am thoroughly disgusted with the party and the process and am uncertain that reconciliation is what is needed. Renovation or wholesale reconstruction seems more beneficial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I keep hoping that the convention delegates will come to their senses and start over.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know that’s like hoping Reid and Pelosi will get the flock in line to actually accomplish something positive -oh wait, they are going to throw around their weight with the super-delegates to put the final nail in Hillary’s coffin. Nice priorities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes conflagration can lead to new growth, stronger roots. In absence of sense, I’d settle for &lt;i&gt;flames&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blue America is our best hope against a “bad” president of either party.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Even when I suggest that electing a <b>bad</b> woman president will do more to set women back than not offering her as our nominee, my wife is unpersuaded.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow &#8211; that’d certainly get any reconciliation off to a great start. What about a bad (your term) black male president [in terms of setback]?</p>
<p>I find your analysis simplistic. I don’t find the historical aspect of either a female or a black as president being sufficient reason to put <i>any</i> black or female in that office and with the current candidates I find no other reason to vote for them.</p>
<p>I am neither sexist nor racist but I am thoroughly disgusted with the party and the process and am uncertain that reconciliation is what is needed. Renovation or wholesale reconstruction seems more beneficial.</p>
<p>I keep hoping that the convention delegates will come to their senses and start over.</p>
<p>I know that’s like hoping Reid and Pelosi will get the flock in line to actually accomplish something positive -oh wait, they are going to throw around their weight with the super-delegates to put the final nail in Hillary’s coffin. Nice priorities.</p>
<p>Sometimes conflagration can lead to new growth, stronger roots. In absence of sense, I’d settle for <i>flames</i>.</p>
<p>Blue America is our best hope against a “bad” president of either party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martha</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475062</link>
		<dc:creator>martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/06/02/reconciliation/#comment-1475062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. This was my issue from the beginning. I was an “anyone but Clinton” voter for just that reason. I refused to support an extension of the Bush Clinton Clinton Bush Bush line. Cold and calculating maybe. But, I studied evolutionary biology in college, so that’s probably where I got it. The Democratic party needed new blood. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a great country with many, many highly motivated, gifted, qualified people who could lead us. We needed to find them and give them a chance. Now we have. And it’s not just Obama, it’s the people he’s motivated to join the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. This was my issue from the beginning. I was an “anyone but Clinton” voter for just that reason. I refused to support an extension of the Bush Clinton Clinton Bush Bush line. Cold and calculating maybe. But, I studied evolutionary biology in college, so that’s probably where I got it. The Democratic party needed new blood. </p>
<p>This is a great country with many, many highly motivated, gifted, qualified people who could lead us. We needed to find them and give them a chance. Now we have. And it’s not just Obama, it’s the people he’s motivated to join the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.229 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-16 21:37:32 -->

