Brave New Films and The Nation have teamed up to produce a series of documentaries on activists who have made a difference — and are still making a difference — in their communities. This Brave Nation series is an enormous tonic to all the anger and bitterness swirling about — because it puts the power to change back in the hands of all of us. We have to choose to channel our anger into something better…and then do the work necessary to make it happen.
Linked at left is the trailer for the entire series, and gives you a feel for the conversations between activists that will follow: Carl Pope and Van Jones, Majora Carter and Pete Seeger, Bonnie Raitt and Delores Huerta, Anthony Romero and Ava Lowery, and Tom Hayden and Naomi Klein.
It’s an amazing idea — and one that reminds us all of how much in common we have, and how much common good can be achieved when we work together to achieve something better for us all.
A kind of "living history" project composed of short videotaped conversations, This Brave Nation brings together the most intelligent, passionate and creative voices of one generation with the activists, journalists and artists of the next to dialogue on loves, lives, politics and history. Each discussion will be produced as both a five-minute video and a thirty-minute mini-documentary, which will be collected in a DVD box set. Starting today, June 1, a new video will be released each Sunday for four weeks leading up to a live event in Los Angeles on July 13.
The first discussion between Carl Pope and Van Jones is available at The Nation to watch in full. And a teaser trailer on the conversation with Pete Seeger and Majora Carter is available on YouTube. All of them are worth a watch, and I am truly looking forward to the discussions that will follow.
There is a lot of frustration and seething going around these days, because too many have been looking at our primary as a zero-sum war — but it is not, and should not be, since a single election will not be nearly enough to solve every problem we face.
That isn’t to say the frustration is not real or valid on anyone’s part. As Digby so eloquently puts it:
To many African Americans, a constant clamor for Jackson (or Obama if it had gone that way) to drop out of the race would have been seen as a call to go to the back of the bus. Likewise, for many of Clinton’s supporters, it’s been seen as a call to sit down and shut up (or "stifle" as Archie Bunker used to say to Edith.) I’m not saying it’s entirely rational, but then these things rarely are. The extreme closeness of this race makes it even more frustrating and emotional for a lot of people.
There is opportunity in all this mess. Obama’s main rationale for running is that he’s uniquely capable of bringing the disparate strands of our frayed politics together to get things done for the common good and change politics as we know it. If this is handled well, and the party comes together, he can take credit going into the fall for healing a painful rift in the Democratic party thus making the case that he has the ability to do the same thing for the country.
Activists can all help him do that by getting past this tedious pie fighting stage as quickly as possible. Obama supporters should acknowledge the fact that Clinton got an enormous number of votes and represents a vital constituency in the Democratic party that must be respected if we are going to win. And Clinton supporters need to acknowledge the fact that while their candidate came extremely close, at the end of the race, she came up short. Somebody has to win it and by the measures the party has set forth, Obama is the one who did. This is a Democratic year and I believe we will win this thing. But it’s going to take leadership from both the candidates — and us.
It is going to take leadership — from each and every one of us — to pull off a win in November. Without it, you can kiss the Supreme Court and the desperately needed reforms on the rule of law, on labor issues, on poverty, on women’s rights, on constitutional concerns…any progressive priority goodbye if a McCain Administration walks through the doors of the White House.
We cannot wait to come together — the nation’s soul is at stake in this election cycle, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to allow my country to be defined for four more years by John McCain’s crony posse. I’ve had more than enough of craptastic corruption and lack of care for the least among us to last a lifetime.
Given how narrow the margins are between the Obama and Clinton camps, can we honestly say that potentially throwing out close to half the Democratic party’s votes to salve individual needs for revenge or punishment or saying "suck it up and deal" is a winning strategy for November? Is it the human thing to do — something that felt right when the GOP spat it at you after the 2000 race was decided by SCOTUS? Is that who we want to be as a party, who Obama supporters want to be as a whole? Clinton folks? I don’t think so, not based on most conversations I’ve had with staunch supporters on either side.
I certainly hope folks aren’t willing to cut off their votes to spite their nation, anyway, and that supporters of one candidate aren’t quick to be dismissive to those on the other side of the fray.
It’s time we all stood up and became the leaders we wish to see. That means putting the nation and it’s desperately needed policy changes ahead of our own egos and grudges and snippy, poo-flinging urges. That means finding compassion somewhere inside the ire, and forgiveness inside the scars from a very closely fought race — because we must, or we will lose. All of us will lose.
It’s time we all lead, including the politicians themselves, because the nation desperately needs us to do so. What say you?
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Christy!!!!
Hello, Christy!! Lovely days, lately – great for gardening.
I think a lot of the dissention within the ranks has been incited by Operation Chaos types – playing on the (what was it called?) diminishment of the group? where a group loses layers of civilized behavior and becomes more rabid.
Argghhh!
I’m having issues.
Hard Refresh Mr. Checkov!
I was an Edwards voter who didn’t get to vote for him, he dropped out too soon. I will vote for whichever Dem gets the nod. We can’t afford four to eight more years of death and destruction.
I will vote for the Presidential nominee of the Democratic party in November 2008.
And say a lot of prayers for everything and everybody.
yeah Christy! As ever the voice of reason, armed with insight and a pile o’ links!
Sorry for the glitches, gang — we’re having a little hiccup. But we’re working on it…
Christy did you see this…?
Oh, and do watch the great YouTube links here — This Brave Nation series is really great. Just what we all need right now…
Thank you for reminding us once again of this, Christy. Lot of people are sitting back waiting for “them” to take care of things. Well there isn’t any “them” there’s just us.
Wow CTuttle! jus cogens!
OT, but not completely. From WaPo fact checker:
The real trick here is to harness the energy of the primary and the candidates involved and really kick ass both in Nov and following the election. There’s a lot of cleanup to do and it’ll need everyone …
Great post Christy!
Obama’s behavior has made ‘unity’ impossible.
that is what Obama’s supporters don’t get. Obama — the supposed great healer — has run the most divisive campaign in my memory. He hasn’t merely treated Clinton with contempt, he has treated her supporters with contempt.
Any chance of unity went down the toilet on saturday, when the rules of the DNC were complete ignored, and delegates won by Clinton were stolen from her and given to Obama.
The lawyer in Christy will understand that “fair reflection” as found in the Charter and the rules means a fair reflection of the votes cast — here is the relevant passage
in other words, ‘fair reflection’ is not about who people wish they had voted for if everyones name was on the ballot — its about counting the votes as they were cast.
Barack Obama decided that latino and jewish voters and women voters in florida should be worth only HALF a vote — that they should be disenfranchised — while ignoring completely the will of Michigan voters but giving the michigan delegation full strength votes. THe utter contempt shown for the rules — and for the votes of Clinton supporters — is something that we’re not getting over.
The best thing that Obama could do for party unity right now is negotiate his own concession
Thanks Christy.
My mother would chastise me with that old adage, “Don’t bite off your nose to spite your face!” I have thought of that warning lately and seeing your use of it here made me smile and appreciate it.
I was listening to a program on AirAmerica in which Elizabeth Lesser being interviewed by Richard Green about Eckhardt Tolle’s new book, A New Earth, which addresses the toxicity of EGO and free floating anger and fear and its damage to the spirit, admitted that she does not listen to political radio because the negativity wetblankets her spirit.
So the paradox is that we need to be aware, and get a sense of outrage at injustice, but not sit around in a circle like wailing babies clanking our bottles against the slats on our playpens playing “ain’t it awful” looking for a giving parent to lift us up. To not be deluded that activism is simply preaching and snarking with the choir (though I think some of that does help morale and education… nothing to excess including moderation as St. Francis asserted).
I do think that elements of the people when disappointed after rallying behind a candidate with their passion… I wish I could find that passion again after Edwards… but I am hoping he will be a part and one of the leaders of the new administration… anyway, those groups deserve their 5 stages of grief to get to acceptance and hopefully won’t get lost in anger, despair, whatever. I guess HRC et al. are finishing up the “bargaining” and denial stages.
FDL was inaccessible and I missed it. Glad it is back.
Ok. I know this is a day late, but maybe this is the place for it anyway:
I don’t think the supporters in either camp are looking for leaders. They think they’ve found them. But I’m in a terrible place about the candidates. I long ago decided that I didn’t want Hillary as president. That was a huge disappointment. OTOH, I have found myself more often defending her because of the gleeful denigrations often cast upon her by the opponent’s supporters. I see them complain of disparaging attacks on Obama by “Clintonistas” but I’m not seeing it. Is questioning Obama an attack? That’s what I’ve been accused of because I say, “I’m worried” or “I don’t understand” or “so and so says this, what does Obama say about it?” The ONLY answers I get are “I have faith he will address this” Or something similar. I never get a substantive answer. It’s like there’s no there there. I WANT to support Obama. I just need more information that doesn’t make me cringe.
The information I do have shows him to be a dour, controlling and ambitious man with no regard for anyone else. I want to be disabused of this picture I’m getting but “faith” in him is not good enough for me.
I wrote a note about his successful attack on 527s on facebook. That’s scary when you think about the ramifications. His sole reason given is because he wants message unity. In other words, don’t allow a voice with a different message. I don’t agree with everything he proposes. I’m supposed to shut up? Then there’s the attempt to takeover the DNC.
What does this mean? I need help. I need just one Obama supporter to give me a sales pitch that I can buy. Help please.
Audrey,
I fell in love with Edwards and his crusade.
I pray Obama will be a good leader. I am an intuitive person and I appreciate his calm presence, and how he does seem to stop and give himself the time to sort through his thoughts before speaking and seems to be trying to be gracious and embracing. I hope he does not in his eagerness to bring harmony, sacrifice his own values. I think there are such seductions on the political trail. Ambition is dangerous.
None of us have guarantees about these leaders. I haven’t heard profound negatives about Obama. But I don’t hear the working class laundry list of wants that Edwards and then HRC could so easily pop off.
I was disappointed with Hillary and some of her campaign tactics, especially in SC against JRE, my man.
And McCain and his stuff terrifies me. His personal style of hair trigger anger, his seemingly addict roller coaster mood swings which make for dynamic sound bytes that titillate the press. And his imperialism astonishes and terrifies me. War-mongering still at this point. But his personal macho vibe is quite compelling for voters looking for an authoritarian, parent voice leader. Not the voice of BO.
Will BO pool the brain and heart trust of the Dem rank and file and leadership. I hope so. I thought he could get JRE’s endorsement in a cake walk but wondered if there was that competitive ego stuff going on from him to JRE. It took so long, but ultimately came.
So we look to each other, we listen to Oprah, Teddy Kennedy, Edwards, Richardson, Caroline Kennedy … in the case of Obama… and hope statesmanship will trump gamesmanship. I think once Edwards left the Dem contest, it lapsed into gamesmanship. I saw that mostly at HRC’s side and the MSM, but maybe BO was more covert or I was not as vigilant nursing my Edwards wounds to monitor closely. I hope the youth of America and their intuition is right on with BO. I am proud of a country that is ready to have a blackman or a woman as our presidential candidate. The same country crazymakingly that saddled us with Bush for 8 years. I pray the pendulum is away from that inclination at long last.
I don’t know if this helps you at all. Just be careful of demonizing the other sides. I am ashamed I did not read Obama’s book yet. It will give me insight into who he is… a bit at least.
Good luck.
Thank you for the thoughtful comment. I absolutely hate the bashing that is going on…both ways. Unfortunately, way too much of it is media driven. They spin it and supporters buy it when most should know better. The MSM is not to be trusted. I notice a surprising lack of linkage where there used to be plenty. The fact that there is mostly media silence on Obama’s (or his team’s) actions is troubling too. There is a problem between rhetoric and activity that I find disturbing. Would love to have someone explain why it’s a good thing for Obama to shut down 527s that help downticket races and educate the public about issues. Or why it’s Ok for Obama to want to control the Party. What does he mean by Unity? He proudly claimed Lieberman as his mentor. Lieberman called for Unity too. Is that what he means?
He can spout lots of pretty words. But pretty is as pretty does. I want some facts that I can argue “for” Obama with. I’m not really finding them. It hurt me when he attacked Hillary for including mandates in her health plan because I would not have access to health care without them under his plan and I really need it. Is he clueless about such things or does he really intend for me to go without?
Disclaimer: I have no access to things like Oprah or other such tv or videos online, etc. I also don’t have access to books. No library. No funds to purchase, so I’m stuck with what I can find on the Internet. If people would provide links to stuff, it would really help.
Disclaimer II: The above criticism is not my final word. It just reflects my concerns about the information I’ve found. I am very open to new information that refutes it.