Comments on: The Jena 6: Will Their Biased Judge Be Recused? http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:51:22 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: timbo http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1472629 timbo Sun, 01 Jun 2008 06:02:15 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1472629 <p>Thanks! Please keep us all informed!</p> Thanks! Please keep us all informed!

]]> By: skippy http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471885 skippy Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:25:09 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471885 <p>great job as always, dave.</p> great job as always, dave.

]]> By: gannonguckert http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471768 gannonguckert Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:44:56 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471768 <p>I’m curious as to the dateline, “Houston.” We’re not in federal court, are we? Or, are we?</p> <p>I’m sure there are a billion prior law review journal contemplations on the subject, of which I have little knowledge, so might there someone among us who could address/discuss the issue of admissible evidence versus local judges’ “familiarity” with inadmissable evidence?</p> <p>thx, jimmyjeff</p> I’m curious as to the dateline, “Houston.” We’re not in federal court, are we? Or, are we?

I’m sure there are a billion prior law review journal contemplations on the subject, of which I have little knowledge, so might there someone among us who could address/discuss the issue of admissible evidence versus local judges’ “familiarity” with inadmissable evidence?

thx, jimmyjeff

]]> By: BooRadley http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471291 BooRadley Sat, 31 May 2008 23:37:02 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471291 <p>David, I really appreciate post, thanks.</p> David, I really appreciate post, thanks.

]]> By: dakine01 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471102 dakine01 Sat, 31 May 2008 20:53:20 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471102 <p>additional point: Especially if the Jena 6 have been sitting in jail for the entire time with no trial and especially no conviction.</p> additional point: Especially if the Jena 6 have been sitting in jail for the entire time with no trial and especially no conviction.

]]> By: dakine01 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471101 dakine01 Sat, 31 May 2008 20:50:46 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471101 <p>Dave,<br /> Any possibilities of a new judge actually dismissing the charges due to the lack of speedy trial?</p> <p>IANAL, obviously, but seems that would be a motion worth filing just on general principles.</p> Dave,
Any possibilities of a new judge actually dismissing the charges due to the lack of speedy trial?

IANAL, obviously, but seems that would be a motion worth filing just on general principles.

]]> By: Smgumby http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471096 Smgumby Sat, 31 May 2008 20:39:25 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/31/the-jena-6-will-their-biased-judge-be-recused/#comment-1471096 <p>Jus Cogens!</p> Jus Cogens!

]]>