AFL-CIO blog writer James Parks talked with Colombian trade unionists who traveled here last week to urge Congress not to pass the U.S.-Colombian Free Trade Agreement. As James relates below, Colombian trade unionists do not want Congress to reward that nation with a trade deal in a climate of fear and death that they and their union compatriots face daily. Online with us today are two AFL-CIO specialists in trade, Brett Gibson and Jeff Vogt, who can answer questions and fill in the details.
On April 23, 2008, Jorge Gamboa was in Yarima accompanying a group of African Palm workers who were on strike to demand respect for their basic labor rights and to seek negotiations with their employer. Two individuals targeted Mr. Gamboa, one of them holding a revolver. Gamboa was fortunately able to disarm the individual before any shots were fired. The striking workers then apprehended the two assailants and turned them over to the police.
Instead of arresting the two men, the police put them in a truck and drove them to the highway where they were released. At no point did the police question or arrest the perpetrators. In fact, they assisted them in their escape.
That’s what the life of a union leader is like in today’s Colombia. You could be killed at any moment and chances are not much will be done about it. Murders of union leaders often go unpunished because the murderers most likely are members of paramilitary groups with close ties to the government, Gamboa says.
Gamboa, the president of the National Petroleum Workers Union, is one of seven Colombian union leaders who visited the United States last week to lobby against the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA). He says 85 members of his union have been murdered and 400 have gone underground. The murders have killed a father or mother of some 650 children in his union alone. He says last week, workers uncovered a plot to kill his union’s general secretary and a union vice president was threatened. A Colombian labor scholar says trade unionists in Colombia face genocide.
Gamboa traveled to Washington, D.C., to make sure Congress “realizes what’s really going on” in Colombia. In meetings on Capitol Hill, he and his colleagues told lawmakers that despite claims by the Bush administration and Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe that progress has been made in stemming the violence against union members, the reality is that violence has increased against labor leaders in Colombia.
More than 2,500 trade union members have been killed in Colombia since 1986, including 39 murdered in 2007 and another 24 killed so far in 2008—a rate of more than one a week. Yet the Colombian government has obtained convictions in few cases and has done little to stop the bloodshed or guarantee worker and human rights in the country.
Another 6,500 union members have been threatened, attacked, kidnapped, tortured or harassed in the same period. Of the seven visiting unionists, at least four have received threats recently. But their resolve is strong. Speaking at a reception Wednesday in their honor at the AFL-CIO headquarters, Luís Alfonso Velásquez Rico, from the Unitary Workers Center (CUT) , said:
Don’t think of us as victims. The political map in South America is changing, he says, and the workers are on the right side of history—and together with trade unionists from the United States, they will prevail.
As horrendous as the violence is, the Uribe government is making the situation worse by promoting an anti-union culture throughout the country, says Ivan Toro Lopez, a member of the executive committee of the National Association of Bank Workers (ASEB).
Business and government have joined with Uribe to deny the right to strike, to organize, to bargain collectively. Multinational companies are taking advantage of that culture.
Lopez says Colombia’s trade unions are strongly opposed to the FTA because they already have experience with what passes for free trade through other agreements and the social and economic effects have been disastrous.
Alba Lucía Campaz, president of the Hospital Workers Union of the Hospital Universitario del Valle, says the deal would lower the standards of living for workers in both countries. She points to the privatization of nearly every major industry in Colombia, including schools, as an indication that workers’ rights are being ignored in the nation’s economy.
The seven leaders say they received a “positive” response from lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Lopez says some were “very convinced.” He says the workers tried to give opponents of the deal more facts to strengthen their arguments.
In February, a delegation of AFL-CIO union leaders went on a two-day, fact-finding trip to meet with leaders of major Colombian unions to hear firsthand the dangers and challenges faced by Colombian trade unionists. They also met with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, telling him the U.S. union movement cannot support the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement until real progress is made to protect the lives and rights of trade union members. United Steelworkers (USW) associate general counsel Dan Kovalik took part, and describes the meeting with Uribe.
Uribe [claimed] the three unionists killed near Saravena in 2004 were in fact guerrillas linked to the guerrilla group ELN. I disagreed with the president, pointing out that his own attorney general had concluded, after investigation, that this claim was not true, and that the 18th Brigade had actually planted weapons on the unionists after the fact to make it look like they were insurgents killed in a gun battle. In response, Uribe said he had gone to Saravena personally and that members of the community had assured him the three killed were in fact members of the ELN.
So, based on hearsay, without any proof, and in defiance of his own attorney general’s conclusions, the president clings to the contention that these individuals were “terrorists.”
Sadly, this was not a slip of the tongue by Uribe. Indeed, he has made such dangerous statements before. Consider what he told Colombia’s leading newspaper El Tiempo. In discussing two trade unionists killed last year, he said they were killed because one of the men was a “terrorist.” Again, there was never any proof for this assertion.
And, indeed, human rights groups, and the U.N. High Commission for Human Rights as well, have debunked any theory of union-guerrilla collaboration, and are unanimous in the conclusion that unionists in Colombia are being killed, not because they have any illegal affiliations, but precisely because they are unionists.
By a 224–195 vote in April, the House removed the 90-day deadline under Fast Track trade-promotion authority for an up-or-down vote on the U.S.-Colombia FTA. The vote will delay consideration of the deal indefinitely, probably until after Bush leaves office in January. In fact, Bush told reporters the deal is dead unless House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) schedules a vote.
But we can’t take anything for granted. We need to make sure lawmakers know the United States should not reward murder. Send a message to Congress now by clicking here.



72 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
So, Tula!
Welcome to Tula’s guests. Heaven forbid labor should organize in other countries, because then business might have to treat labor here better.
jus cogens!
Hey All,
Tula is out, but Jeff and myself (Brett) are happy to answer any questions.
Egregious, Colombia has the lowest rate of unionization in the Western Hemisphere at under 5 percent, which is down from 15 percent a few decades ago.
The campaign of fear, violence, and intimidation, coupled with weak labor laws unfortunately has been working.
As the unionists from Colombia often say to us, “They aren’t just murdering unionists, they’re killing the unions.”
Hi Brett, hi Jeff. So glad you could be with us today.
I was at a dinner with some members of congress the other day, and a Blue Dog (whose identity is protected by the fact that he just assumed I knew who he was, but I had no clue) said that the government had assigned prosecutors to the cases of all the union members who had been murdered, and wonderful progress was being made on them all.
I think I remember hearing that 98% resulted in no conviction. What exactly is happening with that?
C-SPAN showed the Congressional delegation’s recent visit to Colombia…they took them on a bunch of “shiny object” tours overlooking the city…pointing out new parks and schools and bragged that there is no violence anymore, etc., but at one point they did meet with the labor leaders and were told about the killings. It was hard to tell from the footage as to whether it impacted the representatives or not. They seemed pretty starry-eyed by the “everything is so safe here now” story…
Oh yeah, Jean Schmidt was on the trip…
It seems the only differences between Columbia and the US is in the US unions are being killed without actually killing the Union leaders these days.
Or at least, business and government are attempting to kill the unions.
Remember the plans for Iraq to be a Great Experiment in Capitalism after a quick, decisive defeat of Saddam? Why does this start to smell like a South American version of the same, minus the regime change?
Hey Jane. Glad to be here. Yes, it’s true they’ve set up a special prosecutorial unit, but they haven’t made all that much progress.
The Fiscalia General (the Office of the Attorney General), reports that it has secured convictions in only 78 cases related to violence against trade unionists. However, some of those cases are not for murder, but for lesser offenses. In others, the person was sentenced in absentia and thus is not even in custody. And in almost all cases, the intellectual author (the person who planned the killing) has not been caught or convicted. It is therefore inaccurate to say that these convictions signal an end to impunity.
LS, yes the delegations to Colombia are led by none other than Bush Administration Cabinet secretaries. We call it the Dog and Pony Show. I’m sure things look great in Colombia when the view you have is at the President’s Polo Club (a reporter who went on one of these trips told us this was an actual stop).
Could someone please explain to me how this huge puzzle in my mind fits together? I watched a show (maybe 60 minutes) about the prosecution of Chiquita Banana for paying “taxes” which amounted to protection money to keep their employees safe, to some groups our government claims are terrorists. Chiquita Corp says if they didn’t pay, their employees would be at great risk, and if they simply gave up their banana operation in Columbia, their employees would not have work. Beside this, apparently many other companies are paying the protection money, but they did not come forward when they realized they were breaking US law, so no other companies are getting prosecuted. On the other hand, as you’ve pointed out in this article, the government is not prepared to protect the workers and if anything, they are in league with the “terrorists.” I’m finding it very difficult to distinguish the good guys from the bad! Could you put some logic in this for me?
Any payments made to the AUC or the FARC (both are designated as foreign terrorist organizations by the United States) are illegal and subject to criminal penalties. If the price of doing business is aiding and abbetting illegal armed groups, then you need to find a new place to do business.
Jane,
To expand on the remarks about impunity, the Govt. of Colombia also designated 3 judges to preside over the union murder cases in 2007. However, the judiciary has already removed one highly qualified judge, Judge Sanchez. Of note, it was this judge who issued an important ruling that sentenced officers of the 18th Brigade of the Colombian Army for murdering three union leaders in the department of Arauca. The judge found that these officers had planted guns in their hands of the unionists to make it appear that the victims were members of the guerrilla organization, ELN. This decision put the judge directly at odds with President Uribe, who continues to accuse these and other unionists of being guerrillas.
So our contention is that Judge Sanchez may have been doing his job a bit too well, if you know what we mean.
Congressman George Miller, Chair of the Ed and Labor Committee has been following this issue closely.
This is such an important topic and should be at the heart of any trade negotiations that we make. We should not be supporting murderers or terrorists of any ilk. We’re so inconsistent on these issues. How can we expect to gain respect of other nations if our values are based on commercial interests first and human interests last? This is the same as our relationship with China. We let thugs get away with horrible things just because a few companies need their bottom lines protected. Insidious!
Shorter version of the argument for the Columbian Free Trade Agreement: If we don’t support our terrorists, then the other terrorists win.
Dakinikat,
Couldn’t agree more! At the AFL-CIO we believe the Bush Administration should not have even been negotiating the Colombia FTA in the first place.
They also negotiated one with the UAE, of which Dubai is a part of, and we all remember the Dubai Ports fiasco from a few years back (they’ve since shelved the FTA because of that).
We think that there needs to be a “readiness” criteria for what countries we do and do not negotiate FTAs with.
Solidarity strike?
That’s really interesting. I was just going to ask how the actions of President Uribe are at odds with the claims that he is working to reduce the number of trade unionist deaths.
Also, it’s my understanding that these murders are done in public execution style, with trade unionists being dragged off the bus for example and shot in public as a lesson to others. It seems to have been remarkably successful in driving union membership down.
Which of our elected leaders in the Senate and Congress are most responsive to your “readiness” criteria. Is this issues discussed in the foreign relations committees as well as the commerce?
Also, could you talk a bit about how the decimation of organized labor in Colombia makes a mockery of the whole idea of “free trade?”
Jane, some of the murders are as you describe–very public. Unionists at Drummond Mining Company (based in Alabama) which operates in Colombia were killed in such a public manner–dragged off a bus and shot.
In many of the cases, the victim is tortured before being murdered. That happened just this year when Leonidas Gomez, a bank workers’ union officer was tied to a chair in his apartment and stabbed multiple times. It’ horrific.
The Uribe administration acts much the same way as the Bush administration–they talk a good game but do very little in actuality. While unionist murders were down to 39 killed in 2007, this year alone 25 unionists have been murdered thus far–a sharp increase over the same time last year.
If the Uribe administration spent half the time focusing on its internal violence issues as it does in Washington DC lobbying the US Congress for an FTA, they might be making some progress (they spend over $100k per month on lobbyists, by the way). Unfortunately, the situation on the ground in Colombia is still terrible.
OT: House judiciary committee subpoenas Karl Rove over Alabama Governor
I swear when I heard Chimpy talking some time back about “rewarding” the “strongman” of Colombia, I knew it stunk like a fish, especially since it was spoken in the same 5 minutes as Hugo Chavez. But I didn’t know it was this bad, until I read another article and then this post. Will contact congress critters. I am sick of Nixonian/Kissinger policies.
Dakinikat, trade champions like Senator Brown (OH) and Congressman Mike Michaud (ME) are very much engaged on the readiness criteria concept and active in pushing it (along with a complete revamping of how we approach trade as a national policy).
Just heard this on Thom Hartman’s show but cannot find any reporting on it yet…
Umm Tula? I do not get an action page from the link that says contact congress members “here”. Is there supposed to be one? AFLCIO going to send out an action alert to those signed up as well? I think this is important.
We have the Rove story in the News Box, would encourage folks who want to talk about it to make comments over there out of respect to our guests.
A few words are in the NYT
Ooops sorry
It’s also interesting to note that while most newspaper editorial boards (which are resoundingly pro-free trade) continue to tell us all how the Colombia FTA is imperative, the articles that are published in their papers tell a completely different story (re: violence, impunity, government scandals, and government ties to paramilitaries).
The juxtaposition is interesting.
I’m really horrified as economist that we consider treating labor like expendable commodities as some kind of comparative advantage in countries with which we trade. I know that during the Reagan administration we experienced a wholesale dismantling of our unions through legal maneuvers, but to allow countries who we actively fund as well as trade with to kill and torture unionists is an entirely different plain of morality. I don’t think we should hide behind the banner of free trade when the so-called competitive advantage in a country’s market is based on exploitation of a resource.
Geebus. Does anyone notice how every leader that wants to murder a particular people en masse, in this case unionists, in the case of China, ethnic minorites, refer to the victims as “terrorists?”
I always make this point when we are talking about unions since the right wing have managed to demonize the labor union concept
an industry must always bargain for the goods they purchase, they don’t simply set the price, they don’t tell the steel mills “we’ll pay .75 cents a pound, the steel mill says “we charge 1.50 a pound and that’s what you’ll pay
of course there is a negotiation but it’s not the buyer that sets the price it’s the seller
all a union does is form a labor “industry” where they can bargain as a collective to get fair value for their product
but industry thinks they can persuade laborers to abandon this bargaining process if they demonize that process
they want to set the price they pay from the supplier instead of the other way around
once we present the union purpose in this framework most people agree that the union is a good thing
yes, the industry might bargain for a deal that makes it impossible to turn profit, in those scearios it’s in the best interest of both orgainizations to come up with a fair solution where the industry can thrive but so can the laborer
Mui1,
Try this link to take action:
http://www.unionvoice.org/camp…..trade_deal
I’d also like to know the answer to Ann in AZ @12. And more generally, could you give us a quick summary of the political situation in Colombia, i.e., who are the “good guys” and what kind of poliitical base they have. I no little about the country & am having a hard time finding a way to get my knowledge up to speed so I can follow the situation intelligently.
Second question. What U.S. corporations want the Colombia FTA to happen and to whom in the U.S. congress do they make their biggest contributions?
egregious, Maybe I am mentally challenged today. But how does the House Judiciary Comm. expect Rove to show up when they can’t even get Harriet Miers penalized for not showing up?
Make that “know,” not “no.” I’m multitasking & am not good at it.
Er ha Haha. Merci!
If this goes to all “my” congress critters in CT, I can expect yet another nauseating response from Senator Holy Joe.
mui1,
In Colombia the anti-union forces like to refer to unionists not just a terrorists but “guerillas.” In Colombia, being called a guerilla can be a death sentence, as it marks you as a FARC supporting leftist, which means the right wing paramilitaries will take notice of you (not in a good way).
Certain persons in the Government of Colombia like to make these types of unfounded accusations against unionists, knowing it could lead to threats of violence or actual violence.
That’s just sickening. And does the press also call them terrorists and guerillas?
BTW, you may call me mui
Discussion of Rove moves to Marcy’s new fdl post
I’d also like to know if this “reward” is somehow a way for Chimpy to get back at Venezuala.
eCAHNomics and Ann,
Here is a great link to articles/info on the bad US corporate actors in Colombia. It includes Chiquita, Coca Cola, Drummond Mining, and others.
http://www.iradvocates.org/news.html
I’m sure the thought crossed his mind.
Also, do I remember that he got Uribe to invade Ecuador, which is in league with Venezuela?
Thenaks. Many of the usual suspects, I see.
The “Polo Democrativo Alternativo” party in Colombia has been working against the FTA.
http://www.polodemocratico.net/ (you can have Google translate the page)
Senator Gustavo Petro has been the foremost critic of whom I am aware.
I think we should not just frame it as MURDER, but as TERRORISM. It is ironic that the government of Colombia is seeking to frame unionists as terrorists while ignoring anti-union terrorism.
Certainly Stinks like a fish via Christian Science Monitor:
And
Well here’s the link
Yes, Bush does try to use Hugo Chavez as the boogy man for passage of the Colombia FTA.
The argument goes something like, “If we don’t pass this FTA and help Uribe, then Venezuela will take over Colombia.” What an FTA has to do with regional security interests I’m not too sure. But they pull that card (surprise!) all the time. Not to mention the US provides Colombia with billions in foreign aid (I believe they are one of the top five recipients after Israel, Egypt, Iraq), so I think they know the US govt is their ally.
The Colombians we talk to always shake their heads when they hear the national security argumetn and tell us that Colombia is its own sovereign nation and they don’t even think about Chavez.
Yeah, but using words that are overused by Chimpy and his facist cohorts hear and abroad does not appeal. It is genocidal though to kill members of a certain group though.
Fine! Then why is the US doing any business with Columbia at all? I would just as soon see it be illegal to do business in any country that is not prepared to protect its own citizens. Columbia is and has long been a very corrupt country. Drug trafficking seems to have been a staple in the country and caused the deaths of many judges and government official, that is, the ones that did not work hand in hand with the traffickers.
And BTW, I thought that the idea of unions was that with unity comes strength. I can’t see the abuse of (and especially the killing of) union members (or their families) being tolerated by the teamsters union in IN. You mess with a teamster in IN and there will be hell to pay or some type of retribution. I remember an incident at Inland Steel wherein a huge truck with many tires, all flattened, was left in the crossroad of two major streets leaving the mill at rush hour due to some perceived slight. Nobody got hurt, but it sure snarled traffic and sent a major message! You just didn’t mess with the union! Sad to say, that’s happened more often than not in the history of unions, and I would say, if it’s not happening in a country as corrupt and violent as Columbia has historically been, and since the government purports to be helpless against it, maybe the unions need to take a firmer stand. Perhaps they need to be more intransigent and unwilling to take any guff!
I worry about Venezuala. Seems like Bush wants a replay of Chile.
Colombians dollarized around 2000, they use U.S. dollars in place of a native currency. That alone speaks volumes ..
Who are their lobbyists, BTW?
How has that worked out for them? As I recall, not so good for Argentina. How is Colombia’s economy doing (ex. cocaine that is)?
Let’s just say some businesses are less scrupulous than others (and that’s saying something!). Sure Chiquita had to pay out a hefty fine to the US for paying the paramilitaries in Colombia, but it was probably factored into their cost of doing business.
Unfortunately again, the unionists in Colombia are being targeted by highly sophisticated, well-funded, and well-armed groups. Most of our brothers and sisters in Colombia consistently advocate peaceful resolution and non-violence, even in the face of such danger.
It was a humbling and moving experience to have them in DC, knowing that they were literally putting their lives in danger for coming here and speaking their minds. They were appreciative for the visits with Members of Congress (they held big press conference with Senator Sherrod Brown and Congressman Mike Michaud and had numerous other meetings).
Their main concern was that they wanted their voices to be heard. They know they are up against the Bush Admin, the Uribe Administration, the business communities in both countries, and the millions of dollars in PR that all buys. I think they did feel that they got to have their say.
They’re current account stuff pretty much isn’t done in the Colombian peso … it’s mostly used for the traditional part of their economy.
Raw Story’s got it.
They’re not as fully dollarized as say Ecuador, but it’s supposed to be a form of inflation targeting for them. It’s not working out so well at the moment since the U.S. has started to let the dollar fall as a way of stimulating exports. It’s good for the sale of their products, but there are many things that the country must import. This makes getting finished goods really difficult for them from any where but the U.S. If you look at Belize, jamaica, some of the other more heavily dollarized economies, basically their dependence on the U.S. has really increased. It’s almost like setting your self up as a hostage.
Well, Mark Penn and his company was one until that exploded.
We do know the Govt of Colombia does/did employ the Glover Park Group (which has strong DLC ties). There are likely others.
In addition to the Colombian Govt’s direct expenditures they have the entire US business community–the Chamber of Commerce, Caterpillar, National Association of Manufacturers, pretty much the entire computer/software industries, etc, etc.
Whether or not they have a direct stake in the Colombia FTA the business groups tend to gather in solidarity when any FTA is on the line.
Thanks. My expertise, as you know, is domestic U.S. economy, so I don’t automatically know about how many of these things work out for other countries. Liked your last sentence.
There is such a move towards monopolism in commerce and trade these days it is really sad. I don’t think that we’ll be able to reverse the downward trends in income equality and in labor’s share of productivity gains until we get a pro-labor movement started in this country again. Until that happens, I think it’s much harder to get the taxpayers and consumers here to wake up and see that what’s going on in Colombia is an extension of what is happening to workers here. Labor-hostile governments are essentially democracy-hostile, imho.
Unfortunately again, the unionists in Colombia are being targeted by highly sophisticated, well-funded, and well-armed groups. Most of our brothers and sisters in Colombia consistently advocate peaceful resolution and non-violence, even in the face of such danger.
It was a humbling and moving experience to have them in DC, knowing that they were literally putting their lives in danger for coming here and speaking their minds. They were appreciative for the visits with Members of Congress (they held big press conference with Senator Sherrod Brown and Congressman Mike Michaud and had numerous other meetings).
It’s heartbreaking to have people standing up for something decent getting slaughtered. Their voices should be heard.
Thanks Mui.
They are brave people and you can’t help but admire the line by Luís Alfonso Velásquez Rico, from the Unitary Workers Center (CUT) , that is quoted above:
“Don’t think of us as victims.”
BrettG,
What do you think is the biggest incentive that Bush has for pushing this deal? Is it the reward from companies doing business with Colombia, or dioes it havemore to do with geopolitical/economic dominance, with Venezuala as a target.
“don’t think that we’ll be able to reverse the downward trends in income equality and in labor’s share of productivity gains until we get a pro-labor movement started in this country again. Until that happens, I think it’s much harder to get the taxpayers and consumers here to wake up and see that what’s going on in Colombia is an extension of what is happening to workers here. Labor-hostile governments are essentially democracy-hostile, imho.”
You are very right. It’s difficult enough in the US and we don’t face the violence. Hopefully the November elections will tilt things more in the favor of workers’ rights!
Brave people never like to be thought of as victims, even when they are.
A new GritTV is upstairs
In all honesty, I think it’s stubborness–Bush likes Uribe and promised he would get this done before he left office. The Democrats taking the Congressional majorities put a damper on that, but damned if he isn’t going to still try.
Another reason is the Bush Admin made it a habit to pass FTAs in the order in which they were finished being negotiated, and Colombia is the next on the docket
In economic terms, the FTA isn’t really all that significant. The US-Korea FTA would have significantly greater impacts on US workers and industry.
I think there’s gotta be a Chavez-hating, frothing at the mouth love of free-trade a la Chicago school in that stubborness. But it’s still sick if stubborness, the “iron will” of the frat-boy-in-chief, is rewarding the leader of a country who has made the climate murderous for unions.