Photo by Frank Niemeir, AJC
Well, if anyone had any illusions about Barack Obama's presidential candidacy helping the nation get over its racial divide -- especially if they thought it might finally bury the old racism that has stained the nation's history -- the past few weeks should finally lay that to rest.
As Glennzilla points out, it's now evidently become acceptable for mainstream news organizations like The Washington Post to distribute "white supremacist cant about Obama's 'blood equity' and 'heritage' " (in the form of a truly execrable Kathleen Parker column) for popular consumption to the rest of the nation's papers. We've got assassination jokes and a panoply of dog whistles and race-baiting campaign ads.
It's all indicative of a shifting national mood that seems to find open expressions of racism increasingly acceptable and even normative -- thanks, no doubt, to a decade and half's worth of right-wing yammerers essentially defending racism as being merely "politically incorrect." It's manifested itself in Democratic voting patterns as well, and is embodied in the racism encountered by young Obama campaigners while on the campaign trail.
And then there is the bar in Georgia selling "Curious George" shirts with "Obama '08" as the script:
The T-shirts are being peddled by Marietta bar owner Mike Norman at his Mulligan's Bar and Grill in Cobb County. They show a picture of Curious Georgie peeling a banana, with the words "Obama '08" underneath.
Rick Blake, a spokesman for publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, which owns Curious George, said Wednesday that the company didn't authorize the use of the character's image, but hasn't been in touch with anybody selling or manufacturing the shirts.
"We find it offensive and obviously utterly out of keeping with the value Curious George represents," Blake said. "We're monitoring the situation and weighing our options with respect to legal action."
Norman has said he got the T-shirts from someone in Arkansas. He started selling them at his bar -- known for the provocative, ultra-conservative political slogans often posted on signs out front -- in April but said he has no plans to mass market them.
The sales came to light this week when a loose coalition of local groups called a protest of the T-shirts.
About a dozen protestors rallied against the shirts Tuesday afternoon, condemning them as racist and asking Norman to stop selling them.
Norman acknowledged the imagery's Jim Crow roots but said he sees nothing wrong with depicting a prominent African-American as a monkey.
"We're not living in the (19)40's," he said. "Look at him . . . the hairline, the ears -- he looks just like Curious George."
Comparing blacks to apes has been a time-tested favorite of the racist right, of course. It was a staple of both Nazi propaganda (Hitler called blacks "born half-ape") and the Klan over the years (a Klan speaker in Alabama, for instance, once warned: "Black apes in our high schools and elementary schools with our superior White children and forced them to mix. And the day a Black ape lays his Black paw on a little White girl, the Ku Klux Klan will move in and trim that paw back.")
Here's a classic example: This was a flyer that was circulated around the Bellevue, Wash., area by someone from Matthew Hale's then-organization, the National Socialist White Americans' Party back in 1995. (Hale, you may recall, gained later notoriety by becoming the leader of the white-supremacist World Church of the Creator, eventually earning jail time for plotting to have a judge assassinated.)
The "Curious George" shirts are more than a mere dog whistle: they're an outright resurrection of the ugly racism that was commonplace in America a century ago. No, we're not living in the 1940s; but the right -- including the Kathleen Parkers of the world and their enablers -- sure wish we were doing so again.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Leisure Guy!
jus cogens!
PRESSSCOTT BUSH and Poppy and Barr…all supported EUGENICS….the ARYAN race rules babe
if there were ever a time this country would elect a person who is not white, we can thank gw for it
I believe we can do it…there is so much vile hatred toward the republican party that if ever, then now
Is it your view that the national view is changing or that these views are becoming increasingly public?
freaks
The Human Genome Project, as it admits on the very first page of its website - http://vector.cshl.org/eugenics.html, is derived from the eugenics movement in the US and Nazi Germany during the first half of the 20th century. The Eugenics Records Office at Cold Springs Harbor NY-where American eugenics started-was built by the Harriman family-the Bushes’ Wall Street business partners in funding Hitler. This is the new frontier of colonialism in the 21st century-the total domination and exploitation of the earth and everything on it-the New World Order both former President Bush and Adolf Hitler so frequently called for
“There is no scientific justification for the notion of ‘race’.”
- Craig Ventner, Celera Genomics
I think it’s always been latent. It’s just that after a decade and more’s worth of signals giving permission to express these sentiments again, it’s becoming more acceptable.
I think these things are going to backfire bigtime on Republicans. The majority of people don’t want to associate with this kind of thing. The more they think of racism when they think of Republicans, the better it is for us.
Maybe that it’s out in the open is a good thing. A conversation can begin and people who aren’t racist can start to really push back. I think a large percentage of Americans actually have believed that racism was almost gone and they could stop thinking about it. Light does a lot of harm to bacteria.
Sheikh bin al JeremiahBaraBitterBlackHusseinFarrakhMadrassaSharpto
MuslimSleeperAgentOsamaBamaNotQuiteABrothuh will surmount this racist shit as well.
Let them go down this path.
I made a similar (if longer-winded) point recently on my blog, where I argued that the 2008 election at its core is a battle between two mentalities: one, a tribalistic, bigoted psychology that sees enemies and threats from “the other” on all sides; the other, a long-exiled hunger for genuine solutions to our increasingly dangerous problems.
http://insideoutthebeltway.blo.....illed.html
I do tend to agree that the winning side is the one that yearns for real leadership and solutions. It will have to overcome increasingly strident racism and regressivism of the kind showcased here, but I think it will triumph.
At least electorally.
Since his name is getting longer you need to petition Jane for a wider page. This always makes me just crack up. Thanks for all the laughs.
I doubt that there can be a conversation while Republics have any power. Race-baiting is part of their political bread-and-butter.
A contributor to this “forever hatred/bashing” of blacks came from that genre in American TV comedy, starting (or continuing) with more mainstream, open and “accepted” racist slurs in shows like Sanford and Sons, a lot of Eddie Murphy’s stand up, etc.. That was just never funny to me and I always thought it was going to create repercussions one day. Those programs made racist jokes and ugly comment acceptable through humor. This is but a personal rant, but I just never thought those jokes and programs to be that funny.
Doesn’t something have to be dead to experience a resurrection? This shit isn’t dead in Georgia, the South or anywhere else in this counrty.
Totally agree. Which is why we do what we do here.
Mebbe “reanimation” would’ve been a better word.
sorry, that was pretty picky
Anyone aware of any research on the relationship between racist attitudes/behaviour and age/generation?
Nice blog ya got there. BTW, as a middle-class whitey, my experience with racism is about as personal as it gets (scroll down).
Also, btw, Taibbi has a good rant about “tribalism” in the current Rolling Stone.
What I said
I live to serve.
;)
I’m reading his book and it’s killer
Yes. And we consumers, particularly in the educational community, can weigh our options too.
Interesting thought. Reminds me of how Dave Chappelle said that part of the reason he quit doing Chappelle’s Show was the more and more widespread misunderstanding and abuse of his humor by racists who would simply ape his jokes as an excuse to express their own bigoted attitudes.
I remember Chappelle recounting a story of one show in which he heard a laugh coming from the audience that sounded particularly nasty, as if laughing at him for the bit he had done.
My take is that humor by marginalized groups about their marginalization is a healthy and effective way to move beyond victimization. However, there will always be those who misunderstand and misuse the humor as a long-awaited opportunity to say what they’ve been thinking secretly, or only amongst the like-minded.
Every time my Rolling Stone comes I immediately go straight to his articles. Gotta buy his book ASAP.
Thank you, I’ll check out your piece just after this.
Oh, I can’t wait to read Taibbi’s new column! He is, hands-down, my favorite political commentator. I bought his new book The Great Derangement and it is blowing my mind.
Someone in Georgia is a racist? I’m shocked- shocked I tell you.
I wish I had said that.
I don’t think the idea ever was that Obama’s candidacy was going to magically erase racial divisions; he talked about how we will have to talk about these things, not just “get over it.” And I think it will still have a positive effect; the more blatant actions of the mouth breathers undermine conservatives’ attempts to declare that racism is over so we don’t have to do anything about it. When they talk like this about The President of the United States, it will drive a wedge between the 28%-ers and those Republicans who actually do believe that the respect due the presidency and is real and not just a partisan weapon, (like the Clinton impeachment, actually.)
The Obama candidacy was never going to be the end of racism as we know it in America, but with luck it may be the start of the end.
I’m certainly not the first!
Tired of me reminding folks that MLK said people from Mississippi need to “come to Chicago to learn how to hate”?
Great photo.
Timing is everything!
agreed, I’m sick of being bullied by a racist minority, and I’m not th eonly one.
I would be equally shocked to discover a rascist in Chicago.
Try Cicero
Thanks David.
FWIW, the online comments at the WaPu are overwhelmingly critical of Ms. Parker’s refined white supremacy. The problem with her using words such as “heritage” and “whites” in the same piece is that it focuses attention who really is “white.” Does Ms. Parker want to include the Jews? Does she want to include the Irish? Does she want to include the Italians? Does she want to include the slavs? Does she want to include Asian Americans? Is she really being fair to her “heritage” if she does?
The fact that Ms. Parker added gaybashing onto her refined white supremacy only made her piece more disgusting.
That’s a very powerful story, BobbyG. Thank you for sharing that.
mebbe it’s time to listen to Obama’s Philadelphia speech again
Per Raven excellent comment.
I also love Parker’s (at least implied) disqualification of, um, SLAVERY and other discriminatory labor conditions, from the category of the sacrifice required to call one’s self a true “American.”
To take a slightly longer view, remember that what they care about is power, not how they get it. So while I agree it’s true that they have to be turned out of power before they’ll stop using racism, I do have some hope that if we can keep up the fight so it doesn’t work for them, they’ll eventually catch on and move on to something that does. It may be the hazy memories of youth, but Republicans overall didn’t used to be as awful as they are nowadays, and they could recover. (It might be a better object lesson if they went the way of the Whigs, but I don’t want to get too optimistic.)
Seems to me the whole War on Terror is race-based.
Hard to see how Obama’s candidacy could quell racism, more likely that it will stir it up—as people come to grips with the distinct possibility of an African American president.
A successful presidency, on the other hand- could do some good..
English philosopher Edmund Burke said, ‘The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.’
The racism bubbling up because we have a black presidential nominee was inevitable. It is time to for us to say “bring it on” unAmerican right wing yahoos…. and we are up for this fight. It is time for the “good” but many heretofore not heroic people in this country to walk the walk. To get proactive. The right wing bullies have I pray pushed us to a critical mass of activism or pre-activism and we have to push back.
A wonderful old film, Gentleman’s Agreement with Gregory Peck deals with anti-Semitism. A great speech in that movie is about how good people being silent and uncomfortable BUT PASSIVE means they are not so good people… not so much… in fact they are colluding and enabling EVIL, as Burke says above.
This is our war at home.
It’s sad that the life-begins-at-conception crowd is never required to deal with the draconian monitoring that would be required to detect and adjudicate responsibility for fertilized eggs that don’t result in babies.
You’re not suggesting that this country’s almost wholesale replacement of Osama bin Laden with Saddam Hussein had anything to do with racial (and religious) bigotry, are you???
You are welcome. I had to re-learn a lot of attitudinal shit pretty quickly.
I disagree because these were aimed at a black audience. Why point fingers at who started it or perpetuated it? The fact is it’s here, has always been here and some element of society will always keep it going. With each passing generation such thinking becomes less dominant. The best thing to do is do what these folks did, protest against it to show that it will not be tolerated.
When I lived in Germany, I witnessed many a counter protest against neo-nazis. Signaling that they (germans) were not going to tolerate it.
Obama doesn’t want an election based on race- he wants an election based on the issues- but he will get race as well unfortunately.
That’s why I posted that. Some stuff is just way obvious, and way indicative of the lack of clear thinking.
No, that had to do with Bush family crony protection, Bush family psychotic revenge, and Bush family lust for plunder.
Digg this
In a strange way- the Obama candidacy is a giant step backwards to Jackie Robinson and the breaking of the color barrier in baseball. Jackie was told what to expect and he handled things well, Obama will likely face some similar issues..
Can’t have clear thinking in this country. No one would ever vote for a Republic.
Right, but their ability to convince so many Americans that we should invade Iraq, and to believe that Iraq was such an existential threat, had very much to do with bigotry, don’t you agree?
and George Allen, Virgil Goode, and Tom Davis approve Norman’s message.
Another ‘proud’ Macaca moment in modern Murka.
Racism seems lively and active.
Yes.
Well, 9/11- addled mindless, unreflective bigotry against any and all people from that region, perhaps in part. I recall news accounts of Indian Sikhs etc getting the shit beat out of them by Murkin rednecks.
Is the woman holding the tee shirt in that photo above an african american?
And then to play on pseudo-humanitarianism rationalizations for cover … we must save people and grant them democracy… as long as they are in oil rich countries which we can exploit financially by destabilizing in the name of “saving” and spreading democracy.
Tendency to demonize is a natural human tragic and pathetic human response. Charismatic leaders take free floating fear and anger of others and use it to manipulate and target others for their own self aggrandizement.
Oh I know - in my blue-collar hometown, Hindus from India were being stared at as terr’ists.
Norman acknowledged the imagery’s Jim Crow roots but said he sees nothing wrong with depicting a prominent African-American as a monkey.
“We’re not living in the (19)40’s,” he said. “Look at him . . . the hairline, the ears — he looks just like Curious George.”
Marietta native Pam Lindley, 47, joined Tuesday’s protest after reading about the controversy.
“I don’t want people to think this is what Marietta is all about,” she added, motioning towards the tavern. “This is what some people think the South is still like. Marietta’s come a long way but I guess it’s still got a little ways to go.”
She said she’d like to see the city ban Norman’s provocative musings regularly posted on a sign out front of the bar, which is near Marietta’s downtown square. Those who gathered Tuesday say they will continue their campaign against Norman’s “hate speech.”
But his defenders are just as resolute. Mulligan’s is a refuge, they say, in an otherwise hypersensitive world. Smoking isn’t only allowed at the bar, it’s expected.
“This place is a diamond in the rough,” said Gene McKinley, a Woodstock engineer among the patrons Tuesday. “People here are genuine and honest. It’s the one place I can go without having to worry if I’m offending someone.”
Norman said he fielded calls throughout Tuesday about his T-shirts. An ajc.com story about the controversy was picked up on the Drudge Report. “One guy in New Jersey wanted me to send him 100 shirts,” said Norman, 63.
Uh-oh, here we go…fasten seat belts…
Jeeezzz…
Maybe,maybe not. African american has many constructs. Africans that are naturalized are african americans, americans of african descent are african americans but considering that biology and anthropology ahs shown that life began in Africa, that would make everyone in America –African Americans
(I think she is a protestor showing the shirt not promoting it)
The ignorance of Americans regarding other cultures is bottomless. I was very concerned about the Indians locally because we have many.
Yes–I just read the story- thanks
oh for corn’s sake.
Gang code…. LOYALTY above all …. those who will suspend ALL critical and moral thinking… and enter the thrall of powerful others
You left out references to gays and rap/hip hop … *g*
Part of our new hearts and minds policy: we’ve lost our hearts -and- our minds.
Thanx, my Bad. Next Time.
:)
I get your point DC, on the one hand it works to air things out a bit, but on the other hand it’s damaging and negative in message.
A yes, the predictable refuge of racists and bigots: “we’re just plainspoken folk rebelling against a hyper-PC, overly sensitive world of censorship!”
How long can they milk the anti-political-correctness cow? The new political correctness is declaring any revulsion at something offensive “political correctness.”
This is not news in the Middle East or other countries outside of America … it’s been known for years …
nicely done
Is it racist to dislike rap? Yikes!
Yes.
I just wish these bigots would stop using “Aryans” and our beloved Swastika to further their hateful agenda, which is against the principles of Hinduism/Yoga …
Stringer Bell for President.
;)
Nope, just to blame it for the ‘continued denigration of society’ …
Whhose message? Problem is the majority has a stinking habit of defining the minority. Naming and defining are inherently very powerful things and the only way to capture that power back is to take that same definition made by majority and redefine what it is as a minority. Think of it was defining yourself instead of being defined by someone
A lot of us 100% European Americans need to be Stan Musial.
Race isn’t an issue? My view is that when you get down to brass-tacks there are subtle and unspoken inter-relationships bewteen race and poverty, race and gender issues, race and war, race and education, etc. Many of the issues of the “culture war” are clearly related to race and ethnicity. Immigration issues…race. Music censorship…race.
While one can make an argument that ones positions on these issues are NOT related to race and are independent of such influences…that’s untrue for many folks who actually vote against their own interests because some Republican does a “dog-whistle” on race. Look at the “War Against Poverty” by LBJ and how it was resisted in the South and led to Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” despite the fact that whittes in the Deep South would have been the major beneficiaries of major poverty alleviation programs. Instead their education stinks and poverty levels remain ridiculously high.
It;s always easier to take something already in existence and erase it’s meaning by giving it a different meaning.
Yep - that’s the point. And the problem for Dems - we have allowed the Repubs to define us for 30 years and it has worked beautifully for them. Hopefully we can now start to tell the American people who we are and what we stand for.
i know wobblybits, and many that I’ve talked to about this agree with you. it’s a controversial opinion, i know.
still, that type of comedy just never did sit right with me, and i didn’t find it funny, but rather, offensive. i respect that there are many who don’t agree with my thoughts on it.
no one is 100% anything in this country. If your family has been here for a few centuries, you have some umm colourful genes
Thank you for the power and beauty of your story…we humans need beauty, the food of the soul, imo. Speaking of movies, what do you think of American History X? I thought it was powerful, and Ed Norton is a great actor.
Hitler started using both terms to give his movement history and therefore respect … the ‘neo bigots’ removed the Cross and salute he used but kept these two symbols …
I understand how it might be found offensive but my thing is how do you counter things that make you want to cry…make fun of it and point out just how absurd all this ‘defining’ is
Whew!!
((( rwcole )))
he did it to Wagner as well and the German national anthem, etc. Appropriation of things once cherished and soil them to the point where they have lost all their original meaning
Happened in Sacramento, too. A turbaned Sikh was run-down by a racist in a car…idiot didn’t even know that Muslims don’t wear turbans.
And the Buddhist temple was targeted with graffiti.
These people don’t have the highest intellectual capacity in the world, it seems. Anything that is not “US” is “THEM”…if you don’t wear a flag pin you’re a Commie.
You make a good point- still, I think Obama doesn’t want this election to be about race.
Fear of the ‘other’
it’s always something….. i am soooo sick of racist attitudes that still persist and sadly this particular primary season has brought out horrible feelings lurking below the radar even on some “progressive blogs”…..
That’s the snarling, tribalistic lizard-brain that will be facing off directly against Obama, and against the Democratic agenda of the next 8 years.
As it becomes more marginalized, it becomes more extreme.
right, but it seemed to me that we’d actually come a long way since the days of “black face” comedy in vaudeville. then this new genre emerged, and it was like 10 giant steps backward. i hope that it did help, bring the ignorance into the light and assuage and validate some feelings by making light of it. racism is just such a stupid and abhorrent issue to me, like no. 2 on my top 5 list of things i hate so badly i could go all whoop ass over it, i’m really touchy about it. and these WERE jokes by blacks FOR blacks. A white person could NEVER repeat them and get the laugh. it never felt good or right to me.
It wasn’t about race in the beginning. IT started to rear its ugly head when the decision was made to paint him as the ‘black’ candidate. Go back and read articles up to South Carolina. Very little to no discussion of race
Racism AND Sexism are both an issue. I wish I could have heard similar rants against the mysogyny of pundits who villified Hillary Clinton and then decided she should quit. When the Democrats walk away from women they do so at their own peril. I for one will not sit down, shut up and vote for the boys choices.
Thanks.
That was a very, very good movie. I love anything with Ed Norton in it generally, but American History X was a courageous flick.
Actually, as I recall, on “Sanford & Son” the only people who could be counted on, at all times and in all situations, to act like complete idiots were white people. Redd Foxx was enjoyable, but I prefer his comedy albums.
Sorry, another shameless plug.
http://insideoutthebeltway.blo.....brand.html
This one’s about how the Republicans’ attempt to “rebrand” themselves as non-Bush change agents will fail, forcing them to revert to their core tribal nature to an even greater degree than before.
The best ever, IMO, was Dick Gregory. I would love to see him do standup again.
There are too many reasons to not want Clinton in the White House (again) that have NOTHING to do with her sex. I’d have been on the band wagon for a woman president, i always HAVE been since we were burning bras. Just not THIS woman.