Today the House passed the Farm Bill by a veto-proof margin. Tonight or tomorrow the Senate may do the same. That’s bad news.
The Farm Bill that passed the House does contain a badly needed $10.4 billion increase in food assistance and a few other good policies (including increased support for organic ag, produce farmers, African American farmers, and beginning farmers; disaster relief for salmon fishermen who lost their catch to irrigation pumps; elimination of disincentives to fruit and veggie production; and around a 10% cut – but not removal – in subsidies for corn-based ethanol). Tragically, these nuggets bob in a lagoon of waste and eco-devastation big enough to make a CAFO owner blush. The Farm Bill the House passed even slashes the miserly amount the US spends on international food aid, surely a thoughtful act when our neighbors across the Caribbean must resort to dirt sandwiches.
Why do they hate us?
Though I’d usually celebrate any Congressional defiance of President Bush the Torturer, the Farm Bill the Blue Dogs dragged into Congress smells like the Dogs spent the last months rolling in feedlots. And if we consider K Street as one form of feedlot, that’s exactly where they have been.
One more good reason to put the Blue Dogs out of the House. And the Senate.
Why do Blue Dogs hate America? Together with Dixie Rethug Senators and a few Dems beholden to ADM and Industrial Ag, the Blue Dogs have annealed the desperate poverty and very real starvation haunting urban and rural America into a weapon. With this weapon – the Farm Bill – a tiny fraction of Americans extort the rest of us, forcing each of us to cough up $140 per year to support the most comfortable farmers and megacorps. And – to ensure our children and their children their future will be even bleaker than our present – the Farm Bill subsidizes accelerated depletion of aquifers (hey, who says Atlanta needs water?), erosion of fertile topsoil, runoff-driven suffocation of Gulf Coast fisheries, and conversion of fragile prairies to greenhouse gases.
Why do the Blue Dogs hate our grandchildren?
One reason is that they’re paid to: agribusiness paid for the Blue Dogs’ (and the rest of TFB’s supporters’) votes with $100 million in lobbying and campaign contributions bribes. For you and me, that’s a pretty steep price for access. For Industrial Ag, that’s a bargain: the $100 million in tax-deductible bribes they plant in the Beltway grows into $43 billion dollars of crop subsidies (not to mention $23 billion in crop insurance – much of which is skimmed off by private firms.) But for Industrial Ag, the subsidies alone are a bargain: about $430 in subsidies for every dollar in lobbying and campaign contributions bribes. Sweet deal for the Blue Dogs – especially given that if you or I place that same dollar in a savings account, a year from now we get a nickel.
Oh – and the other reason Blue Dogs and the other Farm Bill extortionists support TFB? Ambition. The ambitious pols who would be Prez – or Veep – know the path to power runs through Iowa.
Iowa: the overwhelmingly white, heavily ag-dependent state where every four years a subset of residents join in the ritual of social intimidation and peer pressure known as the Iowa caucuses. The Farm Bureau (Big Ag’s wholly-owned lobby group) is well-represented there: Gulf Coast fisherman and the rest of us – not so much. The Iowa caucuses ensure that viable Prez candidates (and preening Congresscritters running for vanity and ego) bow down before ethanol subsidies and other insane strategies that decimate our land and Treasury, but sluice rivers of our taxes to the wealthiest farmers.
Even before the stinker of a Farm Bill that passed the House today, only 19 Congressional Districts – out of 435 – gobbled up half of the commodity (crop subsidy) payments from 2003-2005.
How much is half of the ‘03-05 commodity crop payments? Oh – only $17.37 billion. That’s almost twice as much as the increase in food assistance in the Farm Bill that passed today.
Of course, with Blue Dogs and Rethugs and K Street in the game, the have-mores got the biggest slice of the crop subsidies:
The top 1% of beneficiaries received 17% of the crop subsidy benefits between 2003 and 2005. Their average benefit was $377,484 per person for the 3 program years or over $125,000 apiece annually. As a point of reference, the average adjusted gross income within the ZIP codes of those same top recipients was $45,853 in 2004 .
And hey – not just Iowa can play. Any wealthy "farmer" (including the politically powerful Florida sugar growers like the Fanjul family who profit from slave labor abroad and modern-day slavery here at home and the obscenely rich California cotton barons diverting subsidized Federal water into private fortunes), as well as megacorps like ADM, Cargill, and Monsanto who ante up for campaign contributions and lobbying bribery purchase the juice to wring more millions – or billions – out of the Farm Bill. But hey – if you’ve got so much juice President Clinton will interrupt an Oval Office romp with Monica on a Federal holiday to take your call, of course you’ve got the juice to sluice our tax dollars out of the Farm Bill – and muck up the Everglades. And, of course, the rest of America will be on the hook to clean up that sticky mess, too.
When Big Ag plays, they win big.
How big?
Well – at least $43 billion dollars big – in TFB commodity support. That’s the cost of crop subsidies in the Farm Bill the Blue Dogs dragged into the House today.
And $23 billion in crop insurance – much of which goes right back to insurance megacorps.
And another $3.8 billion in perpetual "disaster" payments: subsidies for deciding to farm land with too little rain to support farming – and expecting to make money at it. Year after year after year.
Hey – if I decide to open up a specialized psych practice on a beautiful, isolated stretch of the Pacific Coast, with too few people to support the practice, and expect to make money at it – where do I sign up for "disaster" payments?
Nowhere – unless, of course, I invest in lobbying and campaign contributions bribery and hold food aid to the poorest among us hostage until I get my cut.
As we discussed last fall, The Farm Bill is a collection of Titles that chains social and environmental benefits such as Title IV (where Food Stamps and WIC live) and Title II (the Conservation programs) together with giveaways such as Title X (Crop Insurance, with huge megacorp subsidies) and Big Ag’s favorite cash cow, Title I (the Commodity programs).
The Farm Bill even includes historical payments that go to those on land that used to grow crops, but is now covered with houses or stores. That’s like Medicare paying retired docs and shuttered hospitals in 2008 because once upon a time, years back, the docs and hospitals provided care for patients.
Which makes about as much sense as the lavish subsidies – to the wealthiest farmers, to those who own ground that was once farmed, to corn-based ethanol profiteers like ADM and Cargill, and to the insurance megacorps – the Blue Dogs successfully fought to keep in the Farm Bill the House passed tonight.
Guess the Blue Dogs want to keep those K Street treats coming.
Too bad they didn’t care as much about feeding the rest of us.
Bon appetit.
Related posts:
- Pete Stark: “Brain Dead” Blue Dogs Just Looking to Raise Insurance Industry Cash
- Blue Dogs Win Big for Health Insurance Industry; Public Option Now Less Robust
- Public Option Expert Jacob Hacker on Why the Blue Dogs are Blowing Smoke
- AFSCME and HCAN Go After Blue Dogs On Health Reform
- Waxman: Blue Dogs Trying to “Eviscerate” Health Care





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Jus cogens!
Blue dog democrats MUST be targeted and defeated. Start with that evil Ellen Tauscher. I’ve never seen a better Clusterfuck-slurper except Lieberfuck, and that guy needs to be…well, you know.
and to you, tw3k!
tw3k, thanks also for giving the shout-out downstairs….
It is such a simple question/not a simple answer….what are the poor folks doing tonight? ie. How does one fight this stuff?
Dr. Murphy, you post great stuff!
The only chance we have is publicly funded elections..
have to get rid of those blue dogs
Good post, Doc.
Here is a link where your readers can Digg it…
Thank you Kirk. My Senator Blanche Lincoln, Blue Dogs Reps Ross and Berry are like pigs at the trough when it comes to agri bills.
Hi folks – thanks for wading through the Farm Bill with me – and neuro, thanks for helping with the Digg!
Y’all heard about the Edwards endorsement, or is that old news? (I been out all day doing a beneift show for our homeless veterans’ organization, heard it on NPR on the way home just now)
Update via the wapo article:
yep, we talked about it in Cliff’s thread downstairs.
Wow, ES – and here I thought I was frustrated with No Table Nancy and DiFi representing me….
And JayBur, I think you’ve put your finger on the long-term answer to RevBev’s question (in the short term, a whole lotta local/ civil society organizing helped make TFB less bad than it might have been).
Aloha, Doc! Another excellent expose’!
Dr. Murphy, you are the man! Were that I was half as eloquent! The agri-conglomerates shall be the end of us all, unless someone dares to stand up to them. As it is now we pay them to take advantage of us for basic foodstuffs-see their latest profit figures! ADM, Conagra,Cargill, they feed the world-just as long as the world can pay for the privilege.
I remain in sticker shock from grocery shopping today. Civility prevents me from expressing my true feelings about the thievery.
How many Indian farmers a year? These conglomerates are the devil.
Aloha CT, and thank you.
BobbyG, thanks for your kind assessment – and I so respect your efforts for homeless vets. Good on ‘ya.
Good on ya Bobby. I’m watching the shake down on that now.
*
Is it good that there has been an actual Veto-Proof vote, hoping the dems can do it again in the future?
Or, is it that it’s not enough and so it doesn’t matter?
Are the Republicans getting fraidycat in the waning days?
I’m wondering.
Those individuals surely do not include the big corps, it’s fair to say, or, goes without saying.
I was gonna bring my Dad to this one (disabled WWII vet), but he died last Tuesday, sadly.
You are correct about BigAg, this bunch has been watching the petroleum industry for the last seven and a half years rape and pillage the population and they are ready for their turn. “Ya can’t eat oil”
I would imagine it all about the personal income tax returns on that limit / not limit.
I am sure the Cargills et. al. double dip..)
(((BobbyG)))
I am so sorry for your and your family’s loss, BobbyG. I’m guessing your dad was mighty proud of your bigheart and your willingness to go the extra mile – for the vets you knew (like him) and those you did not know.
So sorry, BobbyG.
My thoughts and heart are with you. I know you mentioned that earlier, but sounds like this is something where you would really feel the loss and something he would have enjoyed. Peace, my friend and good thoughts.
wobbly, I think JayBur has the answer to getting the Blue Dogs out of the House, too. I so agree with your goal.
I am so sorry to hear of your loss, Bobby G. My respects to a fellow Veteran.
My Condolences, Bobby!
Thanks. I wrote about this on my music blog.
Missin’ my pop now, even though I knew this was comin’.
Publicly funded elections won’t solve this. Shining a light on it is a start. The light needs to be brightest on those that receive the largess of TFB. And former recipients of this largess need to be brought in to publicize the grave wrong being done to our grandchildren.
Getting rid of Blue dogs is a tough prospect in many districts – my home district in Indiana is a good case in point – Baron Hill won his primary handily as the incumbent, even though he lost to a bad republican in 2004. He took work done by progressives in 2006 to return him to office and promptly forgot that he needed to listen to the volunteers that gave him his slim margin of victory or he would lose them. When I do GoTC in his district this fall I cannot in good conscience tell people to vote for him, I’ll push for green party or NOTA votes as I absolutely cannot stomach helping return Sodrel to Congress. A significant showing for a Green might get his attention, especially in a close contest. And honestly Sodrel’s capacity to do damage in the next Congress will be limited by our new president and other gains made by progressives in the new Congress.
I’m working on a pitch asking voters to cast a protest vote even if it is a spoiler. GoTV for Obama, and to send a message to Blue Dogs that we need a new Lee Hamilton for IN-9, not a pusillanimous malfunctioning weathervane like Baron Hill.
There have been so many loopholes in the bill in th past. So many ways for smart lawyers and accounts to get around limitations. Put on parcel in a spouse’s name, maybe your brother’s, etc…, then it is a series a “small” farms.
I’m sorry, BobbyG.
Thanks to all of you for the kind words.
Hey, Doc, how much attention is truly given to the wide spread use of fertilizers that are petroleum based and are there any viable alternatives…?
wmd1961, the good folks at EWG created an awesome data base to search the TFB recipients….including the top 20 recipients
and good on ya for working to replace Hill with a progresive dem…
Kirk – isn’t this first veto-proof vote?
Still wondering.
Keeping our eyes on the big prizes….or, is it too little too late.
CT, that’s a great question, and I don’t have a generic answer…crop and climate go a long way to determine what – if any – alternatives may be viable.
Over the long term, some studies have shown petroleum-based fertilizers for corn (maize) show a plot of decreasing returns over time (appproaching no return)….and some studies by Rodale (and the UK’s soil institute) show that over time non-chemical “fertilizers” are just as prodcutive as petro-based inputs, IIRC.
But that’s just what I can pull out of my hazy mind – what do the folks on thread know about this (especially those who are reading at the Lake but have yet to post a comment – please jump in!)
demi, you’re also asking a good question to which I’ve no answer. What do folks on the thread recall about veto votes and the Boy Torturer?
I hate to sound like Someone Else saying I’m not ready to give up the good fight. I think there are still some months for the congress to pass a Few Good Bills.
I’m heartened to see the two sides working together to this extent.
Thanks for the response, what sparked the question was an interview of several leaders of NGO’s that Dhaljit Dhaliwal conducted, about efforts to get fertilizer and seeds to numerous African nations, and, their references to the exploding costs of fertilizer was a daunting task they needed to redress…
Kirk? Did your graphic up top get everyone hungry?
Everyone went out for pizza?
Eco terrorists are out of control in Brazil. They have attacked Monsanto genetically modified crops and viciously destroyed them.
There are also similar anti agribusiness zealots in France! They wear funny hats and have stopped the latest attempt to allow franken foods.
Next, these hippies will probably try to stop the genetic modification of pigs, using for example, jellyfish genes.
CT, I can’t find the reference, but one of the “fathers” (funny, scientific/tech events seem to be lacking in “mothers”….according to the men, anyway) of the Green revolution has been quite vocal about his beloief that widepsread petro-fertilizer use in (most of) the develpoded world has been a disaster, causing progressiveloss of soill fertilikty and thus neccessitating ever-rising amoiunts of synthetic inputs- which ultimately become unaffordable….
Frank33, thanks for the action update. Vive la France! Go Brazil!
“and some studies by Rodale (and the UK’s soil institute) show that over time non-chemical “fertilizers” are just as prodcutive as petro-based inputs, IIRC.”
I have an aversion to any source that uses terms like “non-chemical fertilizers.” Fer Pete’s sake, everything is made of chemicals. There’s no such thing as a non-chemical fertilizer. I suppose what you mean is “man-made” fertilizers, e.g. it comes out of laboratories rather than out of the rear end of animals. Ammonium nitrate is ammonium nitrate, no matter if it is made in an industrial chemistry lab, or is refined from animal byproducts. Gimme a break.
Of course, the substance of this difference may not be in the main ingredients, but in the impurities: There may be something about the impurities that come out of the rear end of animals that is better than the impurities that come out of an industrial lab. But that’s a whole nuther subject.
Bob in HI
King Ranch (Texas) is first on one of the lists of top recipients. Aren’t they Cheney’s buddies? Ford makes a King Ranch Pick em up Truck for King Rancher wannabes.
Cheney favors pheasant ranches- hatch the little guys and then release em when they’re barely big enough so that great white hunter can blow their brains out.
bob, when you get organic agriculture to change their terminology, do let me know what terms have been consensed upon and i’ll happily adopt them. until them, i’ll choose terms according to community usage.
of course, your aversions may vary.
btw, if comfrey grows in the isles, i hear it helps heal breaks….
Synthetic is the operative word, Bob! That is the gist of the petroleum based fertilizers… It ain’t natural as is bovine or chicken excrement.
kirk, who are the chief villains in the passage of the Farm Bill in the form that was adopted? I saw the list of Blue Dogs who supported it, but who are the 2 or 3 or 4 primary Congressional movers and shakers who dominated the process that resulted in the Bill as adopted?
Who would have guessed that the head of the Swift Boat smears is now accused of being an abusive alcoholic of a father.
Bob Perry may be busy this election season.
-G
IIRC, it was King Ranch property where Dick blasted his atty friend after a couple Coors Lights with lunch (then Dick made Harry apologize when Harry began to complain a little about getting shot in the face).
hackworth, great pick-up (so to speak)….
the king ranch is apparently adjacent to the Armstrong ranch where Cheney shot an old man in the face….
and the two appear to be closely linked (according to the salon article)
Comfrey and speckled aloe grows great here, Doc!
damn neuro – sure wish i knew….another great question where i’m ignorant…
Would love to know what Cheney actually paid for that apology.
As I recall Dick also had the Secret Service head off the local lawman’s attempt to investigate, and did not report it until the following day (i.e. time to sober up?)
“Denny Crane” on Boston Legal: “McCain is patient zero, Mad Cow.” Well Mad Cow disease is caused by Bad Agriculture.
Them’s gooper pigs- once they get hold of a teat- they ain’t about ta let go.
Dayam, has to file bankruptcy because he can’t live off of a $29,000 a month trust fund…? Whew, some expensive tastes…!
(The Armstrongs) were as close to aristocracy as the state had ever known, and became more so in 1944, when Tobin’s brother married into the King family, whose adjacent ranch added even more wealth and prominence to the family.
Tobin Armstrong, who spent 48 years as the head of a prominent cattle industry association, married his wife, Anne, in 1950, and the pair spent the next five decades financing Republican candidates and serving in Republican administrations.
Mr. Armstrong had close ties to then Gov. Bill Clements, the first Republican to win the Texas Statehouse since Reconstruction — and whose campaign in 1978 was worked on by a young political operative named Karl Rove. When Mr. Rove opened his direct-mail consulting firm, Karl Rove & Company, beginning his career, it was with financial support from Mr. Armstrong.
By many accounts Mrs. Armstrong, the matriarch, was as much of a driving force in politics as her husband. A New Orleans native, from a wealthy family of her own, she was named counselor to President Richard Nixon. President Gerald Ford, for whom Mr. Cheney served as chief of staff, appointed her United States ambassador to Britain in 1976. In more recent years, she served on the boards of American Express and Halliburton, the energy company of which Mr. Cheney was chief executive before becoming vice president.
The family’s relationship with George W. Bush is equally apparent: When he was governor of Texas, Mr. Bush appointed Mrs. Armstrong as a regent of Texas A & M, and made her daughter Katharine a member of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission; she later became the chairwoman. She also became a lobbyist, and her clients include Mr. Baker’s law firm, Baker Botts. Lobbying records show that Ms. Armstrong made at least $760,000 lobbying for clients in Washington in 2004 and 2005, and at least $300,000 working for four separate clients in Texas during that same period.
In the 2000 presidential cycle, both Katharine Armstrong and her parents were listed as Bush campaign “pioneers,” fund-raisers who attracted $100,000 in donations for the Republican team.
As the family’s influence rose, “going down to the Armstrong Ranch” became a phrase heard in Republican and Bush administration circles, conjuring up images of party luminaries gathering, as they did last weekend, for intimate weekends away.
“These are the deep pocket people, and that’s the ancient tradition of the region,” said Bruce Buchanan, a professor of political science at the University of Texas at Austin. “It’s just the way big money operators wield influence.”
Mr. Buchanan added: “Here in Texas they just happen to use ranches. Up on the East Coast they use boats.”
There- in a nutshell, you see why Clusterfuck had to go an buy himself a failed pig farm in a desolate part of a desolate state….braggin rights.
Buy himself a Ranch! It’s a Ranch!
The Ranch is an unconscious symbol of Clusterfuck’s modus operandi.
It grows nothing- raises nothing- profitith nothing- and is a sad reflection of it’s owner who has never produced anything in his life save two kids.
Impearch!
Good point. Your mind is like a steel trap. Notice all the familiar players in that article (Rove, Shrub, Cheney, James Baker) and the courtesies extended all ’round. The complete article is found in Murphy’s second link in comment 54.
Wow Hackworth – I had no idea: thanks for learnin’ me…..
WE ONLY have Laura’s word that he produced them young uns.
And in any event, she had a lot more to do with it than he did…
So what I am really wondering is, does Preznit Pigfarmer get federal subsidies for the pigs that he doesn’t raise?
That’s a Texas rancher for ya.
stocked pond?
spew!
another monitor needs a sponge bath….
Oh yes.. Seven pound perch just ain’t natural in North America.
Don’t see any reason why he shouldn’t. Check out the article – click on the second link in Murphy’s comment at 54. Its a gold mine of good ‘ol boy politicks and favors. Two pages quick reading. Incredible stuff. Big money boy’s club.
Texas refrain:
“You show me YOUR ranch—and I’ll show you MINE”
Popular in Dallas at the Petroleum Club.
Wow folks – thanks for your thoughts and the grins – I appreciate both tonight. Wishing you all safe and abundant food…and “leaders” worthy of the term….
And one does not even want to think about what she had to endure.
We hate when you leave! Good Night
Oops – hit wrong button – but gonna wander off to the back
40err….deck andrustle up some grubdress some salad.Guess I’ll never fit in at the King/Armstrong ranch..
but then I’ve never shot a friend (’cepting with a camera….)
Bon appetit!
PW is upstairs
Upstairs is a lulu….who can believe this stuff?
Bush tells German paper he caught the largest fresh-water perch in history!
He is just so full of shit! Yellow Perch World Record – 4 lb. 3 oz.
Thank you, Doctor M. Excellent report!
One of those ‘historicals’ I noticed last week: a physician in Houston owns a property that once grew rice. Now he’s received $490,000 for NOT growing rice. *sigh*
Obviously a Monsanto yellow perch …