
“Ours is a time of great political disaffection, and I understand it, because so far in this new century, we have failed the people of this country. We’ve got a lot of damage to repair. There are no magic bullets. Future generations will look back on this period as a very dark one if we fail. But heaven help us if we don’t try.”
Harry Reid, The Good Fight: Hard Lessons From Searchlight To Washington.
No kidding.
I didn't know much about Harry Reid's background before I read his memoir other than that he came from a small town, had boxed in his youth and served on the Nevada gaming commission before going into politics. I assumed I wouldn't be reading the usual up-by-his-Sperry top-siders from Andover to Yale that usually characterizes political biography in this country but I have to say that this wasn't what I expected either:
I come from a mining town.
But by the time I came along - December 2, 1939 - the leading industry in my hometown of Searchlight, Nevada, was no longer mining, it was prostitution. I don't exaggerate. There was a local law that said you could not have a house of prostitution or a place that served alcohol within so many feet of a school. Once, when it was determined that one of the clubs was in violation of this law, they moved the school.
As a boy, I learned to swim at a whorehouse. Nobody in town had ever seen such a fancy inground tiled pool in their lives as the pool at the El Rey. Or any pool at all, for that matter. At least nobody that we knew. The El Ray was the main bordello when I was growing up in Searchlight. Every Thursday afternoon, the whoremonger in town, a kindly bear of a man by the name of Willie Martello, would ask the girls who worked the El Rey to clear out, and he'd invite the children in town, usually no more than a dozen or so at a time, to swim in his pool. And we would live the life of Riley for a couple of hours, splashing in the azure blue of that whorehouse pool. This was a rare luxury in a hard town. When I was coming up, there were several other brothels in Searchlight - the Crystal Club, Searchlight Casino, Sandy's - thirteen in all, and no churches to be found.
In my home, we had no religion. None, zero. And when I say none, I don't mean 10 percent religious, I mean none. It wasn't that my parents were atheists or something, it was that religion just wasn't part of our lives. But Franklin Roosevelt was. In our little home, my mother had a navy-blue embroidered pillowcase with a little fringe on it, and she put it up on the wall. On it, in bright yellow stitching it read, "We can. We will. We must. - Franklin Delano Roosevelt." And that was my religion.
That's just not your average political biography in our culture of idealized small town life of white picket fences and Fourth of July picnics. It's a really rough story, with parents who drink too much, acute poverty, spousal abuse and finally suicide. It's a childhood out of Jack London. Or maybe Dickens' London. You can't help but be somewhat horrified. And inspired. How does someone crawl out of that beginning to become one of the most powerful people in the country? This is a truly self-made man.
As it turns out, this matter-of-fact recitation of grit and self-reliance is a quintessentially American story. He hitch-hiked to high school across the desert because he desperately wanted to improve his lot in life. He worked his way through George Washington Law School, with a young family, as a police officer. He became a defense lawyer in Nevada, which meant he defended some very colorful characters and then he famously took on the mob as head of the Nevada Gaming Commission during the Casino era. When you see him speak, it's really hard to believe that this soft spoken fellow is the guy who did all that.
The Good Fight turns out to be a breezy read and I frankly didn't expect it to be. It's structured in an interesting way, juxtaposing the recent congressional fights during the Bush Administration with the life story, which I would guess was done as a way of illustrating the "fighter" in both instances. I'm not sure that really works, since Reid patiently explains throughout just how much compromise, hand-holding and outright horse trading is required of a Senate leader. The fighting we see is nearly all of the sheerly defensive type since the Bush Republicans adopted an unprecedented form of Senatorial brinksmanship to serve the ambitions of the likes of Bill Frist and Karl Rove.
Those of us who've followed the Senate battles of the last few years will find some of what Senator Reid reports to be surprising. (For instance, that Joe Lieberman had to be convinced repeatedly to stay with the Gang of Fourteen.) His view of the Senate is that of a person who holds the rules and traditions to be somewhat sacrosanct (which might be surprising coming from libertarian Nevada, but when considered in light of his upbringing makes much more sense.) He believes strongly in the necessity of a branch of government that balances out the powers of the large states with the small --- a Madisonian concern about the tyranny of the majority.
His fight against the Republicans employing the nuclear option was based upon preserving the integrity of the Senate. The fact that they were threatening it in order to place radical, right wing judges on the court seems to have been less of an incentive. Senator Reid was concerned about preserving our system for the long run. Of course, as John Maynard Keynes said (and George W. Bush famously mangled) "in the long run, we'll all be dead." The legacy of the Bush appointments are going to affect all of us for the rest of our lives. Senator Reid succeeded in preserving the filibuster for the next generations. (Considering that the Republicans of this Congress have now used it more frequently and capriciously than any minority in history, one can't help but wonder if he might have a few second thoughts.)
The book is written in that flat laconic way of hardscrabble westerners, no frills, just the facts ma'am. It has, at times, the feeling of a soliloquy or a voice-over in one of those quiet western cinematic tone poems, like Tender Mercies. He doesn't bare his soul or let us into his inner life, but then he doesn't have to. His life story stands as a testament to the American dream and that's something that speaks for itself.
I am honored to welcome Senator Harry Reid of Searchlight, Nevada to today's FDL Book Salon.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Senator Reid, welcome to the Lake.
My pleasure.
Senator Reid, it is a great privilege to have you here with us today. Welcome!
Welcome to FDL Senator Reid.
Senator Reid, it’s a great honor to have the Senate Majority Leader at FireDogLake. I was wondering if your book addresses the problem of the corporate financing of national (and local) campaigns? As I know you are well aware, Congress is forced to spend a high percentage of its time raising money that sometimes the lobbyists end up writing the legislation. Sara, a commenter here at FDL, has suggested requiring donations to be from registered voters. In addition to that, I have read some discussion of capping corporate donations at some percentage (20% for example) of whatever a candidate has already received from registered voters. This would force corporations to at least line up behind registered voters in terms of access to our elected officials.
It’s also a great honor to be on the same thread with Digby.
Thanks guys. Lets get some questions.
Aloha, Senator Reid, we greatly appreciate your taking the time to be with us here at the Lake!
Welcome to the book salon Senator reid. It’s a pleasure to meet you.
Keith Olbermann brought up last night that you reported in the book that President Bush said on the sixth anniversary of 9/11, “Bring ‘em on. We’re killing them. We’re killing them.” Do you think president Bush is delusional or has the administration’s policy actually been simply to kill terrorists off one by one as if there’s some sort of finite number of them?
Why did you not honor Sen. Dodd’s hold on the SSCI version of the FISA bill?
This is a autobiography of my life. It wasn’t meant to deal with every political question. But I believe campaign financing has been changed in this Dem. presidential primary because of the Internet. Remember 10s of millions of dollars of contributions came in with an average amount of 90 dollars. So corporations had little do with this campaign on the Democratic side.
Hello, Senator Reid. I was part of the crowd at YKos convention at Los Vegas waving the “Give ‘m Hell, Harry” sign!
Thanks for the response.
Welcome Senator Reid. I was at one of the front tables at the Vegas Yearly Kos when you welcomed us to town, so it feels right to welcome you here. Thanks for coming by.
Do you think there are still opportunities for young Americans to make of themselves what you did? Your story is so inspiring; do you think others could repeat it now, with income disparity so much wider and inequality so much greater?
Sen. Reid, thanks for taking the tie today. Curious about your opinion in whether the primary has hurt the Democratic party or, as Digby and others contend, has served to strengthen it.
Senator, welcome!
As a pastor, I got two great and unexpected laughs. The first one came in the excerpt Digby posted above, about learning to swim in a whorehouse pool. The second came at the end, where you mention in passing that you actually defeated God Almighty in a primary election.
My question is less humorous. I saw your appearance on Keith Olbermann’s “Countdown” where you seemed to indicate that Steny Hoyer and Jay Rockefeller were negotiating a compromise of some kind on FISA and telecom immunity, but that you had not seen their work — and you did not sound as if you would support any kind of compromise. Is it common for the Majority leader of the House to work behind the back of the Majority leader of the Senate?
Senator Reid,
I have not had the opportunity to read your book but was wondering what in your background do you believe prepared you for what has to seem like herding cats sometimes (being the Majority Leader of the Senate with all the big egos around)?
Senator, if you are replying to a specific comment, you can click on the button just below and to the right of that comment marked “reply.” That will make it clear who you are responding to.
On the night before the issuance of the 9-11 report Governor Kean and Congressman Hamilton, in a closed meeting were asked by me, explain what’s going on with all these terrorists. They responded, there is a finite number of terrorists who you can only kill or capture. But there are millions who sympathize with them and our goal should be to work so these million come to our side. Obviously Bush’s direction has been contrary to what Kean and Hamilton suggested.
One thing we at FDL and other liberal blogs struggle with is the MSM (Mainstream Media). It was a pleasure to see you on Keith Olbermann’s Countdown. Many of us have tuned out just about everyone else. Does “The Good Fight” contain any insight into the MSM and how we can get them to more accurately cover the issues of our day?
Senator Reid, thank your for being here!
There has been a lot of talk in Democratic blogging circles concerning the idea that Senator Obama has constructed a powerful new fund-raising and campaigning system that has the potential to completely reconfigure the political power structure of the Democratic Party for decades to come.
Could you please give us your opinion of whether this is, indeed, the case, and what your impression is of what the future has in store for the Democratic Party?
Senator Reid, I’m concerned about the ‘comity of Congress,’ it seems to me that the Democrats are trying to legislate, and the Republicans are waging war. Can you comment to that? Thanks.
There is a general misunderstanding of holds in the Senate. Holds are temporary not permanent. Senator Dodd and I worked together on FISA. Senator Dodd and I voted together on FISA. Senator Dodd and I will continue to work together against immunity for the phone companies and for Bush and Cheney.
With all due respect, Senator, please deal with Joe Lieberman, sooner rather than later, by stripping him of his committee positions. He is a traitor to the Democratic Party and he openly supports the Republican presidential candidate.
Hi Senator Reid!
I can’t wait to read your autobiography. I admire your personal journey.
To my question(s): How many Senatorial seats are in play in November? What are the chances that Democrats will take Republican seats in the election? And, how on earth do you deal with McConnell?
You don’t have to answer that last one. I just couldn’t help myself.
And, lastly, I admire your and Speaker Pelosi’s strategy over the past two years given the voting challenges in the Senate and Executive veto.
Welcome to FDL, Sen. Reid. Thanks, as always, for such a wonderful introductory piece, Digby.
We spend an awful lot of time of late discussing respect for the rule of law and the need for restoration of the balance of powers. Your book talks about a number of the threats — through party intrigues, power plays, and outright scheming among various factions in the GOP (as well as some intricacies with the Democratic party structure as well). As someone who has spent her lifetime watching politics on the national stage (and here in WV as well), I have to say that there are days when my cynical side says that desperately needed reforms are never going to come. Because individual political self-interest among so many of our nation’s elected leadership comes before national interest far too much of the time.
For example, after Katrina I so hoped that poverty, health care and other issues surrounding the grinding desperation for so many in this country would finally come to the fore. And they did for a couple of weeks, only to recede when the kleig lights faded. The same regarding rule of law and betrayal of national security during the Libby trial’s spotlight, only fade away. Personally, the unilateral executive power that George Bush and Dick Cheney have abused for the last few years is as brazen as it is astonishing, but it far too often seems as though the checks and balances that ought to be there are far too infrequently pushed to the fore.
What can we do to help force our government back into balance? Beyond oversight hearings, will there be pursuit of contempt — through legal as well as inherent means — when the Administration fails to respond to subpoenas?
That is one of the two reasons I wrote my book. To show that Harry Reid’s of our country can still make it. We live in a great country. Each of has to work every day to make sure that the priveldged and wealthy don’t run our country.
Sen. Reid: One thing I’m always curious about is the inner working of the lobbying process. Who comes to you from the telcos and what do they say in regard to their quest for immunity?
What are their lines of thought? Do they talk about how much money it will cost them if the don’t get it? Do they talk about the promises that were made to them that if they did the data gathering they wouldn’t get in trouble? To they appeal to national security? Patriotism?
What other kind of pressures do they bring up to you and other legislations as the reasons that they MUST have this immunity for laws broken. Do they talk about the pressures on THEM to get this immunity deal? Do they say that laws really WEREN’T broken?
How are they working you on this issue?
Amen Sister!
Thank you for coming, Sen. Reid, and for being willing to share your views with us today. FDL has its share of critics of your leadership, but we welcome your courage in taking our questions and in arguing for our support.
Heroes in Dickensian stories win via the intercession of long lost but newly found relatives or a kindly turn of fate. Decidedly not the end met by most Victorian foundlings. Heroes in Jack London stories win or lose owing solely to their ability to take whatever the wild throws at them, to become as wild as circumstances require in order to prevail.
America today is the land of presidential lawlessness and torture. It is not a fiction. Voters said in 2006 and say today that they want a Congress that will stand up to a lawless President. The current Congress, despite its Democratic majority, seems unwilling to do that, the temporary FISA victory notwithstanding.
Is that true, in your opinion, Mr. Reid? If not, why not? If so, why does that justify voting Democrats a larger majority in November?
I dont recall ever talking to the phone cos re the FISA issue. I have had several briefings w the CIA re this issue. As you know I oppose immunity for the phone companies and for Bush and Cheney.
If I remember correctly, you could have introduced a version of the FISA bill that did not include telecom immunity rather than the one you chose as the base bill. Isn’t this correct?
Senator Reid, I am one of your constituents (ZIP code 89123), one who writes and emails my represntatives repeatedly. Thank you for being here today.
Pre-emptive telecom immunity simply must not be granted. These corporations have numerous ways to get around civil liability, and you know it. The push for pre-emptive blanket immunity has everything to do with covering up Bush administration constitutional violations, and little to nothing to do with telecom litigation risk. We need your help here. Do not cave.
Mahalo, for responding! Isn’t it true that as long as a Senator does have a hold on a bill it precludes further action on the bill, I seem to recall Mitch McConnell having placed numerous holds on critical bills and essentially shutting down those particular bills…?
Senator Reid, your personal story is pretty amazing. You didn’t grow up with any of the community or family advantages that so many Americans had, even in those war torn and post war years. To what do you attribute your success? It seems almost impossible.
Oh and are the Democrats going to carry Nevada in the fall? ;)
Welcome Senator Reid, Bruce Fein & Jonathan Turlington, both Constitutional Lawyers have said repeatedly that this administration has broken laws and yet Congress is unwilling to investigate.
How can the American people have confidence in you upholding the Constitution and rule of law when you turn a blind eye to these transgressions ?
What can we expect of you and Congress, in prosecuting these violations ?
Hi Senator Reid! Thank you for coming to talk with us today.
I have not read your book yet, but part of the title mentions hard lessons. What was the hardest lesson you had to learn?
Your fingers to God’s ears of us taking Nevada, Digby. *g*
Thank you for answering my question, sir.
I was surprised to read (elsewhere) that you won your last Senate election in Nevada by less than 500 votes. Due to Senator Daschle’s defeat, some say it’s unwise to have someone from an “unsafe seat” lead our party in the legislature. What do you think about that?
Also, how do you square your position on a woman’s right to choose with the Democratic Party core value? Do you think our legislative leaders’ positions should be aligned with the core values of the Democratic party?
Thanks again!
Senator Reid,
Does not justice call for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W. Bush? Does not the reputation of our nation require that we act, even in the face of long odds against success, to demonstrate that we are a nation of laws and justice? From the mishandling and destruction of White House e-mail to the lies used to justify a war of aggression to the indelible stain of encouraging the use of torture, does not our posterity and national legacy demand that Congress move to impeach the Vice President and President, in that order?
Senator Reid,
This is in the news today..
“Former Venezuelan Attorney General Isaías Rodríguez has presented the Venezuelan Government with detailed plans of a plot to destabilize the government and overthrow the elected President Hugo Chavez.
Rodríguez presented the document titled “Shock and Awe Theory in Venezuela: Provoke a State of Shock In Order to Command Respect” to the courts investigating the murder of Danilo Anderson on Friday.
The document details plans involving Colombian troops, paramilitaries the United States intelligence services and revolves around the promotion of the secession of the oil rich state of Zulia.”
What will Congress do if this is true?
what will Congress do if the Administration attacks Iran or Syria?
Senator Reid, thank you for coming and being open to questions not about your book.
What would you see as the top two or three priorities for the Senate Majority Leader in January 2009 if we have a President Obama?
Just a comment Senator Reid per Earl of Huntingdon’s question regarding torture. There are many liberals who want to leave the Democratic party in disgust over torture, “rendition,” and the politicization of DOJ; so they can start a third party. I and many others here spend time urging them to remain inside the Democratic party. In my case, this is kind of funny, because I grew up a Barry Goldwater Republican.
I hope you and others in Congress can make the case that America is infinitely safer when ordinary people feel comfortable coming forward and sharing whatever information they have.
Welcome to the Lake Senator Reid.
We who spend time energy and money here at FDL are overwhelmingly concerned about the rule of law and the abuses it has incurred by the Bush administration. While we are well aware that any kind of actions toward impeachment must originate in the House and that Speaker Pelosi has “taken it off the table” we are continually wondering what Bush and Cheney would have to do for it to be put back on the table. We have witnessed the uncovering of torture, secret prisons and rendition, a war started on false pretenses, the spying on citizens, the outing of a covert CIA agent, disregard for habeas corpus . . . we could list instances all day.
What will it take to hold the criminals in the White House accountable?
Before my 9 new Democratic Senators were sworn in Jan, Senator Johnson of South Dakota became seriously ill. Our majority dropped to 50-49 and with Sen. Lieberman voting with the Republicans on Iraq causing our majority to go out of existence. Inspite of this, the Democrats fought on to require 37 votes on the war, passing most sweeping lobbying and ethics reform leg. in the country, raised CAFE standards for the first time in 30 years, and other important measures inspite of our lack of our numbers and the obstructionism of the Bush Republicans in the Senate. We haven’t gone as far as we would like. And thats why we need more Democrats in the Senate after this November.
I now know why you are as successful as you are in Congress — your upbringing in your hometown was the perfect preparation for Washington DC.
I, too, think that any deal that grants retroactive immunity for activity criminal complicit with the Bush-Cheney administration to deny the citizens of this country their constitutional rights will dim the light of democracy more than we will ever be able to stand.
Isn’t there anyone in government in Washington who has any sense that the democratic tradition of this country has been damn near destroyed by the incompetent thuggery of this administration?
Welcome, Senator Reid. Thank you so much for being here today. The book has many a colorful story — and I like the Lieutenant Governor 1970 hair. You’ve kinda got a Harvey Keitel thing going on there.
Senator Reid: I’d like to know why you think this is - what do you see as the root causes of the failure? Specifically, how do you think Democrats have contributed to the problems we face and what different approaches should we be demanding of our democrats in congress?
(I say this as one very disappointed citizen who has learned to regret much of the volunteering I did prior to the 2006 elections)
…And an awesome 1970s tie. *g*
Fein and Turley obviously haven’t watched what’s been going on in the Capitol Hill. Because we have conducted scores of hearings in the Arm Services Comm, Judiciary Comm, and other committees on President’s what I believe are illegal activities including his signing statements.
Thanks Jane. I prefer Robert Redford.
Senator Reid
I haven’t read what sounds like a fascinating book yet.
But given what Digby wrote about your concern for preserving the Senate as an institution, I’d love to hear you compare your tenure as Majority Leader with that of LBJ. LBJ managed to leverage the question of preserving the filibuster in ways that finally produced important legislation. Do you think there are any opportunities to do the same? Just as an example, why not try to take the Gang of 14 (which, in the incarnation we got, basically meant Democrats ceded to Republicans on all but 3 judicial choices) and try to extract some concessions on other legislation. (Though I accept that the Gang of 14 precedes the time when we had a majority.)
Thank you for your response Senator.
I’m not smart enough to read between the lines of your answer, please help me.
What did the CIA tell you about this issue of telco immunity?
(I know the easy answer is “it’s classified” but I’m not interested in anything classified I’m interested in the arguments and rationalizations that are provided. Some people are more convinced by one set of arguments than another. Some people are more easily swayed than another with appeals to “national security” some are more easily swayed by, “you will look weak on terror” arguments.
With out getting into ANYTHING classified what is the CIA telling you about this?
Be careful when you hitchike.
Just bought your book Senator Reid (and miracle of miracles, I remembered to use the FDL link).
Thank you for replying Senator Reid, will those hearings bring this administration to justice ?
The sense of many of us is that Bush & Cheney will get off scot free and thus set a dangerous precedent for future administrations.
That was my second choice.
In all due respect, Senator, many of us have watched the hearings religiously, what has all those hearings produced?
LBJ had huge majorities in the Senate. My majority has been at best 1 and sometimes with Johnson sick at -1.
For starters, Alberto Gonzales is no longer the AG. *g*
While listening to the news about Myanmar blocking aid fm our country and others to help with their natural disaster, my 14 year old son asked why their government would do that. I explained about the military junta there and told him that if he thought our government was a mess, he ought to think abut how other countries had worse. He said to me that there’s nothing wrong with our government, but just the officials we have.
What do you have to say to a 14 year old who is learning about history and politics to give them faith in our system?
An honor to have you hosting us today, Digby.
And thank you Senator Reid for visiting with us today.
I have not read your book, but I have seen a couple of your book tour appearances on television, and in one of them, you suggested that Senator Joseph Lieberman’s interests in pursuing an aggressive military posture in Iraq is the main thing separating him from the rest of the Democratic Party, essentially brushing aside the other differences
.
But there are other substantial differences. One is his shameful support for Senator MaCain’s candidacy for President.
Even more infuriating however, Senator Lieberman, as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs refuses to investigate the events surrounding the governments response to Hurricane Katrina. What are you empowered and prepared to do as Majority leader to see that this catastrophe is properly investigated?
We need you to lead, Senator. If that means being impolite to Senator McConnell, I’m certain your constituents won’t object.
Thank you again for visiting with us today.
Illegalities are being revealed, but the consequences are minimal or nonexistant.
Two quick examples: we got rid of Gonzalez and Jackson.
Senator, are you planning to hold hearings on the illegality of the Pentagon’s propaganda training program of retired military officers that was recently exposed by the New York Times and Glenn Greenwald?
You have said, Sen. Reid, that Sen. Lieberman votes with Democrats on virtually “all issues but the war”. That’s an exception that swallows the rule. It seems to put friendship ahead of the interests of the country and the Democratic Party. The GOP’s version of that is one reason they are rightly reviled.
The issue is less Sen. Lieberman personally than the Congressional oversight his “leadership” precludes. He has held no hearings into the tens of billions (mis-)spent by Homeland Security. No investigations into the failures of Katrina, politically inspired ICE raids, or the fiasco that is the “terrorist” watch list. For starters. He expresses unqualified, even slavish support for Sen. McCain and calls unhesitating for military action against Iran.
Those are not priorities we support or respect. Failing to oppose them is not likely to garner the Democrats more votes in November.
not sure we gained anything with Mukasey.
Its good that your 14 yr old is so interested. It is true inquisitive, concerned young men and women can recover from the Bush disaster from last 7 years.
How has Gonzales’s replacement been an improvement ?
Do you take credit for the appointment of Mukasey and his ensuing actions ?
Actually, in a recent piece for the Economist, Robert Caro argued that LBJ wasn’t working with all that different numbers than you are–though I’d add the caveat that he worked in a time before Civil Rights and the Southern Strategy changed partisan fights dramatically.
In any case, thanks for responding–and if I may ask one more question of both you and Digby. What did it mean that you had to convince Lieberman to stay in the Gang of 14?
Thanks for joining us at the Lake.
Sorry about jumping in. The key is GOTV in Reno (former resident, 89502) and especially Vegas
Thank you for being here today, Senator. I agree with you wholeheartedly, that many of the President’s activities have been illegal. I’ve been glad to see the hearings as a necessary first step to shed light. But what next? Surely there is enough evidence of illegality, of wrongdoing, to take it to the next step. What would that be? What can the Senate do to move action against the illegal activities of this Administration forward?
The answer is yes. I have personally spoken to Chairman Levin and he is tremendously concerned as I. And we are proceeding accordingly.
What is the first advice you gave your newly arrived nine Democratic Senators when they were sworn in?
It’s been a two steps forward, one back two step with him, sure. But the civil rights division is a much healthier place absent Gonzales. And I’ve heard that the OLC is a healthier place as well. Depends on with whom you are speaking, and what issue you are concentrating on as to whether things are better or the same. Ultimately, there won’t be a big change until the next administration. But stopping the hiring based on Bush-philosophy fervor for career track positions and going back to qualifications and respect fr the rule of law as the top consideration is a huge, huge step…and we got that by booting Gonzales. That’s a long-term benefit for the DOJ, and one that was essential…
Damn right!
Work hard. Attend your committee hearings. And don’t fool around.
Senator Reid,
I think that some of the frustration you might hear out in the public and among the activists is at the idea that the Republicans are going to get away with what they’ve done — and will logically be emboldened to do it in the future. We all understand that there is much business to be done and that you have a terrible mess to clean up. But the history of the last 30 years since Watergate, through Iran Contra and the numerous constitutional abuses of the Bush administration, is that Republican administrations are lawless and undemocratic. (The US`Attorney scandal alone is enough to give you the willies.)
Is there any way, short of holding the presidency and a majority in the congress forever (which I’m sure you would prefer…) to break this awful pattern, short of impeachment? They seem to escalate every time.
Sen. Reid, is Richard Bruce Cheney a member of the legislative branch, a federal employee working for the executive branch, or a Fourth Branch of government that is immune from Congressional oversight?
Given the forthcoming testimony (I’ll believe it when I hear it) of David Addington, those are serious questions, not snark. Thank you.
I’ve watched many of these hearings - either on CSPAN or by committee webstream. And I have to say that by and large the hearings have been a great disappointment. There are a few stand out Senators (Senator Feingold and Whitehouse come to mind), but the majority of the questioning has been pretty lame. Senators frequently miss hearings, or only attend for a short while (in order to get their time before the camera). They are frequently ill-prepared, ask lame (or no) follow up questions and are too often apologist for the worst of the Bush administration’s dangerous, illegal and immoral actions.
As a quick and recent example - in 2004, Senator Schumer defended the administration’s use of torture in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Then, on April 30 of this year, during a SJC hearing on secret law, a Republican Senator played a recording of Senator Schumer’s previous statement. How in the world can Democrats be entrusted to defend our country’s most basic values (to say nothing of our common defense), with actions like this?
Given how close their arrival would have been to the Foley mess, I’d say the “don’t fool around” advice likely resonated. *g*
Heh.
Especially with Roger Stone running around …
I knew that he would have some influence with the Republicans and some of the more conservative members of my Caucus. His participation was important.
Do you mean “fool around” as in Old Searchlight fooling around, or K-Street golfing trips to Scotland fooling around?
This is a very good question.
When the Repubs have legislative majorities, they take scorched earth approaches that demonize and destroy the ability of the minority to have any influence at all. Then, when they are in the minority, they scream “partisanship” every time the majority attempts to exert its prerogatives.
How can we break this pattern??
Thanks for answering my question Senator.
Both.
((((( Digby )))))
Great thanks for doing this !
In your book, you state repeatedly that Senator Lieberman is with the Democrats on “everything but Iraq.”
How does Senator Lieberman’s endorsement of and campaigning with John McCain sit with Democrats in the Senate?
So he didn’t want to stay in it because he opposed the compromises the Gang made?
I would guess both…
Sorry folks. I have to run now. Thanks again for having me here today. I want you to know all proceeds from my book will go to charity. I will check back and look at rest of this thread. Thanks again everyone. And thank you Digby!
and replaced him with a smarter and more competent apologist for torture and an out of control executive branch. I fail to see this as an improvement.
Are the more conservative members of your caucus chastened or emboldened by Joe Lieberman’s treatment thus far? Being tossed from the party in a primary must be terrifying; being embraced by your colleagues upon your return to the Senate must be comforting.
Which Lieberman lesson do you think your more-likely-to-wander conservative colleagues take away from watching him thus far?
Sen. Reid, your willingness as Senate Majority leader to dialogue with us at a substantive level is deeply, deeply appreciated. I know some here will not be satisfied with all your answers. That is to be expected. Many, however, with far less responsibility in the Democratic Party’s leadership than you, have done far less than you have today.
What would be the top areas where liberal blogs could be of the most assistance to you?
Senator Reid, following up on Digby’s comment (77), would you be personally supportive of a “Truth and Reconciliation” hearing process, with amnesty if need be, to educate the American people about the crimes committed by the Bush administration.
What exactly would you suggest to ensure that a future administration would not be able to get away with what we’ve witnessed these past seven years. (Obviously, the prospect of impeachment has not been an effective deterrent.)
I hate to repeat myself, but…
Senator Lieberman, as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, refuses to investigate the events surrounding the governments response to Hurricane Katrina. What are you empowered and prepared to do as Majority leader to see that this catastrophe is properly inv