Oh, yeah. He’s pure as the driven snow on this ethics stuff.

The media narrative on McCain – no doubt concocted over a plate of quality CostCo beef ribs – is that after Johnny boy was part of the Keating Five, he cleaned up his act and became an ethical reformer and the poster boy for clean government.

Ask any lobbyist employed by him as a campaign consultant, the man is awesome!

Funny how, upon inspection, that narrative falls apart.

Sen. John McCain championed legislation that will let an Arizona rancher trade remote grassland and ponderosa pine forest here for acres of valuable federally owned property that is ready for development, a land swap that now stands to directly benefit one of his top presidential campaign fundraisers.

Initially reluctant to support the swap, the Arizona Republican became a key figure in pushing the deal through Congress after the rancher and his partners hired lobbyists that included McCain’s 1992 Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members (one of whom has returned as his chief of staff), and an Arizona insider who was a major McCain donor and is now bundling campaign checks.

When McCain’s legislation passed in November 2005, the ranch owner gave the job of building as many as 12,000 homes to SunCor Development, a firm in Tempe, Ariz., run by Steven A. Betts, a longtime McCain supporter who has raised more than $100,000 for the presumptive Republican nominee. Betts said he and McCain never discussed the deal.

Looks like a map of this deal would have a lot of straight lines connecting Mr. Straight Talk’s name and the people who most benefited from this law, his contributors.

And it was a sweet deal:

Although the bill called for the two parcels to be of equal value, a federal forestry official told a congressional committee that he was concerned that "the public would not receive fair value" for its land. A formal appraisal has not yet begun. A town official opposed to the swap said other Yavapai Ranch land sold nine years ago for about $2,000 per acre, while some of the prime commercial land near a parcel that the developers will get has brought as much as $120,000 per acre.

And the man who hates lobbyists so much, he hired them to run his campaign from his "McPlane", was apparently persuaded by, lobbyists:

McCain initially withheld support for Hayworth’s bill, which failed in 2002. Ruskin saw McCain’s restraint as an obstacle. He said Senate staff members warned him that the senator was wary of a swap because "he spent some political capital and got some bricks thrown at him" over the Tonto National Forest deal.

Ruskin, who is a pediatrician by training, said he realized he needed to hire lobbyists "to open communications with McCain’s office."

He turned to some of McCain’s closest former advisers. In 2002, he sought out Mark Buse, McCain’s former staff director at the Senate commerce committee, which the senator chaired…

That year, lobbying records show, Ruskin also paid $60,000 to Michael Jimenez, another former McCain aide. Wes Gullett, who had worked in McCain’s Senate office, managed his 1992 reelection bid, and served as deputy campaign manager for his 2000 presidential run, also lobbied on the bill, documents show. The watchdog group Public Citizen lists Gullett and his wife, Deborah, as bundlers who have raised more than $100,000 for McCain’s White House bid. Ruskin also hired Gullett’s partner, Kurt R. Davis, another McCain bundler and member of the senator’s Arizona leadership team, to work with local officials and "to help with McCain if we needed help."

You can literally see peoples’ backs being washed [so I'd avert my eyes if I were you].

[O]pponents were baffled by the senator’s seemingly contradictory positions. Said Blaeloch: "The bizarre thing to me regarding McCain is, we spent a lot of time with his staff, and we all seemed to be on the same page about the problems with this swap. But somehow, John McCain kept pushing it forward."

Meanwhile, the alleged Tony Rezko trial has proceeded in Chicago without Barak Obama’s name being connected to any malfeasance — despite all of the reporting anxiously awaiting it.

Funny how that happens.

Related posts:

  1. Pat Roberts Fights for Your Right to Lobby
  2. And Nobody Thought to Say “What Deal”?
  3. Vote: Which Democrat Doesn’t “Walk the Talk” On the Public Option?
  4. McCain Rediscovers His Passion for Screwing Us with Bad Telecom Policy
  5. When Wilson Defines Debate, Democrats Squander Chance to Set Record Straight