I have two points. First, I can smell a “no illegal” argument coming up, on the basis that what is being violated (by the combination of a loan agreement and not abiding by limits agreed to by contract) isn’t against statutory law. “Not illegal” will fool most of the public.

Second, while there is a dispute as to whether or not the FEC has a voice in the contract it entered (McCain’s camp insures this is disputed), there is also the question about HOW the FEC will rule when it gets the opportunity to express itself.

I just can’t believe that there isn’t something obvious to nail them with….they had to have planned this for years and then put everything into place so carefully, so that no one can get to them…but I believe that there is something out there..right under our noses…a thread to pull.

I was thinking that…since it is illegal apparently to use taxpayer money to feed Propaganda to the American people — especially, since the goal was to make a case to put troops into harms way based on “propaganda”…there might be something there that they can’t claim executive privilege to…seeing that the DOD had to release all of those documents via FOIA…and the “missing WH emails” are for the exact same time period and are cited as missing right when the DOD documents get released…it sure looks like they ditched the emails, because they couldn’t produce them or it would incriminate them by showing that they were defrauding the people…so they destroyed the evidence, which is a pattern with them…

I think there is something substantial in this, but I’m not a lawyer…

msnbc had some “analyst” syaing Obama shouldn’t have chosen those words. Frankly I would say “lost his bearings” about anyone who doesn’t seem to be grounded in their beliefs, regardless of age. but opponents want to interpret it as an ageist remark, so throwing the wright issue is fair play. blech.