<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late Late Nite FDL: Tip The Canoe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:12:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434215</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I won’t LOL, but the GOP was in debt last year…and have been involved in a major book-keeping embezzlement scandal that leaves them unaware of how much money they actually even have. Bush’s fundraising is likely to barely keep them from going under. McCain technically went broke before his last set of primaries that got him the nomination and he’s facing a FEC challenge about borrowing money under the promise that he’d accept public financing…when he didn’t…and surpassed the spending limits to win the nomination. Now he’s back asking for public money again ’cause he’s broke.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile both Democratic candidates raised tens of millions more than Bush has…in fact Hillary claims (and we’ll have to take her word for it since you don’t report on a daily basis) she brought in over $10 million on the Internet in 48 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20080301/ai_n24373568&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Democratic candidates raise massive war chests&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won’t LOL, but the GOP was in debt last year…and have been involved in a major book-keeping embezzlement scandal that leaves them unaware of how much money they actually even have. Bush’s fundraising is likely to barely keep them from going under. McCain technically went broke before his last set of primaries that got him the nomination and he’s facing a FEC challenge about borrowing money under the promise that he’d accept public financing…when he didn’t…and surpassed the spending limits to win the nomination. Now he’s back asking for public money again ’cause he’s broke.</p>
<p>Meanwhile both Democratic candidates raised tens of millions more than Bush has…in fact Hillary claims (and we’ll have to take her word for it since you don’t report on a daily basis) she brought in over $10 million on the Internet in 48 hours.<br />
<a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20080301/ai_n24373568" rel="nofollow">Democratic candidates raise massive war chests</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbrother</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434213</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OOPs..Was LBJ’s slogan “The Great Society”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOPs..Was LBJ’s slogan “The Great Society”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434212</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434212</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The phrase &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/topic/chicken-in-every-pot&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chicken In Every Pot&lt;/a&gt; has a pretty sordid history and isn’t something that should be attached to LBJ. It was used by the RNC in the Herbert Hoover campaign just on the eve of the Great Depression. It actually went “Vote Republicans for Prosperity! We gave you a chicken in every pot…and a car in every driveway, to boot!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generally it’s a phrase brought up to suggest the worst sort of pandering and demogoguery - and a willful avoidance of the hard economic issues facing the country.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/chicken-in-every-pot" rel="nofollow">Chicken In Every Pot</a> has a pretty sordid history and isn’t something that should be attached to LBJ. It was used by the RNC in the Herbert Hoover campaign just on the eve of the Great Depression. It actually went “Vote Republicans for Prosperity! We gave you a chicken in every pot…and a car in every driveway, to boot!”</p>
<p>Generally it’s a phrase brought up to suggest the worst sort of pandering and demogoguery &#8211; and a willful avoidance of the hard economic issues facing the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbrother</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434211</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your political skills and experience far out weigh mine. I have other interests where I put my energy. If the Wikipedia statements are true regarding the corporate board he was not aware of their predatory lending practices. He has moved away from his support of war.&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Obama has earned the top spot and see John as a very good assistant in running the Executive Administration such as directing the DOJ fix of Rove’s mess. Directing HUD’s turn around, helping formulate and implement policy. Veep if he is asked. He showed in the debates an ability to debate with Obama. They are both respectors of persons.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your political skills and experience far out weigh mine. I have other interests where I put my energy. If the Wikipedia statements are true regarding the corporate board he was not aware of their predatory lending practices. He has moved away from his support of war.<br />
I agree Obama has earned the top spot and see John as a very good assistant in running the Executive Administration such as directing the DOJ fix of Rove’s mess. Directing HUD’s turn around, helping formulate and implement policy. Veep if he is asked. He showed in the debates an ability to debate with Obama. They are both respectors of persons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexBetsy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434210</link>
		<dc:creator>TexBetsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK.  I think the meds have kicked in. Going to try to sleep some more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  I think the meds have kicked in. Going to try to sleep some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadlyyes</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434209</link>
		<dc:creator>sadlyyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bush raises megabucks for the GOP&lt;br /&gt;
By Sam Youngman&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 05/06/08 07:53 PM [ET]&lt;br /&gt;
President Bush’s approval ratings may be down, but they haven’t affected his ability to raise money for Republicans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush is on pace to raise significantly more money in 2008 for the Republican campaign committees than he did in 2007, according to Republican officials. Through the first four months of 2008, Bush has already raised more than half of what he took in last year for GOP candidates. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 2007 was not an election year, it’s not surprising Bush would raise more money in a year in which Americans will pick his successor. Still, the early 2008 totals show Bush could be a fundraising force for the GOP this summer and fall, even if polls show a minority of Americans approve of his presidency. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2007, Bush raised a total of $66.6 million for the Republican National Committee (RNC), the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the National Republican Congresssional Committee (NRCC) and individual Republican candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through April of this year, Bush has already attended events that have brought in $36.6 million for those committees and unnamed candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fundraising has some negatives, as it fuels attacks by Democrats on GOP candidates. For example, Democrats and liberal tax-exempt 527 organizations targeted Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) with ads last month after Bush attended a fundraiser for Connecticut Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush acknowledged the potential pitfall in a March press conference with presumptive Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). At the time, he said that there are parts of the country where his approval ratings and his presence might hurt a Republican candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, the Democratic attacks haven’t kept Bush from being very much in demand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush raises megabucks for the GOP<br />
By Sam Youngman<br />
Posted: 05/06/08 07:53 PM [ET]<br />
President Bush’s approval ratings may be down, but they haven’t affected his ability to raise money for Republicans. </p>
<p>Bush is on pace to raise significantly more money in 2008 for the Republican campaign committees than he did in 2007, according to Republican officials. Through the first four months of 2008, Bush has already raised more than half of what he took in last year for GOP candidates. </p>
<p>Since 2007 was not an election year, it’s not surprising Bush would raise more money in a year in which Americans will pick his successor. Still, the early 2008 totals show Bush could be a fundraising force for the GOP this summer and fall, even if polls show a minority of Americans approve of his presidency. </p>
<p>In 2007, Bush raised a total of $66.6 million for the Republican National Committee (RNC), the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the National Republican Congresssional Committee (NRCC) and individual Republican candidates.</p>
<p>Through April of this year, Bush has already attended events that have brought in $36.6 million for those committees and unnamed candidates.</p>
<p>The fundraising has some negatives, as it fuels attacks by Democrats on GOP candidates. For example, Democrats and liberal tax-exempt 527 organizations targeted Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) with ads last month after Bush attended a fundraiser for Connecticut Republicans.</p>
<p>Bush acknowledged the potential pitfall in a March press conference with presumptive Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). At the time, he said that there are parts of the country where his approval ratings and his presence might hurt a Republican candidate.</p>
<p>Still, the Democratic attacks haven’t kept Bush from being very much in demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbrother</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434208</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Edwards carries the aggressive progressive aganda. Sorta like Lyndon’s “A Chicken in Every Pot” philosophy. He needs to be leading that agenda for the next President. He can learn. He is a good front man. He brings the Southern liberals and the working class. Ian Welch spoke for him that is a good economic humanist backer. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In reviewing his academic and athletic (Football)background he has great empathy and mental capacity. Get out of Iraq, end poverty in America and other progessive goals like universal medical care &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt; I am not a political prognisticator but here is a person with great energy for sustainable enery policy, good on the Supreme Court appointments, reversed a bad policy on Iraq and apologized. He seems to have character and honesty. He could be a great emissary as he is an experienced and tough deal maker (we have no one that hasn’t given away the farm) A good veep and will go after the Corporate Oligarchy which is number one in my book. Oh and will create jobs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards carries the aggressive progressive aganda. Sorta like Lyndon’s “A Chicken in Every Pot” philosophy. He needs to be leading that agenda for the next President. He can learn. He is a good front man. He brings the Southern liberals and the working class. Ian Welch spoke for him that is a good economic humanist backer. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards</a><br />
In reviewing his academic and athletic (Football)background he has great empathy and mental capacity. Get out of Iraq, end poverty in America and other progessive goals like universal medical care <a href="http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/</a> I am not a political prognisticator but here is a person with great energy for sustainable enery policy, good on the Supreme Court appointments, reversed a bad policy on Iraq and apologized. He seems to have character and honesty. He could be a great emissary as he is an experienced and tough deal maker (we have no one that hasn’t given away the farm) A good veep and will go after the Corporate Oligarchy which is number one in my book. Oh and will create jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadlyyes</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434207</link>
		<dc:creator>sadlyyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FYI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Business   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May 7, 2008, 7:49PM&lt;br /&gt;
Some oil companies reportedly settling MTBE suits&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By DAVID GLOVIN&lt;br /&gt;
Bloomberg News &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TOOLS&lt;br /&gt;
Email  Get section feed&lt;br /&gt;
Print  Recommend&lt;br /&gt;
Comments (1)  Yahoo! Buzz&lt;br /&gt;
ConocoPhillips, Shell, Marathon, Chevron and BP  are among about a dozen oil companies that will pay $423 million to settle lawsuits brought by water suppliers in 17 states over contamination from the gasoline additive MTBE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suits claim the oil companies contaminated wells and underground aquifers across the country by adding methyl tertiary butyl ether, or MTBE, to gasoline as a way to reduce air pollution. They claim the oil companies hid information showing MTBE would cause “massive” contamination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The settlement was filed Wednesday with U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin in New York, who is presiding over the 153 settled lawsuits brought by municipalities. The six oil companies and refineries that didn’t settle include Exxon Mobil Corp., the world’s biggest publicly traded oil company, according to Robert Gordon, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI</p>
<p>Business   </p>
<p>May 7, 2008, 7:49PM<br />
Some oil companies reportedly settling MTBE suits</p>
<p>By DAVID GLOVIN<br />
Bloomberg News </p>
<p>TOOLS<br />
Email  Get section feed<br />
Print  Recommend<br />
Comments (1)  Yahoo! Buzz<br />
ConocoPhillips, Shell, Marathon, Chevron and BP  are among about a dozen oil companies that will pay $423 million to settle lawsuits brought by water suppliers in 17 states over contamination from the gasoline additive MTBE.</p>
<p>The suits claim the oil companies contaminated wells and underground aquifers across the country by adding methyl tertiary butyl ether, or MTBE, to gasoline as a way to reduce air pollution. They claim the oil companies hid information showing MTBE would cause “massive” contamination.</p>
<p>The settlement was filed Wednesday with U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin in New York, who is presiding over the 153 settled lawsuits brought by municipalities. The six oil companies and refineries that didn’t settle include Exxon Mobil Corp., the world’s biggest publicly traded oil company, according to Robert Gordon, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexBetsy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434206</link>
		<dc:creator>TexBetsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;According to John Zogby &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7387919.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My understanding is that probably today,&lt;/a&gt; but certainly within 48 hours, about 30 super-delegates will endorse Mr Obama. That should give him further momentum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to John Zogby </p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7387919.stm" rel="nofollow">My understanding is that probably today,</a> but certainly within 48 hours, about 30 super-delegates will endorse Mr Obama. That should give him further momentum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434205</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/05/07/late-late-nite-fdl-tip-the-canoe/#comment-1434205</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s an interesting article about the impact of Republicans on the races in North Carolina and Indiana and whether that means much in the General Election,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/very-high-turnout-in-north-carolina-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Very High Turnout in NC and Indiana&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Extract ALL the Republican crossover from these two Democratic Primaries and the number of votes cast are much higher than the number Kerry got in the 2004 Presidential Election. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d like to point out another little item missed. TRUE 20-25% of Clinton voters said that they wouldn’t support Obama in the General election in the exit polls. But if many of these were the Republican Crossovers then these individuals may have voted for McCain in any case….and this is true whether or not they were part of “Operation Chaos”. They could genuinely believe that since McCain had won the nomination they’d vote for preference #2 (Clinton) in the Democratic race.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let’s do some math. 10% of those voting in the Democratic race identified as “Republican”. Almost all voted for Clinton. Clinton won by 50% (which means she had 40% Dem and “true” independents+10% Rep). Thus 20% of her support were Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now lemme see ~ 20-25% of her supporters say that they will defect to McCain , &lt;strong&gt;or not vote&lt;/strong&gt; if Obama gets the nomination. Hmmm! So almost all Democrats and Independants will either vote for, or consider Obama (or if some of that group defects it’s balanced by an equal number of defecting Republicans from McCain’s side that actually voted in the primary). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now re-read the article above…and think if the Republicans have a big problem on their hands!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s an interesting article about the impact of Republicans on the races in North Carolina and Indiana and whether that means much in the General Election,</p>
<p><a href="http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/very-high-turnout-in-north-carolina-and.html" rel="nofollow">Very High Turnout in NC and Indiana</a></p>
<p>Extract ALL the Republican crossover from these two Democratic Primaries and the number of votes cast are much higher than the number Kerry got in the 2004 Presidential Election. </p>
<p>I’d like to point out another little item missed. TRUE 20-25% of Clinton voters said that they wouldn’t support Obama in the General election in the exit polls. But if many of these were the Republican Crossovers then these individuals may have voted for McCain in any case….and this is true whether or not they were part of “Operation Chaos”. They could genuinely believe that since McCain had won the nomination they’d vote for preference #2 (Clinton) in the Democratic race.</p>
<p>So let’s do some math. 10% of those voting in the Democratic race identified as “Republican”. Almost all voted for Clinton. Clinton won by 50% (which means she had 40% Dem and “true” independents+10% Rep). Thus 20% of her support were Republicans.</p>
<p>Now lemme see ~ 20-25% of her supporters say that they will defect to McCain , <strong>or not vote</strong> if Obama gets the nomination. Hmmm! So almost all Democrats and Independants will either vote for, or consider Obama (or if some of that group defects it’s balanced by an equal number of defecting Republicans from McCain’s side that actually voted in the primary). </p>
<p>Now re-read the article above…and think if the Republicans have a big problem on their hands!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
