And above all, the ability to dream of something better…and to do the work necessary to get us there.
Politics is often described as the art of the possible — I say it is time we reworked it to be the art of making possible what is the impossible, the improbable, the desperately needed for all and not just for the few. We, the people…we have the power, if we would only use it for the greater good instead of squabbling over the mundane scraps.
Imagine restoration of the rule of law. Imagine extending a hand to the downtrodden and the despairing that they, too, might have hope in a time of despair and fear. Imagine working toward solutions — together. Imagine it…and then work to make it possible.
The WaPo has a piece on Bobby Kennedy’s campaign from 1968 that is worth reading today:
It’s a historic year in American politics, and during a pivotal Democratic primary in Indiana, a television ad shows the candidate speaking casually but forcefully within a scrum of farmers. Other spots feature similar conversations — spiked with talking points on crime, jobs and agricultural policy — set in a roomful of schoolchildren, perhaps, or a group of homemakers sipping coffee.
It’s not Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton visiting the stations of the campaign-media cross: It’s Robert F. Kennedy in the first primary of his 1968 run for the presidency. Produced by Washington-based filmmaker Charles Guggenheim, the TV spots were made on the fly, just weeks after Kennedy announced his candidacy. Guggenheim created some of the ads from footage he had already shot for Kennedy’s 1964 senatorial campaign, as well as stump speeches featuring the candidate’s soaring oratorical skills.
But the most compelling pieces featured Kennedy — always dressed in a suit and tie, with that famous unruly shock of hair and brooding eyes — by turns challenging and charming the farmers, factory workers, women and even young children that Guggenheim and his team had hastily assembled for a series of what were meant to look like off-the-cuff encounters.
To watch Guggenheim’s ads four decades later, it’s possible to see the creation, almost in real time, of the grammar of political advertising — the elements of style that are still evident today, at a time when emerging technologies and political passion are merging again to revolutionize political communications.
At a time when the nation was at a volatile pitch, RFK spoke to the best of who we could be — who we ought to be. And, in the process, over time, he evolved to become the change he wished to see.
Maybe, just maybe, this time around, we can get solving some of those problems RFK was talking about all those years ago: racial division, inequality, poverty, justice. These are the ties that bind us, the problems we all see but never seem to resolve — and it will take a concerted effort from us all to push for a better tomorrow. We are all — all of us — in this together. Let us remember…
What follows is the RFK ad from 1968 with the candidate with a group of homemakers sipping coffee referenced in the WaPo piece. What I love about this commercial is that it puts the public in the center of the discussion — brilliant stuff. Also, do yourself a favor and read this 2000 essay from John Harwood.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

So, Christy!
This is a great phrase:
much is desperately needed, indeed. For example, serious pressure to avert US aggression against Iran, pressure the (D) candidates are not providing, even though it might save them from defeat if there is war fever in Nov 08.
for those who care to stray from the sunny fields of (D) electioneering, Arthur Silbur has drawn together several past essays:
http://powerofnarrative.blogsp…..r-and.html
Beautiful post Christy!
So many things have changed for the better since then, and yet so many things remain the same and many are worse.
All I know is that Robert Kennedy would be turning over in his grave if he could see what has been done to his so carefully crafted Justice Dept. He was the brother of the President, yet I have no doubt that he would have told the President no rather than create the Constitutional crises that this President has created in his pursuit of unbridled power!
Great post, BTW, Christy!
The coffees were the center of every Kennedy campaign.
Christy!
Why Our Dems haven’t taken the high ground and proclaimed a better way for all is beyond me…
71% of Americans are saying that’s what We, the People want in Our Leaders, Now.
coffee!>?
“The desire to lift up the least among us so that they, too, might have an opportunity for a brighter future.”
_______________
Don’t forget “the weakest among us.” They too deserve ‘equal protection.’ ‘eh?
President McBu’ush and Vice President Huckabee will see to it.
Great vid, post and layout. Goes well with coffee. I like this message.
“you may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.”
Pleasure to join your imaginging, Christy.
I came across this a couple of years ago and can’t resist passing it on. The page links to audio of his address to the Commonwealth Club of California on Jan 4, 1968. He talks for 17 minutes and takes questions for half an hour.
What Do We Stand For? The Liberation of the Human Spirit
Are we at “war” or not? I want to know.
Paul Wolfowitz, Dan Senor, Douglas Feith, and Peter Rodman all seem to say that we are in a post-war, non-occupation in Iraq…that the “war ‘and’ occupation” ended in June, 2004.
Are we at “war” with Afghanistan? Are we at “war” with Iraq? No and no.
No declarations of war to be found anywhere….
http://www.hudson.org/files/do…..0final.pdf
So, how can “We the People” allow “He the Prezdinent” to claim the right to establish all of the horrible civil liberties violations and Constitutional violations that he has implemented, based on us being at “war” and “he” having all of these magical powers out of thin air, and get away with it???? I want to know why, and I want to know how to stop it and reverse it!
Seriously. This really p*sses me off.
Grrrrr…..*G*
Christy,
That picture of Caesar breaking his fast with Bobby always lifts me up (check out that lapel pin!)
trying to minimize the personal here – simply said am working to send a down ticket Dem to DC as a means of silencing the louder and louder voices urging me in to the streets . . .or underground
Bobby would have loved your work. thank you
“Some men see things as they are and say why; I dream things that never were, and say why not.” Robert F. Kennedy.
The great thing about this election cycle is how things have come together to bring those issues RFK was talking about so many years ago to the surface…front and center…revealing them…only by revealing the absurdity of the divisions can the wounds be disinfected and healed. Just no additional “complications” please…maybe the old is falling away…
“replace the men who make the policies..” RFK
That is the only way.
Excellent post, Christy. Thanks. I was thinking about this very subject over the last week or so. Who are we as a nation, REALLY? What’s the purpose of having whatever we have, if we can’t keep in mind those who have less or nothing, and what sets me so far apart from those in power now.
Also, I really can’t remember when I’ve felt I was a part of a nation of people under a leader I could be proud of, one I could thoroughly back and trust, follow and support. I really never felt that way in my adult years and would love to experience that before I leave this place.
The last 8 years have caused me personal shame, embarassment and fear; not of terrorists or another attack, but of the damage created to my country by the current pResident and his thug buddies.
Here’s to 1/20/09! And to all of us being better people, better Americans under a leader who authentically cares for us, over the insider deals and corruption of corruption of the national spirit!
Here’s to your comment!
How much did Bobby Kennedy pay for a haircut?
How could he care about poor people and the disenfranchised, being a privileged son of a financier and ambassador?
How about that big house he lived in, Hickory Hill, in McLean?
See how stupid our political discourse has become in forty years?
And see how that stupidity favors the plutocrats, and disadvantages those who would voice the people’s concerns in the public square?
Thank you, really beautifully written and researched
I can’t bring myself to watch those clips yet. I still fill up and spill over when I see pictures of Bobby. Had he lived we would have a profoundly different country today.
Salute to you Christy,
“We the people” was proceeded by a statement in the declaration of LIBERTY ” governments are instituted among men,deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed.” How do we bestow those powers to those who would benefit the well being of the country? The vote and it seams to me between gerrymandering and electronic voting machines we have been denied the power to ordain our chosen leaders.
First step would be Hand Counted Paper Ballots with a video trail of custody from the booth to the results.
i have argued with my county commissioners for a system that an eight grader could recount and verify the results and anything less is an insult.
A little help… if anyone is hanging out, please?
I get this email from my very “conservative” uncle from Topeka, KS… subject line: Listen to this very brilliant man – or something along that line.
Now I can usually shoot back pretty efficiently, but I am at a loss as how to respond to this mess.
Please looky and any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I know most of you are probably rubbing elbows with Glenn and Arianna upstairs, but a moment of your time
Thanks,
Bong
Sweet, bleeding Jesus… I’m going to have to do a bit of Googling, but the first thing that jumped out at me was that he said “Barack HUSSEIN Obama” 4 times. He also referred to Clinton’s presidency as a “reign.” And he called Bill Cosby “dearly beloved” twice before he swiped at him. I’m gonna have to look again to write down who he refers to as his professors (I’ve got friends who went to Union Seminary), and do a bit more scrounging. I want to know who pays his bills, first off… DrBong, thanks for dragging this dude out into the light.
Well, that was an odd little video. It is a little hard to know how to respond.
Wow. Well, that is interesting, but not really surprising.
One thing to point out is that all “black” people do not think alike nor do all “white” people or any other race. This man has an opinion, but who knows why he has the opinion he does.
The voting results show so far that his opinion does not match that of the polls of black voters and white voters…so I would just write it off to one man’s opinion that does not represent the majority.
Unless, of course, he is a black Republican paid by the RNC or someone…that is also a possibility.
First off, he seems to have awarded himself a doctorate. I did a Google search for The Atlah Theological Seminary, and the third cite says he founded it. Damn, I’ll bet I could command MUCH more respect if I had a doctorate. I’ll award myself one tomorrow, as soon as I found the school…
Exactly. That was my first thought. Then I found out he awarded himself a doctorate. Smells like Republicans to me…
Marion, LS, Fern…
*tips hat*
grazi!
And digging down deeper into the Google search it appears that the NYT has the goods on him too. (Hey, even a blind hog finds an acorn…)
De nada! (Don’t have any Italian at all… so I tried another Romance Language!)
And for what it’s worth, this site, a self-proclaimed Sarasota conservative blog, is pushing him. As I said first off, I want to know who’s paying his bills.
You beat me to it!
This is starting to look ugly.
Front page post, forthwith!
*tee-hee*
Really, guys (gals, whatevah)
Thank you from the bottom of my little black (jaded) heart.
;~P
Ugly is what Republicans do best. I’m going to try to get in touch with an old friend who’s a priest in NYC and see if she knows anything about this dude. She would be a LOT more tapped into what’s going on in the black community than I would. Given her schedule it may take a day or two to get a response, but Mother Martha may have something to say about him.
At least I’ll be able to respond intelligently (at least as intelligently as a bong can) to my poor, misguided uncle.
;~P
I can understand how someone could be taken in… Hope you have enough ammo to spike that cannon!
I’d be very interested to know what you find out. If you’re still here and if you would be so kind, please either post a comment or better yet email me
merci
He apparently wants to declare independance for Harlem, excuse me, ATLAH, which is simply a name that God told him to call it. Black nationalist and hater of black-white intermarriage…as it weakens the race. What’s next…a coalition with the KKK?
No wonder the guy hates Obama!
Now he is one scarry Preacher.
Glad everyone enjoyed the videos. I watched the first one three times today already, soaking in the historical vignettes. Amazing to think of all the things that have gone, how far we’ve come, and yet…how far we need to go still.
Mukei — I’m going to enjoy that link. Thanks so much for posting it!
So, is he from Harlem? Maybe that is why there were no black votes for Obama in the Harlem precincts on Primary day in NY. Actually Obama had 0 votes in several Harlem precincts. OT Obama took Quam today
Guam?
Been there
I’ll make a note of your e-mail and will be sure to let you know if I find anything out. It would appear that this is a dude who needs to be exposed for what he is.
Thanks, Marion
and mods, if you get a chance, please make my #40 go *poof*
don’t want the whole world knowing my email addy, i get enough spam as it is.
*off to combat the evils of “conservatism”*
bbl
oh, and you guys are da bomb!
mods, too
;~P
paradoxically, sometimes a truth can be so true, that it becomes a taboo, and cannot be spoken of or acknowledged in any way amongst people of a given tribe, or faction, or affiliation.
these reactions to a thoughtcrime, as Orwell pointed out, can be almost preconscious, or instinctual. Merely being in the presence of the unthinkable causes the mind to flick past it, without considering, veracity, applicability, or relevance.
Currently, for example, there is the studious avoidance of any admission on the part of the broadcast ‘news’ networks that their role as a propaganda funnel in the runup to the unprovoked agression against Iraq has been revealed for the world to see by the New York Times.
The truth in this case is clearly also a taboo, and the rules of the tribe say that the perpetuation of their central myths, their master narrative, takes precedence over the truth. Easy call, there is lots at stake, money, power, and self esteem. The latter is important for sustaining a feeling of superiority over Soviet or Baathist propagandists, with their absurd devotion to Party Line over self-evident realities.
Turns out however that the paragons of the corporate media in the USA are not that different than their Soviet colleagues.
This may still be an un-assimilated concept for many, but if you put this and a few other insights together into a perspective that is skeptical of concentrated power, you can make some predictions and compare them with observed reality.
This is something Arthur Silbur has been doing over at powerofnarrative.blogspot.com for many years.
for example, in October 2006, he predicted:
1) The Democrats will do nothing to speed up our exit from this immoral and illegitimate invasion and occupation.
TRUE! see for example
House Democrats work on huge Iraq money bill
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/…..=printable
2)Assuming they have majorities in both houses, will the Democrats repeal this vomitous legislation? (The Military Commisions Act) No, they will not.
TRUE! Supposedly, Obama has some campaign rhetoric about the restoration of Habeas Corpus, but prior to the passage of this abomination, his staff steadfastly maintained, via email and phone, that the Senator had no position on the bill, had not yet read it, and other such slippery evasions and equivocations. So his conversion to support for the centuries old writ of Habeas Corpus is a little too recent to be presumptively sincere.
3) Point Three: the Democrats do nothing but ensure the inevitability of an attack on Iran.
sigh, TRUE.
Warhawk H. Clinton promises “obliteration”, while Obama voices the right-wing-talking-point of Dick Cheney that “all options are on the table”. And of course on July 11, 2007 the Senate passed the “Lieberman Amendment to Confront Iran” by 97 to zero.
So this guy Silbur has the ability to make predictions that can be tested and confirmed. Also, he is likely in profound agreement that it is vitally important that we
But, alas, Mr Silbur seems to have his priorities all wrong – since he cannot seem to place allegiance to the Democratic Party over and above his opposition to war and torture, and thus he is always uttering thoughtcrimes that make him beyond the pale in the (D) captured ‘progressive blogoshpere.’
For example:
Part 2 – Part 1 is an unutterable, unthinkable taboo to those who think (D) electoral politics will lead to “restoration of the rule of law… extending a hand to the downtrodden …” etc. Research and evidence to the contrary, no matter how voluminous, is irrelevant, for we are in the realm of Faith.
Like the yearning for a Sky Daddy to give direction to the Universe, people of a certain faith in the USA have to beleive that someone from up high is gonna come and make things all better, and that the vehicle that will deliver this saviour is the apparatus of the (D) Party.
but if your Faith sometimes wavers, though, read some links from beyond the pale, see if they can be easily refuted, or if they deserve fair consideration…
…none of the other firepups have to know….
word