<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is McCain Impotent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:52:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: priscianusjr</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1414089</link>
		<dc:creator>priscianusjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1414089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, that last comment wound up on the wrong thread. I’ll put it on the right one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that last comment wound up on the wrong thread. I’ll put it on the right one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priscianusjr</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1414069</link>
		<dc:creator>priscianusjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1414069</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Which raises the question: What exactly is the difference between publicly wishing for an event to occur and actually advocating it?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Publicly wishing, IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE OF DITTOHEADS, for an event to occur, IS advocating it. In other words, the nature of Rush’s core audience has to be considered. How does this differ from his calls for Operation Chaos?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Which raises the question: What exactly is the difference between publicly wishing for an event to occur and actually advocating it?”</p>
<p>Publicly wishing, IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE OF DITTOHEADS, for an event to occur, IS advocating it. In other words, the nature of Rush’s core audience has to be considered. How does this differ from his calls for Operation Chaos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wobblybits</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413508</link>
		<dc:creator>wobblybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just don’t buy that argument given that there are sufficient swing states that Obama could carry that she can’t.  i think the argument is moot at this point given that mathematically it is impossible for her to win the nomination on either the delegate or popular vote.  We’re going to have to wait it out and see what shakes out (who gets the nod) and then get to some serious work&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don’t buy that argument given that there are sufficient swing states that Obama could carry that she can’t.  i think the argument is moot at this point given that mathematically it is impossible for her to win the nomination on either the delegate or popular vote.  We’re going to have to wait it out and see what shakes out (who gets the nod) and then get to some serious work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413487</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413487</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not too worried about Wisconsin either- it’s OHIO that will be critical…As goes Ohio goes the White House- or so it looks to me. Obama isn’t behind McCain by a LOT there, but he IS behind- and he’s WAY behind in Florida. I believe that Obama will win the nomination and the White House- but Ohio and Pennsylvania seem to represent Clinton’s best arguments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not too worried about Wisconsin either- it’s OHIO that will be critical…As goes Ohio goes the White House- or so it looks to me. Obama isn’t behind McCain by a LOT there, but he IS behind- and he’s WAY behind in Florida. I believe that Obama will win the nomination and the White House- but Ohio and Pennsylvania seem to represent Clinton’s best arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wobblybits</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413486</link>
		<dc:creator>wobblybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413486</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the rest of us are underwhelmed by their ‘wonderfulness’ but your right about their lack of logic.  It is as I have heard (the repug mantra):  Tell them X (econ will trickle down, surge is a success) then talk about abortion (you know,switch the topic)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the rest of us are underwhelmed by their ‘wonderfulness’ but your right about their lack of logic.  It is as I have heard (the repug mantra):  Tell them X (econ will trickle down, surge is a success) then talk about abortion (you know,switch the topic)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wobblybits</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413484</link>
		<dc:creator>wobblybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413484</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, that would be Wisconsin but he is expected to take that too but only time will tell&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that would be Wisconsin but he is expected to take that too but only time will tell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413480</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413480</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Obama WILL take it—if for some reason he doesn’t- he’ll be having BIGGER problems than Oregon&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama WILL take it—if for some reason he doesn’t- he’ll be having BIGGER problems than Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyG</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413478</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413478</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. So, yeah, I’m not just trippin’.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those among The Self-Appointed Morally Wonderfuls never delve too deeply into their own illogic. Being Wonderful suffices.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. So, yeah, I’m not just trippin’.</p>
<p>Those among The Self-Appointed Morally Wonderfuls never delve too deeply into their own illogic. Being Wonderful suffices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siri</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413477</link>
		<dc:creator>siri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413477</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post TSF, and I’d also like to ad that your comments on other’s posts here are provocative and intelligent.  You always make me think, or run an look something up.&lt;br /&gt;
I am glad you write here.&lt;br /&gt;
:)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post TSF, and I’d also like to ad that your comments on other’s posts here are provocative and intelligent.  You always make me think, or run an look something up.<br />
I am glad you write here.<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413465</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/27/is-mccain-impotent/#comment-1413465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post TSF, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post TSF, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
