<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m With the Band</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:02:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalGeorge</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398737</link>
		<dc:creator>CalGeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Journalists appalled by the debate are “not merely observers but participants in the Obama phenomenon.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is that what they are suggesting? Seriously?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How clueless can you get?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! </p>
<p>Journalists appalled by the debate are “not merely observers but participants in the Obama phenomenon.”</p>
<p>Is that what they are suggesting? Seriously?</p>
<p>How clueless can you get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregB</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398647</link>
		<dc:creator>GregB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Has John McCain rejected and denounced Ollie North for negotiating with the Iranians and giving missiles, a cake and a bible to the regime that took US embassy staffers hostage?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Curious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-G&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has John McCain rejected and denounced Ollie North for negotiating with the Iranians and giving missiles, a cake and a bible to the regime that took US embassy staffers hostage?</p>
<p>Curious.</p>
<p>-G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann in AZ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398611</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann in AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398611</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, I just heard McSame on CNN talking about taxes.  He says he wants to double dependent exemptions from $3,500 to $7K for each dependent.  Since I have none, and neither of my kids nor my niece nor my nephew have dependent kids, I object!  To top that off, he says that we should not stifle innovation with excessive regulation, etc., so he is proposing to ban all taxes on wireless cell phones and ban taxes on the internet.  My question, how does that comport with net neutrality?  Does it have no bearing at all, does it mean he’s supporting net neutrality?  Is this a smoke screen to fool us into thinking he’s for net neutrality while he allows the companies to tack on their own fees to internet usage?  And why didn’t he address reducing taxes for companies that keep their businesses here, rewarding companies that keep Americans working?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I just heard McSame on CNN talking about taxes.  He says he wants to double dependent exemptions from $3,500 to $7K for each dependent.  Since I have none, and neither of my kids nor my niece nor my nephew have dependent kids, I object!  To top that off, he says that we should not stifle innovation with excessive regulation, etc., so he is proposing to ban all taxes on wireless cell phones and ban taxes on the internet.  My question, how does that comport with net neutrality?  Does it have no bearing at all, does it mean he’s supporting net neutrality?  Is this a smoke screen to fool us into thinking he’s for net neutrality while he allows the companies to tack on their own fees to internet usage?  And why didn’t he address reducing taxes for companies that keep their businesses here, rewarding companies that keep Americans working?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398597</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398597</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and, by the way, Jane, i sure would like to be a fly on the wall with you and Glenn in the room. the vibe must be really special ……&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and, by the way, Jane, i sure would like to be a fly on the wall with you and Glenn in the room. the vibe must be really special ……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398591</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398591</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey, it was easy ……&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitterand could’ve worked for Colbert.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, it was easy ……</p>
<p>Mitterand could’ve worked for Colbert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWBartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398590</link>
		<dc:creator>DWBartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398590</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like that. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398588</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the thing about Santorum is he has this smooth, pleasant, small town earnestness about him. he acts and sounds like a nice guy, if you don’t pay attention to the meaning of his words - especially the subtext.&lt;br /&gt;
a lot of voters are taken in by his manner. a lot of them. he just has to be a good guy, you know? he couldn’t be bad or wrong!&lt;br /&gt;
the Republicans have this down. completely.&lt;br /&gt;
fundamentally, Americans, a huge number of them, are into this.&lt;br /&gt;
if fuckwad and the Delays of the Party hadn’t screwed up so very, very, badly, Santorum and his ilk would still be riding high. we may win in ‘08 but they’ll be back. you can count on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing about Santorum is he has this smooth, pleasant, small town earnestness about him. he acts and sounds like a nice guy, if you don’t pay attention to the meaning of his words &#8211; especially the subtext.<br />
a lot of voters are taken in by his manner. a lot of them. he just has to be a good guy, you know? he couldn’t be bad or wrong!<br />
the Republicans have this down. completely.<br />
fundamentally, Americans, a huge number of them, are into this.<br />
if fuckwad and the Delays of the Party hadn’t screwed up so very, very, badly, Santorum and his ilk would still be riding high. we may win in ‘08 but they’ll be back. you can count on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398575</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;don’t know if this applies to Hillary or not but&lt;br /&gt;
my favorite take on Margaret Thatcher:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“She has lips like Marilyn Monroe and eyes like Caligula.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;                                            -Francois Mitterand&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don’t know if this applies to Hillary or not but<br />
my favorite take on Margaret Thatcher:</p>
<p>“She has lips like Marilyn Monroe and eyes like Caligula.”</p>
<p>                                            -Francois Mitterand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petrocelli</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398567</link>
		<dc:creator>Petrocelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Touche !&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It truly has unfolded before our eyes …&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Touche !</em></p>
<p>It truly has unfolded before our eyes …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWBartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398564</link>
		<dc:creator>DWBartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/im-with-the-band/#comment-1398564</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Read it.  Agree with much of it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do  you think Herbert has a clue?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Isn’t it much more fun to bash each other and feel smug about it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oops, only one ’side’ is ‘bashing’, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Durn ‘Bama INTIMIDATORS!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, of course, Herbert is anti-Hillary and we must take his purview with a grain of assault.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it.  Agree with much of it.  </p>
<p>Do  you think Herbert has a clue?</p>
<p>Isn’t it much more fun to bash each other and feel smug about it?</p>
<p>Oops, only one ’side’ is ‘bashing’, right?</p>
<p>Durn ‘Bama INTIMIDATORS!</p>
<p>But, of course, Herbert is anti-Hillary and we must take his purview with a grain of assault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.313 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 00:12:57 -->

