We've been saying all along that Barack Obama's candidacy is going to bring out the ugliest face of the Republican Party before long.
But today's Republicans know that they can't engage in the open race-baiting of the Strom Thurmond era without endangering their party's image as "inclusive" -- an image intended not so much to appeal to minorities but to moderate voters repelled by overt racism. So they talk in a lot of code about "preserving white culture" and other well-worn tropes, often hinting and nudging at the old race-baiting vocabulary (such as the time Karl Rove talked about that "trash-talking" and "lazy" Obama fellow).
It's called "dog whistle politics," and Republicans -- including John McCain -- are its past and present masters.
So it's kind of funny that everyone's pretending that the most noteworthy recent example of it -- from Rep. Geoff Davis, a Republican from Kentucky -- is no big deal (at least, so far, it seems to be getting a pass from the media). Davis told an audience at a Republican fund-raiser:
"I'm going to tell you something: That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," Davis said. "He could not make a decision in that simulation that related to a nuclear threat to this country."
Wheeeewit!! Here boy!! C'mere an' get some good ole red meat! And of course [shpittoo], nobody hearing someone call a grown black man "boy" would have any cause to think it meant anything racist, right? [Wink nudge wink]
Davis himself was quick to disclaim that there was any subtext intended:
But Davis campaign spokesman said Davis misspoke and was not directing a racist statement at Obama but instead calling into question his qualifications for office.
"He simply misspoke," said Jeremy Hughes, Davis' campaign spokesman.
This is, to put it kindly, unadulterated horseshit. We all know that Davis was giving voice to a certain set of racial attitudes, and that he did it as part of a talk before a banquet audience indicates it was clearly intentional. And no one but the most blinkered and gullible Republican (though there are plenty of those, it's true) should be willing to buy it.
It will be telling, I think, to watch how the media handle it. If we're supposed to take Davis' glib manure-spreading at face value, it will speak volumes about a Fourth Estate that makes a fetish out of ostensibly offensive remarks by a black pastor for weeks on end but can't find the time to consider how Republicans are talking about one of the two remaining Democratic candidates for the presidency.
That's especially now the case that Davis has apologized. But note how he does so:
On Saturday night I gave a speech in which I used a poor choice of words when discussing the national security policy positions of the Presidential candidates. I was quoted as saying "That boy's finger does not need to be on the button."
My poor choice of words is regrettable and was in no way meant to impugn you or your integrity. I offer my sincere apology to you and ask for your forgiveness.
Though we may disagree on many issues, I know that we share the goal of a prosperous, secure future for our nation. My comment has detracted from the dialogue that we should all be having on legitimate policy differences and in no way reflects the personal and professional respect I have for you.
That's all swell and wonderful, but Davis never apologizes for what was most egregiously offensive about the remark -- that it referred to Obama the way an old Confederate slaveholder would refer to his holdings, the way old segregationists referred to civil-rights workers. It wasn't simply that it was offensive, it was that it was classic race-baiting.
And of course, Davis' defenders have been quick to proclaim him free of racist taint. Already, we can see how it's going to go:
Campbell County Democratic Party Chairman Ken Mullikin said he could "not believe" Davis would make such a comment.
"When you get somebody in an emotionally charged situation they speak what is on their mind," Mullikin said. "That comment clearly shows what Geoff Davis really believes about African-Americans."
But Northern Kentucky Republicans strongly disagree that Davis is a racist. They said it is Obama who has slammed small town America and working class people with his recent comments that those voters are "bitter" and clinging to guns and religion.
"Geoff Davis is absolutely not a racist," said Fourth District GOP Chairman Kevin Sell of Alexandria, who attended Saturday's dinner but said this morning he does not recall Davis' use of the word "boy" to describe Obama.
"I've known this man since 2001, and have campaigned with him," Sell said. "This is a man of integrity. All he was doing in that speech was questioning the experience of a candidate and the defense of our country. There was no question about that."
That's right: that whistle you heard may have brought every dog in town to my yard, but really, you didn't hear anything.
And besides, it's those Democrats who are the racists, dontcha know?
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Hello David, I will read this when I get to my Rat hole in a bit.
KO!
That is one hell of a misspeak
I’m growing bitter over this nonsense that has been exploding day after day over the “bitter” nonsense.
Enough already. How about talking about the fact that the Preznit has endorsed illegal activitiey, namely, torture?
Arf!
was “boy” uttered as a two syllable word?
I am already tired of this “Obama is elitist” crap, from the media as well as from Sen. Clinton.
And Keith should know better. He’s not exactly living up to his own standards lately.
right on!!!! enough with this crap, let’s get to the real deal
yeah but you know he had to cover this stupid crap, right?
Just be on the lookout for people doing more and more of this over the next few months.
I was going to link to something but it may not be appropriate. Is there a mod I could ask?
There is no doubt what the representative said and it was a overt racial slur by a bigot. Does his constituency approve of his remarks?
Can you Digg it?
no, he didn’t.
Is no one willing nowadays to point out the ol’ Freudian slip? Even if consciously repudiated, it was unconsciously expressed (and of course, it wasn’t unconscious). But why oh why are these cheats always let off the hook with the I-didn’t-mean-to whine?
He has to counter Tweety who went on about how important Obamas comments were.
HILLS new commercial,is not resonating with me
Tweety will be on the Colbert Report this evening. Which may prove entertaining…
Obama made a comment that wasn’t supposed to get outside the room- it did. He fucked up—hopefully not a fatal mistake but it won’t go over well should christian america see a marxist interpretation of religion in the comments. It can make it hard for Obama to maintain his “I’m a christian” mosaic.”
i am viscerally hating TWEETS
I’m bitter that people are bitter about being bitter from being called bitter. Am I meta enough to be pundit now?
Seriously, what I am curious about is this nuke war game business.
“He could not make a decision in that simulation that related to a nuclear threat to this country.”
What is up with that? Who puts these on, and who gets to play them, and why? Who gets to put their finger on the simulation nuke-em button? Why are people kibbitzing? Did Geoff Davis get his finger on the button? Did he ‘win’ did he blow us all up?
I want to know what he is talking about.
Been reading Little Billy Kristol?
That is my take on it as well but I respect Rev’s displeasure (I do wish it wouldn’t occupy what is now almost a quarter of his show) That means less time on Bush’s admission
im bitter,so are my friends and family! he is correct
Me too.
is elitist the new say to say uppity?
anyway, I would like a president with a triple digit IQ if that’s ok with y’all.
I’m not sure if his use of the word “boy” in his speech was intentional … at least not in the conscious sense.
But he made a point of quoting himself — using the “boy” language, without (as you note) acknowledging that was what was offensive. That was a conscious decision — using the word “boy” may have been a ‘freudian’ slip the first time, using it the second time was clearly not.
Great post, David. Does everyone remember how the White Boys Club reacted when Tiger Woods won his first golf championship? Of course you do. These are the same republicans and other racist assholes of today who learned back then to not say what you really feel out loud. In fact, they were the ones who were harped on because Americans are sick and tired of racism no matter what level. And what have those White Boys Club members learned over the years since then? Loads of money and an affluent background does not make you entitled to win every championship, skin color has nothing to do with anything, and sometimes working hard with very little can achieve the same thing.
si”g”
Racist jack of asses.
I’m getting really bitter about what the press chooses to cover. Still nothing about the POTUS admitting that he cleared torture. Everything about Obama saying that people might be bitter. Might be? I’m bitter as hell.
The “boy” comment got all of 6 seconds. The bitter nonsense got 14 minutes on KO/
Priorities, people.
Better yet, does his presidential candidate–John McCain–approve of the remarks?
Someone should ask him if he is going to “denounce and reject” Rep. Davis.
I was born the year of Brown v Board of education. This year, a black man is in avery good position to become President and he’s still being called “boy.” My goodness, how far we haven’t come.
yup FUZZY ZELLER
he doesn’t know either. he was baffling everyone (including himself) with bullshit
There were a series of “war game” rehearsals by Homeland Security last year…”top something” or something like that…they were all over the country….I’ve lost the link, but there were members of Congress that may have participated, as well as many local officials…
im making teeshirts that say
IM BITTER……..SO!
Love it! Can we buy one when you’re done?
ooooh me likey
I think there is a good chance Obama will be helped by the bitter flap. So far it has not hurt his polling numbers in Pennsylvania, though I guess it is too soon to see how the whole assinine corporate media Kabuki plays out.
I laughed this week. I heard the news announce a piece with ‘Obama on defensive and backpeddling over remark’ then the piece consisted of a sequence of millionaire pundits and media swanks gassing about how his remark was condescending. Not a word about Obama said at all. Not a word from anyone earning less than an annual fortune spouting media gas for a living.
We spent a whole thread looking for a reason why Hillary lies. We got no answer. The person who wrote the last thread is a poster on Taylor Marsh which has become awful. http://taylormarsh.com/ Take a look and see if you want FDL to be like that.
I havent been here much I hope I can come back someday.
Why are you supporting Hillary after 8 years of lies Why do you think that her lies about NAFTA are Ok? Or Tuzla followed up by her Husbands lies.
What a shame
Clinton, on tape on Countdown, just called G.W.Bush “one of two very good men,” if I understood her correctly.
hmm next story on KO, more stupid crap (clinton vs Gore and Kerry)
*sigh* Nooooooooooooooo Chimpy admitted to torture
Not many here support her from what I can tell. The last poster does, however, but as you can see, his/her post did not change any minds.
Who is “you”???
FDL is not biased one way or the other….many commenters have different preferences. Just not McCain, as far as I can tell.
certainly!
in no particular order, how about these:
food and energy prices
the economy in general
the environment
war and militarism
human rights, civil rights, labor rights, the bill of rights
oh, and our president just admitted to being the torturer-in-chief!
I’m now a PA voter and I’m beginning to hate Hillary. Originally I had planned to write in Edwards—folks here can attest to my declaration—but I’m being pushed by Hillary into Obama’s camp. Not that I think he’s the Messiah—he ain’t—but Hillary is making me crazy.
It’s normally not like this and to be honest this just really erupted pretty bad today.
We had a poo flinging thread some time ago to get out the raw emotion but we havge pretty much had the understanding that we would not personally attack one another but that shit seems to have gone out the window.
The Clinton’s are trying to become a version of the Bush family so that’s no suprise.
4036 of our troops have died as of today and Hillary is talking about drinking and shooting. And the Repubs are talking about Obama can’t bowl. What a load of horse pockey!
Nope–Did he say that?
No he just says Obama lies as a response as to why Hillary lies. Why is he a poster?
Smirking all the while as well.
I’ve stopped reading his stuff. No point to it as far as I’m concerned.
i don’t think that is quite true.
ana Millbank,speaking the truth on KO
yep. i can and do.
Not worth focusing on. There are fantastic posters here and it’s not fair to judge the sitte by the actions/opinions of one poster.
sit back and read, you’ll see that there is room at the table for everyone
thank you. I was an Edwards supporters but listening to Obama, I am impressed and feel he will be able to help this country.
Of course he isnt perfect but his take on issues are remarkable.
I have heard him address the constitution too.
John McCain supports President Bush’s policy of torturing human beings.
John McCain:
Worse than Bush
Someone on the teevee suggested that Hillary and Obama’s sniping is carrying on as long as possible to bring out all of the potential attacks now that will be forthcoming from the Pukes once a candidate is nominated in order to get them out of the way. Could be.
I’m not attached to either Obama or Hillary—but will vote for whichever of em is the nominee come November.
As near as I can see, they’ve both been fuckin up regularly and calling attention to the other’s fuckups…Nothin new or even interesting about that….McBush has been having some VERY serious fuckups as well….going to be two badly damaged candidates come November.
Best for Obama if Hillary raises hell about this recent fuck up so that he can claim that it’s “old news” come October- same for Hill.
I do read and have for at least a year.
But if you are supporting a candidate tell us why.
i guess i’ll join you. it certainly isn’t worth getting upset about (not for me) but I will never let anyone get away with insulting me (man, woman or shrub)
Yes…time for a poster or better yet a t-shirt
I believe she was referring to Gore and Kerry.
Maybe but then I don’t think that you can trust the Clintons. They are way too friendly with the Bush family.
I agree, I just didn’t want you to think that we were a bunch of poo flingers
Why is the media covering some “bitter” comment when John McCain is openly and systematicly violating campaign finance law?
Interesting…
neuro - she was referring to Gore and Kerry
riffing off the Obitterpalooza - (and I’m paraphrasing) ‘two very good men lost bec they were perceived by a significant portion of the electorate to be elitist’
Rove may be entitled to some royalties here
I was talking about that particular piece. I am eager to see something from ordinary folk who are supposed to be bitter. Do you know of any clips on the internet?
because McCain makes great ribs, Obama not so much. damn elitist eats arugula. you can’t put bbq sauce on arugula
No, I figured a FDL poster that all FDL approved.
Thanks
Oh, my, yes he did.
OH. I mised the link in your comment. Thanks.
I have my personal thoughts too, but I just try to stay out of the preference discussion most of the time, because it is so divisive. McCain is the problem. Obama can take care of himself, and if Clinton gets nominated, she can too.
Oh, I hope so. In the context of her remarks about the candidates for president in 2000 and 2004, I thought she was talking about the nominees.
Speaking of that….I was watching C-SPAN a few weeks ago and they had Barbara Bush on a panel taking questions. When a question was raised about her husband’s relationship with Bill Clinton she said in part (paraphrasing), “I was so disappointed the American people didn’t see their relationship as a good thing. We really wanted to show Americans if these two families could unite…our whole nation could”. OMG! I can’t tell you how many times I gave her the finger after she said that.
Americans have had enough of the Clintons & the Bushes. The End.
Here’s a funny—ironic kinda funny. Obama beats McSame in MI but Hillary loses to him.
I don’t mind saying, I’m still vaguely in Hillary’s column but willing to be undecided between the two senators. I am, however, fully decided against McShrub. No McShrub. That’s how I’m voting. No to McShrub. No to racism and race-baiting. No to sexism and gender-baiting. No to bitter old white men. Just no. Enough.
G.E. etal.
Such a misspoke is never a once off the top of your head but rather is ingrained in your very fiber of being. You may suppress your words but it has a way of creeping out. Imagine what Geoff Davis says around his intimate friends and what they say to him.
I just added dog-whistle politics to my descriptive phrase choices. My, my!
from there you can go to the original articles, but rosen puts it in some perspective, which imo, is a nice place to start.
Lieberman has been pushing ‘Maybe Obama is a Marxist’ line also.
McBitter
Yes…how does McCain feel about this comment?
Honestly Snowbird, I had no idea that poster was connected to the fake journalist/fake everything/to get in high places/…Taylor Marsh. Maybe there should have been a disclaimer telling us that?
funny, I never watch CNN anymore but caught a few minutes of Jack Cafferty talking abut his 3000+ emails on this -
he said the overwhelming majority of letters were sympathetic and agreed with Senator Obama - Jack - “people really get what he was saying”
Put a question mark at the end and I’ll buy one!
Geoff Davis - the audacity of racism….followed up by some of my best friends are black…
Code.
Traitor Joe is inching very close to the irrelevant chasm. About to fall into it, actually.
KO is talking about McCain’s finances.
i love arugula with reggiano,and olive oil and pepper
Now, KO IS covering McCain’s campaign finance law offenses. Good for him.
about 36 minutes late into the program.
Could we just give him a little nudge? I would gladly assist.
ot - heads up for the c-span junkies (that haven’t already seen it). tomorrow’s hearings include:
9:30 am – House Armed Services
Building Partnership Capacity and Development of the Interagency Process.
Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense
Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State
Michael G. Mullen, USN, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
1 pm - House Judiciary
Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
Hearing on H.R. 3189, the “National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007”
as reported by the ACLU, witnesses will include:
Glenn Fine, DOJ Inspector General
Valerie Caproni, FBI General Counsel
Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU National Security Project
2:30 pm - Senate Foreign Relations
To hold hearings to examine protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949….
John B. Bellinger, Legal Adviser, Department of State
Charles A. Allen, Deputy General Counsel, International Affairs, Department of Defense
Brigadier General Michelle D. Johnson, Deputy Director for the War on Terrorism and Global Effects, J-5 Strategic Plans and Policy Directorate, Joint Staff
you got it
*sigh*
what a sad, sad man
Hmm- Not surprising- it does echo that sentiment. I’ve always thought that the concept was pretty bad as a scientific explanation- but it’s not the sort of thing that a person wants to be caught saying in a presidential election in any event…
yup…tripe
does that go well with a shot and a beer?
Hillary is making me crazy too. I supported her for a good long time, but she’s now making a fool of herself.
Thanks for reminder. I’m one of those C-SPAN junkies. Are there other stations?
Thank you for the heads up!!!
I disagree with Paul about Clinton, but he isn’t some loon. He’s just passionate about his candidate, and passionate about the underlying racism/sexism things he’s seeing.
This is the man whose FOIA requests got us the information about Bush’s ANG service.
And also in his defense, he wanted to have a discussion that he didn’t get to have - I think his poorly written paragraph caused that, but he really wanted to look at a real issue, sexism.
Please don’t take this as a defense of Taylor Marsh, though. That site is just out there.
we do care, wtf? why would he say we don’t care?
hahahahahahahahaha
Haven’t has a shot and a beer for years—I have some good memories of it- but for some reason it doesn’t sound good any more.
that’s what we were doing in CT in 2006 - nudging. *g*
LOL Gross. *plugging nose*
Oh, and he shouldn’t have called us idiots, that wasn’t cool, but I blame the Taylor Marsh influence.
I agree, it was a provocative and interesting post. It just got a little personal there for a little bit…which was a bit rattling…
i despise the clintons. but not clinton’s supporters. you are right, imo, paul has more than earned the benefit of the doubt.