Oh this is helpful. Holy Joe goes on Fox News:

KELLY: So, OK, it goes on and on. What about Obama’s refined position that McCain supports a 100 troop presence in Iraq is inaccurate?

LIEBERMAN: Well, I think that – let me say generally that Sen. Obama doesn’t come to this debate with a lot of credibility. Basically on the question of Iraq, John McCain has had the guts to stand out on his own arguing for what he thought was right. And it turned out that he was right about the surge working to improve conditions in Iraq.

If we did what Sen. Obama wanted us to do last year, Al-Qaeda in Iran would be in control of Iraq today. The whole Middle East would be in turmoil and American security and credibility would be jeopardized.

On the specific question of the 100 years, I think that’s an unfortunate example of the way Sen. Obama has used it, of playing political gotcha with a national security question.

If you look what Sen. McCain said in that exchange at the town hall meeting – I believe it was in New Hampshire — he wasn’t talking about a long war. He would like to see our troops, as many of them as possible, come home as soon as possible from Iraq. But the fact is, we’re going to need, as we have after every conflict we have been in, World War II, Korea, et cetera. We’re going to want to leave troops there to secure the peace that our soldiers have won.

It’s clear that that’s what he meant. Anybody who says that John McCain is for a 100-year war in Iraq is either not informed or is intentionally trying to mislead the public. And I think Sen. McCain appropriately responded to that today.

This is gold for McCain, having "liberal, bipartisan Democrat Joe Lieberman" standing by his side, trashing Obama on experience and national security credentials.

So I’ll ask it again, to nobody in particular, and not that I expect an answer — why didn’t you fuckheads take him out when you had the chance?


Related posts:

  1. Lieberman Says He’ll Filibuster Health Bill; What’s Obama Going to Do?
  2. Breaking: Obama Writes Letter Opposing Inclusion of Graham-Lieberman in Supplemental
  3. Lieberman on Point for Senate DADT Repeal
  4. Rachel Maddow Redux: Dangers of Keeping Lieberman in Caucus (from November 2008)
  5. Obama, Lieberman Express Support for Triggers