Wow!!

scooter will probably land a cush job as a ”pundit”.

Jeebers. Does he really deserve that kind of treatment? Lordy. Have mercy on the guy.
.
.
.
.
.
NOT!

how about a poo-flingin parade?

Boo-hoo-hoo for Scooter! It is nice to have something to smile about!

How long before he’s reinstated via Bush?

I wish it wouldn’t happen, but we all know it probably will…

-S

Little victories. Savor them. They’re all we’re likely to get from all the massive garbage heap of lawlessness and Constitution-shredding Bushco’s admin has wrought.

Ms Toensing is banging out her WaPo Sunday Op Ed as we speak

Jane - hope you caught The Daily Show’s skewering of Luntz last night - thought of you immediately :D

Can’t happen. fortunately there are some things that Bush simply can’t decree.

No, he will land a cush job as a consultant.

Can you imagine having that jerk for a lawyer?

He can work at the AEI and wear elevator shoes.

Usually, the second and subsequent jurisdictions’ disbarments follow without too much ado. It’s called “reciprocal discipline”; once one jurisidiction’s Bar has established that the miscreant should be disbarred and actually does it (entering a judgment to that effect), the other jurisdictions’ Bars deem the underlying offense justifying disbarment as established fact and the miscreant is “collaterally estopped”* from challenging them in the subsequent disbarment proceedings.

* Fancy lawyer talk for “those issues have been established in a proceeding in which you had a full, fair and free opportunity to litigate them and you do not get a do-over on them but are, rather, stuck with them.”

He can work at the AEI and wear elevator shoes.

How tall is he? Is it a case of short guy syndrome?

Scooter’s all ready on wingnut welfare by way of the Hudson Institute

Thanks for the legal explanation and understandable explanation. I’m still laughing.

Can’t happen. fortunately there are some things that Bush simply can’t decree

Ye gods don’t tell him!

Part of the Court Order

…

After notification of respondent’s convictions, this court suspended
respondent from the practice of law and directed the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) to institute a formal proceeding and determine whether respondent’s crimes involved moral turpitude per se. Having concluded that respondent was convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude per se, the Board filed with the court a Report and Recommendation that respondent be disbarred if his convictions were sustained on appeal. Subsequently, this court received a certified copy of an order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissing respondent’s appeal upon his motion for voluntary dismissal. Therefore, this disciplinary matter is ripe for final action.
2

The records of the court reflect that respondent filed with this court an “Affidavit of Compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14” on June 12, 2007.
When a member of the Bar is convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude, disbarment is mandatory. D.C. Code § 11-2503 (a) (2001). When convictions on more than one count are involved, disbarment is mandated if any one of them involves moral turpitude.

In re Lipari, 704 A.2d 851, 852 (D.C. 1997) (citation omitted). This court has held that obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503) and perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1623) are crimes of moral turpitude per se. In re Gormley, 793 A.2d 469, 470 (D.C. 2002) (citations omitted). Since respondent was convicted of each of these offenses, as the Board concluded, disbarment is mandatory under D.C. Code § 11-2503 (a). Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has taken exception to the Board’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that I. Lewis Libby, Jr. is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will run from the date on which he filed an affidavit which conforms to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).1

Luntz should buy himself a new Stoat … the one on his head looks … um … ratty …

I posted this downstairs, but obviously it’s most relevant here:

Scooter Libby disbarred DC appeal court rules.
moral turpitude.
still has PA but wld be hard to practice there.

So now he’s doomed to a life of $50,000 speeches and ‘think tanks’.

A nice side benefit of all the stealing they do is that there’s always plenty of loose cash around to buy silence and provide wingnut welfare.

“collaterally estopped”

Yikes! Sounds terminal.

Luntz should buy himself a new Stoat

He is one.

Kind of seems like some old time military “cashiering ceremony” is in order with a formal parade, where they call the miscreant out and break his sword and force him to leave.

here ya go

btw hippies - I have ‘comparisons’to Dreyfuss’ in the pool

perfect !

LOL … ((((( Elliott )))))

Are you watching Barack’s speech ?

Question: Wasn’t Bill Clinton disbarred for a certain period of time? Does Libby’s disbarment have a time limit? Is it for like one year? Five years? The term of his sentence if it had been enforced?

Scooter’s a little fella that’s why he likes to be above the law!

… in more ways than one … *g*

The cashiering process for Libby included tearing his law license in half, hyperextending his briefcase open, and cutting off his tie with a pair of scisssors.

But that’s NOTHING compared with the Adult Entertainment Website’s cashiering out process for Jeff Gannon…

ouch!

Thanks Jane.

I’m tired to the politics of the past.

I think fish-slapping is in order!

You left out making him go through the metal detectors with the rest of the rifraff.

OT:

The HRC camp claiming she was always opposed to NAFTA even thought she held five meetings lobbying for NAFTA in 1993 is gaining traction. Seems they are still trying to spin it.

From Wiki:

“…Clinton was disbarred from his Arkansas law license for five years and ordered to pay $25,000 in fines to that state’s bar officials.[123] The agreement came on the condition that Whitewater prosecutors would not pursue federal perjury charges against him.[124] In October 2001, Clinton was suspended by the Supreme Court and, facing disbarment from the high court as well, Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar in November.[125]”

can’t right now, will have to watch the replay tho

(((Petro!)))

((((( Helen )))))

Is 5 years a standard length of time or did he have to meet certain criteria before being reinstated ?

Carpet Scooter Libby is supposedly employed by the Hudson Institute as some kind of consultant/ expert on some damn thing yet absolutely no mention of him can be found by searching the website, I’ve tried.

http://www.hudson.org/

He hung all the problems of America around Bush and McCain’s necks … brilliant and the crowd was pumped …

So all implications are that Libby will at some point be allowed to apply for reinstatement and will have every likelihood of being reinstated ultimately.

great!

I love it when people actually stand up to BushCo

janesays–Kind of seems like some old time military ”cashiering ceremony” is in order with a formal parade, where they call the miscreant out and break his sword and force him to leave.

or a pen.

i pictured steve martin standing over him saying ”I break with thee, I break with Thee, I break with Thee!”

sidenote-can you be arrested for dispensing legal advice without a license?

Of course, the national press spent much time and energy telling us about how Bill Clinton was disbarred: Google turns up 102,000 cites for “clinton disbarred“. Let’s see in a week or two if Scooter’s coverage equals that.

Scooter is a lawyer what kind of work can he do for the Hudson institute that is not lawyering, sweep floors? Collect paychecks?
Would a parole officer tolerate this from a mob guy working at a job and getting paid at rates he does not have the skills to justify except if he is resuming his evil ways?
Do disbarred people have parole officers? I want to see his job description.

Barack’s latest speech up on the Great Orange Satan. He’s testing out his General Election themes and playing to the Super Delegates. It’s a smart play. He’s saying: this is what you will get as a campaign leader if you go with me, and think what this will do for your local tickets.

Scooter has gotten disbarred in part because of his work for the government, surely having him work at a public policy institute is some kind of payment for the illegal acts that he has done.
Isn’t Rico applicable? The GOP does act like a criminal enterprise.

What is the great Orange Satan?

OT but - anyone else hear about Debbie Wasserman Schultz refusing to endorse fellow Democrats in Florida?

Dailykos

The Daily Kos.
Keep up man!

LOL!!!

Yes I did and I think it’s because these cuban thugs are so pro Israel. Why would someone not want to get rid of the Cuban in congress? They are so right wing.

The people over at Emptywheel who are way smarter than me (nolo and BMAZ to name just two) are having a lively conversation about this. They say, prolly NO; he cannot get it back; even with a pardon.

Little Kos is the great orange satan? Oh that’s funny.

Probably not much. Scooter wasn’t President and the meek, mostly silent Democratic Leadership in the House and Senate do not dominate the news cycles the way that Newt and the Republics did when they were hunting Clinton.

It’s a moniker largely used in the Blogs, though not necessarily one we all agree with …

Scooter is a lawyer what kind of work can he do for the Hudson institute that is not lawyering, sweep floors? Collect paychecks?

I want to see his job description.

Good luck with that!

I know of a disbarred lawyer here in Phoenix who kited checks, co-mingled money, in fact, used her client’s trust account money as her own personal piggy bank. Her offenses included many counts of fraud and misappropriation of funds. But she is currently working in some capacity for some major corporation here in Phoenix (I can’t remember which one.) I believe she oversees contracts for their legality. She does not necessarily do the work of an attorney, per se, but legal assistants of all kinds do not have law degrees and they can still do research, etc.

Given the record of the Bush administration why would any conservative think tank want a Bushie working for them except to get access? Accesss he gained by by not ratting out his bosses.
After all who would want to hire a Bushie to accomplish anything let alone come up with a plan.
The Bush administration has failed to come up with a plan let alone get Ossama, Win the war in Iraq, lower gas prices, save the economy, save Bear Stearns, leave more kids left behind etc.
With that kind of record you don’t get hired anywhere even politics unless they owe you or your connected.

If Scooter is a paralegal then I wonder how his paycheck compares to other paralegals?

When I read the papers this morning on LibbyBoy’s disbarment, I reflected on other possibilities that would reward him. I’m glad to see he’s been disgraced, publicly.
So, if he indeed has been invited to joint the Hudson Institute (much like Manhattan Institute, AEI and other NeoCon think(less) tanks, he can be a consultant using his legal background in some other capacity other than with the legal department.

The Hudson Institute is quite a piece of work. Here is their Mission Statement:

Hudson Institute is a non-partisan policy research organization dedicated to innovative research and analysis that promotes global security, prosperity, and freedom.

Try and make sense out of that Mission Statement. We call such statements gobbligook. The Hudson Institute has no purpose. I think that is very stranger. But their Mission statement sounds a little like a Purpose Statement so if that’s the case, what’s their mission? Damned if I can figure it out.

Here, take a stab at it. It reminds me of all those dotcom companies with the quasi purposes and missions that said nothing. Why don’t they just say their purpose is to promote NeoCon ideology so there is clarity? Ha! Never from NeoCons.

http://www.hudson.org/learn/in....._statement

Osama is related to long time Bush family cronies. No Bush wants to risk that cash cow. Thanks to Bush, Osama’s always been safe.

The Bush Family business is cronyism, so why should a Bush Administration be different?

Of course he’s safe. I imagine that deal was made before the Saudi plane left here on 9/11

If people get rewarded with jobs at rightwing think tanks and news organizations which are usually not in the habit of hiring lawbreakers much less hiring them for less salary.
Then is this a reward by a criminal organization for keeping their mouth shut? G Gordon Liddy, Ollie North, Scooter, come to mind I think we have a pattern of behavior.

OT: Clinton now leads Obama nationally in Gallup poll.

WOO HOO!!!!
Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Barack should drop out for the good of the Democratic party and of America.

But he doesn’t care– he wants to win at any cost.

McCain’s probably thinking the same thing.

Remember you only get hired if you break the law for the GOP. Charles Mansion need not apply.

The president doesn’t have the power to reinstate him. The caourts themselves decide who is allowed to prective before them.

LHP ♥ Federal Judges.

Today, especially DC Circuit Court judges.

Not questioning your support for Hillary, but in all seriousness, do you think she can beat McCain and do you also think Obama could?

I don’t know about that– he probably thinks Obama’s “pastor problem” will nullify his own “pastor problem”. Hill doesn’t have a pastor problem.

Oh, wait– what about “The Family“?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let’s not flatter the Bush family. They are criminals otherwise known as “mob”. Libby was a councilier for the Bush/Cheney Mob.

Can someone explain why there is a nato alliance?

Who exactly is the enemy of the nato countries?

Suspensions are for a term of years. Disbarments are usually permanent, though is some extraordinary circumstances, I believe some individuals have been permitted to re-apply.

The best example is someone who has a chemical dependency problem, screws up their fiduciary responsibilities, get disbarred and later gets clean and sober and re-applies.

For a problem like Scooter’s I think this is meant to be permanent

It’s the delegates that matter. Do the math.

Hill has a lot of negs going against her.

Well, she won most of the swing states and blue states, Barack won mostly red states that he won’t have any chance to win in the GE. So yes, I think Hill is by far the more viable candidate.

My only concern is I don’t want us to lose the support of the African American community. They are one of our most important constituencies.

Did you learn math in school?

In summary, when you have a warfare state, everyone is your enemy. How else can you justify your existence!

I prefer the term “consigliare” *g*

super delegates will count heavily, and they will be swayed by viability in the general. Neither one can get enough elected delegates to win.

Yes, that was my major.

And you think we would still have the AA community if Obama dropped out? Why should he, anyway? He’s doing just fine. This “pastor” problem will disappear when the next blond goes missing.

I seriously just want to see train loads of sobbing Republicans in November.

So you know that Hillary should drop out of the race for the good of the party because she has no mathmatical chance of catching Obama in the delegate count? You must have studied the “new” math. Or your emotions for your candidate have clouded your rational thinking ability.

Hill has lost the commitment of the SDs

In fact she has lost the pop vote

has won less delagates

few states

We need a 50 state strategy and her showing in middle america was pitiful

she didn’t even win TX.

I hope those trains aren’t heading for Canada … *g*

I prefer the term “consigliare” *g*

Thanks Jim. I like the Italian spelling much better than my creative version.

We certainly are going to send them to you - they’ll like your health care plan :)

Are there any charges a Democratic administration can file against Scooter that we can nail him on? Especially if new information comes to light. Like if we get White House papers regarding this matter?

The race for the Dem nominee is over … Obama has won.

Please stop flaming either candidate, save the vitriol for the Repugs …

United We Stand, Divided we fall

Sobbing around bonfires of Bush stuff.

Can Abu G be next, pretty please? Mr. obstruction and purgery himself.

Is Valerie going after Scooter in civil court?

JANE!

I think you are looking for this:

SCOOTER! (sung to the tune of Branded)

poor baby -there, there *g*

Nah, they think we’re ‘a socialist third world country like France’ … *g*

So as a Hillary supporter you are advocating that the will of the voters be overturned in favor of the “Elite” of the party can determine the vote and your candidate wins. Is that your position that the voters should not count? Harsh and desperate positions to take.

Hopefully but we need to stop wingnut welfare to make sure he suffers.

Greetings, all-

Can someone explain why there is a nato alliance?

IMO, the purpose of the NATO alliance, other than defending against invasion from the USSR, was to dominate the economies of the host nation. I believe France correctly recognized this, developed their own nuclear bomb for defense, and told NATO to take a hike. The evidence that this second motive is correct is the fact that NATO has continued to expand since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Oh-your question was rhetorical, wasn’t it? *g*

So that’s why he’s into ‘brush farming’ … *g*

Like if we get White House papers regarding this matter?

These papers have been encased in wet cement, left to solidify and dropped in the ocean to spend the rest of eternity with the fishes.

ROFL

((( RonD )))

If asked, will Cheney’s response be “So?”

its clinton2 vs obama1?

How about would you rather Bill or Michelle as the first lady?

Great question, what was the process that caused Scooter to be disbarred and how can AbuG, Addington and the others get drafted into the process ?

Will of the voters is not as cut and dried as Irish Jim would like to believe. Someone saying Hillary lost Texas because a caucus of questionable voting is indicative of Obama supporters who believe in the will of the people is just like Bush’s victory in 2000…or his mandate in 2004. SUSPECT. One much look a little closer.

Hi Petrocelli-you’ll help me seek asylum if McCain wins, right? :)

LOL

No contest..Bill

Destroying White House records is a crime sure there is probably not much of a punishment. But what if we took away government funding for Bush’s library as a punishment? Can we?

I promise to do so … however if Diebold does not decide this election, you will be staying put ! *g*

Looseheadprop, thank you so much for the answer.

Of course, the pups at the Lake heart you, too!

MWAH!
-S

Hiya Jane…

…late coming to the thread…

I forgot Cindy… Is she really a drag queen?

Yes it is cut and dried. It comes down to simple math; delegates won, states won and popular vote won. What is more cut and dried than that? Obama leads on all counts. Insurmountable leads on most counts. Look I was a die-hard supporter of Edwards. I am a progressive Democrat who after examining the math, have gotten behind the presumptive nominee, Sen. Obama.

Not to worry, Jane. All state bars have reciprocal discipline. He will be automatically disbarred in every jurisdiction in which he’s licensed to practice, including the Supreme Court. (At the opening of each Supreme Court session, they take care of this administrative business, stripping their bar rolls of everyone who’s been disbarred anywhere in the country. Might be worth a trip just for that.

Nice catch.

How about would you rather Bill or Michelle as the first lady?

If it’s Bill, what designer will provide his wardrobe? Will he dress in the manner of Jackie or will he go to Burlington Discount Factories like Laura? He could do the Penny’s large size department like Barbara. Michelle will be a blast for couture houses.