The US invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003. We're coming up on the 5th anniversary of this invasion, a useless war that distracted from the war on terror, from the US focusing on Al-Qaeda (and the Taliban) in Afghanistan and in Waziristan, the autonomous Pashtun tribal region between Afghanistan and Pakistan, where Osama bin Laden is supposed to be hiding out with Mullah Omar, the head of the Taliban.
On March 16, 2008, The New York Times reported that American officials say that Pakistan’s pledge to fight Al Qaeda and Taliban militants in Waziristan is being weakened by disagreements in the Pakistani military and security forces over what their priority should be. The divisions have emerged as a source of growing frustration to the Bush administration, with officials saying the main disagreement in Pakistan is over whether to gear up a counterterrorism campaign against Islamic extremists or to try to shore up a conventional force focused on potential threats from India. (Almost two months after elections in Pakistan, in which the assassinated Benezir Bhutto's extant Pakistani People's Party (PPP) won the elections against Pervez Musharraf's party, there is still no viable government in Pakistan.)
On March 10, 2008, National Public Radio's Morning Edition had the following report:
"It's been more than six years since the al-Qaida network was routed from its bases in Afghanistan.
In the meantime, many al-Qaida leaders have been killed or captured - but not Osama bin Laden or his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Within intelligence circles, there is debate over whether the terrorist network has recovered from the setbacks it suffered after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Some analysts say al-Qaida is a shell of what it once was. But U.S. intelligence officials are not so sure.
There are many different judgments of al-Qaida's strength being put forth these days. Just last month, President Bush, before the Conservative Political Action Conference, said the group is reeling.
"The Taliban, al-Qaida and their allies are on the run," Bush said.
But the president's own intelligence agencies offer a different opinion.
National Intelligence Director Michael McConnell, in his most recent threat assessment, said the core al-Qaida leadership has "regenerated."
Having survived the global war on terror, al-Qaida in this view is again a centrally directed network with military capabilities. Speaking on CNN two weeks ago, McConnell reflected that view.
"They have the leadership that they had before, they've rebuilt the middle management, the trainers," McConnell said. 'they're recruiting very vigorously.' "
And also on March 10, NATO reassessed its presence in Afghanistan in light of the Taliban's reconsolidation not only in Waziristan but within Afghanistan itself:
Those Nato countries whose armies are taking growing casualties on the front line are very publicly accusing other member countries, deployed in quieter provinces, of not fully sharing the burden.
And Afghans who welcomed their country's return to the international fold after the fall of the Taleban, are asking where the billions of dollars have gone and why the rebels' reach is growing.
The Taleban now control swathes of land across south-west Afghanistan and mounted about 140 suicide attacks last year, including some in the capital Kabul.
The intelligence findings follow Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff statement on Wednesday that he has a "gut feeling" that the United States faces a heightened risk of attack this summer.
A counterterrorism official speaking to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity said the stark appraisal, entitled "Al-Qaida better positioned to strike the West", indicates the terror network that launched the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil has been able to regroup despite nearly six years of bombings, war and other tactics aimed at dismantling it.
Al-Qaida is 'considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001," the counterterrorism official said, paraphrasing the report's conclusions. "They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States.'
The report says al-Qaida has used its safe haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border to restore its capabilities."
Let's briefly reexamine what happened on September 11, 2001 (9/11/01: 911: the national emergency number, as the property manager of my apartment building pointed out to me that morning), events happened in New York City, Washington, DC, and near Shanksville, PA that brought together several components: capitalism, technology, nomadism, multiple identities, postcolonial citizenry in the first world, and political and economic regimes in the third world.
The hijackers who targeted US capital used its technology against it.
Capital and technology framed the master text of this disaster. Corporate America had been dealt a blow, possibly leading to an economic recession in the US that might extend to the whole world because of the international grid and network of capital. The hijackers transformed the hijacked jetliners into ferocious missiles (with human freight) aimed at corporate America and aimed against capital.
These hijackers were polyglots, had multiple identities, and used technology to plan and achieve their nefarious mission: When they were flight students, they reportedly frequently used flight manuals, cell-phones, and laptops with complicated software programs to plan their missions. They also honed their training by frequently playing Microsoft flight simulator games on their laptops. And they also drank quite a bit of alcohol in bars (not a usual practice by Muslims) where they played other kinds of video games (presumably Velocity's "Jetfighter II" was one of these). (These hijackers belonged a special jihadist group known as Tafkir-wal-hijra, [H/T John Forde] whose members are not bound by the usual Muslim constrictions , like abstention from alcohol, for purposes of deception.)
Most lived near or in Delray Beach, Florida, because of its proximity to Interstate 95, halfway between the municipal airports in Boca Raton and Lantana--obviously to facilitate their global travel while designing plans for their September 11 mission. And all the hijackers bought the airline tickets (which they used for their doomed September 11 flights) on the Internet from Travelocity using credit cards or frequent-flyer miles.
Shortly after the national air lockdown, President Bush declared a national state of emergency and mobilized some 1 million military reserves to get ready for what he proclaimed "the first war of the twenty-first century." He said that "a group of barbarians have declared war on our country," and that "Americans must prepare themselves for battle." From Day One, corporate media had been describing the rubble of the WTC towers as Ground Zero: military moniker for the front line of a war battle.
(And let's recall that Osama bin Laden wrote what is referred to as a fatwa in August 1996, and was one of several signatories of another and shorter fatwa in February of 1998.)
On September 15, 2001, in a brief appearance with his senior advisers at Camp David, George W. Bush said point-blank: "We're at war. There's been an act of war declared upon America by terrorists, and we will respond accordingly. My message is for everybody who wears a uniform to get ready." Shortly afterward, in his weekly radio address, he warned that "those who make war on the United States have chosen their own destruction." He told Aericans to steel themselves for a campaign "without battlefields or beachheads." Victory, he said, "will not take
place in a single battle, but in a series of decisive actions against terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them." Bush again called those responsible for the attacks "barbaric people."
And so the US prepared for war against Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda, his international network of terrorists, and against nation-states, which is what Bush meant when he said "and those who harbor and support them." And therein lay the rub: this network is transnational, nomadic, and diasporic, and operates with fake multiple identities, passports, and nationalities, with cell-phones, rented apartments and apartments near freeways in world cities, with Internet encryption communications, and with face-time in modular cells.
The US engaged diasporic and fluid cell-units in war. And the nature of war itself had changed considerably since Pearl Harbor. To paraphrase the title of Manual de Landa's excellent book: What we now have is "war in the age of intelligent machines." The US and the West, mostly Judeo-Christian, armed with global capital, confronted an international network of nomadic terrorists, mostly Muslim, armed with ferocious passion for redressing (perceived) injustice, guns, knives, robust funds, and jetliners transformed into lethal missiles. The world might be faced with what Samuel Huntington famously called the "clash of civilizations."
And both sides are armed with technology. The former's terrain are digital cities, and the latter, deserts and mountains, and also digital cities. It seemed at this point that in the US, we aren't too far from the Los Angeles of Ridley Scott's Bladerunner, if we believe what security experts said in the wake of September 11 events. Security experts described a new kind of country, where electronic identification eventually became the norm, immigrants tracked more closely, and airspace over cities like New York and Washington off-limits to civilian aircraft. Security experts said--and still say--technology presented almost limitless possibilities, including national electronic identification cards. "Each American could be given a 'smart card,' so as they go into an airport or anywhere, we know exactly who they are,"said Michael G. Cherkasky, president of Kroll Inc, a security consultant. "The technology is there," Mr. Cherkasky said. "These cards in industry are going to spread, and then it's going to be rapidly spread elsewhere."
By December 2007, all new and renewed US passports became smart cards, with computer chips that have detailed information about those they were issued to and that would identify them when read by a computer. (Disclosure: I have one of those.) It's just a matter of time before these passports will be coordinated with fingerprints, or in a few years, with facial characteristics, and be programmed to permit or limit access through turnstiles into buildings or areas. They could track someone's location, financial transactions, criminal history, and even driving speed on a particular highway on a given night. Video surveillance, already becoming widespread, could be sharply increased in stores, offices, and public spaces and at public events. In the interim, the profiling and surveillance of Arab- and Muslim-Americans have increased and will most certainly continue to increase within the US, echoing the internment of Japanese-Americans after Pearl Harbor.
What the future on earth will look like is anyone's guess. But one thing is certain: Life in America changed forever after September 11, 2001. Already people talk about "pre-September 11" America and "post-September 11" America. Again, as a professor-friend of mine said:
"America discovered foreigners after 9/11." It took me some bit of time to unpack that one...
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
UP’d from downstairs:
March 17-21: Sunshine Week (Hey, Prairie, you’re on!!)
During ‘Sunshine Week,’ which is this Monday through Friday, various civic, media and government accountability groups celebrate the March 16 birth date of President James Madison and his clear statement of the principle that a democracy cannot function if citizens do not have the means and take the opportunity to look at the records and data that document just what their government is doing.
http://www.twincities.com//ci_…..cities.com
MODS: Please fix in post:
…whose members are not bound by the usual Muslim constrictions, like abstention from alcohol…
[ModNote; refresh your browser and it should be fixed.]
Great post, Biodun!!
in the 6th line of the 6th para…Thanks in advance!
Morning, Biodun.
Great post-but for a minor quibble with the interpretation of the Ground Zero terminology. In military terms, Ground Zero refers to the detonation point of a nuclear weapon.
They are definitely the wookies.
Hello, Biodun, great description of our asymmetrical clash of civilizations. Thanks for this post.
Thanks all!!
Oh, my. That’s even more scary. Great post, Biodun.
Everyone should become familiar with the research of Robert Pape on the motivations of suicide terrorists:
More here: http://www.dailykos.com/storyo.....128/477856
BTW, love the comparison to “Blade Runner” I think that is a perfect shorthand description of what is happening. Far more picturesque than “the surveillance/security state.”
Third paragraph, second line after the second large block of italics says international gird. Did you mean to use grid?
i take that back - hadn’t read and absorbed your post, Biodun. sorry
Ha! Best definition of “September 11 changed everything” I’ve heard, Biodun.
Let us not forget the “bait and switch” pulled by W in the days and weeks following 9/11. The target changed as follows:
a- al-Qaeda (”those responsible”)
b- “those supporting al-Qaeda”
c- terrorists in general
d- the “Axis of Evil” (Iran, Iraq, North Korea)
e- just Iraq, to the detriment of the a,b & d (especially North Korea, which does have WMD.
Thanks..you’re right…although gird will work too…*g*
but…
MODS: If you canfix, that would be great too…grid…
[Mod Note; done.]
hiya Jane:
Yep. When my friend said that I had to think about what he said there for minute. Not as simple as one might think…*g*
Great post, Biodun! Wow. What I never understood (said with a little snark) is why is it our FBI knew who the terrorists were who attacked us, showed us pictures of them pretty quickly, but yet, quite a few were living in America, took flight lessons here, and yet, our government did not go after them knowing full well they were listening to some of their conversations the night before 9/11/01 and still did nothing.
In my eyes, technology really didn’t matter on either side. Our current White House wanted the attack and did nothing to stop it (didn’t even send up the F-16’s when the first planes went off course 5 degrees). What the waronterra needs today is a White House that is rational and not a lying stinking warmongering hateful bunch.
i don’t think there ever was a war on terror. and what we’ve done to the people of afghanistan is just as reprehensible as what we done to the people of iraq.
Life in America changed forever after September 11, 2001.
I disagree. And certainly America discovered foreigners during the Iranian hostage crisis, and numerous times before.
The “9/11 changed everything” framing is very dangerous because it has been used to undermine the Constitution. Nothing has changed.
9/11 was the first time in history that foreigners attacked contiguous US–Pearl Harbor is not part of contiguous US…
(sorry…but those are the facts…)
unsubscribe from the War on Terror!
That’s a good one!
Hmmmmm. IIRC, the British attacked and burned Washington D.C. in the war of 1812.
Here’s what George Bush said in June of 2001:
“It’s negative to think about blowing each other up. That’s not a positive thought. That’s a Cold War thought. That’s a thought when people were enemies with each other.”
Wow! He changed his tune, huh? Started a fake waronterra after he and his cohorts allowed the biggest attack on our nation happen without intervening!
Geospatial Technology: Mapping For Human Rights
LOL. There are some, however, who would not include DC as part of the real U.S.
i agree with you… maybe what Biodun is trying to say is not that the world changed, but that american’s understanding (or probably more accurately, our mis-understanding) of the world changed.
What would you consider the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993?
And here’s what George Bush said in August 2001 while on the ranch (PDB came a few days later, but again, he shrugged his shoulders):
“My administration has been calling upon all the leaders in the- in the Middle East to do everything they can to stop the violence, to tell the different parties involved that peace will never happen.”
Oh brother.
I suppose they wouldn’t include New Orleans either.
Or the anthrax attacks.
An example that illustrates the point is the “thumb reader” now in use at Disney theme parks. Purportedly in use to stop entrants from trading or lending their high-priced tickets, it is said to “read” only the digit’s shape rather than the detailed print. (Coming from the master of digitalized fantasy, take that characterization for what it’s worth.) While Disney continues to accept government-issued picture ID’s, it’s well-trained gate staff don’t always remember the exception.
Apart from dramatically increasing the bio-data in an unrestricted commercial database, it conditions the young to accept giving their bio-identifiers for the most routine commercial transactions. That such information won’t be misused, absent stringent and stringently enforced public oversight, requires a belief in fairies and talking mice.
[h/t www.boingboing.net]
Attacks on North America during World War 2
heh, this is a good one for Microsoft Messenger users: Microsoft Discovers You Are Six Degrees From Kevin Bacon
That would be a different group.
you know what?
it’s about friggin time the democrats started laughing at this “comander in chief”’s claim that there is anything but miserable failure from this guys assinine desisions
he has made the world a catastrophy and that’s exactly what the democrats need to be doing
Are we prepared yet to say that the invasion of Iraq had something to do with oil?
That was during the American War of Independence…doesn’t really count…American wasn’t a full-blown republic then…nice try but no cigar…*g*
yep, you got it right…
I believe that Senator Obama understands the need to get out of Iraq.
it wasn’t as successful as the 9/11 attack…
Um, the War of 1812 was not the American Revolution.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.....onsack.htm
That was during the War of 1812.
I thought this post by Dahr on biometric creep was good: The Biometric Cataloging of Americans at Home
Who do you think will get us out of Iraq? President Obama or Senator McCain?
Exactly, what did they know and when did they know it? The 9/11 Truth movement raises lots of questions. There are so many crazy theories out there that it clouds the serious issues. When you begin to question the official version you get lumped into the “there were no planes it was holograms” or the “satellite controlled plasma beams brought down the towers” crowd and people won’t listen. At the very least it was total negligence that allowed this to happen and that in itself borders on treason
thislink only proves my point…Pearl Harbor, Aleutian Islands off Alaska…not part of contiguous US…but a baseball field in Oregon shelled by a Japanese fleet? Couldn’t even be proven… I vigorously stand by my point…
Who do you trust? Senator Obama was against an unprovoked war with Iraq. McCain was for it.
OK you got me…how about the first attack on contiguous US in modern US history? There…*g*
GWB has messed up in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Palestine.
I imagine the structures below ground dwarf the White House’s above ground structures. It would have been more dramatic and destructive had the Capitol been hit, as the original plan called for. For Condi to have legitimately said, “No one could have anticipated…[fill in the blank]” requires a White House staff totally ignorant of Tom Clancy and the entire genre of novels he launched twenty years before she took office.
well, finally the republicans are starting to get it
I think WW III has already begun.
Howdy y’all. This war sucks. I am just grateful that my brother will be done with his army service in a year.
Also weren’t there military exercises being conducted on Sep. 11 that played out those type scenarios.
John McCain is in Iraq. Now I feel better.
re: conspiracy theories:
what he forgot to say;
“a president who turned the word “Conservative” to mean “radical”, a party that was for small government into a party for huge government, a party who were against taxes to a party that raises taxes, a party for fiscal responsibility into a party of borrow and spend, a party for the military into a party that destroys our armed forces, a party for the constitution to the party that disassembles the constitution, a party for privacy into the party where nothing is private”
but he can plagiarize my pros if he wants to, I give him permission
Terrific article, Biodun. This trend is one of the reasons I’ve been so concerned about FISA and the Patriot Act. Technology can be used as an instrument of freedom or an instrument of control. It’s really just up to us to decide what we want.
he has on his sunday best flak jacket, the liar man is there with him
Do y’all think there’s gonna be a draft?
Hi Cassie!
“the patriot” act seems as if it was lifted word for word from hitler’s “enabling act”, I wonder if bush’s grandfather had a personal copy given to him from his pal…that hitler charachter
And here’s the latest even now, as we discuss this live. From BBC News:
I think the original bio-metric airport readers (iris readers and the like) originated for frequent business travelers at European airports. The program metastasized in the US, though it’s still infrequently used, requiring not just bio-metric data, but the equivalent of a security clearance screening.
One of the major public debates this administration has spiked is the range of data it collects, how it verifies the accuracy of that data, and corrects inaccuracies. By all accounts, it does only the first. The injustice of that is a classic example of “externalizing” costs onto the innocent. You’d think this administration were populated by nothing but corporate lawyers and lobbyists.
Every tool is a weapon if you hold it right.
in a word, no.
Thanks…
hi RonD!
GOOD! cause i don’t wanna go!
The two men in America I now fear most.
Uh, depends on what happens in Mideast & Central Asia…we’re not going to be able to expand deployments a hell of a lot more without a draft. Or…
They may just hire a lot more mercenaries.
I hold my tool right I am sure
McCain and his buddies in Baghdad this Sunday.
Jane:
Do you suppose they all show up at that market agin?
Haven’t figured out how to use a micrometer that way yet, but generally that’s true.
McCain and Lieberman. A volatile concoction.
2:00-3:15 The Future of GI Resistance via ivaw
Who does Mr. Lieberman really work for?
Maybe a draft would shock people out of their complacency.
If McCain is elected he will take that as a mandate to attack Iran.
Yes. I agree. A hell of a lot of complacent college kids would find the politics of war much more interesting if they were facing a draft.
From the Beeb:
Yet he still hasn’t grasped the obvious. For some reason, that joke about “horticulture” comes to mind …
A military draft will not happen.
No idea. But I don’t think Clancy came up with the idea of flying a 747 into the Capitol in an act of terrorist rage. He used it to great effect in ending a spy novel, but I should think the idea had been kicked around long beforehand. So, yes, I imagine it would have been a routine option in any theoretical war game that involved defending the nation’s capital from surprise attack. Which makes Condi’s assertion, “Who woulda thunk it?”, pablum for the Base, not a credible statement by the National Security Adviser to the President of the United States.
My choice for Sec. of Defense or State under President McCain, would have to be Joe Lieberman.
Huh? The War of Independence (aka the Revolutionary War) lasted from 1775 to 1783.
Per the Wikipedia: “Once the Congress of the Confederation received word of New Hampshire’s ratification, it set a timetable for the start of operations under the Constitution, and on March 4, 1789, the government under the Constitution began operations.”
The War of 1812 occurred more than twenty years later.
CIGAR!
And a NYTimes reporter’s blog about first impressions of Baghdad draws comparisons to Bladerunner…:
Draft Kassie, Al Quidea would surrender in the morning!
Droopy Dog for Sec. of State - now that’s showing our best face to the rest of the world.
see my 50…still, no cigar…*g*
But Cassie would still be in the army and the neocons would find 12 new wars!
Good God I feel safe.
McCain in Iraq on fact-finding trip
AP - Sen. John McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee who has linked his political future to U.S. success in Iraq, was in Baghdad on Sunday for meetings with Iraqi and U.S. diplomatic and military officials, a U.S. government official said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....raq_mccain
…you ready to be drafted? You can develop your online courses on your laptop in a foxhole somewhere in Iraq…*g*
Who is droopy dog?
I’m 4a baby, honorable discharge and I was RA (regular army), as Burt Lancaster said in “Go Tell the Spartans” “fucking draftees”!
Can the choice be clearer. Obama or McCain?
gotsta go. bye!
Ah, yes, the mighty pen in Grosse Pointe Blank, and rolled up magazines and The Bourne Supremacy.
I belive that would be Lieberman.
from Erica Goode’s (that NYTimes reporter’s) blog:
Same link as 88…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droopy_Dog
Lieberman reminds me of this character nearly every time he opens his mouth. Unfortunately, he’s even managed to live up to the “outwit his enemies” part.