<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s A Poor Superdelegate To Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:54:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: harvey</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1323598</link>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1323598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The only democrat left in the race is Clinton. Obama has already made up his mind and stated he would appoint Republicans to his cabinet. this election was to get the republicans out of offices not to install them in offices.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only democrat left in the race is Clinton. Obama has already made up his mind and stated he would appoint Republicans to his cabinet. this election was to get the republicans out of offices not to install them in offices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsAnnaNOLA</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322497</link>
		<dc:creator>MsAnnaNOLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Add the developing anti-Hillary Dems to the throngs of Anti-Hillary Republicans and Independents and well. I believe she could lose the general. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where is Edwards when we need him. I know he could win the general and keep the supreme court safe.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add the developing anti-Hillary Dems to the throngs of Anti-Hillary Republicans and Independents and well. I believe she could lose the general. </p>
<p>Where is Edwards when we need him. I know he could win the general and keep the supreme court safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322448</link>
		<dc:creator>marshen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If this all were to happen at the convention, all the Obama supporters new to politics would sure learn a lot about democracy. So would the rest of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this all were to happen at the convention, all the Obama supporters new to politics would sure learn a lot about democracy. So would the rest of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wobblybits</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322296</link>
		<dc:creator>wobblybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;slightly OT:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;One Clinton aide yesterday derided Mr Obama’s victories in “boutique” caucus states rather than the hardscrabble terrain of the rustbelt, saying: “Obama has won the small caucus states with the latte-sipping crowd. They don’t need a president, they need a feeling.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3507714.ece?token=null&amp;offset=12&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*sigh* boutique states?  It’s because of the lattes, isn’t it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slightly OT:</p>
<blockquote><p>One Clinton aide yesterday derided Mr Obama’s victories in “boutique” caucus states rather than the hardscrabble terrain of the rustbelt, saying: “Obama has won the small caucus states with the latte-sipping crowd. They don’t need a president, they need a feeling.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>more <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3507714.ece?token=null&amp;offset=12" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>*sigh* boutique states?  It’s because of the lattes, isn’t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322272</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is amusing that the State Party doesn’t report them…  Heh, maybe their abysmal turnout #’s were too embarassing, so early in the primary season…! *g*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amusing that the State Party doesn’t report them…  Heh, maybe their abysmal turnout #’s were too embarassing, so early in the primary season…! *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322269</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322269</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Probably cuz it’s all OBE now&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably cuz it’s all OBE now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322265</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know that, bra, but, I’m telling ya, try and find the actual voter turnout #’s…  I spent more than the obligatory 5 min’s on Google and elsewhere…!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that, bra, but, I’m telling ya, try and find the actual voter turnout #’s…  I spent more than the obligatory 5 min’s on Google and elsewhere…!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322260</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322260</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only problem I have with talking about Supers voting “the way their district went” is that not all of them are tied to a district. DNC, former public officials, and a handful of others don’t have “a district” to follow per se.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well of course, trying to convince a “free Superdelegate” to vote in a manner that is irrelevant wouldn’t work. But I think about half the Superdelegates are current Representatives and Senators. That means that they will be under at least some pressure to vote as their Constitutents voted…especially if the vote was decisively large. If the delegate counts come even closer this may become an even bigger pressure. I believe that Dianne Waters of Compton has already pledged to Clinton. But her district went something like 9:1 for Obama. I would bet that Dianne wouldn’t be re-elected if her vote contributed to a Clinton victory when he actually led in the committed delegate votes. She might actually go to Clinton and say…”Look, I’m sorry, I endorsed you…but I’m in trouble here”. BTW…Superdelegates merely announce their support…they aren’t really “committed”. They can, and do, change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many of the Superdelegates are also elected or former elected officials. I believe that all living former Congressmen are Superdelegates, as are all former Presidents and VPs, Party Chairmen, Democratic Governors, etc. A former Congressman or Senator might also be approached to support the results of their former district or State. Or they might be approached to support the candidate that would do the best for candidates in that area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s say that a particular former Congressman in Virginia came from an area that voted for Hillary, but it’s unlikely that Hillary will visit the State since under most calculations she’d lose the State easily to McCain. Obama however is tied in Virginia with McCain, and would visit it alot, put on lots of advertising, and likely support get out the vote efforts. That would benefit a candidate in that District trying, in a close race, to defeat an incumbent Republican. Even worse, Hillary at the top of the Ticket might drag out the Neanderthals from their caves down to the polls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So he might look at his choices and decide for Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only problem I have with talking about Supers voting “the way their district went” is that not all of them are tied to a district. DNC, former public officials, and a handful of others don’t have “a district” to follow per se.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well of course, trying to convince a “free Superdelegate” to vote in a manner that is irrelevant wouldn’t work. But I think about half the Superdelegates are current Representatives and Senators. That means that they will be under at least some pressure to vote as their Constitutents voted…especially if the vote was decisively large. If the delegate counts come even closer this may become an even bigger pressure. I believe that Dianne Waters of Compton has already pledged to Clinton. But her district went something like 9:1 for Obama. I would bet that Dianne wouldn’t be re-elected if her vote contributed to a Clinton victory when he actually led in the committed delegate votes. She might actually go to Clinton and say…”Look, I’m sorry, I endorsed you…but I’m in trouble here”. BTW…Superdelegates merely announce their support…they aren’t really “committed”. They can, and do, change.</p>
<p>Many of the Superdelegates are also elected or former elected officials. I believe that all living former Congressmen are Superdelegates, as are all former Presidents and VPs, Party Chairmen, Democratic Governors, etc. A former Congressman or Senator might also be approached to support the results of their former district or State. Or they might be approached to support the candidate that would do the best for candidates in that area.</p>
<p>Let’s say that a particular former Congressman in Virginia came from an area that voted for Hillary, but it’s unlikely that Hillary will visit the State since under most calculations she’d lose the State easily to McCain. Obama however is tied in Virginia with McCain, and would visit it alot, put on lots of advertising, and likely support get out the vote efforts. That would benefit a candidate in that District trying, in a close race, to defeat an incumbent Republican. Even worse, Hillary at the top of the Ticket might drag out the Neanderthals from their caves down to the polls.</p>
<p>So he might look at his choices and decide for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322258</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wyoming Rs caucus was back in early Feb I believe.  Willard won.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wyoming Rs caucus was back in early Feb I believe.  Willard won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322256</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/08/whats-a-poor-superdelegate-to-do/#comment-1322256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;CNN, was reporting 7,500+ ballots were cast in Wyoming and 59% Obama and 40% Hill…  Now, for some strange reason the Goopers seem to have not reported any numbers on actual turnout…  Hmmm…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN, was reporting 7,500+ ballots were cast in Wyoming and 59% Obama and 40% Hill…  Now, for some strange reason the Goopers seem to have not reported any numbers on actual turnout…  Hmmm…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
