. If there's an Oscar given out for Worst Comb-over Of the Modern Era, it goes to Mike McConnell, whose need to give Enron Ed's telecom clients immunity has been responsible for for a "national security" argument that's about as persuasive as the sweep of his locks. This morning on Late Edition he said the telecoms all turned into reluctant virgins last week after the PAA expired, and he needed the power to "compel" them to cooperate with domestic spying. Yeah, it's called a warrant.
. Doris Kearns Goodwin was on MTP talking about whether Obama copped lines from Duval Patrick for his speech or not. She went into a long discourse about how politicians are always "borrowing and absorbing patterns and evolving," and dismissed it as no big deal. Which may in fact be true. But is she the best person to be weighing in on this? Considering that the biggest scandal of her career was about plagiarism, it was kinda like asking Roger Clemens to speculate about the problem of steroids in the WWF and making no reference to, you know, the elephant in the room.
. Bill Richardson told Wolf Blitzer that he will probably be making an endorsement soon, and that there are too many superdelegates (of which he is one). He said he believes that those superdelegates should vote the way that the people who elected them voted. Wolf noted that Hillary Clinton won New Mexico so that meant he would have to vote for Clinton. It didn't appear that Richardson had thought that one through. "Well, only by one percent," he said.
. I can't decide whether my favorite moment of the morning was concern troll Bill Kristol recommending Hillary Clinton adopt the politics of fear, Ralph Nadar announcing his candidacy, or CNN's Ali Velshi reporting from Texas in a cowboy hat. File under "just because nobody asked for it."
. I don't know who on the Clinton campaign decided that attacking William Ayers for being a member of the Weather Underground was a good idea, but you have to think that someone would have remembered that Bill pardoned Susan Rosenberg (also a member of the Weather Underground) on his way out the door. Hello? Anybody home? (h/t MBH)
. I'm sorry, Huckabee was hilarious last night on SNL. And oh yeah...bitches get stuff done.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
G’day, Jane
Fortunately, none of these folks are on my TV here.
early OT but for a good cause.
heads up folks in NC!
tommy yum yum’s son esten is doing beautifully and they are having a benefit for him on march 1 at the Cat’s Cradle in Carrboro. it will be an all day concert and tommy says he has pulled together a band for it.
that esten is doing well is very very happy news.
Raul has been named to be Cuba’s new president.
…dang…I missed that silly huckabee on SNL…think it’s on youtube?
Saw the Raul news. Is he sober enough to stand up and take an oath?
That is very good news.
Youtube seems to be down for the moment, I couldn’t get in to look for it.
I remain convinced that America dodged a bullet when One Percent Bill never caught fire during the primaries. “Thinking things through” doesn’t seem to be his strong suit: Supreme fave Byron White; gay being a choice; reciting his resume in answer to every debate question; etc.
And we, in our house, thought Tina and Amy were channelling certain LakeMistresses last nite on SNL. Hot.
Here’s Huck on SNL
Go Esten!
That’s great news selise. Tommy must be so releieved.
Someone want to tell Bill how much changing the vote by 1% would make a difference in recent history?
When we were in Iowa we were driving around with some folks from a particularly well-liked campaign here at FDL. We were wondering what to do and one of them said “hey, we can go over to the headquarters of Candidate X and see all the women he’s inappropriately groped.”
No names, of course.
Here is my question: at this week’s debate does Hillary wear black?
I think it would be a hoot.
Watched the You Tube clip (couldn’t stay up late enough to watch last night) and that might be a good motto for FDL–bitches get stuff done.
I may needlepoint that on an inspirational throw pillow.
Jane
Two things.
Which do you the is worse, comb-overs or the if-I grow-my-hair-long-on-the-bottom, they won’t notice the top is bald?
and,
Bitches do get things done.
I think it’s ’cause they (we) don’t care if they’re called a Bitch. They (we) just want it got done.
‘Cause, lawdy, people do love to do the name-calling-rag.
How the hell does this get reported as “straight reporting” ?
One of the most powerful lobbyists in DC, lobbying for some of the most powerful companies in this country, working as McCain’s top advisor, sitting on the damn bus, says that McCain doesn’t do favors for lobbyists? And he’s a lobbyist? The fact that he’s running his campaign is a favor.
Unreal.
We should all email this reporter and ask him if he ever thinks while doing his “reporting”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/.....refer=home
John McCain `Does No Favors’ for Lobbyists, Adviser Black Says
By Edwin Chen
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) — A senior adviser to John McCain today defended the Arizona senator against a newspaper report suggesting the likely Republican presidential nominee did favors for a Washington lobbyist eight years ago.
“John McCain does no favors for, nor gives no special treatment to, any lobbyists — even if they are a friend of his,” Charlie Black, a longtime Republican strategist, said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program. “He listens to both sides of issues from representatives from both sides, makes a decision on the merits and goes ahead.”
SNIP
“Senator McCain does not act in his own self-interest or in his own political interests in making decisions, but rather in the interest of the country even if there’s a cost to him politically,” Black, now chairman of BKSH & Associates, a Washington lobbying firm, said.
“I have not studied that carefully so I can’t really measure what’s going on there,” Obama said. “It’s indisputable that his top advisers in this campaign are lobbyists. Many of them have been running their business on the campaign bus while they’ve been helping him. And he’s comfortable with that, and he’s comfortable with raising money from lobbyists who are currently active in Washington. I think that is a problem.”
Obama said it’s “a legitimate issue for voters to ask if somebody presents themselves as a reformer and all the guys that are running your campaign are lobbying on behalf of various special interests and industries.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Edwin Chen in Washington at EChen32@bloomberg.net .
a year or two ago, tommy posted the info for esten’s care page…. and i’ve been following his progress ever since.
lots of ups and downs, but for awhile now it’s been mostly up. i don’t think i have tommy’s email, but if anyone here does, please send him lots of hugs and love. and hope the benefit is wildly successful.
So the women have been inappropriately groped but continue to run his campaign ?
Is this saying that those women are not smart enough to detach from that campaign and file a complaint ?
I’m in Toronto, and I’ve not heard about this issue before.
Oh, but that’s a cultural thing. (In other words, all latino guys grope.) It’s muy macho.
/s
I wonder what folks are thinking about Hillary.
I am appalled that she would trash the party and Im embarrassed right now.
Further what about the debts her campaign have left with small vendors all over the country?
Hmmm, so do you get groped every day and is it appropriate ? *g*
Yes, bitches do get things done.
I am appalled that she would trash the party and Im embarrassed right no
How has she trashed the party?
All McConnel needs is a military cap with skull and crossbones and he looks just like another party beauraucrat.
The face of McConnel is a portrait in the banality of evil.
Thanks for the link……that sheeeet is funny……Huck has a future as a character actor. I am sure Chuck can get him some work.
He has no problem with the casual lie.
Ding!
I’m latina and grope ..um wait that doesn’t work here, carry on *g*
I don’t know about ‘worst comb over’, i always thought Peter Arnett held that title, but then again there is Donald Trump.
Watching the clip with my wife, she says if she were a Republican she’d vote for him because he’s more personable than the rest.
I said I like him because he thinks wives should willingly submit to their husbands.
She left the room.
OT, but Atrios has post with a great comment thread — And Their Story Is?
From the comments, a 7/25/07 preview of the Obama Plan –
“Shame, shame on you Barack Obama”. I watched her and my guilty conscience kicked in and I felt like it was me being scolded, ……and poor BO had the look of someone who got caught doing something…..its really weird. I bet he gets sick or something and wiggles out of the next debate. I don’t blame him. Imagine her scolding Bill in that tone of voice…..no wonder he has been behaving. She still has my vote, I am afraid not to vote for her after seeing that….
Trump probably has the worse comb over but Mike McConnell does have a really bad one as well.
Huck reminds me of Ned Flanders
Hi, Jane and everyone!
That really is a nasty comb-over. It fits with the right-wing penchant for massive self-delusion.
That scared you? That is pretty tame next to the tongue wagging you would get from the women in my family.
I wonder how Richardson got his resume. He always seems like a doofus to me any time he opens his mouth.
So, ya like those strong kinda womens?
Is that why you love the lake?
I am sure the women in your house would love me and you would hear the refrain “why can’t you be more like Brian”……..which would be a bitter pill indeed, because I am really quite a rascal, as you know.
It takes a lot more than that to light a fire under ‘ol Bong’s ass.
Rates about here for me.
;~P
Brasilian women are stereotyped as being a little on the crazy side, so ummm…well maybe I’ve said too much *g*
I wonder what the life expectancy actuarial tables are for that statement ;-)
I dunno…..
Here’s Hillary’s latest. This wordsmith is at a loss for words. Temporarily. Maybe.
Didja see the recipe I left you a couple threads back ?
i hit that submit button too fast. What I meant to say was….
I dunno, I’m a girl and all and as open minded as I am, I don’t want to be like that rascal Brian
No, which thread?
Wobblybits … “Just a couple of wild and crazy guys” thread @ 178 …
Guess she doesn’t want the VP slot.
“John McCain does no favors for, nor gives no special treatment to, any lobbyists — even if they are a friend of his,” Charlie Black, a longtime Republican
strategistlobbyist, said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program while on the phone in the back of The Straight Talk Express. “He listens to both sides of issues from representatives from both sides, makes a decision on the merits and goes ahead.”“Hey, somebody get me a sandwich back here!” he also said.
oooh gonna go take a look see
Regarding Ralph, doesn’t he need to get petitions signed in each state and is he ready to do that? It seems like he has perhaps waited too long this year. Shame, shame on you Ralph Nader…….
Shhhh. Listen. Hear that door slamming shut? It’s the Obama campaign, clicking deadbolts in place to keep Hillary off the ticket and out of the White House. Just sayin’.
That was just shocking– she was making fun of Obama!
I mean, that was really below the belt! I don’t think even the Republicans will do something that low, assuming he wins the nomination (which he no doubt will after Hil made fun of him like that).
That’s interesting. Seems that a lot of what Obama had planned was, indeed, strategic on his part. But obviously, there is luck involved. If a rival candidate enters the race with a similar approach one begins to divide the vote. Now one could argue that Edwards was the one that fit that mold, but Obama had started organizing young voters much earlier and captured that critical part of the chessboard. I suspect Edwards mainly was attempting to use a base from his prior camapign.
In addition, from the start of his Senatorial campaign Obama was making his attacks on NAFTA and the war. These were not “new issues” in his speeches “borrowed from John Edwards”. They were part of his stump speeches in Illinois back when Edwards was still voting on centrist bills in the Senate. Obama thus had occupied that space, particularly in the critical early Primary states, marginalized the other candidates, before taking on Clinton, who represented the establishment.
Obama would have never chosen Hillary as his running mate …
Having said the above, the her words are true, the tone is very off.
I don’t know who on the Clinton campaign decided that attacking William Ayers for being a member of the Weather Underground was a good idea, but you have to think that someone would have remembered that Bill pardoned Susan Rosenberg (also a member of the Weather Underground) on his way out the door. Hello? Anybody home?
Let it be a matter of record, that Lahoma and I were in sympathy with SDS in the 60’s and seventies. We remain in sympathy with SDS. Sisters and brothers.
okk and Lahoma.
Ouch, Hillary’s wearing Loo Hoo’s fav jacket … *g*
Oh yummmmmmmmm
Thaks so much. That is exactly what I’m having for dinner tonight. I’ll have to find some piece of dead animal for the hubby (sorry, he won’t do squirrel)
I know, but it’s nice to have it in the coffin, nailed down forever.
Hillary is not a believer I guess. If she wins we will have more bickering and fighting. Although I do not really think we will get out of Iraq or get universal health care without at least a little bickering. But I have not seen the light yet myself.
Do you really feel that her bit was farther below the belt than what we’re going to see in the general?
I didn’t think it was that big a deal.
She made her point.
I’m a little tone deaf myself… but I don’t understand who she is criticizing… Obama or his supporters?
Call it by some French name … Écureuil au gratin … (I know, my French is awful) *g*
OT to wobbleybits - I think it was you who posted about buying veggies and reading the code to see if they were organic or factory farmed or frankenfarmed. ?? Would you elaborate? Below on Kirk’s thread is fine if you like.
Hello? Bill is not Hillary. Hello?
I added the Jalapeno to the blender …
Exactly. I was being sarcastic– I guess I should have laid it on a little thicker. :-)
My take was Obama, since she didn’t mention sheep.
My lady and I went horseback riding earlier. And naturally the subject of politics emerged during that ride. Lahoma advised she was angry with Hillary Clinton. I asked how so? She said she was unpleased with Clinton because she had a chance to be the first woman president, and blew it. I indicated my agreement. The matter was then dropped.
Oh, sorry. Didn’t read it as sarcasm.
People Do tend to get thin-skinned here sometimes…
Thicker, or the little /s thingy.
Again, sorry.
Carry on.
Really? I was thinking she was making fun of his adherents, because I doubt he believes his own schtick.
Well I’m going to try and say something nice here…..
it’s the sincerest form of flattery?
if you can’t win them on policies, go for laughter?
ummm she’s attacking a policy of his (you know the whole-unifying-hope-thing)
okay, I got nothing
This is something that I berated my nephew about when he was umm 8 years old, it’s reminiscent of elementary school and not very becoming to someone who has accomplished so much and still has much to offer.
OT, but Atrios has post with a great comment thread — And Their Story Is?
As I wrote before there’s been a lot of insidery campaign stories about the Clinton camp and not so much from the Obama camp. More than that, there really hasn’t been a lot of analysis (that I’ve seen) about how team Obama achieved what they did.
Campaign stories tend to be overly determined by who the ultimate winner is (if you win it was all genius if you lose it was all stupid), but I’d really be interested in knowing how much of what Obama achieved was due to some awesome master plan, and how much of it was just luck combined with a charismatic candidate.
I love Atrios, but the following was a great comment in that post:
Luck. Really? Are you trolling your own blog?
I mean come on “just luck” in beating Clinton, Edwards, Richardson, Dodd,etc.?
In America, with the name “Barack Obama”?
Come on, folks.
Better than mine, which is non-existent, LOL
See…you’re a smart man.
(Some here could benefit from Kiddo lessons…/s)
I’m going out to an afternoon concert.
Pups have fun…
I unable to dispute that. ;0)
hiya y’all!!
Yeah, no problem! I think this is a problem with the written word– it’s hard to read people’s body language. People used to talk about this when e-mail was just starting to be widely used. It’s easy to be misunderstood when you’re typing.
So I’ve been working on being more low key so as not to come across as too abrasive.
Sure, in one of my raw foods book, they talked about being able to identify the way foods are grown and it goes as follows:
The little stickers on the fruit and veggies are called PLU stickers and there will be either a 4 or 5 digit number on it.
5 digits and digits begin with the number 9 = organic
4 digits = conventionally grown
5 digits and digits begin with the number 8 = genetically modified
But wouldn’t she want to convert and the subsequent support of his adherents? Or is this just an attempt to slap them to their senses?
Why is it that the Clintons always drag it down to the bottom fishing level. Now we have Doris opining on plagiarism. Unattributed copying is not plagiarism unless the copying is done without the permission of the author. In Obama’s case, the purported author said Obama had permission. Hence no plagiarism. Just unattributed copying. In Doris’ case of reported plagiarism, she reportedtedly did not have the consent of the author(s) and reportedly paid bucks to settle the claims.
But I had forgotten about Doris. Why is it that the Clintons turn these people up?
Too true.
It’s especially difficult to read sarcasm.
And, by the way,
Kiddo, my /s should have read *g*.
I wasn’t being sarcastic.
I think a lot of men everywhere could benefit from Kiddo Lessons.
Not just the math ones, but how to treat a spouse.
You and Lahoma are inspirations.
Thanks. Good to know.
or maybe just a slap? Even if it was not aimed at her supporters, many may take it as such (even those that are not necessarily in his camp) but it’s her decision, right?
Do you think SNL would do a skit with Amy Poehler as Vicki Iseman?
Do you really think it was that bad? I thought it was pretty mild. I’m pretty sure she has not intention of alienating his adherents, but I think she was mainly trying to appeal to independents.
But I want to emphasize, it was very mild. I mean really.
I have one more qualification, before I head out.
My husband is one of the good guys.
Treats me Just Right.
Melodramatic and (with apologies to the “fellow” feminists here) scolding. At some point that term has to be allowed to be used. Clinton has become the whinging, scolding holier-than-thou….hypocrite.
Yes, her campaign has also sent out fliers exagerating and misrepresenting Obama’s positions. Does she really believe that Obama’s plan for Social Security relief will cost a “trillion dollars of YOUR money” (Sh*t, where will I get it from?). And that 30 million people uncovered by his health care plan is simply out of the blue. If the plans are attractive enough (from collective buying power) then it may be far less. Her plan also indicates some uncovered individuals that would want to opt out…but would be compelled to join by some “undefined” penalties. She will not state what that means (fines, dunning of wages, or simply being denied access…if the latter that means it’s not “universal”).
I think Clintons stridency has gotta be desperation at seeing internal and external polls showing that her prior strategies to have her message gain traction have failed. Obama has benefitted a bit from “Obamamania”, but it also means that people are looking at his ideas and positions with more scrutiny. And also comparing the two. In many cases their positions are nuanced, in other cases they are broad. Hillary, it seems, is trying to take the nuanced differences and make them Grand Canyons, while concealing the areas that they have substantial distinctions.
Not a problem, always glad to pass along helpful info :)
I was going to say, if your husband has been anything less than attentive I was going to step up and ask for a tryout.
Ah - got it.
I think it was MTP that dug up Doris. They wanted a presidential historian, and chose her.
Probably not the best choice, given the topic at hand.
Not enough Hi’s in there, Missie, ya threw everyone off…! Aloha!
Yeah, the whole issue is interesting. He made the whole question appear absurd in the last debate by explaining that she and McCain were calling his supporters “delusional.” The audience laughted and even Hillary appeared to actually laugh, rather than a false smile. Even so, she’s back at it with more gusto.
I have only decided against her recently, but it appears she still has at least two weeks left to try something and there is really no good campaign option left.
I think Clinton has run a decent campaign and Obama has run an excellent one.
Clinton problems have had very little to do with tactics. Rather, the problem was strategy.
She ran on a restoration theme. In this poltical enviroment, where change is trump, this was always going to be a difficult hand to play.
hi mr CT! hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hello hello hello hola hola hola hey hey hey hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hello hello hello hola hola hola hey hey hey hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hello hello hello hola hola hola hey hey hey
I’m turning into my mother but it’s true that, in the end, it’s OUR decision as to how we react to a situation.
:) Everyone enjoys a compliment, and I thank you for that.
Yep! She’s been hanging out with finger-wagging Condi Rice too much and she’s picked up some bad NeoCon habits. Me superior and never wrong. You unholy good-for-nothing unchosen before time began.
E.J. Dionne mentioned on This Week earlier today that Newsweek has reporting on the NYTimes story on McCain… it does, byline Evan Thomas and Isikoff.
Legs still growing on this story.
And Nader? Harold Stassen for the 21st Century…just sayin’ ’round the blogosphere.
Tommy has a website for his song publishing. That page has a “contact Tom” citation. Accordingly, if you go to his site, (http://www.tommaxwell.com/TMindex2.htm) you can reach him. I’m sorry, I tried making it into a link, but it didn’t work so you’ll just have to cut and paste it into your browser, or you can search for Tom Maxwell & Squirrel Nut Zippers, as I did.
I can only respond that I don’t see it that way at all. You mention “Clinton’s stridency”. That’s a pretty strong term. I just don’t think she’s been anything close to strident. It’s politics. Think about it– if she’s being scolding and strident, what words will you have left to describe what the Puke smear machine will dish out in the general?
Much better, Cassie! *g*
I know, I know. I got it the first time. I need to apply some balm to my thin skin, I guess. That said, I believe with my whole heart that Hillary is not the anointed one and lately, she is demonstrating that in spades. Slinking back to my cave now.
Shoot. I do plagiarism all the time. I’m a math teacher. I doubt I’ve ever had an original thought in my life. Everything I know and say has been appropriated by me. (But seriously… I get the drift). I support Obama. I do not care much for Ms. Goodwin and her copying. Why does this individual command respect?