![]()
John McCain's story about the letters he wrote to the Federal Communications Commission in 1999 continues to fall apart -- fast. Now the favor-seeker and campaign contributor who owned the company on whose behalf McCain first said he didn't write the letters -- the fellow McCain then said he didn't meet with? -- says, hold up, Straight Talk, yes we did.
Broadcaster Lowell "Bud" Paxson yesterday contradicted statements from Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign that the senator did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist before sending two controversial letters to the Federal Communications Commission on Paxson's behalf.
Probably just a brief casual meeting at a party or Capitol Hill watering hole, though, right? Nothing St John could be expected to remember.
Paxson said he talked with McCain in his Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters in 1999 to the FCC urging a rapid decision on Paxson's quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station.
Well, how will we ever sort this out? I wonder if there was anyone else at the meeting, someone who might have facilitated the get-together between Bud Paxson and Senator Straight Talk?
Paxson also recalled that his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, likely attended the meeting in McCain's office and that Iseman helped arrange the meeting. "Was Vicki there? Probably," Paxson said in an interview with The Washington Post yesterday. "The woman was a professional. She was good. She could get us meetings."
Probably, though, the letter that Paxson wanted written came up obliquely and wasn't mentioned specifically by either party, wouldn't you imagine? That's the way these things are done in DeeCee -- on the double-hush, on the queue-tee, on the down-low -- without actually describing the exact favor being requested, right?
But Paxson said yesterday, "I remember going there to meet with him." He recalled that he told McCain: "You're head of the Commerce Committee. The FCC is not doing its job. I would love for you to write a letter."
But I doubt St Straight Talk replied, "Sure, my friend. I would love to write a letter -- or two! And I would love for you to give me another ride on your shiny private plane. I would also love for you to contribute thousands more dollars to my presidential campaign, my friend. And I would also love for your lobbyist to fly back from Florida on your shiny private plane with me."
No, these things just don't happen that way. Do they?
{photoshop by watertiger}
A former Paxson Communications president said Saturday he never met with John McCain about the Arizona senator writing letters to the Federal Communications Commission regarding the regulatory delay of a Pittsburgh TV station sale.
Dean Goodman, who was in charge of the company's lobbying efforts in 1999, told The Associated Press he also doubts that chief executive Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson met with McCain over the issue, and said he doesn't recall such a meeting.
[snip]
"I never met with or discussed this with Senator McCain," Goodman said. "I don't recall Bud meeting with McCain. It would be extremely rare that there would be a meeting that I didn't attend, and I can tell you that I didn't have a meeting with McCain on this issue."
"Whether Bud discussed it with him or not, via some other mechanism, I can't rule it out," Goodman added. But, he said, "I don't think there was a meeting."
And the McCain 2008 campaign issues a statement that includes the phrase "does not recall directly discussing:"
Jill Hazelbaker, a McCain campaign spokeswoman, said Saturday in a statement, "Senator McCain does not recall directly discussing the issue with Mr. Paxson or any representative of Paxson."
The campaign said his 1999 Senate schedule does not show any meetings between McCain and Paxson or any of Paxson's representatives on this issue. The campaign said the schedule shows no meetings with Paxson that year, but shows one meeting in 1998 and one in 2000, months before and after the letters were sent.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


Hey Teddy! I just want to know what missy has beneath her dress to cause the bumps.
like lifting a rock in the garden, interesting to see all the critters scurrying away from the light of day.
*ndfg waves at teddy*
This is great! Too bad the NYT couldn’t wait until McBush had already accepted the nomination.
I hope Giulliani doesn’t get any ideas.
getting more interesting by the minute
This story is over. The NYT is not a creditable news source like CNN or FAUX NOISE….
Let’s all move along now. Nothing to see here.
Teddy!
Sorry, that should have read, Hey Teddy, my friend!
I believe Dean, not Bud! It’s all lies and inuendo…! ;-)
Senator McCain does not recall directly promising to tell the truth, the whole truth or anything like the truth. So help himself.
Gee, Mark Shields even described him as a model of rectitude (time to say g’nite, Mark).
Thanks, Teddy.
Hello, my friends.
Two words Senator, “plausible deniability”
well,since vicki dearest was giving mcbushain a b-job at the time, he couldn’t really be expected to remember anyone else at the meeting, now could he?
(oops — not sure how i typed that … certainly didn’t mean it …)
Ok what are the consequences to whom about lying about which lies if they are found out? Aside from the Democrats laughing for a week or two at the irony. Bill Clinton must be smiling :)
LOL! I hadn’t noticed that before. Now my imagination will probably wander along all sorts of muddy paths… I thought I was pretty familiar with female underpinnings, even back to the day when girdles were the thing, but for the life of my I can’t recall anything that looked like that! (Unless… unless… do you thing it’s a lobbyist’s money belt?)
McCain can pretend this will go away, as can Cindy. It won’t. This is too much corruption for the dems to let fly in this important an election. Well, maybe not the dems, but the bloggers.
Sigh. I miss edit. For the life of me, and do you think…
Well, more appropriate than girdles, I actually remember wearing gizmos to hold up the Modess pads. My girls howl!!
Chastity Belt, of course.
;~P
That’s it!!!
Oh, lordy, so did I. Bulky? If you look that word up in the dictionary there’s a picture of Kotex…!
I wondered the same thing..Doesn’t fit any anatomy that I can think of…maybe incisional hernias? Or a hankie slipped from her bra?
I foresee Shrub pleading that in the near future… ;-)
thank you Loo Hoo! now we’re all wondering!
Well, Clinton got one too… BJ that is…! ;-)
She has an outie
He’ll have cue cards: “plaw-za-bul dee-nye-a-bill-a-tee” Somehow I don’t see him saying that all by himself, do you?
Belly button then… She’s a carpenter’s dreamboat…!
Whatever it is it’s in an odd place - maybe a garter belt - men seem to think those are sexy.
I see two… Oh, lawdy! I can see the headlines now — Dean Loves Aliens.
Eggsactly, Foe-net-ick-lay spelled out…! *g*
No, I’m sure he’s seen the movie Independence Day so will remember his line that way.
Forbidden fruit? ;-)
i suspect she has an innie-and-an-outie …
*g*
She wasn’t even born when garter belts went out of style.
Really, been to the movies lately?
Sorry, but she was. And I believe you can still get them today.
It’s up to us to keep this alive as long as the TradMed unearths new material. Remember how long TPM pounded on the fired USAttorneys scandal before it got any traction? We need to persevere on this — it must be the defining moment of McCain’s campaign, and we can make it so.
Well, well, well. Mister straight talk, looks like your memory could use an upgrade.
Well that’s an interesting bit of information. This issue carried on for about two years, isn’t that right? So isn’t the 1998 meeting relevant?
No…but I remember that a garter belt was a lot better than panty hose at the late show at the drive-in.
Garter belts are still in style some places. Very much so.
Ever hear of Victoria’s secret? Where am I?
This post could use some Digg love.
*he pleaded awkwardly*
Did I land in sensible-shoeville?
Not to mention Frederick’s - no doubt they have red ones.
Teddy, that is a great post and here we are talking about ladies undies and other assets. Sorry.
Gentlemen’s Clubs (I presume)
;~P
Don’t forget Hucklebee on Saturday Nite Live tonite — I wonder if the writers gave him some Vicki jokes?
Repetition, repetition, repetition.
We hash over this stuff and go on to the next outrage, thinking we’ve done all we can. Not so.
Dugg Teddy.
Well, the picture certainly calls for some commentary of its own! *g*
We could talk about Hillary’s wild ass claims about Obama’s mail.
huh … OT, but this nyt “blog” on obama’s response to clinton’s accusation of rove-ishness seems awfully reasonable and even-minded. maybe it’s just unfair reporting, maybe the guy really does respond in a centered, balanced way.
Let’s leave Bubba outa this…
oh, nevermind.
The Sunday Gasbag Programmes will be interesting — presumably most Villagers will view this as a Sex Scandale, and thus distasteful. On the other hand, some reporters on the round tables might break some news.
I betcha lots of Villagers knew about this before it broke.
and … your point is?
:-)
my bad
:-)
OOOOO, a scandale, is dat Italian?
The next step for an enterprising journalist is to FOIL McCain’s schedules to see if there are other missing appointments. I also wonder if this mis-remembering simply indicates the ease with which Vicki Iseman breezed in and out of St John’s Senate office, clients in tow, sans appointment, during the period in question.
That bump is too low to be her belly button. Brain bleach stat!
Strap-on harness?
FOIL - Like mon chapeau?
or
FOIA?
;~P
The Washington Post reports on the freezing of Home Equity Lines of Credit:
Now, for sure, you can KYAG.
From Teddy’s quoted WaPo piece:
Doesn’t get much clearer than that.
So, does Paxson have any conceivable reason to lie?
I wonder if he sees a subpoena in his future.
Or foil like a sword?
…or foiled again!
done - all you have to do is ask… i too often forget.
(but is it ok if i skip the belly button discussion?)
Ohhh. Thanks for the SNL reminder.
Foil me once, shame on you… Foil me twice, uh, er Won’t get foiled again…
Doesn’t get much clearer than that.
So, does Paxson have any conceivable reason to lie?
I wonder if he sees a subpoena in his future.
Doesn’t seem so. What would Paxson gain from lying in this instance. He has alot to lose but nothing to gain from coming clean now.
OT, really a follow up to our burning NAFTA conversation earlier in the day …
WaPo look at Toledo, lack of green mfg, loss of good jobs…
how to fix this?
have to say i’m surprised at seeing some pretty good reporting in the (right-wing controlled) MSM…
I saw the acronym FOIL (for FOIA) and I like it.
Presumably, FOI’s not an Act anymore but now a Law. (per Schoolhouse Rock)
no.
;-)
Wit Tina Fey, and here’s a picture of her in a (gasp) garter belt!
he said as he dangled his shiny private plane and 30-year-old lobbyette in front of St McCain’s wide greedy eyes, along with thousands of dollars in campaign contributions, knowing full well that this meeting wasn’t on the official Senate office calendar.
Ding!
it was really wrong of me to ask the question if i had already decided what i was going to do ;-)
Okaaayyyy! In the WashPo article yesterday it said
“
Hmmm! So Bennett was saying that McCain “never denied meeting with Paxson or his staff”…yet that’s precisely what the campaign denied earlier. No meeting with Paxson, his company, or a lobbyist in which anyone asked Mcacin , “to send a letter to the FCC regarding this proceeding.”
Suddenly Bennett is now saying that the meetings occurred, and the letters were requested. No Bennett is admitting that “assistance was requested”. The fallback line yesterday was
Bennett first denies everything the campaign said were “lies”. Then he says that as long as McCain interfered with the FCC’s adjudication (an act serious enough to be censured by the Commissioner) but didn’t say he favored Paxson then it was all right. The Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee whose gambit is the FCC, approaches the FCC regarding an important contributor who has been trying to purchase a Non-Commercial TV Station and says “make a decision, NOW… I’m watching”.
The message on what direction that decision should go, becomes quite clear.
And in fact, when the FCC placed stipulations on Paxson’s purchase (requiring that the station continue to act as a non-commercial educational station under the original license standards) the Republicans on the Commerce Committee and the rest of the Senate introduced a Bill to handcuff the FCC from restricting what programming must occur on religious stations, and opening up non-commercial stations to commercialization.
double ding
But since St McCain is honorable and known to steadfastly refuse the imprecations of lobbyists after he barely escaped the Keating Scandal with his career intact, none of these temptations would, um, tempt him.
’s ok — it’s not a belly button …
If there are any college hoop fans out there #1 Memphis vs #2 Tennessee is a serious barn burner.
“. . . but I knew that would be wrong,” said St. McCain. Still, he couldn’t help himself. “Slowly I turned. Inch by inch, step by step . . .”
I can see Bennett’s statement from a mile away…
“Now wait just a minute…
You’re holding Senator McCain to the word of some lowly staffer who’s out of his/her depth?
Balderdash!”
Niagra Falls!
That is actually on youtube and I had forgotten how violent it is!
Haven’t heard that “slowly I turned” thing is years and can’t remember what it’s from. Please tell me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ9lQe2YoBs
Fortunately, there are smarter economists that Bush types.
sorry folks, time to move on, conversation is over. not going to be discussed anymore …
ok, what’s next? now that we’ve settled that … anyone got any good jokes?
c’ape, it’s the mutation of the story as the McCain spokespersons and attorneys hold it up to the light of statements made by other parties that’s most intriguing — and that will convince editors to allow reporters to continue to dig. Until they nail down a single version of events, this thing has legs. And legs are good.
OMG! I forgot how uncomfortable those puppies were! Didn’t get to wear them often though, too expensive.
I believe Raven @88 has the answer you are seeking.
Why did Paxson rat the Good Saint out? He could have kept his big yap shut and the MSM would have let it slip away, something’s funny here.
Because he didn’t see any problems in saying what happened. “What do you mean, ‘rat the Good Saint out?’ I called John, he wrote to the FCC, and things got settled. That’s the way it always works. What’s the problem? Why does everyone have their knickers in a twist?”
I think I found it! (don’t click if you are under 18 years of age)
yeah, that’ll stop’em.
hi jackie, way to keep the thread classy! *g*
Sorry - and I was SO pleased to have found something that “Fit” the bumps so well…
Hiya Teddy
Paxson ratted the liar out because it’s “time” to identify John McCain as a total fraud. Besides, Paxson might be culpable of “aiding and abetting” if he did not tell the truth. Although McCrazy would like to not have to talk about this any more, it appears that this is going to be an ongoing scandal with information coming like a tsunami which will bury his campaign.
The Straight Talk Express has been changed to the “Double Talk Express”. This saga has tenacles which are wrapping themselves around St. John and will take him under.
We now can see the total lack of integrity of this man: He disses lobbyists and then we discover that he’s in bed with one and his campaign is full of them. He abuses the system and then criticizes those who do the same thing or blames the system instead. He’s done the same with media concentration - after aiding and abetting the use of the FCC loophole by his inappropriate letters pressing them to permit this breach of the law, he then goes national and says “the problem is with media concentration”….This is beginning to sound like what Bush did with the circle jerk using Judy Miller - He and deadeye dick concocted the blather, sent it to Miller who published it, then they turned around and referenced it as though it was an outside opinion. This crap has got to stop. Besides, McCain suffers from PTSD and senile dementia - not to mention his medical diagnosis of invasive melanoma which probably means that he would not be able to fill even a 4 year term. He’s toast, as they say.
I read this someplace and thought it was funny…
What did John McCain call Vicki’s breasts?
“My friends”
Re why would Paxson do this: Paxson is a born-again Christian, unless he got unborn. Isn’t McCain having some problems with the Christian right?
Spectacular jacqrat! THAT is the Republican Magic Underwear!
And now you have been put on ANOTHER special list by Karl Rove.