The union movement is turning green. Not with envy, but with an escalating sense that the nation must work to address climate change and that we must be part of the effort to create good jobs that also are green jobs.
Last December, an unprecedented delegation of unionists traveled to Bali, Indonesia, for the U.N. climate change conference. Of the 90 union delegates, more than 20 were from North America.
Roger Toussaint, president of Transport Workers (TWU) Local 100 in New York, was one of them. He explained the need for union involvement this way:
We have to rise to the challenge of climate change by making it a key priority for our unions. A trade union agenda, rooted in the organized strength of workers and day-to-day engagement in affected communities, can help transition our society to a low-carbon future. This will bring “green” employment in such areas as public transportation, which is critically important now and in the years ahead.
I firmly believe all leaders of America’s working people must take immediate steps to familiarize themselves and their organizations with the issues involved and figure out the obligations of their appropriate job sectors. Nationally, the union movement must take the lead in shaping policy and legislation needed in this area. We need meaningful engagement and decisive action. We are on borrowed time, but the chance to make our mark on the process is there for the taking.
Earlier this month, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney addressed the Investor Summit on Climate Risk where he said investors, workers and government must come together to create a stable climate and a strong global economy that creates good jobs.
The global economy cannot prosper unless we secure a stable climate and sustainable sources of energy. Global warming means global depression, food and water shortages and drowned cities. I have stood in New Orleans’ Ninth Ward and seen that future.
Al Gore also spoke at the one-day meeting, sponsored in part by the United Nations Foundation and including more than 450 investor, financial and corporate leaders, who together control more than $20 trillion in investment capital.
Next month, unionists will take part in the "Good Jobs, Green Jobs: A National Green Jobs Conference," to share best practices about revitalizing our manufacturing sector, driving green building, promoting safer chemicals and realizing the economic benefits of global warming solutions. We will be joined by environmental and public health advocates, policymakers, business leaders and others who will launch a nationwide discussion on the benefits of a new green economy. The location of the March 13–14 conference at Pittsburgh’s David Lawrence Convention Center highlights the group’s commitment: It’s the only entirely green convention center in the country.
Unions increasingly are taking concrete steps toward making the connection between good jobs and green jobs. Here are just a few examples.
- The United Steelworkers (USW) and the Sierra Club have formed a “blue-green alliance” to work for good jobs and a clean environment. The alliance is focusing on three issues: global warming and clean energy, fair trade and reducing toxics. USW President Leo Gerard says the union movement’s vision of addressing global warming challenges global policies that allow corporations to make huge profits by buying and trading the rights to emit carbon "without ever addressing the basic inequalities in our global economy."
- The USW also recently released a report, DuPont and Greenwash, the first in its series of “Greenwashing” reports. The report notes that while DuPont touts its environmental image, its products are likely to dramatically impact global warming as greenhouse gases when they are disposed and used. It also finds the emissions from those products could be enormous, possibly canceling out or exceeding DuPont’s touted reductions in greenhouse gases from its facilities. The USW report says the company refuses to disclose the climate impact of those products.
- Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) President Warren George has called on policymakers to invest in mass transit systems to reduce greenhouse gases:
We don’t need to reinvent the wheel, or create new infrastructure from scratch (although the infrastructure needs a lot of work). The machinery is in place. We the skilled workers are in place. All we need is the political will to provide the funding and the insight and incentives.
- In November, the AFL-CIO—together with the Apollo Alliance––convened a meeting of workers’ pension trustees and money managers to discuss opportunities in clean-energy technologies. Through the Apollo Alliance, the AFL-CIO and some affiliated unions such as USW, seek to create jobs with a public investment in sustainable energy such as hydrogen fuel systems and related transportation, construction and manufacturing.
- The Oregon AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions have been engaged in moving an agenda of renewable energy and good jobs by coordinating the activities of the Oregon Apollo Alliance. In October, Oregon AFL-CIO convention delegates passed resolutions on climate change and jobs and set up a task force of affiliated union leaders to help examine its impact on our members and implications on its policy work.
Last year, the AFL-CIO endorsed the Low Carbon Economy Act of 2007. Introduced by Sens. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), the bill set a goal of reducing the nation’s carbon emissions by at least 60 percent by 2050.
Electrical Workers (IBEW) President Edwin Hill said the legislation offered an effective approach to address climate change while allowing our economy to grow.
The fact that this bill is the only climate change legislation that also addresses the problems of international participation in emissions control makes it unique.
The AFL-CIO Energy Task Force last year issued a report which said in part:
It is time for our nation to take bold steps to meet the 21st century challenges related to energy policy. We believe our nation should embrace a balanced approach that assures abundant, affordable energy supplies, creates good-paying jobs for American workers, improves the environment and reduces our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.
In focusing on our core issue, family-supporting jobs, we in the union movement provide unique insight into an as-yet little explored facet of addressing climate change. There’s still much work to be done, and part of that involves educating our members.
Barbara Byrd, secretary-treasurer of the Oregon AFL-CIO, was among our U.S. union delegation to Bali. As Byrd notes:
We recognize the Western states will be enacting far-reaching policies in the next few years, and we believe the union movement must be at the table to debate with other stakeholders how best to craft climate change legislation.
We will need to educate our own members as well, sothey will not only understand the complicated technical issues, but also so they will feel the urgency that drives the work of the labor delegates in Bali.
But we’ve taken big steps forward—concrete action as well as countering what USW President Gerard accurately describes as the myth of incompatibility between unions and the environment.
Says Gerard:
We need to put an end to the lies, the myths, the hysteria that say you can have either a clean environment or good jobs. You can have both, or you have neither.



48 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
this is a point I’ve been trying to make for some time, that green technology will help the economy
our economy must ever expand for it to be successfull and green technology fits that prescription
economies thrive when we convert to green, technology will advance, jobs will be created and our children will not have to get cancer breathing the crap we left behind for them
this is something the corporatists are afraid to let go public, because while the economy will grow, there will be some industry that becomes obsolet
anywhay, here is a perfect example;
if our auto industry had played their cards right, were at the cutting edge in hybrid, electric and renewable energy for cars, most people would be dumping their vehicles and getting that new technology
in other words, if the auto industry were forced to continue the standards put into motion by carter, (rescinded by reagan), our auto industry would be enjoying their greates profit years ever
instead, they are going out of bussiness
going green is a no loose situation for america, where the economy grows, bussinesses profit and the world is better off
those industries that might be adversely affected can invest in this field and regain the profit they might have lost
If the auto industry had done what you said possibly I would have been driving an American hybrid car for the last 5 years instead of a Honda.
Either good jobs or clean environment is a false dichotomy. The major problems are corporations who are too lazy to change their business model to include the environment. It has little to do with money. Corporations create their own demise by not reinventing themselves to fit the needs of the times. They would rather suffocate in their own debris than change the way they do business.
Let them fall. Good riddance. Emerging companies with a better understanding of running a business that includes a greener approach will bury the stogy old corporate model. The only reason they have been kept afloat this long is because we have a government that props them up using our tax money to keep them in business.
There’s a budding field of study/professional approach leaping into the fray as we speak, and sounding pretty good.
E.g., movement twd encouraging cross-discipline study at universities e.g., biologists/ecologists working with and actually being listened to by business people who seem to “get it” and realize things have to be done differently if we are to [expect our kids & theirs to have any future at all/ work to help less wealthy nations around the world/ foster a greener approach to everything we do]*
*[ ] = my words making a stab at explaining topic of a seminar my biologist sweetie attended yesterday, but that I did not. He was guardedly excited by what he was hearing. I’ll try to find a link to the name & location of the speaker and link it later… sorry so vague at this point…
actually, you might not have had any choice
american auto industry was cutting edge in this technology, they had the battery all auto’s had to use
then the laws were rescinded that demanded they develope the technology, gm actually sold that battery technology to the petro industry
let me repeat that;
gm sold their battery technology to the petro industry
that sale should have NEVER been approved, that should have been referred to anti trust law
we’re gonna have to start growing hemp I might add, hemp gets a good energy return on investment
Aha, just as I suspected. Do you have a link to the sale of the battery technology?
I do, hang
There have been numerous energy saving inventions that have been prevented from going on the market. Here is where one corporation colludes with another through government convention. These agreements are mostly done in secret.
American know-how is allowed only with corporate approval across many industries and will increase the profits of corporations. Very little is ever done to benefit the consumer. The consumer is the perpetual golden goose.
here ya go
from here
http://www.ev1.org/chevron.htm
although now I see there are “counter blogs” and entries that claim the battery wasn’t good
I can attest to the fact that they were good, they lasted longer then I needed and the car went 80 miles an hour, this was a governed speed and the car could go faster
I think the following link describes what I was referring to at #5.
I would suggest entering the site there and clicking around to see the sorts of things they’re doing. They are encouraging investment in going green, using business models that gack Wall Street gurus should understand and respect. A hair-raising idea for me, but my hubby – PhD teaching biology 30+ yrs, and other superb ecologists we have regular contact with, seem quite interested.
http://www.nfwf.org/AM/Templat…..n=Partners
The speaker at the informal seminar on the topic:
Dr. Daniel Petit (Director, Bird Conservation Initiative National Fish & Wildlife Foundation)
The place he appeared: University of Akron, Akron OH, Dep’t of Biology
http://www.uakron.edu/colleges…..s/biology/
Forget all about this issue. It turns out we’ve been worrying for nothing:
Children, Children’s Children: ‘Stop Worrying About Us’
http://www.theonion.com/conten…..ldren_stop
A belated HI! to you Tula. ;->
Great topic. Thanks!
Building new, green industries will be great for our economy. New jobs will spawn along with altogether new industries. Green industry will benefit everyone, except for the wealthy owners of polluting corporations. The power corporations have over our government from bribes (i mean campaign contributions) will be difficult to overcome, but we will prevail if we remain vigilant.
RantingRaver.com
Thanks very much. Just as I suspected.
please to elaborate?
Nothing specific, just that for years (probably been saying it since a bit after the first oil shock in 1974) I’ve been saying that all inventions that would reduce oil consumption have been bought up by the oil companies & trashed. I’ve said that without a shred of actual evidence. It’s about the only “conspiracy theory” that I believe in.
So you have finally added meat to the bones.
Thanks again.
Reading your excerpt this date didn’t make sense to me. Going to the link you provide, that’s the date they mention, but when you then follow that link back, the date is actually July 17, 2001.
Did you own one of these cars perris?
It’s not exclusively the oil companies. Years and years ago you could buy small disks in a rubbery collar that you would put into lamp or ceiling fixture sockets before you screwed in the lightbulb. They acted as some sort of a damper and allowed the filament to slowly light, thus preserving the life of the filament and making the lightbulb last longer. When we couldn’t find them any more we inquired and were informed that the company that made them had been purchased by GE. Who makes….lightbulbs.
ecahn, any “theory” that involves more then one person is a “conspiracy theory”
for instance, if we believe the republicans are conspiring to regain the whitehouse, that is a “conspiracy theory”
it’s hard for a theory NOT to be “a conspiracy theory”
You’ve been DUGG!
Great post Tula. It’s really inspiring me. It’s exactly the direction I want to go in personally – to help get our economy to run on green jobs and sustainability. Thanks for all the ideas.
not own, had friends that were able to lease
one day, turn your car off while driving home at night down a highway
the sound (or lack of it) is eery
that’s what these sounded like when you weren’t excelerating
my toyota hybrid is real quiet like that at times too.
it’s actually what i love about both sailing and skiing – that you can be moving fast and there’s no sound of motors.
perris 24
one day…. -um- puleeze not on my road
power steering anyone? off means off! eh?
I’ll have to check around, but one thing is certain – the part about that device “slowing down light” is wrong. If it’s in the socket, it can’t. It looks to me like it would serve to make the contact between the bulb and the socket less efficient, which would lead to arcing and reduced filament life. If I’m right in imagining this, it would also present an increased fire hazard.
If that’s true, GE did the public a service.
ymmv
breaking. and broken.
NYT.
Another conflagration in the Balkans may be the outcome. Another war for BushCo.
Shall we see Hillary claim to be a better commander-in-chief because she was in public service during the last Balkan war.
A little snark to offset the tears welling in my eyes.
Back to lurkin. ‘Enjoy’ your breaking news.
there is an economic pitfall however to a completely electronic car and I have no idea how to address the problem, maybe ecahn can give some kind if insight;
the electric car doesn’t break down, it can probably be the owners last car, all they’ll have to do is replace battery packs and a few other wearable pieces of hardware but the car should always be repairable at a cost vs return
in other words, the car would probably put the industry out of bussiness
much like the zamboni, a machine so good it put itself out of bussiness
also, if you have an automatic transmission you could do damage throwing it into nuetral
can only be done with a standard transmision on a road with nobody around
OT – sort of – If you wish to take action and call your senators and representative, to support the passage of Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act (S.594/H.R.1755).
The Pentagon and the administrations are trying to undermine international negotiations to protect civilians from cluster bombs. Cluster Munitions Civilians Protection Act states: “Cluster munitions will not be used where civilians are known to be present or in areas normally inhabited by civilians.”
Companies that make cluster bombs and/or key components:
Raytheon
Alliant Techsystems
EADS
General Dynamics
L3 Communications
Lockheed Martin
Thales
Aerostar
Gencorp
BAE Systems
Magallen Aerospace
Northrop Grumman
The administration and the Pentagon are hoping this slips by the public with little notice. Reminds me of slipping and sliding around waterboarding and torture.
OT: Donna Edwards was great on “Softballs” I can sure get used to this. Interesting they have her on when she’s not even in office yet.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/…..with-cuba/
Can’t comment on the relative merits of internal combustion vs. electric cars when it comes to maintenance, but anything with moving parts will break, and electric cars have them. The wheels, axles, motors, etc., will require maintenance of some sort and will occasionally break.
My guess is that maintenance requirements will go down somewhat, but they’re not going to disappear.
maintenance doesn’t dissapear largely turns into mainenance vs a heavy replacement bill
in any event, the car is always worth repairing as oposed to gas car where the cost becomes prohibitive
I use a narrower definition of conspiracy. It must either be seriously different from the conventional theory or against the public interest.
Thanks guys. I learn a lot around you fellas… ;->
I gotta go get some recycling together. No, really. Sitting here reading all this makes me feel guilty.
Anyone want a basement full of used but useful “junk”?
Consumers are fundamentally insatiable. If they don’t buy cars, they’ll buy something else. The transition could suck, but less so if you plan for it.
However, I’ll not hold my breath while waiting for a perpetual car.
QuakerGirl at 32: such topics are never OT, in my book. Thanks.
thanks for asking but I have a garage full and am just waiting until it is warm enough to work in there to clean it out.
OT
Rice is testifying on CSPAN2. Even while she smilies, she frowns. What a mug.
Perris – you and me, buddy on the hemp thing. That is a plant that would make so many jobs – building materials, textiles, food products, paints and coatings. No wonder the oil industry hates it; you can replace all petroleum based lubricants, paints and coatings with products made from hemp oil.
is she wearing leather boots and a low skirt cut high?
Visible only from the neck up.
why, if I am not mistaken, it can even replace alcohol for recreational purposes
if I’m not mistaken
ooo, Perris, what you said *g*
But seriously – there are so many products being produced from it that are being used in US industry right now – like the inner door panels in cars — but US farmers are prevented from growing it commercially. Right over the border in Canada, farmers are growing huge acreages of it, but our companies, whether they are hemp seed in energy bars or textiles or what have you..we have to import it all. Drives you crazy.
I listen to thom hartman on the issue, it is simply amazing we aren’t growing hemp
we could make the heartland of america the heartland of our economy
and the progressives could plaguerize that as their platform, they have my position;
i thought they were gone for the week, just here in pro forma. ya know, went home and let the PAA expire.