This is the part we see

Building upon what Thers wrote, either four years or nine days ago (this campaign does seem to condense six months into one day) on quite a few blogs:

1. Eloquence is bad.

2. Fear is good.

3. Someone’s like Kennedy, that’s now bad — except when it’s Kennedy-like in my candidate which is teh awesome.

4. No matter what is said, it clearly implies that your candidate is a racist and/or sexist, probably both.

5. Your candidate is too black, or not black enough — or too manly, or too womanly — all at the same time.

6. Your candidate’s supporters are clearly worse than my candidate’s supporters. It sure seems like they start most of the baseless criticism — as opposed to my candidate’s supporters’ worthy concerns.

7. Your candidate is like McGovern.

8. And also like Nixon.

9. Someone’s like FDR, also bad, except for the good parts.

10. You know who was a good speaker? Hitler! Now I know that Lincoln and Roosevelt were good speakers too, but still you know what that means? Your candidate is just like Hitler, and not like anyone else who ever spoke well. And unlike any other time, this time it’s perfectly legitimate to play the Hitler card.

11. Your candidate has no substance — and no, I will not look at their effing website, I know what I know, because I can feel it and pundits tell me.

12. You are in a cult.

13. No you are.

14. Boy, is your blog going to look bad in the archives.

15. Your number 14 above is both sexist and racist. And you know who liked to make lists? Hitler.

(picture from Today is a Good Day)