the entire concept has to be off beat so I don’t get it

My big fear is that Obama is in the same corporate pocket as Clinton, but wrapped in feel-good platitudes.

Given that Obama has refused to take contributions from any lobbying organizations, what’s the evidence for this?

And to me “solutions and getting things done” without saying what it is Clinton got done are the quintissential nebulous platitudes that define nothing.

I believe Clinton should show she has the insight and judgement to recognize a huge mistake–her authorization and continued support of the fiasco in Iraq that is increasing Dover coffins and trillions of dollars of national debt with no end in sight. She then voted for Kyle Leiberman and against the Levin amendment. Levin says her interpretations shows a lack of understanding of how to read his amendment.

She should acknowledge these mistakes.

She should put some sun shine on her hidden income taxes and her hidden library contributions to the library with her name on it.

I’d like to know where she got $5 million dollars to loan to her campaign? It would be hammered in the general election?

I’d like to know how in the world she thinks she’s going to leave Michigan and Florida as they are now, and get them to count, when hundreds of thousands of Obama voters didn’t bother to waste their time in an election that did not count?

If someone told me my state wasn’t counting, I wouldn’t be there to vote in a meaningless election. Either there is going to be a fair chance for candidates to campaign in Michigan and Florida and someone is going to cover the cost of re-voting or they are history.

I understand Clinton is being told due to wide margins, she can’t make them up in Texas, Ohio,and Penn so her campaign is looking to steal phony elections in two states that did not have real ones. Won’t fly–ever. What were they thinking?

My big fear is that Obama is in the same corporate pocket as Clinton, but wrapped in feel-good platitudes.

I pray he proves me wrong, and if I get the chance to vote for him in November, I will be happy to give him the chance.

The political conversation stimulated by the contrasting of Obama and Mrs. Clinton is the healthiest political dialogue this country has had in 40 years…even though I do not support Mrs. Clinton and will never vote for her, her candidacy is necessary for the future of the Democratic Party. When she loses she will take with her the corporatization of the Democratic Party that had been germinating since 1946 and blossomed in the 1990’s. Beating her with a Black candidate who will be forced to the progressive side by her own conservatism is a bellweather for the future.

KEEP THE FAITH FOLKS AND DON’T WASTE TIME ON GASBAGS!!

But besides all these homilies and invocations of Machiavelli and noble aspersions as to what this country deserves as a voter–do you actually have an opinion that you can support and show it to us?

Do not ever state an attributeyour candidate without placing it in context with the opponent.

Maybe there are two newtonusers. One of them 3 nights ago, made a request for me to begin comparing and contrasting the two Democratic candidates for President. I immediately replied I would do that.

By definition, on its face, in order to compare and contrast, you need to examine the two things you’re comparing and contrasting. It’s that simple. And it’s is deliciously ironic, that after I complied with your request, you’re now invoking Machiavelli.

Tell me–how is it you would prefer that I advocate for my candidate? Have you ever debated? Have you ever cross examined the other side?

As to the comment that I’m chanelling Karl Rove–really someone has to be kidding. I’m doing what everyone who is examining this campaign is doing. I’m also doing exactly what John Lewis has done who opted to support Obama. I don’t konw what has precipitted confusion here. Not supporting Clinton does not constitute dislike or hate personally. She is disingenuous and systemically so. Her ridiculous dance around her Iraq vote is pathetic, and it’s huring her every day.

When you all get past invoking Karl Rove, who will by the way be a very big participant in the general election, with a lot of financial backing for his work (I believe more so if Hillary were in the GE, I’d like to hear who you advocate and why. That was why again.

Someone I know well in my state who is a very prominent Republican decision maker, wrote me that he prays Obama is not the candidate and so do most of the people who run the Republican party here and in other states. Why do you think that is? Machiavelli? Rove? I don’t think so.

Obama, and Clinton, deserve better.

Agreed.
nite all

Obama, and Clinton, deserve better.