Comments on: The McCain “Less Jobs, More Wars” Jugger…Not! http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:36:42 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: kittykitty http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1267382 kittykitty Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:11:35 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1267382 <p>FEWER jobs more war.</p> <p>grammar grammar grammar</p> FEWER jobs more war.

grammar grammar grammar

]]> By: demi http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266500 demi Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:59:56 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266500 <p>I’ll take your word for it.<br /> Maybe it’s just me projecting.<br /> I’ll let it go.</p> I’ll take your word for it.
Maybe it’s just me projecting.
I’ll let it go.

]]> By: Christy Hardin Smith http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266492 Christy Hardin Smith Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:57:11 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266492 <p>Yes, I can. But as I don’t think that is the case, I’m still wondering what you mean by it. Which was why I asked if you’d e-mail concerns to me if you have them. As in specifics if you are seeing something that I clearly am not — as opposed to something vague which doesn’t specifically tell me what the problem is that you are seeing.</p> <p>Which probably makes no sense as it runs around in a rhetorical circle, but there you are…</p> Yes, I can. But as I don’t think that is the case, I’m still wondering what you mean by it. Which was why I asked if you’d e-mail concerns to me if you have them. As in specifics if you are seeing something that I clearly am not — as opposed to something vague which doesn’t specifically tell me what the problem is that you are seeing.

Which probably makes no sense as it runs around in a rhetorical circle, but there you are…

]]> By: demi http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266484 demi Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:54:48 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266484 <p>I meant what I said.<br /> I think some commenters are treated more equally than others.<br /> That’s my observation and I’d just like to see everyone treated the same way.<br /> In my opinion, that would be nice.<br /> You can see that, can’t you?</p> I meant what I said.
I think some commenters are treated more equally than others.
That’s my observation and I’d just like to see everyone treated the same way.
In my opinion, that would be nice.
You can see that, can’t you?

]]> By: Christy Hardin Smith http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266467 Christy Hardin Smith Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:47:52 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266467 <p>No, but I’m wondering what you mean by it and, if it would improve the way things are done, I’d like to know. I think you can see why that would be, can’t you?</p> No, but I’m wondering what you mean by it and, if it would improve the way things are done, I’d like to know. I think you can see why that would be, can’t you?

]]> By: demi http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266461 demi Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:45:39 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266461 <p>There’s no reason for you to take my comment personally, is there?<br /> My comment was certainly not intended to be offensive.<br /> Just my observations.</p> There’s no reason for you to take my comment personally, is there?
My comment was certainly not intended to be offensive.
Just my observations.

]]> By: rwcole http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266460 rwcole Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:45:28 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266460 <p>On the one hand- Clusterfuck can order fewer “missions” and reduce casualties in order to help McBush- but then what’s the point of the SURGE?</p> <p>If he allows the military to be aggressive- then casualties may certainly rise back to where they were- and americans don’t find 40 a month an acceptable figure anyway I would guess.</p> On the one hand- Clusterfuck can order fewer “missions” and reduce casualties in order to help McBush- but then what’s the point of the SURGE?

If he allows the military to be aggressive- then casualties may certainly rise back to where they were- and americans don’t find 40 a month an acceptable figure anyway I would guess.

]]> By: sadlyyes http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266457 sadlyyes Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:44:04 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266457 <p>i thought it was you make me want to be a better MAN…guess ill just have to watch it again the horror</p> i thought it was you make me want to be a better MAN…guess ill just have to watch it again the horror

]]> By: sadlyyes http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266454 sadlyyes Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:42:59 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266454 <p>i freakkkkkkin love that movie!</p> i freakkkkkkin love that movie!

]]> By: bigbrother http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266453 bigbrother Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:42:18 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/the-mccain-less-jobs-more-wars-juggernot/#comment-1266453 <p>It reflects a policy change. To reduce our casualties far less risky combat engagements ans stepped up bombing attacks and night time raids on suspected homes. Also fast trigger fingers “shot first and don’t ask questions later” policy reduces our casualties.</p> <p>Pasification never worked.</p> It reflects a policy change. To reduce our casualties far less risky combat engagements ans stepped up bombing attacks and night time raids on suspected homes. Also fast trigger fingers “shot first and don’t ask questions later” policy reduces our casualties.

Pasification never worked.

]]>