<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Willard We Hardly Knew Yee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:10:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbuck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258756</link>
		<dc:creator>Starbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258756</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jane, if you feel up to it, e-mail me with your e-mail and I’ll see if there is anything I might have you would like to see. I have over 300 shots so there are quite a variety.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, if you feel up to it, e-mail me with your e-mail and I’ll see if there is anything I might have you would like to see. I have over 300 shots so there are quite a variety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258321</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258321</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You’re a sick person.  *g*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re a sick person.  *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBuck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258199</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But there was something wrong with the piece, lots in fact.  It certainly wasn’t up to FDL’s usual high standard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LHP could start by answering the criticisms in the DailyKos diary.  No one’s calling for censorship, but if you make serious charges you should expect people to ask you to back those charges up, or retract.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there was something wrong with the piece, lots in fact.  It certainly wasn’t up to FDL’s usual high standard.</p>
<p>LHP could start by answering the criticisms in the DailyKos diary.  No one’s calling for censorship, but if you make serious charges you should expect people to ask you to back those charges up, or retract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBuck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258194</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I suggest reading DailyKos for the front page articles and ignoring the recommended diaries.  Plenty of good stuff there, as well as in Diary Rescue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest reading DailyKos for the front page articles and ignoring the recommended diaries.  Plenty of good stuff there, as well as in Diary Rescue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skippy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258176</link>
		<dc:creator>skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;oh, i thought you meant fred willard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;or else the guy w/the rats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, i thought you meant fred willard.</p>
<p>or else the guy w/the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prairie Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258170</link>
		<dc:creator>Prairie Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LS @ 55&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we get attacked again before the elections….it will be another Republican failure to prevent an attack…just like the ones that happened on the Republicans’ watch….9/11 and the anthrax attacks…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, the Pukes can go shove it!!!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget about CNN reporting today about the vast network of Chinese industrial spies inside the US stealing our secrets right now on the Republicans’ watch… and on the watch of that guy, you know who, who’s in charge of oversight via the Homeland Security Committee?  Joe &lt;strike&gt;Somebody?&lt;/strike&gt; Nobody….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I guess all our security were otherwise occupied today–giving Chee-knee’s hunting dog a secret service escorted limo ride to the vet for a checkup.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LS @ 55</p>
<blockquote><p>If we get attacked again before the elections….it will be another Republican failure to prevent an attack…just like the ones that happened on the Republicans’ watch….9/11 and the anthrax attacks…</p>
<p>So, the Pukes can go shove it!!!
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t forget about CNN reporting today about the vast network of Chinese industrial spies inside the US stealing our secrets right now on the Republicans’ watch… and on the watch of that guy, you know who, who’s in charge of oversight via the Homeland Security Committee?  Joe <strike>Somebody?</strike> Nobody….</p>
<p>But I guess all our security were otherwise occupied today–giving Chee-knee’s hunting dog a secret service escorted limo ride to the vet for a checkup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowbird42</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258113</link>
		<dc:creator>snowbird42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tnr.com/politics/st.....55d748946e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everything you ever wanted to know about the Clintons’ shadiest donors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we have to look forward to from the right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e" rel="nofollow">http://www.tnr.com/politics/st&#8230;..55d748946e</a></p>
<p>Everything you ever wanted to know about the Clintons’ shadiest donors.</p>
<p>What we have to look forward to from the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeBuck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258103</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeBuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258103</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I’m a long-time FDLer, and I was deeply disturbed by LHP’s hit piece.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would not have been disturbed by an article that just attacked Obama for his long association with Rezko, the house deal, etc.  But sexing it up with Ken Starr tactics, and coming up with completely unsupported suggestions that poker games were used to hide bribes to Obama, or that Rezko got Obama his job, was beyond the pale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but that piece deserves to be trashed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I’m a long-time FDLer, and I was deeply disturbed by LHP’s hit piece.</p>
<p>I would not have been disturbed by an article that just attacked Obama for his long association with Rezko, the house deal, etc.  But sexing it up with Ken Starr tactics, and coming up with completely unsupported suggestions that poker games were used to hide bribes to Obama, or that Rezko got Obama his job, was beyond the pale.</p>
<p>Sorry, but that piece deserves to be trashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258093</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was there in 1980, Starbuck, at Orchard Meadow.  That’s so funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there in 1980, Starbuck, at Orchard Meadow.  That’s so funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258039</link>
		<dc:creator>tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/willard-we-hardly-knew-yee/#comment-1258039</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody that thinks Romney’s comment is going to be the definition of “dirty”, I submit that we aint seen nothin’ yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody that thinks Romney’s comment is going to be the definition of “dirty”, I submit that we aint seen nothin’ yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.240 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 04:11:06 -->

