<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Case For Sunshine:  Scrutiny Over Secrecy On Bush Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:57:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ankhtraveler</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1258599</link>
		<dc:creator>ankhtraveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1258599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mukasey today, referring to the warrentless wiretapping said he wouldn’t investigate whether “it was lawful, because it was legal” as per DOJ. I’m not a lawyer, but is there a distinction between something being “lawful” and being “legal” and therefore “unlawful” and “illegal”? Just his use of words brought back memories of what “is” is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mukasey today, referring to the warrentless wiretapping said he wouldn’t investigate whether “it was lawful, because it was legal” as per DOJ. I’m not a lawyer, but is there a distinction between something being “lawful” and being “legal” and therefore “unlawful” and “illegal”? Just his use of words brought back memories of what “is” is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundown</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257823</link>
		<dc:creator>rundown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you as well, enjoy your wine. I’m glad i had someone to vent with.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you as well, enjoy your wine. I’m glad i had someone to vent with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257821</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think I will open up a bottle of wine and join you in a drink.  And, as dinner is ready, I’m going to head out for that as well.  Thanks for the commiseration…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I will open up a bottle of wine and join you in a drink.  And, as dinner is ready, I’m going to head out for that as well.  Thanks for the commiseration…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundown</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257812</link>
		<dc:creator>rundown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I missed it, too, and i was listening. I’m pretty sure i didn’t hear anything. do they vote by raising hands?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i’m with ya, i believe i’ll have a drink tonight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed it, too, and i was listening. I’m pretty sure i didn’t hear anything. do they vote by raising hands?</p>
<p>i’m with ya, i believe i’ll have a drink tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundown</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257807</link>
		<dc:creator>rundown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Trying to analyze this quickly. At first i thought they wanted to use that amendment to dangle in front of senators who might be persuaded to vote for the Dodd immunity amendment, give them another option to split that vote. So he should’ve held his amendment until after Dodd’s. But it looks like he is maybe hoping to get a cloture vote before Dodd can get up and filibuster. By pushing this amendment through first, instead, he might get his damn cloture votes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dammit, outmanuevered.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the plus side, didn’t Bush say he was going to veto this sucker if it had that amendment?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to analyze this quickly. At first i thought they wanted to use that amendment to dangle in front of senators who might be persuaded to vote for the Dodd immunity amendment, give them another option to split that vote. So he should’ve held his amendment until after Dodd’s. But it looks like he is maybe hoping to get a cloture vote before Dodd can get up and filibuster. By pushing this amendment through first, instead, he might get his damn cloture votes.</p>
<p>Dammit, outmanuevered.</p>
<p>On the plus side, didn’t Bush say he was going to veto this sucker if it had that amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257804</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I turn around to cut out some biscuits and get them in the oven and I missed the whole damned voice vote.  I give up…today, I just give up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I turn around to cut out some biscuits and get them in the oven and I missed the whole damned voice vote.  I give up…today, I just give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundown</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257797</link>
		<dc:creator>rundown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They were, according to Reid’s schedule. the Rocke/Bond amendment just passed by raising hands?!?! What the&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were, according to Reid’s schedule. the Rocke/Bond amendment just passed by raising hands?!?! What the</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257785</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What in the hell is Bond doing — I thought they were done with amendments on FISA this evening?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the hell is Bond doing — I thought they were done with amendments on FISA this evening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257780</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257780</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a bad feeling about this one, too, Batman…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bad feeling about this one, too, Batman…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundown</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257775</link>
		<dc:creator>rundown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/07/a-case-for-sunshine-scrutiny-over-secrecy-on-bush-records/#comment-1257775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah, Rockefeller, Feinstein, Landrieu, Inouye all no’s.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, Rockefeller, Feinstein, Landrieu, Inouye all no’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.219 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 21:04:53 -->

