Comments on: Lieberman Has “Superdelegate” Status Stripped Because of McCain Endorsement

By: cosmosis

cosmosis — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:38:11 +0000

Poor Zell Loserman. Bwahahahaha.

By: delandjim

delandjim — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:35:38 +0000

Heh, heh…. heh, heh heh.hahahaha.ok, that is a great laugh.

By: mui1

mui1 — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:11:37 +0000

Yes! Excellant news! *snoopy dance* Poor gurney-Joe. Oh boo hoo.

By: sherifffruitfly

sherifffruitfly — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:59:43 +0000

Sucks for Clinton.

By: apishapa

apishapa — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:39:21 +0000

Why would he have a “superdelegate” status at the Democratic Convention anyway? He is not a Democrat. He does not belong to the Democratic Party. Just because he pretends to caucus with them, doesn’t make him a democrat and he should not have any say in who we nominate.

By: alank

alank — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:29:08 +0000

His status to be anything in the party apart from pariah should’ve been kaput at that point

By: JGabriel

JGabriel — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:32:48 +0000

Wait, I’m confused. Perhaps this question is answered above, but:

Why did Lieberman still have superdelegate status? Why wasn’t it stripped when we kicked him out of the party?

By: cal1942

cal1942 — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:22:25 +0000

I like the way Nelson thinks. It’s great that his superdelegate spot won’t be filled. Sort of a penalty for allowing him to get re-elected.

Pick up a couple of seats in the Senate and we can tell him to go screw himself. We won’t need his vote to keep control of the Senate.

By: Biodun

Biodun — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:44:03 +0000

LOL! Joe-Lie’s BFF…*g*

By: punaise

punaise — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:34:53 +0000

ha!