<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Loaned Her Campaign $5 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:37:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: auntmo9990</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1257471</link>
		<dc:creator>auntmo9990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1257471</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who  is  more  electable?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well  let’s look  at   FACTS  instead of  emotion.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s  Florida’s  results:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinton   856,944&lt;br /&gt;
Obama     568,930&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In  the  major  Democratic  base  states,  who  won?   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California,  Michigan,  New  Hampshire, Florida, New  York,  New  Jersey,  Massachusetts——all   Clinton.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And  I hear  the Obama  campaign  is  conceding  that    they  won’t  win  in   Texas, Ohio,  and Pennsylvania. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It  seems   quite  CLEAR   who is more  electable,  doesn’t  it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who  is  more  electable?  </p>
<p>Well  let’s look  at   FACTS  instead of  emotion.  </p>
<p>Here’s  Florida’s  results:  </p>
<p>Clinton   856,944<br />
Obama     568,930</p>
<p>In  the  major  Democratic  base  states,  who  won?   </p>
<p>California,  Michigan,  New  Hampshire, Florida, New  York,  New  Jersey,  Massachusetts——all   Clinton.  </p>
<p>And  I hear  the Obama  campaign  is  conceding  that    they  won’t  win  in   Texas, Ohio,  and Pennsylvania. </p>
<p>It  seems   quite  CLEAR   who is more  electable,  doesn’t  it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auntmo9990</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1257467</link>
		<dc:creator>auntmo9990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1257467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Obama  is  “grassroots?”     When he’s  aligned  with  the  Kennedy dynasty,   Oprah,  and  Maria  Schwarzenegger?   You think  that  means  he’s  NOT   part of  a  Kennedy  political machine?     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama’s  largest  contributor  is  Goldman Sachs.  It’s  why he  voted  AGAINST  a  cap  on interest  rates  charged  on  credit  cards  for  lower-income   clients  in predatory lending  schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
Goldman Sachs, I’m  sure,   was  very  grateful  for that  vote.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By  the way,  everybody,   Clinton raised  $4 million  in 24 hours,  and  still   counting  even more  donations.  She  also   registered  35,000 new  voters!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gallup  daily  tracking    shows   a  sharp  Clinton uptick after  Super  Tuesday:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinton  52%&lt;br /&gt;
Obama    39%  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Go  Hillary!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama  is  “grassroots?”     When he’s  aligned  with  the  Kennedy dynasty,   Oprah,  and  Maria  Schwarzenegger?   You think  that  means  he’s  NOT   part of  a  Kennedy  political machine?     </p>
<p>Obama’s  largest  contributor  is  Goldman Sachs.  It’s  why he  voted  AGAINST  a  cap  on interest  rates  charged  on  credit  cards  for  lower-income   clients  in predatory lending  schemes.<br />
Goldman Sachs, I’m  sure,   was  very  grateful  for that  vote.  </p>
<p>By  the way,  everybody,   Clinton raised  $4 million  in 24 hours,  and  still   counting  even more  donations.  She  also   registered  35,000 new  voters!  </p>
<p>Gallup  daily  tracking    shows   a  sharp  Clinton uptick after  Super  Tuesday:</p>
<p>Clinton  52%<br />
Obama    39%  </p>
<p>Go  Hillary!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wobblybits</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255828</link>
		<dc:creator>wobblybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255828</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone looking at the discourse occurring in the background or am I sipping some type of conspiracy kool-aid (if so, i hope it’s red kool-aid…yes red kool-aid is a flavor lol)&lt;br /&gt;
When I see Hillary,I see the established political machine and the big donors tied to it.  With Obama, I see the grassroots (with it’s more progressive agenda) at work with his donations coming mostly from people donating less than $100.  The political machine tries to discount the netroots by minimizing them or painting them as the ‘fringe’. Does this not seem more a battle between the grassroots and the political machine over where the party is headed?&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I’ll go sit down and sip on my red kool-aid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone looking at the discourse occurring in the background or am I sipping some type of conspiracy kool-aid (if so, i hope it’s red kool-aid…yes red kool-aid is a flavor lol)<br />
When I see Hillary,I see the established political machine and the big donors tied to it.  With Obama, I see the grassroots (with it’s more progressive agenda) at work with his donations coming mostly from people donating less than $100.  The political machine tries to discount the netroots by minimizing them or painting them as the ‘fringe’. Does this not seem more a battle between the grassroots and the political machine over where the party is headed?<br />
Okay, I’ll go sit down and sip on my red kool-aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255779</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think attrition was kind of the point of this long, drawn out campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
I personally am sick to death of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An interesting point: McCain voted against public financing of elections back in 1990 in the wake of the S&amp;L fiasco, to which he was connected as one of the Keating Five.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think attrition was kind of the point of this long, drawn out campaign.<br />
I personally am sick to death of it.</p>
<p>An interesting point: McCain voted against public financing of elections back in 1990 in the wake of the S&amp;L fiasco, to which he was connected as one of the Keating Five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinHayden</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255518</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinHayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m afraid this has become one of those occasions when Laesch is more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m afraid this has become one of those occasions when Laesch is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWBartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255498</link>
		<dc:creator>DWBartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255498</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We should have known that there wood bee those who wood collar us out, about our lack of restraint.  We must needs harness our enthusiasm and curb our excess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should have known that there wood bee those who wood collar us out, about our lack of restraint.  We must needs harness our enthusiasm and curb our excess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255479</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255479</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You guys cut it out before I become pet-ulant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I didn’t mean to tick you off.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You guys cut it out before I become pet-ulant.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry, I didn’t mean to tick you off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWBartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255461</link>
		<dc:creator>DWBartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seems to me that ‘elect-ability’ ought to be considered worthy os discussion as an ‘issue’.  More so, as we head towards November. But, that might be  considered ‘unfair’ by some.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that ‘elect-ability’ ought to be considered worthy os discussion as an ‘issue’.  More so, as we head towards November. But, that might be  considered ‘unfair’ by some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richmond</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255457</link>
		<dc:creator>Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yup. Also speaks to morals, ethics, and responsibility&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. Also speaks to morals, ethics, and responsibility</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWBartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255451</link>
		<dc:creator>DWBartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/clinton-loaned-her-campaign-5-million/#comment-1255451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect some are becoming fur-ious, as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect some are becoming fur-ious, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
