dick-cheney-angry.thumbnail.jpgSPECTER: I'm pissed my Amendment is being blocked by the obstructionist Republicans so I'm not going to vote for cloture.

JELLO JAY ROCKEFELLER: Despite the fact that this crappy bill is the result of my personal agreement with the White House to give them everything they want, I got punk'd and we're now being "held hostage" by the obstructionist Republicans who are blocking even the teeniest, most meaningless Amendment. This is how much respect the GOP has for "bipartisanship." I'm not going to vote for cloture, either.

Chris Dodd is just as wrong for trying to keep Dick Cheney and the telecoms from getting amnesty for their crimes as the GOP is for their insistance on ritual humiliation of us Democrats before they allow us to give them what they want.

BOND: Surly blah blah blah. (fumbles for mute button)

FEINGOLD: "Invoking cloture on this bill would be an abdication of our responsibility to consider legislation which will effect our constitutents for years to come."

CORNYN: Scary terrorists. Bad. [CHS asks: What's going on with the Abramoff investigation in which Cornyn was implicated in e-mails for helping Jack and Ralph Reed bilk one tribe and screw another? Just asking...] The Intel committee sure was bipartisan, and I'm not just saying that because they decided to cover Dick Cheney's ass with telecom immunity. No, really. "We need to finish this legislation, to give members a chance to debate it, and then to vote." [CHS notes: Then why were you objecting to introduction of any and all amendments to the legislation so that particular issues could be discussed more fully on the Senate floor? Liar. Never mind that FISA is still in effect, the only thing that you care about is keeping the cover Dick's behind immunity in place.]

We need to move on this now, because covering Cheney's behind is important to all of America. If we kick the can down the road, we'll just be right back here with me asking you to cover Cheney's read end yet again. Why not make the tough choice for CYA today? [Note for Mary: He and Bond are both wearing yellow ties today.] "We must eschew partisan lines." Good lord, his staff wrote this for him and he can't say eschew. "Don't repeat the same arguments over and over without coming to a conclusion." [CHS notes: Pot, this is kettle...]

Some people have argued that the telecom companies had a duty to read the law and to refuse to cooperate with the Bush Administration in good faith. [CHS says: No, you dumbass -- and as a former AG, you ought to know this very, very well. We think they should have followed the law. The law requires a warrant. It also allows for complete cooperation for 15 days or longer in case of an emergency. Exactly when did more than 5 years without a warrant and without following the law become lawful conduct for any person prosecuting a case?]