Comments on: Debate Post-Mortem http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/ Firedoglake weblog Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:58:02 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: broadbrush http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218683 broadbrush Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:47:01 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218683 <p>President Bill Clinton noding out while Dr Martin Luther King III memorializes his beloved father-hardly appropriate for the first black-eye to the Presidency of the United States of America. Reinvigorated he will resume<br /> his unprecidented and undignified assault on another Democrat who whoever stands in his egomaniacal way.</p> President Bill Clinton noding out while Dr Martin Luther King III memorializes his beloved father-hardly appropriate for the first black-eye to the Presidency of the United States of America. Reinvigorated he will resume
his unprecidented and undignified assault on another Democrat who whoever stands in his egomaniacal way.

]]> By: Swift2001 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218346 Swift2001 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:53:29 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218346 <p>Perfect smear job. “There’s something wrong with his character,” said the former head of the Joint Chiefs, but we never find out what, and whatever it is, it isn’t shared by others at the Pentagon.</p> Perfect smear job. “There’s something wrong with his character,” said the former head of the Joint Chiefs, but we never find out what, and whatever it is, it isn’t shared by others at the Pentagon.

]]> By: Swift2001 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218340 Swift2001 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:49:45 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218340 <p>I forget which debate it was, back in September maybe, that Hill, Edwards and Obama articulated their policies on getting out of Iraq. Not a dime’s worth of difference between them. Just Richardson and Kucinich were for immediate withdrawal of all US forces. The rest hedge about what “residual” forces there might be in two or three or four years.</p> I forget which debate it was, back in September maybe, that Hill, Edwards and Obama articulated their policies on getting out of Iraq. Not a dime’s worth of difference between them. Just Richardson and Kucinich were for immediate withdrawal of all US forces. The rest hedge about what “residual” forces there might be in two or three or four years.

]]> By: Swift2001 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218334 Swift2001 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:47:00 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218334 <p>About Bill? Asleep? And the “story” is taken up by the Post? Which is owned by who?</p> <p>One of the depressing features of this campaign is how little principle is driving much of the criticism of the Clintons even from their Democratic opponents. Are they beatable on policies? Sure they are. But how much easier to repeat the pap that the media, and the Republican right, has already pre-digested.</p> About Bill? Asleep? And the “story” is taken up by the Post? Which is owned by who?

One of the depressing features of this campaign is how little principle is driving much of the criticism of the Clintons even from their Democratic opponents. Are they beatable on policies? Sure they are. But how much easier to repeat the pap that the media, and the Republican right, has already pre-digested.

]]> By: repuglycon http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218285 repuglycon Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:16:46 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218285 <p>I saw Hillary and Obama in a joint suicide bombing. John Edwards should move his chair a little farther away.</p> I saw Hillary and Obama in a joint suicide bombing. John Edwards should move his chair a little farther away.

]]> By: deandra http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218138 deandra Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:37:05 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218138 <p>Hillary attacks for no damn reason, other than <em>she can’t tolerate any competition</em>. After 8 sad, horrible years of Dubya, we shouldn’t be ‘rewarded’ with a Hillary. How much more sh** can this country take?</p> Hillary attacks for no damn reason, other than she can’t tolerate any competition. After 8 sad, horrible years of Dubya, we shouldn’t be ‘rewarded’ with a Hillary. How much more sh** can this country take?

]]> By: tanbark http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218116 tanbark Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:58:50 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218116 <p>Oliphant’s having fun with Bill. :o) </p> <p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/patoliphant;_ylt=As_l9NOq8FQEAZbKQDEakVFj7CsC" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoo.....EakVFj7CsC</a></p> Oliphant’s having fun with Bill. :o)

http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoo…..EakVFj7CsC

]]> By: tanbark http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218113 tanbark Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:44:38 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218113 <p><a href="mailto:Cal1942@184:" rel="nofollow">Cal1942@184:</a></p> <p>There you go; using the “electable” profanity. :o) Stand by for incoming from the Clinton supporters. :o)</p> Cal1942@184:

There you go; using the “electable” profanity. :o) Stand by for incoming from the Clinton supporters. :o)

]]> By: tanbark http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218111 tanbark Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:41:42 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218111 <p>Katherine Graham <a href="mailto:Cracker@185:" rel="nofollow">Cracker@185:</a> You have to be kidding.</p> <p>Joe Lieberman OWNS Hillary Clinton.</p> Katherine Graham Cracker@185: You have to be kidding.

Joe Lieberman OWNS Hillary Clinton.

]]> By: tanbark http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218110 tanbark Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:40:48 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/21/debate-post-mortem/#comment-1218110 <p><a href="mailto:Hugh@138;" rel="nofollow">Hugh@138;</a> with her record, all Clinton CAN be is “vague about Iraq”. And if we don’t have a candidate who’s going after the goopers, hammer and tongs on that, they’ll be shaving points like the crookedest NBA team that ever tanked, and we’ll be looking at another 8 years of republican rule.</p> <p>And, lest anyone thinks that Iraq isn’t still going to be THE issue:</p> <p><a href="http://www.aswataliraq.info/look/english/article.tpl?IdLanguage=1&IdPublication=4&NrArticle=66777&NrIssue=2&NrSection=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.aswataliraq.info/lo.....rSection=1</a></p> <p>And: <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/updates/?articleid=12242" rel="nofollow">http://www.antiwar.com/updates/?articleid=12242</a></p> Hugh@138; with her record, all Clinton CAN be is “vague about Iraq”. And if we don’t have a candidate who’s going after the goopers, hammer and tongs on that, they’ll be shaving points like the crookedest NBA team that ever tanked, and we’ll be looking at another 8 years of republican rule.

And, lest anyone thinks that Iraq isn’t still going to be THE issue:

http://www.aswataliraq.info/lo…..rSection=1

And: http://www.antiwar.com/updates/?articleid=12242

]]>