<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Matthews Issues Apology On Hardball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:04:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KarenM</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210821</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t believe him. He was only trying to appease his bosses. Underneath it all? The same old Chris Matthews.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t believe him. He was only trying to appease his bosses. Underneath it all? The same old Chris Matthews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChePasa</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210602</link>
		<dc:creator>ChePasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There was no apology. He didn’t even seem to know what he did. All he was trying to do was “explain” why he sometimes says things that — maybe — he shouldn’t. And say he will try to speak more “clearly” and be “smarter” in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But it’s not an apology.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no apology. He didn’t even seem to know what he did. All he was trying to do was “explain” why he sometimes says things that — maybe — he shouldn’t. And say he will try to speak more “clearly” and be “smarter” in the future.</p>
<p>Oh good.</p>
<p>But it’s not an apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic George</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210430</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At the Hardblogger blog they are cherry picking the remarks so it looks like there is more support for Chris than critics.  I sent a critical remark last night and one this morning and NADA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His blog is a sham&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Hardblogger blog they are cherry picking the remarks so it looks like there is more support for Chris than critics.  I sent a critical remark last night and one this morning and NADA.</p>
<p>His blog is a sham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deandra</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210263</link>
		<dc:creator>deandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1210263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a &lt;em&gt;non-apology &lt;/em&gt;apology! Methinks, brass made him do it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a <em>non-apology </em>apology! Methinks, brass made him do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisQ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209985</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No, he doesn’t have a good heart.  This is what wife-beaters say when they want to be taken back.  &lt;em&gt;Aw honey, I didn’t mean it&lt;/em&gt;.  I’ll be disappointed if people fall for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does Bill O’Reilly mean it when he makes sexist comments about other female political figures?  Yes, he does.  Sooner or later there’s got to be an Al Campanis moment for all these pigs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he doesn’t have a good heart.  This is what wife-beaters say when they want to be taken back.  <em>Aw honey, I didn’t mean it</em>.  I’ll be disappointed if people fall for it.</p>
<p>Does Bill O’Reilly mean it when he makes sexist comments about other female political figures?  Yes, he does.  Sooner or later there’s got to be an Al Campanis moment for all these pigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readerOfTeaLeaves</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209939</link>
		<dc:creator>readerOfTeaLeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209939</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with this comment, with one small exception:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;em&gt;And if Chris Matthews has turned a corner (let’s just give him the benefit of the doubt), perhaps there is still hope for the moribund media to redeem themselves, pull up their socks and do their JOB.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t think that Coulter, or Malkin, et al will ever manage to pull up their socks, nor redeem themselves.  Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Coulter, Kristol, Goldberg, et al will &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; ‘eat crow’.  None of them have the guts to offer anything close to Matthews’ apology. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, Tweety ate a lot of crow.&lt;br /&gt;
Having eaten some ‘crow’ myself a time or two, it is NOT a pleasant meal.&lt;br /&gt;
Who relishes the thought of owning up to one’s faults in such a public fashion?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMHO,  Tweety’s apology opened him to the kind of public second-guessing and derision that I’ve just read in this thread.  However, I give him the benefit of the doubt — his apology  acknowledged that he’d screwed up, and that he is learning from his mistakes.  He’d clearly thought a lot about what happened, its effects, and why he needs to do things differently. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need the media to do a better job so that voters better understand their choices.&lt;br /&gt;
I’ll take one flawed, humbled Chris Matthews over the entire, toxic FauxNewz in-your-face-you-librul class of clowns and prima donnas.  Because at least Matthews cares enough to want to improve the quality of information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perfect, he ain’t.&lt;br /&gt;
But he’s working on it.&lt;br /&gt;
That’s worth respecting, IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with this comment, with one small exception:</p>
<p> <em>And if Chris Matthews has turned a corner (let’s just give him the benefit of the doubt), perhaps there is still hope for the moribund media to redeem themselves, pull up their socks and do their JOB.</em></p>
<p>I don’t think that Coulter, or Malkin, et al will ever manage to pull up their socks, nor redeem themselves.  Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Coulter, Kristol, Goldberg, et al will <em>never</em> ‘eat crow’.  None of them have the guts to offer anything close to Matthews’ apology. </p>
<p>In contrast, Tweety ate a lot of crow.<br />
Having eaten some ‘crow’ myself a time or two, it is NOT a pleasant meal.<br />
Who relishes the thought of owning up to one’s faults in such a public fashion?  </p>
<p>IMHO,  Tweety’s apology opened him to the kind of public second-guessing and derision that I’ve just read in this thread.  However, I give him the benefit of the doubt — his apology  acknowledged that he’d screwed up, and that he is learning from his mistakes.  He’d clearly thought a lot about what happened, its effects, and why he needs to do things differently. </p>
<p>We need the media to do a better job so that voters better understand their choices.<br />
I’ll take one flawed, humbled Chris Matthews over the entire, toxic FauxNewz in-your-face-you-librul class of clowns and prima donnas.  Because at least Matthews cares enough to want to improve the quality of information.</p>
<p>Perfect, he ain’t.<br />
But he’s working on it.<br />
That’s worth respecting, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic George</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209785</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;MSNBC wants to know what you think about Chris Matthews right now on his blog &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC wants to know what you think about Chris Matthews right now on his blog </p>
<p><a href="http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/" rel="nofollow">http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetePierce</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209779</link>
		<dc:creator>PetePierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209779</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Totally OT: but on Swiftboating - McCain now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The source of  current Swiftboating of John McCain–junk that he gave things up after torture, or that he neglected his first wife–will become apparent or whatever “push poll” rumors will become apparent.  It’s hard to say right now that the Romney or Huckabee campaigns had an active or even passive hand in them at this point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think they are so obviously ridiculous that McCain’s lesson from the Bush camps whether it was actually Melman/Rove related or not–the rumor that his adopted Bangledesh daughter was illegitimately fathered by McCain–hit home and he’ll respond rapidly and be successful in dispelling the stupidity of the push polls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Totally OT: but on Swiftboating &#8211; McCain now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The source of  current Swiftboating of John McCain–junk that he gave things up after torture, or that he neglected his first wife–will become apparent or whatever “push poll” rumors will become apparent.  It’s hard to say right now that the Romney or Huckabee campaigns had an active or even passive hand in them at this point.</p>
<p>I think they are so obviously ridiculous that McCain’s lesson from the Bush camps whether it was actually Melman/Rove related or not–the rumor that his adopted Bangledesh daughter was illegitimately fathered by McCain–hit home and he’ll respond rapidly and be successful in dispelling the stupidity of the push polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcadesproject</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209760</link>
		<dc:creator>arcadesproject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Y’all call what Matthews said an apology?  I call it lying, self-serving, insulting crap.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y’all call what Matthews said an apology?  I call it lying, self-serving, insulting crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richmond</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209731</link>
		<dc:creator>Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/17/chris-matthews-issues-apology-on-hardball/#comment-1209731</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Totally OT: but on Swiftboating - McCain now. Didn’t I read somewhere that Romney’s campaign guru is the master of this sort of trash. If true, by putting it out there that McCain didn’t serve, or experients on unborn babies, it is an attack which both clobbers (unfairly McCain) and, because it is set up to “seem” as if it is done by Huck’s people so it cloppers him too.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally OT: but on Swiftboating &#8211; McCain now. Didn’t I read somewhere that Romney’s campaign guru is the master of this sort of trash. If true, by putting it out there that McCain didn’t serve, or experients on unborn babies, it is an attack which both clobbers (unfairly McCain) and, because it is set up to “seem” as if it is done by Huck’s people so it cloppers him too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
