Actually Obama stated his opposition to the war long before Edwards did.

How many times did Senator Obama vote to reauthorize and fund the war?

Obama, while not exactly clean wrt war funding and aggressive rhetoric, has a built-in out, not having been in the Senate when it was voted on.
She has cards, but I have my doubts that she has the skills to play them.

Obama says he didn’t vote for the AUMF, but when asked if he would have he said ‘probably yes’.

Obama is a hypocrite, opportunistic, machine pol and a confessed cheat (he said he cheated in Iowa because Howard Dean had done it in 2004).

Hillary is simply a triangulator extraordinaire. Nobody knows what she stands for, but she takes a lot of money from people who do know what she’ll do for them!

And people are worried if Edwards is a phony?

It appeared to be the first time that a federal appellate court has ruled on the legality of the harsh interrogation tactics that U.S. intelligence officers and military personnel have used on suspected terrorists held outside the United States since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

This is the undeniable implication. For there exists at common law the principle that ‘no man can be held accountable for the failure to foresee illegal conduct by another’.

Yup – torture is legal, and just part of the job, thank you very much.

Words fail.

The court rejected other claims on the grounds that then-Attorney General John Ashcroft had certified that the military officials were acting within the scope of their jobs when they authorized the tactics, and that such tactics were “foreseeable.”

“It was foreseeable that conduct that would ordinarily be indisputably `seriously criminal’ would be implemented by military officials responsible for detaining and interrogating suspected enemy combatants,” Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson wrote in the court’s main opinion.

Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented with parts of the opinion, saying that “it leaves us with the unfortunate and quite dubious distinction of being the only court to declare those held at Guantanamo are not `person(s).’

‘`This is a most regrettable holding in a case where plaintiffs have alleged high-level U.S. government officials treated them as less than human,” Brown wrote.

http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/

The coffee, tea and hot chocolate are now ready, and I’ve got toasted Thomas’ English muffins with a variety of jams. Try the pear preserves — there’s no sugar in them, just pears, concentrated grape juice, pectin and lemon juice. Yummy! Have a great day. Elliott — the French toast waffles sound delicious. I may have to try those…