Comments on: Where Do We Go From Here?

By: MrMurder

MrMurder — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:47:11 +0000

Unions go where their members vote, minority members in the Union say go Obama and the rest are split between John/Hillary.

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:31:43 +0000

The article basically says that Obama is different from previous challengers to the frontrunner.

Looks like Barack is developing his own “inevitability” theme.

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:27:43 +0000

After reviewing the exit poll results at MSNBC, it looks as if Hillary won the exit polls by about the same margin as she won the election.

What? You didn’t know they just adjust the exit-poll numbers to match the actual results. They did it for the 2004 presidential election too. That way the “polls” look more accurate and fool the public into thinking nothing is wrong. This has been verified, it’s not just an opinion or speculation.

So much b.s., too much time.

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:24:04 +0000

Did y’all see Hillary’s victory speech last night? I think it was one of her best ever (and I’m an Edwards supporter).

If you’re 11 months into a presidential campaign and you’ve just found your voice, are you really ready to be president on day one?

Worse yet, if you think you’ve found your voice, but you’re just repeating someone else’s lines, are you a phony or just not the presidential type?

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:20:31 +0000

New Hampshire Election Fraud: Hillary LOST the paper ballot count but WON the optical scan ballot count. Obama WON the paper ballot count but LOST the optical scan ballot count.

Go check out the pre-election polls for Iowa and the final results. It’s just as bogus as NH.

By: MyrtleJune

MyrtleJune — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:33:45 +0000

Jane, you’re not counting the delegates that each candidate had prior to Iowa and NH…

The real counts now are:

Hillary - 183
Obama - 78
Edwards - 34

This is including the “party boss” super delegates who started Clinton off with 159 towards the indicating the preference of DNC/Memebers of Congress/Party officials/Local and State reps who actually drive this process.

This is how and why for months now HRHClinton was declared the “front runner” before a single vote had been cast.

Why aren’t we talking about who’s really driving this handbasket?

By: redX

redX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:51:40 +0000

Clinton likely won in NH due to her supporters and ground game in addition to Biden and Dodd dropping out of the race and likely giving her 1 – 3%.

By: redX

redX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:50:49 +0000

That is exactly my main point. The stupid pundits are right back on their game. Its only one small primary with some minor bounce (that can be effectivly magnified by the media – which one would expect them to do when trillions of dollars are at stake). All people need to do is chill out. But hey to hell with policy, lets talk about gender and race because Edwards is sexist and racist, Obama is sexist, and Clinton is racists or whatever. None of that stuff is true. How boring is a push from all candidates and supports on political attacks and story lines shoved down our throats right before and after the election. God, can we please distinguish between talking about these important issues as issues rather than as the main storyline of the election.

By: GMFORD

GMFORD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:56:22 +0000

My opinion is that Clinton’s win in NH was caused by Iowa. When her supporters saw that winning the primary was not a given, they came out in droves to vote for her. Obama’s team did better GOTV in Iowa, Clinton’s in NH. My prediction – a nailbiter from here on.

By: mui1

mui1 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:09:29 +0000

Excuse me everyone, Hillary and Obama + Free Trade Agreement (mostly in Peru) means no jobs in the US. I still don’t understand why anyone in the world would believe Hillary or Obama support the American worker.