FWIW, I’d be willing to bet that Raven would consider the reference to
“twisted personalities” to be a compliment.

He has continued to make these ridiculous statements and I don’t know how you define it but, if the shoe fits, he need to wear it.

It’s beyond your capacity Raven to define or refute what you deign “ridiculous statements.” You’re too busy calling names as you did ages 4-9.

It’s funny to me that the same people who call names and cuss people out like ole Raven, make sure they don’t post anything substantive when they are calling names.

It’s because they can’t. If they could, they’d be concentrating on issues instead of what their twisted personalities perceive as threatening.

Raven, as a very wise man has said more than once in these threads….I’ve gotta go adjust the track lighting.

with respect

mj

I must tell you that I’ve seen this idea now when you say you’re not for Hillary both out and about among some of my women friends, and here that you somehow are associated with women haters or people who think because she’s a woman she would be less qualified.

That never crossed my mind on any conscious level.

It frustrates me though that in the last couple days, if you point out strategy from the Clinton campaign you don’t approve of or think is working some real venom comes out.

What I commonly hear from my friends who are disappointed in the turn of events for Hillary is “people wouldn’t say those things abbout her if she were a man.”

Well it depends what the meaning of “those things are” but when Bill Clinton misquotes Obama as he has today, calling him on it doesn’t have much to do with thinking Bill Clinton is a woman.

Some women are very sensitive to any criticism of Hillary. I understand this psychologically in that she’s the first woman who has made a serious run for the Presidency.

But if we are to recognize gender equality in government, we need to insure that women have equal numbers as Presidents, Judges, and in Congress.

Somehow criticizing Hillary for some firepups has been equated to comments that Chris Mathews or Keith Oberhmann made last night that offended some women.

That’s unfortunate. But I can’t all of a sudden support Hillary Clinton because it will make certain people happy.

I’m most frustrated by Congress, and Hillary, Feinstein, Lincoln, and Pelosi have been significant components of that frustration.

And FWIW, the term “troll” was used by several people and my earlier comment was addressed to each and every one using the term.

Thanks.

1) that you don’t hate women. I have always posted sincerely.

2) Posting reasons why you are disatisfied with Clinton’s, Lincoln’s, and Feinstein’s performance.

There must be 1500 posts on FDL as to Feinstein’s failure in the Senate in the past month by scores of people.

3) Raising the question as to why Congress hasn’t passed an amendment or law that would mandate equal gender representation in the Presidency, the Courts, or the Legislative branch of government.

The name calling and cursing towards individual firepups has never come from me.

I’m interested in ideas, and that’s what my posts have been and will be reflecting.

RBG can you link me to any of your posts that discuss ideas?