<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Referendum On Bush/Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192800</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192800</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then he used it as proof that Democrats are crazy that Edwards isn’t running away with the nomination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds about right to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What seems to be the problem with Dems these days is that we have some low-information apathetic voters who only know the candidates media tells them about and even those are judged on superficialities. Pretty pathetic for a party which is supposed to be superior to stupid Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Houston, we have a problem.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Then he used it as proof that Democrats are crazy that Edwards isn’t running away with the nomination.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sounds about right to me.</p>
<p>What seems to be the problem with Dems these days is that we have some low-information apathetic voters who only know the candidates media tells them about and even those are judged on superficialities. Pretty pathetic for a party which is supposed to be superior to stupid Republicans.</p>
<p>“Houston, we have a problem.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prostratedragon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192214</link>
		<dc:creator>prostratedragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192214</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just who in the hell are these dem voters who classify themselves as “enthusiastic” about the Bush presidency (2%), or “satisfied” (4%)?&lt;br /&gt;
WTF? If they are so enthusiastic and satisfied why are they dem voters? This makes no sense at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Members of the irony faction? Maybe we could call them Taupe Dogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just who in the hell are these dem voters who classify themselves as “enthusiastic” about the Bush presidency (2%), or “satisfied” (4%)?<br />
WTF? If they are so enthusiastic and satisfied why are they dem voters? This makes no sense at all.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Members of the irony faction? Maybe we could call them Taupe Dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayDuray</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192080</link>
		<dc:creator>RayDuray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you think they tampered with the voting machines?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It certainly would not be the first time. :) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some people who pay a lot of atttention to the integrity of our vote include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/71200.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Black Box Voting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verifiedvoting.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Verified Voting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradblog.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brad Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:
</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you think they tampered with the voting machines?</p></blockquote>
<p>It certainly would not be the first time. :) </p>
<p>Some people who pay a lot of atttention to the integrity of our vote include:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/71200.html" rel="nofollow">Black Box Voting</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.verifiedvoting.org/" rel="nofollow">Verified Voting</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/" rel="nofollow">Brad Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linfalas</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192026</link>
		<dc:creator>Linfalas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192026</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Delegates            Iowa:  16 Obama, 15 Edwards, 14 Clinton&lt;br /&gt;
New Hampshire (projected): 9 Clinton, 8 Obama, 4 Edwards, 1 Richardson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The projection assumes that NH divides the 22 delagates based on % of the vote (I haven’t found anything that says and of course the MSM is all about the “Winnah”).  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For future reference look for the delegate tracker at &lt;a href=&quot;http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2008 Democratic Convention Watch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delegates            Iowa:  16 Obama, 15 Edwards, 14 Clinton<br />
New Hampshire (projected): 9 Clinton, 8 Obama, 4 Edwards, 1 Richardson</p>
<p>The projection assumes that NH divides the 22 delagates based on % of the vote (I haven’t found anything that says and of course the MSM is all about the “Winnah”).  </p>
<p>For future reference look for the delegate tracker at <a href="http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">2008 Democratic Convention Watch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowbird42</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192018</link>
		<dc:creator>snowbird42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192018</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and U of NH in Durham&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and U of NH in Durham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nahant</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192011</link>
		<dc:creator>nahant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192011</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As you should life sure does teach you lesson that temper you!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you should life sure does teach you lesson that temper you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanneleon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192012</link>
		<dc:creator>joanneleon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192012</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What happened to PetePierce?  I was anxiously awaiting some more of his insight. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to PetePierce?  I was anxiously awaiting some more of his insight. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neurophius</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192010</link>
		<dc:creator>neurophius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192010</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tweety says Clinton won&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweety says Clinton won</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redX</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192007</link>
		<dc:creator>redX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1192007</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Media conceding that no matter what Clinton story is in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5,700 KO back on target.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OH - over. Clinton.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media conceding that no matter what Clinton story is in.</p>
<p>5,700 KO back on target.</p>
<p>OH &#8211; over. Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redX</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1191998</link>
		<dc:creator>redX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/08/a-referendum-on-bushcheney/#comment-1191998</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;…how many student at Datmouth?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>…how many student at Datmouth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
