It’s odd that a search of the Washington Post website for "libby" turns up, on the first page of search results: recent campaign articles by Libby Quaid and Libby Copeland; Dave Barry’s humor column which mentions Scooter; Dana Milbank’s inscrutable "Potomac Man" drivel with an incomprehensible reference to Scooter and human sacrifice; and the Hannah Montana contest controversy over tickets awarded by the Club Libby Liu store in Dallas (the little girl who lied in her essay about her father dying in Iraq is not getting to go to the concert after all; justice prevails!)

Do you think that’s odd?  I do. 

Not a single year-end retrospective article in the Washington Post mentions Scooter’s trial, unless you count the "Most Popular Opinions" article on 12/29, which refers in passing to

" columns Froomkin wrote about the legal tribulations of vice presidential adviser I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby."

I mean, that trial DID happen this year, right? And the "tribulations" included four felony convictions.  And those convictions still stand and are not being appealed.

It’s as if Bush’s commutation made it all go away. From everywhere.

Update: No year-end mention in the New York Times, either.

Another Update: Or the Los Angeles Times.

Related posts:

  1. The Huffington Post Is Drinking the Washington Post’s Milkshake
  2. Cheney Interview: Washington Post Losing Its Ability to Report, Too
  3. Invest in Good Reporting
  4. How The Post Tried to Kill Froomkin’s Traffic
  5. Late Late Nite FDL: Real Kind Of Thing