<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Year&#8217;s Message from Chris Dodd to the Netroots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:31:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tightsunstr</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175923</link>
		<dc:creator>tightsunstr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Happy new year, everyone!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peony</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175759</link>
		<dc:creator>peony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m so glad you saw the response.  I knew I could not leave your question unanswered even though the thread was closed.  I’m very pleased to meet you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bigbrother, I appreciate your comments.  What I’ve been thinking about lately is will there be a deflationary recession or an inflationary one.  It looks like we have both now, deflation in the housing market, and inflation with the cost of food and energy.  Boy do we ever need a New Deal!  FDR was a genius.  The difference between 1932 and now though is we’re up to our eyeballs in debt.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m so glad you saw the response.  I knew I could not leave your question unanswered even though the thread was closed.  I’m very pleased to meet you.</p>
<p>bigbrother, I appreciate your comments.  What I’ve been thinking about lately is will there be a deflationary recession or an inflationary one.  It looks like we have both now, deflation in the housing market, and inflation with the cost of food and energy.  Boy do we ever need a New Deal!  FDR was a genius.  The difference between 1932 and now though is we’re up to our eyeballs in debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldstandard</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175645</link>
		<dc:creator>goldstandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175645</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Edwards/Dodd works for me. One can concentrate on corporate buyouts on K Street while the other can return us to the rule of law under the Constitution. Seems a no brainer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards/Dodd works for me. One can concentrate on corporate buyouts on K Street while the other can return us to the rule of law under the Constitution. Seems a no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175621</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175621</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
In response to GrandmaJ at 95:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    Can Edwards stand the heat? How do we judge that?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where has Edwards stood in the past on important issues?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During his Senate career he was representing North Carolina and had to defeat Lauch Faircloth (R) by running against the Jesse Helms machine to get the seat. A lot of what he said related to how one gets elected in a Red state and how the people of that state wanted to be represented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He followed-up on what he promised.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now he’s going to represent &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; of us and the issues he’s been discussing are clearly most pressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I trust him to do what he’s promising. I think it flows naturally from his background (as he so often relates) and it fits with his career as a trial attorney helping people who’ve been hurt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of these candidates is perfect and I agree we can’t know exactly what any of them would do. A lot of this is taking a leap of faith. I trust Edwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
In response to GrandmaJ at 95:</p>
<p>    Can Edwards stand the heat? How do we judge that?
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Where has Edwards stood in the past on important issues?
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>During his Senate career he was representing North Carolina and had to defeat Lauch Faircloth (R) by running against the Jesse Helms machine to get the seat. A lot of what he said related to how one gets elected in a Red state and how the people of that state wanted to be represented.</p>
<p>He followed-up on what he promised.</p>
<p>Now he’s going to represent <b>all</b> of us and the issues he’s been discussing are clearly most pressing.</p>
<p>I trust him to do what he’s promising. I think it flows naturally from his background (as he so often relates) and it fits with his career as a trial attorney helping people who’ve been hurt.</p>
<p>None of these candidates is perfect and I agree we can’t know exactly what any of them would do. A lot of this is taking a leap of faith. I trust Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mommybrain</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175534</link>
		<dc:creator>Mommybrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Peony, that is indeed the exact question I was asking and thanks so much for the response.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recently moved into a BIG house, a very strange thing for us DFH’s to do.  We realized after we moved in that we were both thinking the same thing when we chose it:  now we have room to help any friends who will need a place to live in the next couple of years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peony, that is indeed the exact question I was asking and thanks so much for the response.  </p>
<p>We recently moved into a BIG house, a very strange thing for us DFH’s to do.  We realized after we moved in that we were both thinking the same thing when we chose it:  now we have room to help any friends who will need a place to live in the next couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbrother</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175519</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175519</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No chrystal ball here…Yet I agree when times get tough bonding with your neirghbors and community is prudent…We all need to stick together and help one another. Housing will be more expensive and the poor will have a much higher percent of income dedicated to that. More people are without healthcare every second. Essentials like food clothing and energy are rising fast. Governement services will be cut drastically as tax revenues decrease with the recession. Community and family gardens (victory gardens) are needed.&lt;br /&gt;
The housing industry can be put back to work building smaller multifamily housing that can be subsidised with no interest loans. The new administration can do out of the box programs that don’t feed the K street lobbyist. We need a “New Deal”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No chrystal ball here…Yet I agree when times get tough bonding with your neirghbors and community is prudent…We all need to stick together and help one another. Housing will be more expensive and the poor will have a much higher percent of income dedicated to that. More people are without healthcare every second. Essentials like food clothing and energy are rising fast. Governement services will be cut drastically as tax revenues decrease with the recession. Community and family gardens (victory gardens) are needed.<br />
The housing industry can be put back to work building smaller multifamily housing that can be subsidised with no interest loans. The new administration can do out of the box programs that don’t feed the K street lobbyist. We need a “New Deal”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peony</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175444</link>
		<dc:creator>peony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mommybrain, this is in response to your question at the end of Ian’s post Sunday.  (Note to Mods:  if there’s a way you’d prefer to handle posting what I think is a needed response to a question after a thread is closed, please advise.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Peony, is the configuration followed by another re-ocurring configuration? If so, what characterizes it? Is there hope in the stars?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mommybrain, it would take a long essay to do justice to your question.  But, briefly, yes, if I understand what you’re asking, planetary configurations do follow one another in sequence and reoccur in cycles that can be anticipated ahead of time.  Periods of contraction and crisis (next two or three years) are followed by more expansive ones where we’ll see a culmination of revolutionary and/or emancipatory movements worldwide, cultural creativity, and rapid technological progress (2010-2011). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What often happens too is that configurations having very different or contrasting archetypal characteristics are operative simultaneously which unfold in highly complex ways in the collective psyche and historical events.  We’re moving into one of these which is unfolding between now and 2011.  This particular one occurred only twice in the 20th century:  1929-1933 and again 1964-1967.  The mid ‘60’s to elaborate on this example was accompanied by widespread civil unrest and protest and like now, we were in an unpopular war.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks like politically and socially, the country will be even more polarized than the last seven years, with progressives and conservatives - both empowered - with a high degree of tension created by contrasting and opposing archetypal forces.  Whether that means a Republican will win the presidency and the Democrats will maintain control of Congress I don’t know.  But, given the dynamics of these configurations, a message of unity, the change theme beng a significant exception, doesn’t resonate with the spirit of the time, a time which will be more hard-edged and turbulent.  The current divisions between corporate wing and the progressive wing of the Democratic party will likely continue or intensify.  But, in the long run (2010 and beyond), the country is moving more toward the progressive end of the political spectrum and the influence of the netroots will grow stronger.  Around November, ‘08 and whoever is in the WH in 2009, it also looks like national security will be a major issue again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot do better than to take Ian’s sage advise to be on good terms with my family and friends, know my neighbors, forge strong ties with my community, and to add my own, in whatever way works for me, amplify the inner light and raise my vibratory rate.  Thanks for the question.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mommybrain, this is in response to your question at the end of Ian’s post Sunday.  (Note to Mods:  if there’s a way you’d prefer to handle posting what I think is a needed response to a question after a thread is closed, please advise.)</p>
<p>“Peony, is the configuration followed by another re-ocurring configuration? If so, what characterizes it? Is there hope in the stars?”</p>
<p>Mommybrain, it would take a long essay to do justice to your question.  But, briefly, yes, if I understand what you’re asking, planetary configurations do follow one another in sequence and reoccur in cycles that can be anticipated ahead of time.  Periods of contraction and crisis (next two or three years) are followed by more expansive ones where we’ll see a culmination of revolutionary and/or emancipatory movements worldwide, cultural creativity, and rapid technological progress (2010-2011). </p>
<p>What often happens too is that configurations having very different or contrasting archetypal characteristics are operative simultaneously which unfold in highly complex ways in the collective psyche and historical events.  We’re moving into one of these which is unfolding between now and 2011.  This particular one occurred only twice in the 20th century:  1929-1933 and again 1964-1967.  The mid ‘60’s to elaborate on this example was accompanied by widespread civil unrest and protest and like now, we were in an unpopular war.  </p>
<p>It looks like politically and socially, the country will be even more polarized than the last seven years, with progressives and conservatives &#8211; both empowered &#8211; with a high degree of tension created by contrasting and opposing archetypal forces.  Whether that means a Republican will win the presidency and the Democrats will maintain control of Congress I don’t know.  But, given the dynamics of these configurations, a message of unity, the change theme beng a significant exception, doesn’t resonate with the spirit of the time, a time which will be more hard-edged and turbulent.  The current divisions between corporate wing and the progressive wing of the Democratic party will likely continue or intensify.  But, in the long run (2010 and beyond), the country is moving more toward the progressive end of the political spectrum and the influence of the netroots will grow stronger.  Around November, ‘08 and whoever is in the WH in 2009, it also looks like national security will be a major issue again.</p>
<p>I cannot do better than to take Ian’s sage advise to be on good terms with my family and friends, know my neighbors, forge strong ties with my community, and to add my own, in whatever way works for me, amplify the inner light and raise my vibratory rate.  Thanks for the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175401</link>
		<dc:creator>PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175401</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is relevant, as the figurative meaning of “plum” as something desirable arose secondarily out of its meaning as a particular kind of fruit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is relevant, as the figurative meaning of “plum” as something desirable arose secondarily out of its meaning as a particular kind of fruit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDCitizen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175388</link>
		<dc:creator>MDCitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its relevance to the origins of the “Plum Book” I don’t know, but this is the first thing that came to my mind:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Little Jack Horner&lt;br /&gt;
Sat in a corner&lt;br /&gt;
eating his Christmas pie.&lt;br /&gt;
He stuck in his thumb&lt;br /&gt;
and pulled out a plum&lt;br /&gt;
and said “What a good boy am I!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that’s a very old rhyme.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its relevance to the origins of the “Plum Book” I don’t know, but this is the first thing that came to my mind:</p>
<p>Little Jack Horner<br />
Sat in a corner<br />
eating his Christmas pie.<br />
He stuck in his thumb<br />
and pulled out a plum<br />
and said “What a good boy am I!”</p>
<p>And that’s a very old rhyme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175379</link>
		<dc:creator>PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/01/01/new-years-message-from-chris-dodd-to-the-netroots/#comment-1175379</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I believe they will be busy undermining everything an agency will be doing to make sure the idea the government does not work, actually comes true. That will be their mission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grandma, you got that right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But I believe they will be busy undermining everything an agency will be doing to make sure the idea the government does not work, actually comes true. That will be their mission.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Grandma, you got that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.228 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 13:32:20 -->

