Comments on: Huckabee Apologies to Pakistan

By: Mauimom

Mauimom — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:50:54 +0000

I might need to egg this one on just a bit.

Jane, doesn’t he monitor his blog and kick off anyone who dares utter a peep against him?

Mmmmm, Peeps!!

By: MarkH

MarkH — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:49:43 +0000

Cheney just got a woman elected President of ~~the~~ Ukraine.

corrected

By: MarkH

MarkH — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:41:59 +0000

Apparently Bin Laden messages are delivered by being passed along through a series of couriers, which is why it isn’t a simple matter to trace them back. So the fact that he’s not responding to immediate events isn’t really an indication …

Yeah, it’s hard to know.

The recent quote of Bhutto saying he had been murdered is certainly interesting and calls into question the media’s so-called reporting skill. Who knows how much they’ve been hiding from us.

At least they keep reminding us John Edwards has nice hair.

John Edwards for President — Leadership and great hair!

By: tanbark

tanbark — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:16:53 +0000

“I might need to egg this one on, just a bit.”

Egg on, McDuff! And damned be he who first say: “enough!”.

:o)

By: Patrickson

Patrickson — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:53:48 +0000

You know, I bet those darn illegal Pakistani immigrants are invading by way of Mexico. Everyone, be on the lookout!

By: applepie

applepie — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:34:05 +0000

Tis the season of honesty perhaps….Bhutto mentioning that Bin Laden is dead, and now Huckabee apologizing for the excesses of blind colonialist militarism? Freudian slip? Sip of the tongue? Cat out of the bag?

Now perhaps the pols will be honest about the obsolescence of war due to nuclear weapons, and the failure of globalization? Or is that too much to ask? Especially now that Bush is going to veto the National Defense Authorization Act…

By: MartianPolitics

MartianPolitics — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:09:47 +0000

I think that she means that you can be folksy and still know something about what you are talking about. Sam Ervin comes to mind in this regard.

By: jakebob

jakebob — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:55:11 +0000

“Still, whether the US has any influence or not, it would still be good to be officially on the side of the people in this, in case they actually prevail.”

BEAUTIFUL!!! Let’s just hope us peoples, and not Diebold, prevail here in USA.

By: kittykitty

kittykitty — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:19:17 +0000

so…. nobody thinks it’s odoriferously fishy that al jazeera is broadcasting a new audio tape of Osama today wherein he is still talkin about 9/11?? i must be nuts then.

By: tanbark

tanbark — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:42:03 +0000

KGraham@59:

Hillary’s about as much of a centrist moderate as Mitt Romney. She’s a political chameleon, willing to change to ANY color to suck up to the right wing, which is why she attended that big FauxNews 10th anniversary bash last year, and why she let Rupert Murdoch hustle a fundraiser for her.

It’s why she supported Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Primary, against a good antiwar candidate, Ned Lamont, whom we progressives, and the staff here, worked hard to help win that primary.

It’s why she’s taken at least 50K in AIPAC-directed funds.

It’s why she supported bush’s war so faithfully, until the mid-term handwriting on the wall started dripping political blood, and she then discovered her inner “antiwar” self.

It’s why she STILL won’t apologize for her vote to authrorize the invasion, and that means that she can’t go after bush and the goopers for their (and her) bloody petro-abbatoir in Iraq. And if you think ANY democrat can get elected without doing that, then you should go get a job with Hillary’s “savvy” campaign staff; the one that convinced her to triangulate to the right, while she slapped us in the face.

P.S. Don’t forget that vote here on the Lake:

2309 votes cast:

Edwards—998

Clinton—236

Payback’s a bitch. :o)