![]() |
||||
|
||||
Last year, a group of television workers at WMUR in New Hampshire voted to join a union—Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 1228. But management didn't want to negotiate a contract with them—and there's nothing in U.S. labor law that says employers must agree to a contract. So, until this month, the workers had no contract.
Then, one after another, the Democratic presidential candidates started writing letters to WMUR-TV General Manager Jeff Bartlett urging him to go back to the bargaining table and work out an agreement.
Guess what? He did.
After months of deadlock, the WMUR technicians and drivers now have a contract that includes wage increases ranging from 18 percent to 35 percent and improvements in the pension and vacation benefits.
So here's a proposal for candidates of any party running for president: As long as you're raising millions of dollars and talking with thousands of people every day, why not do some good along the way? And in the case of the six Dems who wrote letters to the WMUR station manager, why not take the opportunity to do more good. (The six Dems are Sen. Joe Biden (Del.), Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), Sen. Chris Dodd (Conn.), former Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.)
The presidential candidates have many options for sending a good word on behalf of workers struggling for contracts and union recognition. Jane and Thers have done great work here describing the struggle by striking television writers to get fair compensation for their work on new media. And the Firedoglake action campaign enabling people to write to the CEOs of their favorite shows and urge them to bargain fairly with the writers deserves huge kudos.
Several Democratic candidates have walkedthe picket line with the writers, and the Democratic National Committee canceled Dec. 10's debates in case CBS television writers went on strike, because the Dems said they wouldn't cross the picket line.
So let's ask the aspiring presidents to take the next step and send a letter to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), the umbrella organization representing Big Media, whose members have twice walked away from the bargaining table.
The striking writers and their supporters are on the picket lines at major studios in New York and California in a drive to win an equitable contract that addresses how writers get paid as new media plays a bigger and bigger role in the entertainment industry. They are seeking a formula for fair compensation when their work is broadcast on the Internet, downloaded to iPods or cell phones or distributed via DVD. (Get daily strike updates here.)
The writers have a basic request: Employees should get paid for what they produce. But there’s a lot of money to be made by big corporations if they can prevent the writers from receiving compensation from the growing new media. And that’s why these fat cat producers and CEOs are refusing to negotiate—and one way to accomplish their goal just might involve breaking the union. As David Carr wrote in his New York Times column:
Jorge Zamacona, a Guild member and writer-producer who got his start on “St. Elsewhere” and most recently served as a writer-producer on “Wanted,” since canceled, said that by refusing to negotiate on the future revenues of digital outlets, the studios seemed to be trying to rub them out of the picture for good.
“They are absolutely trying to break the union,” he said. “My daughter watches streamed versions of ‘Gossip Girl’ and ‘Grey’s Anatomy,’ and they all include commercials. Why should writers not be paid a small part of that?”
In a YouTube video posted by the Writers Guild of America, East (WGAE), former “Saturday Night Live” cast member and WGAE member Tim Kazurinsky tells a Chicago TV station:
This is the big, bad writers versus the poor producers. Who are the poor producers? They are G.E., Sony, Time-Warner…the little guys.
Corporations across the board are trying to shut out workers from getting their fair share of compensation from the new media—including Verizon, which set up a "separate" wireless company to literally wall off those workers from the higher-paid, unionized workers at the company's landline facilities. Shutting the writers out of the new media is one part of the attempt by major corporations to deny workers a voice on the job in industries that increasingly are replacing their 20th century predecessors.
So, it would be great if the presidential candidates could send a few letters to AMPTP and urge the industry to bargain in good faith and reach an equitable agreement.
Hope you can join me in urging presidential candidates—Republican and Democrat—to take the next step.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

RSS/XML Feed
zed?
Excellent idea, and something else I’ll start dropping in my emails…
Tula is in the house!
Hello, Tula…
This is a great idea. Do the candidates listen to FDL though?
Thanks Tula. Support unions.
I assume the Spotlight linky above has replaced digg - am off to Spotlight Tula’s fine post and encourage fellow firepups to remember to do the same.
noen at 5 - haven’t any doubt the candidates are well aware of FDL. ;~)
John Edwards spoke at the WGA Washington Square Park Rally on 11/27 in New York City (YouTube), and mentioned he’d cancelled appearances on Ellen and The View in solidarity with the strikers.
He also marched with the writers in Los Angeles, outside NBC studios, on 11/16 (YouTube)
But Tula’s right — letters from the others would be nice, too. *g*
Did any candidate other than Edwards march with the writers on the picket line? I’m under the impression that only Edwards has done so, not once but twice.
Edwards’ parents taught him well - pro union and never cross a picket line.
In the whole equation, it seems that the large corporations have estimated the writers can’t hold out long enough to do them serious damage.
I believe the writers should hold out so that they can do the kind of systemic damage that Carr in NYT and others predict they could do, letting the situation bleed into movies where big money is made. Right now you can’t blink without seeing a Denzel from Oprah ad on most of the cable channels for the Debate movie–because they’ve lost the late night talk shows where their big commercials are walked on.
It will be interesting to see if the big money stars have the guts to stay off the talk shows since they are members of the same union.
My parents taught me the same.
Just FYI, my screen shows a digg it icon just to the right of the headline.
Spotlight and digg this excellent post - only takes a little time and well worth it IMHO.
Thanks demi - as you will note at my comment #14 I figured that out. ;~)
Got there late for Edwards and Nadler but did get these pix and many more.
Thanks Tula for keeping the unions struggle in the spotlight.
Oh, there’s some pup pix in there too.
Da nada.
And, is it my imagination, haven’t other of Tula’s excellent union posts coincided with devastating breaking news?
Oh, and da nada means it’s nothing…a different version of you’re welcome.
I’ve learned a little Spanish, living in LA. *g*
One of the biggest casualities of Shrubco has been the rights of unions.
Shrubco hired that clown who used tax entitlement money to denigrate unions. We have been paying for the demise of our own Democratic Party institutional partners.
One cannot focus enough attention on the necessary role of unions and the politicians who support them.
this clown
Union Facts is headed by Richard Berman, a former lobbyist for the food, alcohol and tobacco industries who runs several other advocacy groups, including the Center for Consumer Freedom and the Employment Policies Institute. He also is general counsel of the American Beverage Institute. Through those groups, Mr. Berman has helped design several similar advocacy-ad campaigns, including efforts critical of animal-rights activists and Greenpeace.
http://online.wsj.com/public/a.....?mod=blogs
why does he have tax exempt status
You’re right on that. It’s happened many times, going back to the Libby trial, the Gonzo stuff, and so on and so on.
MSM has been doing everything they can to avoid talking about anything but haircuts, when it comes to Edwards.
I hope those days are coming to an end.
Hear, hear!
It seems to me the obsession over Edwards’ hair does nothing but take up air time. Those who aren’t voting for Edwards have already made that decision and those undecided Democrats are not focusing on his hair to make their final decision. So, what’s the point? Oh, hum!!!!
Do people grow disinterested when the subject turns to unions? Has anyone else noticed how fewer comments are made on the subject of unions? Anyone want to speculate?
There isn’t much diversity of opinion here on this topic, so it doesn’t lead to back-and-forth discussion?
OK, I think unions, by and large, are past their time.
There are many possible reasons. I can definitely speculate on them. But I won’t…*g*
Well, I think Capital is past its time.
Workers of the World, unite! You have only your chains to lose.
Power — and ownership — to The People.
5-10 years ago I would have agreed without hesitation.
Now, I fear the relevance of unions is waxing rather than waning.
Aw right! “I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night, alive as you and me”!
Right On!
See you at the Filmore for the Dead show man.
There is probably lots of truth in your statement. However, by lack of support it also shows indifference. Unions are in desperate straits these days. It seems to me support would further expose government corruption as commenter Katherine Graham Cracker poins out.
Cool, simple WGA video done by an online friend.
Unions have been fighting an uphill battle for survival for awhile.
A fair percentage of people don’t belong to one.
Personally, I think it’s tragic because of the gains historically unions have made for ordinary workers.
Also, it makes me wonder how are ordinary workers sans unions in the US are going to survive and compete globally with other countries who play fast and loose with their workers in deplorable working conditions.
Do you think it’s a good idea for teacher unions to protect incompetent teachers and stage unions to protect “featherbedding jobs”?
I saw a left-handed compliment today (I think in the NYT) about Edwards’ recent gains in effectivness “following earlier missteps like the $400 haircut”.
No. Nor do I think it is a good thing for workers to be exploited at every turn by bastards making more an hour than they earn in a year…
Well done! Definitely cool, wish I knew how to do that.
There’s no escaping the fact that powerful unions protect some bad workers, just as academic tenure protects some incompetent professors…
In my last year in grad school there was a push to have a grad students union. I argued that there were exploited people at the university, the janitors, housekeepers and other employees, not the grad students. I was as popular there as I am here.
I also worked construction as a laborer in Central Illinois, god help your ass if you worked to hard.
The only union I ever belonged to was the Restaurant Workers.
Took $15/month from my dishwasher’s salary and didn’t give me squat.
On the other hand, my brother-in-law, a hotel Bell Captain has fair to middling health insurance, which is a damn sight more than the large corporate hotel chain would provide.
Ahhh, so there is lots of difference of opinion on unions. These comments are worth while. Unions as they were shaped in the past are not serving the needs of today but what can replace them? I’ll give myself away here. I strongly believe in employee ownership of a company/corporation. When employees share in the success of their company they are strongly motivated. However, this will never happen or be headed by large corporations in which employees make major company decisions. So, like all revolutions, it happens from the bottom moving its way up. Companies like: Publix Supermarkets, Bi-Mart, Lewis Tree Service. Just buying shares in the company is not ownership when a few at the top are making all the decisions (Enron and WorldCom).
In any event, Christy’s upstairs…and I’m lonely up there…*g* The Bhutto business musta drained everyone today. Sad.
Saved by the Redd!
… and the UAW has done a fine job looking after their constituency, n’est pas?
In the real world nothing is perfect even unions.
Still, I wouldn’t throw out the baby with the bath water (pardon me).
There has been problems on both sides of the table regarding management and unions implementing an effective strategy to address the issue you submitted.
Perhaps you are playing the “devil’s advocate” or you don’t really think unions are an effective tool.
I believe in Utah if you work there you can be fired without any specific cause, rhyme, or reason has to be brought up. (Right to Work State). So, if you don’t have a union to back you up it’s basically “Sayonara, it’s been swell, don’t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out”.
Perhaps you are playing the “devil’s advocate” or you don’t really think unions are an effective tool.
Both
Raven - I agree there is the other side of unions. I belonged to a teachers union when it was unpopular. It was considered “communistic” and union members were distrusted. Before unions we were at the mercy of bad administrators who collected a large salary doing very little while teachers were in the trenches carrying the heavy load for little pay. We had little benefits. An Administrator could fire using any pretense. It was ugly.
Unions corrected that, thus it became near impossible to fire really bad teachers who should not have been hired in the first place. The pendulum swong the opposite direction and lazy teachers sat on their a– doing nothing.
It seems to me that throwing the baby out with the bath water s not the colution. Union reforms are necessary.
Ah, the middle way. I likes you QG!
I agree Biodun …
Just the way there is no escaping the fact that being part of the Bush-Cheney Fraternity insulates one from ANYTHING including death, incompetence, destruction, corruption et. al. Think: Blackwater, FEMA in New Orleans, everything in Iraq. Why bash unions??
In France unions are very powerful. People can’t get fired easily. Therefore, people don’t get hired easily either. In other words, unemployment in France is quite high, especially among the youth. But Sarkozy has promised to correct all that, if you know what I mean.
No doubt, unions have suffered telling attacks from the ‘noise machine’ over the last three decades.
However, in my personal experience, when unions reach a ‘certain’ size, their ‘leadership’ (behave like the ‘Democratic leadership’ and) becomes far too cozy with ‘management’ and will not aggressively ‘fight’ for members’
genuine needs.
If we wish to discuss ‘history,’ then let us be honest; during the last fifty years few big unions have supported needful social change, whether civil rights, ending deceitful wars or supporting human rights generally -
have unions spoken about ‘torture,’ the rigging of elections, environmental degradation, the death penalty etc?
Who has abandoned whom?
And, quite frankly, isn’t the Writer’s Union a wee bit esoteric to serve as a general ‘example”?
In our society writers generally, whether union or not, receive very short shrift. Many commenting here might well be able to verify this assertion.
The most ’successful’ union in recent years represents baseball players
(whom we all know are underpaid and unappreciated). How do you like them steriods?
Having said this however, the role that unions could play in helping to make this a better, more just and humane world is not unlike the role that Congress could play. Methinks the greatest challenge facing both unions and that august body is the same: the sort of people attracted to ‘leadership’ leave ’something’ to be desired, call it ‘courage’ or call it ‘vision’; its lack is painful, costly and potentially disastrous.