I've highlighted the latest Edwards ad because I think it is well done and hits on several levels. And I'm curious as to what everyone else thinks. Especially when contrasted against this from Hillary Clinton, these from Rudy Guiliani and the Huckabee Christmas extravaganza, the Obama and Ron Paul offerings, and the Romney attempt at a two-fer. 'Tis the season, I suppose.
Sen. Dodd is getting some good press on his FISA work. Guess that time off the campaign trail standing up for the rule of law resonated with a lot of folks. Gee, who could have predicted? (Ahem.)
Speaking of Edwards, his campaign released a press memo today detailing all the numbers they think the press has been missing. It's quite an eye-full, and a bit amusing in light of the fact that the national press seems to be waking up to something David Yepson in Iowa has been saying for a while: the Edwards ground game there is solid, locally based, and runs deep in the rural areas. Yepsen's also throwing a "he's gotten off his ass and is actually campaigning" bone to Thompson. (More on Yepsen here.) And I loved this particular paragraph from the Newsweek cover on Edwards:
For months, Edwards has been rounding up support in the state's rural precincts where the front runners have paid less attention. While Obama and Clinton have drawn crowds in the thousands in places like Des Moines and Ames, Edwards has been winning over people in tiny towns like Sac City (population: 2,189). Even if he loses to Obama and Clinton in the state's bigger cities, he hopes he can still win by wrapping up smaller, far-flung precincts that other candidates have ignored. "The bulk of our support is in small and medium counties," says Jennifer O'Malley, Edwards's Iowa state director. O'Malley says Edwards has visited all 99 counties in the state; the campaign has so far trained captains covering 90 percent of all 1,781 precincts. Rural voters are sometimes reluctant to caucus, so the campaign has been enlisting respected community leaders to encourage first-timers to get past their apathy or fear.
This is the Dean 50-state strategy writ local. And I would love to see more Democratic candidates nationwide employing the same thing. THIS is exactly what we need to combat the GOP ground game. Kudos. Of course, the Obama and Clinton camps have their own ground game strategies going as well in Iowa, along with every other candidate running, and this year there are no gimmes for anyone in either party.
Ought to be an interesting Jan. 3rd is all I'm saying. And where things go from there? Anyone's guess at this point.
Speaking of Yepsen and Iowa, the Des Moines Register has been featuring essays from presidential candidates that are worth a read (scroll about halfway down the page) -- for what they say, and what they don't as well. And Foreign Affairs magazine has been running some incredibly illuminating essays from the campaigns on foreign policy strategies (or lack thereof). This month features Huckabee and Obama Richardson, but they are all worth a read.
The WaPo points to turnout as being key -- isn't it always in every election? I mean, honestly? For those who are still confused about caucusing, the Clinton campaign video on how to caucus has been joined by an equally snarky take from Edwards. Haven't been able to find any other campaigns putting these together, so if you know of one, link it up in the comments.
The Richardson campaign lays all the Iraq cards on the table with this new ad on Iraq and foreign policy.
Political Wire says the race has tightened up again in Iowa, with Edwards retaking the polling lead. USAToday isn't so certain, but says Edwards is leading the "second choice" portion of the race which can be very important where caucusing with so many candidates leads to a lot of folks switching after the first ballot.
There is a lot more swirling about, including:
-- Krugman and the Obama campaign are going another round on the economy.
-- Huckabee now has something to lose which means the press gets to turn on him, too.
-- Edwards' "surge" in Iowa confounds AdNags.
-- Clinton has embarked on a "likeability tour" according to the NYTimes. Seems like the standard "close the deal" tour at the end of a campaign season to me, but hey -- that's not a sexy headline, is it?
-- The positioning on potential caucus results kabuki has started. See here and here. (Full disclosure: Tony Lake was a professor of mine, not that it really matters in the context of this, but I didn't want it coming up and not have disclosed it.)
-- And this on an undecided voter in Iowa and how the candidates come a'courting.
-- McCain's interesting choice of pals.
What is catching your eye on the blogs or in the news about the campaigns? Do tell...
And one last note: condolences to Dennis Kucinich and his family. So sorry for your loss.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight

Support this site!
Keep up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

RSS/XML Feed
Christy!
I have to say, I found the Rudy ads ever so slightly creepy. See what you guys think. And the Huckabee ad is very in your face with his zeal to sell himself as the one and only Christmas guy.
I am an Edwards caucus captain in a rural NE Iowa. We have a solid orginisation and Edwards’ people have impressed me.For example my organizer is a BC grad from middle class Mass. and is going to law school but taking a year to help Edwards campaign.
That Santa was kind of wierd, giving Rudy a candy cane after he said the R’s should get along, and the Santa saying “I was with you up until then.”
My shivering was not from cold.
Yeah, my question when I saw the creepy Huck ad is “how does that play with the AIPAC folks” who the right-wing fundies are always sucking up to, but now in another incredible act of potential anti-semitism, ignoring.
So these here holidaze are Xtians only, eh, Governor?
“For those who are still confused about caucusing, the Clinton campaign video on how to caucus has been joined by an equally snarky take from Edwards.”
I haven’t seen Edwards’s yet. I thought Clinton’s was kinda weird: Bill Clinton jogging on a treadmill and then chomping on a cheeseburger was a little too graphic for my taste.
Time’s Person of the Year.
I find everything about Giuliani completely utterly creepy. They guy is an unmitigated self-aggrandizing megalomaniacal creepy bastard. The idea that he is some sort of “moderate” Republican is just so absurd, even the wingnut loonies have figured it out.
It says something that Giuliani is too creepy for the NY Post. They had a headline a week or so ago ragging on him for harping on 9/11.
You GO Jim! Hope you keep firepups up to date on the Edwards campaign being how the MSM grows more unreliable each day. When you meet him you can report John Edwards is very popular with the good people of the central CA coast.
Fairly nasty hit-job on Edwards by Adam Nagourney in the NYT today.
Fairly incoherent, too, since it seemed to find something inconsistent
between the “Two Americas” theme from 4 years ago and
Edwards’ recent criticism of the culture of corporate greed.
Say what?
Edwards’ ad has just the right touch to it.
OK. Christy already referred to this.
I want my Edit back!
Okay, I still can’t believe the fire. Tinfoil Hat. Didn’t Sen. Wyden suggest just yesterday that all senators go down to the old executive office building and read “the documents” before voting against /for telcom immunity?!? Then Dodd said the other senators don’t have access. Maybe Cheney decided to make sure they wouldn’t have access before voting against/on telcom immunity.
Oh I could not pass up posting this: (Sorry if this has already been posted)
Time mag touts Putin as ‘Person of Year’
by AP
Posted:
NEW YORK (AP) — Time magazine on Wednesday named Russian President Vladimir Putin its 2007 “Person of the Year.”
The nod went to the Russian leader because of Putin’s “extraordinary feat of leadership in taking a country that was in chaos and bringing it stability,” said Richard Stengel, Time’s managing editor.
Putin, 55, is enormously popular in Russia, presiding over a resurgent economy flush with revenue from oil and natural gas. But critics say he has moved the country away from Russia’s democratic reforms of the 1990s by tightening control of the media, courts and parliament.
“He’s the new czar of Russia and he’s dangerous in the sense that he doesn’t care about civil liberties, he doesn’t care about free speech,” Stengel said.Putin recently endorsed protoge Dmitry Medvedev’s presidential bid, and later said he would accept Medvedev’s offer to serve as prime minister if Medvedev is elected in the March 2 election.
Many believe Putin would remain Russia’s real leader, regardless of his title, though Putin has said he would not undermine his successor. The Russian constitution limits presidents to two consecutive terms.
Others in the running for Person of the Year included Nobel Prize-winner Al Gore and author J.K. Rowling.
This year’s choice was a return to the magazine’s tradition of picking an individual rather than last year’s choice of anyone creating or using content on the World Wide Web.
Previous individual winners have included Bono, President
I just cannot pass up the irony of that bolded quote. I mean couldn’t we really say the exact same thing about our own leader. Is this not lost on these people? UGH!
CHRISTY!!!
From Chris Dodd:
OT. Speaking of Krugman, if you have 70 minutes to spare,
there is a great YouTube of
a talk that Krugman gave at Google headquarters last week,
describing the subprime meltdown and where we may be heading.
Sobering would be an understatement.
1,700 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Hardin Smith and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
Great post, you and Sister Jane are becomin’ the “go-to” kids on all things political, thanks. But I would like to point out that a certain old, broken-down political junkie of Norwegian heritage has been predicting an Edwards victory in Iowa for months now and has been speculating about a Gore-Edwards nexus for over a year. Look for Al Gore to join Edwards on the stump in New Hampshire the day after the Iowa caucuses.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE POPCORN…EDWARDS/GORE ‘08!!!
Didn’t Gonzales get some lawyerly recognition and that was pulled? I think I saw that on Countdown.
I just don’t want to see another picture of Lieberman and McCain holding hands and kissing. Its too much.
Thanks for the Krugman linky - would he not make a smashing Fed Chairman in the happy event John Edwards is our next President?
Ha Ha Hilary and Obama and Biden. May they reap what they sow (or something like that.)From the Time link:
I liked Edward’s ad and the Clinton’s ad.
Love the way you think Norske!
edwards is a real democrat, a real progressive and his entire platform is anti corporate rights
I like that
I am starting to feel better about hillary, worse about obama
I want edwards or kucinich, but between obama and hillary, it’s the hill
Woo Hoo mui1! Second Snoopy dance of the afternoon.
and dodd would get my vote above hillary and obama…just for his courage to face the president and his teleco buddies down
I believe it was the ABA Magazine initially named him “Lawyer of the Year” then after the outcry (which they tried to defend by using Time having named Hitler and Stalin as Person’s of the Year), they changed it to “Newsmaker of the Year”
Yes he would, but I have nothing against Bernanke.
Bernanke has inherited a stinking pile from The Maestro.
Just as out next President will from The Decider.
CNN: Al-Qaeda torture atrocity site..found in or near Baghdad….
See, we have to torture these people, because they are torturers, and they are coming here to kill and torture us. See?
I understand that Edwards is officially in first place out there in Iowa now. Do you think that will hold till the election? How is Dodd doing there, and do you think he’ll experience a bump from his stand on this FISA issue? Do you think that people in Iowa are paying any attention to the warrantless wiretapping and the issue of retroactive immunity?
Edwards seems to be doing a really good job, so far, of playing the role of outsider/insurgent gutsy fighter while at the same time appearing sufficiently Presidential. In 2004, Howard Dean had the first role going for him in spades, but paid insufficient attention to the second role, by his own admission. The “scream” solidified in voter’s minds the doubts they were having about his “presidentiality,” to coin a word. If John can keep walking that tightrope, he could turn this race upside down. I hope he does.
But Christy, what other primaries for House and Senate should we be paying most attention (and support) to?
Bob in HI
I’m hoping for the best for Edwards in Iowa. Ms. Redshift is going up to New Hampshire after Christmas (wish I could go!) I’m a little disappointed with the Edwards campaign here in VA, mainly because I want it to be the Dean campaign all over again, and it’s much more of a standard campaign structure. We have volunteers who can’t travel who really want to be doing stuff, and the response from the campaign is “are you sure you can’t go to IA, NH, or SC?” and nothing else, rather than turning us loose.
The Spears sisters, Jamie Lynn (16) and Britney (43), are pregnant!
Oh shit, sorry, wrong website.
Chris Matthews giving McCain far too much airtime on Hardball - on a silly note I’d love to know who dresses Matthews - he is wearing another horrific sweater - horizontal alternating brown & organge stripes adding a zillion pounds to the fat head’s bay window. LOL!
Donna Edwards! I’m going to see what I can do for her after Christmas.
I see Edwards as gaining ground and probably winning in Iowa, perhaps by a fairly wide margin. I like that. I think, however he might consider broadening his message to include not just those in poverty and without insurance, but the whole middle class which is losing economic ground, is insecure about the insurance they have and constitute a much bigger voting bloc.
We remember that George W looked deep into Putin’s soul and liked what he saw, don’t we?
Bob in HI
OT
DING !
Ditto!
Of course he did. It was like a mirror.
I’m willing to be charitable and say: “gee, what a terrible goof. They must be embarrassed. Poor ABA magazine staff.”
I caucused for John in 2004. He’s a great closer. I do say that I hadn’t seen a lot of John’s ads till recently but he has personally met thousands of potential caucus goers. He is very magnetic in person as are Obama and Hill, but shoe leather works ( a bus to all 99 counties as opposed to Hill’s helicopter tour)
As to Dodd, He is now my second choice for obvious reasons and I think he may surprise on caucus night but have no facts to back that up.
Hello, I must be going.
Gotta shop, y’know. (Divorces are just too expensive right now.)
I have been a big supporter of John Edwards…. and I lurk at FDL on a daily basis. My daugther, who has secret passion for reading the gossip columnist blog by Perez Hilton told me there is an article about Edwards having a child out of wedlock by another woman other than his wife….I hope it isn’t true but unfortunately the National Enquirer has had accurate stories…anyone hear this? There was some hints of this on our local news radio stations here in LA a while back.
UPDATE: NATIONAL ENQUIRER WORLD EXCLUSIVE: JOHN EDWARDS LOVE CHILD SCANDAL!
Presidential candidate John Edwards is caught up in a love child scandal, a blockbuster ENQUIRER investigation has discovered.
The ENQUIRER has learned exclusively that Rielle Hunter, a woman linked to Edwards in a cheating scandal earlier this year, is more than six months pregnant — and she’s told a close confidante that Edwards is the father of her baby!
The ENQUIRER’s political bombshell comes just weeks after Edwards emphatically denied having an affair with Rielle, who formerly worked on his campaign and told another close pal that she was romantically involved with the married ex-senator.
——————————————————————————–
Published on: 12/19/2007 Printer Friendly | Email Article
——————————————————————————–
[RBG Note; it is considered abuse of fair use to reprint entire articles. Providing brief summaries and a link to the source are better ways to get your point across. It may also be helpful to refer back to Blue Texan’s post from earlier today for more perspective on this story.]
Now that would be a ticket worth fighting for! I sure hope to see that happen.
To make matters worse, I think it may be the same sweater he wore yesterday. He said on national TV that his wife hates those crew neck sweaters, so I don’t know who advised him to wear that. I’m sure there must be a Penneys of some other store around to buy another sweater rather than wear the same one on TV on consecutive days!
John Edward’s video hits me right in the gut from the opening line about homeless veterens. He exudes passion for social justice. I love this video, find it very powerful.
Hillary? Jeez, pretty light hearted fare considering the state of the world.
Obama - why do I always feel he is simply reciting lines? He’s polished, sure, and has a great speaking voice, but that’s not going to be enough.
I think he is doing that.
Any chance we could get ActBlue and Blue America working together on the same page? Our neighbor Blue America hypes about 30 candidates, Act Blue is focusing on 9. My wish is that the summary paragraphs would say something about their primary opponent(s), if any. In the next two months, I want to know who to support for the primaries.
Bob in HI
On his replacing Bernanke. It won’t and can’t happen because of the law governing the terms of members of the Board of Governors. Plus, on the basics, Paul and Ben see pretty much eye to eye — some differences on the ’savings glut’ that Bernanke pushed to get his job, but as technical monetary economists they are on a par. When we get a Democratic President, he will not sabotage the economic programme the way Greenspan tried to.
Edwards is surging and the leader always draws a lot of heat. I think he can handle it.
For the record, he’s said the Enquirer story is false.
Edwards for President — Leadership, not negative campaigning
I like this Edwards ad. But I would think it would have been even more effective if the candidate had not even used it AS a POLITICAL AD. I think the theme is great, but then Edwards should have said something to the effect of “Over the next few days, and into the coming year…try to be generous when you can to the food closets, homeless shelters, and other volunteer organizations that have had to try to fill the gap when there are people in need.”
I think THAT would have been VERY EFFECTIVE, as it shows that it isn’t JUST ABOUT THE ELECTION. It’s about life and our approach towards it.
Why isn’t Edwards, at least, hammering the shit out of the Wall St. investment houses over the subprime debacle and the $38 billion in end of year bonuses? Why isn’t he demanding disgorgement of fraudulent profits to help the victims? This is a populist goldmine; but are the candidates afraid to alienate Wall St.?