![]()
I know this is hard to believe*, but just the other day a few right-wing blogs were trumpeting Bush "surging" all the way back to 37% approval in a recent Gallup Poll. Somewhere David Broder’s glasses were steaming up in anticipation of re-declaring his boy being the "comeback kid".
The president’s approval rating in the poll, conducted Dec. 6 through Sunday by Opinion Research Corporation, was 32 percent, tying his all-time low rating from June.
Sixty-six percent disapproved of how Bush is handling his job, the poll found, about equal to the 65 percent early last month.
Only 15 percent said they approved "strongly" of how the president is handling his job, while nearly half, 49 percent, disapproved "strongly."
I’m pretty sure that having 49% of the country really, really, despise you, and having that number more than three times higher than your strong proponents is a really bad sign that ONLY our Beltway Pundits could miss. Well, okay, maybe Powerline too (poor "misunderstood genius").
Oh wait, I’m forgetting a large group that also misses it.
Congressional Democrats.
Democratic leaders in Congress enjoyed an approval rating only narrowly higher than the president’s, with 39 percent of poll respondents saying they approve of what the Democratic leaders in the House and Senate have done so far this year. More than half — 56 percent — disapproved, the poll found.
Still, 53 percent of those polled said Democratic leadership is "good for the country," though that is down slightly from 58 percent in January, when when Democrats took control of Congress.
A nation cries out for Nancy, Steney, and Harry to break off the beer bottles and ask the White House, "Alright who wants some?" as opposed to "Thank you sir, may I have another". Yet every week seems to end in another declaration of "Hey, we kept him from doing even worse!"
When you don’t stand up to Bush, people are going to start to consider you part of the problem. I guess, in Rahm’s world, there’s an argument for "People understand that the GOP is worse", but while they draw their paychecks, their constituents still live in the world the pays the consequences of the half-measures they always end up abandoning. As Froomkin said, "Historians looking back on the Bush presidency may well wonder if Congress actually existed."
But do not fully despair yet dear reader…for we have not yet reached the true depths. What else could there be?
Media Bigs Turn Out For White House Holiday Party
A TVNewser insider tells us about the boldface media names in attendance at tonight’s White House Christmas Party.
NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell, now reporting on Capitol Hill for the network. CBS’ Bob Schieffer "being so friendly and nice to everyone." FNC’s Brian Kilmeade with his brother. CBS’ Dave Price, "making everyone laugh." FNC’s Steve Doocy "brought his son, who’s even taller than he is." FBN’s Liz Claman bonding with FNC’s Brit Hume; CNN’s Wolf Blitzer; FBN exec Kevin Magee; NBC specials EP Phil Alongi "saying hi to old pal" former MSNBC’er and now CNN EP Jeff Kepnes; CNBC DC Bureau chief Matt Cuddy; FBN DC Bureau chief Bruce Becker; FNC’s Greta Van Susteren. NBC’s Jeannie Ohm; FBN’s Alexis Glick just hours after her new show was announced. FBN exec Ray Hennessey; CNN DC Bureau chief David Bohrman; Fox News’ Chris Wallace; CBS Radio’s Mark Knoeller and FNC’s Steve Centanni.
*No, it isn’t.



57 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
when bush is buried in the sands of Arabia I’ll say he did a good job.
1,695 DAYZ AND THE KILLNI’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Attaturk and the Late Nite Firepup Freedom Fighters:
This year is the last opportunity to transform the Democratic Party without blowin it into a third party. The corporateist Democratic leadership must go…the rest will happily follow when off the leash.
KEEP THE FAITH AND THROW THE BASTARDS OUT!!
attack! Attack!! ATTACK!!!
From Minnesota eh?
Nancy is comprimised either by the Bush pushed story about knowing about war crimes. Or the Lefty version that either she lacks a spine and or she is just another bought politican.
We need to get rid of her we need leaders not cool aid drinkers. Find me a Dem with Stones!
meh, sent in a donation request to aei :p
All dems fear A*PAC, and A*PAC likes the neocons and their agenda.
Broder and his ilk need something to hold on to – the last tendrils, straining before the inevitable plummet. But I’m lacking in patience.
nite all
We need to send the message loud and clear.
If you can not stand the danger of being free without wetting yourself, buy a diaper.
Our freedoms are not negotiable!
We need to help Nancy now. When Bush starts his “do nothing Congress talking point”.
We need our talking heads to agree. We need them to say that Bush has discredited Nancy’s leadership and that there will be a strong Lefty challenge to her and Harry’s leadership positions after the election.
We need to say that the GOP better lean on their political contributers to make deals with Nancy now or else risk getting screwed by a real Lefty Leadership with a bigger majority and a Dem in the White House who will owe his win to the strong Lefty antiwar vote.
Unless of course the GOP really thinks that they have a chance to win the White House with their pro war position a tanking economy and the Sub Prime meltdown forcing people out of their homes.
We should outlaw the Republican party as a terrorist organization for its crimes against humanity. You are either for them or against them. There is no middle ground. The question now is just how do we get Nancy to rally her troops to put Bush et al behind bars.
http://13martyrs.blogspot.com/
The GOP will counter that Bush has left the next president a 70’s economy that doomed Carter. They think that they will take the next election.
We counter that a real Lefty President will do an FDR style Keynesian economic prime of the pump. Combined with national health care, higher MPG for cars etc.
If we can do what FDR did and save the country the economy and improve peoples living standards then we will own the next 40 years just like the post FDR Dems did.
Of course the GOP’s political contributers will not be happy with that but their resistance Nancy’s deals now is just making us lefties stronger Bush and the moderate Dems both have low poll numbers.
But ending the war, National Health Care, reducing our dependence on oil all poll much better than Bush or the Center Dems and guess what those are all Lefty positions!
By the time the election rolls around I’m sure we can pick up another 5% minimum of support for our positions.
But if the Stock Market tanks, people sart losing their homes in large numbers, or the war goes south big time then how much support can we expect then?
Nancy made her choice. She choose to create a partisan caucus in a bid towards presidential power. It was, quite simply, the wrong choice. Both Ried and Pelosi deserve strong democratic challengers as does Schumer and the the rest of the DLC gang. They act as if our strongest foundations of democracy are bought and sold to the highest bidder our laws be damned.
Funny Bush tortures people in the name of freedom and 9/11 but has yet to send one solder after Ossama. He needs Ossama free to keep the fear going so he can stay popular (at least amoung the 30%ers and the MSM).
We Lefties on the other hand want to end the war now. We want to help people losing their homes. We want a stock market based on real growth not subprime ponzi schemes.
In other words we want to prevent disasters even if we could use them to gain more political power. We are willing to sacrifice political power if it means saving our country.
But Bush won’t let us and our own moderates won’t fight, so it seems that political power is being thrust upon us unwilling. The very disasters that Bush did nothing about like Ossama or that he actually created like the subprime problem or healthcare might blow up at any moment despite all our work to inform people about the problem and our many suggested solutions.
We could be facing a “Shock Doctrine ” in reverse/our favor and by facing it honestly and working to solve it we will have an opportunity to do what Bush/Hitler could never do. Produce real sustainable change for the better.
We really need to plan more!
You think Nancy was thinking of running or was she acting to support a particular Presidential Candidates run?
Some days I write some good stuff is there anyway to gather all my comments and the great responses from other people? I would like to reread them sometime.
We have to replace her.
idk what the hell she was thinking :/
um, they are part of the problem. Bush II is continuing the policies of Clinton I, who continued the policies of Bush I. And Clinton II will continue the policies of Bush II, as she has indicated by pledging to maintain the criminal, expensive and idiotic occupation of Iraq for the duration of her first term.
see powerofnarrative.blogspot.com for much, much more.
Yeah I can’t figure out her strategy either? If it was a Rational Strategy you would think she would be learning from all her many failure’s. I think she is trying to be nice at all costs like her daughters book of *cough* political wisdom suggests.
Bush keeps kicking sand in her face and she keeps turning the other cheek. You would think after the 777 time she would have fought back.
Hilary to be fair is not the only center Dem we have to worry about. I’m not thrilled with Obama and I don’t think even Edwards goes far enough.
Chirst. If she had a “Rational Strategy.”
She’s so bloody steeped in message control that she can’t even see a problem any longer. Her daughter’s fine example of belt way wisdom is only driving her further into the hole. That CW is anything but wisdom.
It’s kinda funny because I was most against Edwards back when you could still find his page on the Third Way. now he is looking like the best choice of the three :/ talk about triangulation.
Only thing that gives me hope is not seeing KO’s name among that “august” body.
Attaturk, please forgive the o/t -
Are you, or is anyone else, familar with a writer named Robin Wright at the wapo? I ask because there is a recent post over at DemocraticUnderground of an article titled “Inspector General for Iraq under Investigation”. I have always been impressed by Stuart Bowen when seeing him testify during hearings and, either I was very wrong about the man, or the ref’d article is a broken bottle aimed straight at his stomach.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..topnewsp
(that’s hand-typed with its complete URL to try to force the linky to work; if not, you should be able to find it easily over at DU)
Thanks for any feedback!
Still Obama is perceived as a Lefty he represents change to voters. The only way to beat him is to move further left. I’m hoping that at least one of our front runners has some ambition and sense and decides to win by going Left of Obama.
The Dems should not be worried about getting center votes from the 30%ers because they will never get them.
Now why Hilary is chasing after the votes of people who hate her the most and will never vote for her is beyond me? By chasing after them she ignores her base. The Left her base we still love Bill feeling strong has begun to desert her which explains her drop in the polls. We won’t settle for a Clinton again or stay with someone who ignores us and takes our votes for granted.
The 70% antiwar vote is the prettiest girl at the Presidential Election dance taking us for granted is a BIG MISTAKE. I’m sure someone will come along.
idk, i’m still reading it but “bipartisanship” in this climate is right-wing.
The modern day “liberals” are center right. Flag Is Here.
Of the big three Dems I like Edwards the most I’m hoping he decides to go further left though.
From Dan Froomkin:
Translation of my emphasis: Because y’all keep asking.
Well, daymn! Looks like the linky works….
As you can tell, I like your bottle reference; can just hear the mods goin’, “Tsk, Tsk.” *g*
aye, Ron Paul, or anyone who runs as an independent. If not that, then read a good book election day, tend your garden, anything other than supporting someone who threatens a nuclear first strike against Iran.
It is true that the other major (D) candidates are not so different from Clinton, but I am referring to her because I think her nomination is locked in, the horse-race hoo-ha of primary season is just more kabuki.
at least then we’ll be able to get popular bipartisan approval of impeachment.
and the fug’m wapo “9/11 Commission”.
I’m so sick of hearing that as some “bipartisan” phrase.
That commission was anything but bipartisan.
Grandpa Fred has been talking about how we need to reduce entitlements which is GOP code for Social Security. We need our Presidential Candidates to bring this up in Florida. I didn’t see all the GOP debates but I’m pretty sure not a single GOP candidate stood up for Social Security their silence on the issue is telling.
I’m sure that if we bring up the issue they will all rush to defend Social Security. Which is what I want them to do. We need to force our opponents to move where we want them too!
Fred should be first in line for entitlements cuts.
The Left commands the High ground on Ending the War, Health Care, the voters trust us more on the economy. But our candidates and Congress still take the middle ground insisting on taking fire from both sides us and the GOP.
The GOP insists on making a stand at the bottom of the hill in direct opposition to the issues the voters care about the most. (With the exception of Ron Paul) he is the one we have to worry about.
He could out left Hilary, Obama and Edwards and leave them all scrambling to move Left, which I like by the way.
But I worry that Ron might be the GOP candidate.
Congress voting to end their and Bush’s health care plan and Pension plan until every Citizen has health care and Social Security is secure again would certainly boost Congresse’s popularity.
taking a stand on any old lump or rock would help at this point :/
yeah sign up for fur sum terraist reports!
http://www.mipt.org/
Good morning, firepups. Gee, Attaturk posted so early some people took it to be a late post. ;-)
Unfortunately, Fred surely doesn’t need government entitlements. It’s always the rich who promote cuts in programs that assist those less well off.
he may not need entitlements but he sure could use some cuts ;)
lol @
Good morning, pups. Let us all give thanks — David Brooks is off today. Mr. Krugman is alone in the Times, and he says anyone who expects the Federal Reserve or anyone else to come up with a plan that makes the current financial crisis just go away will be sorely disappointed. It’s not a happy picture he paints…
http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/
The coffee, tea and hot chocolate are ready, and I’ve got some cranberry pecan muffins just out of the oven. Have a good Friday.
Wrt to fred -
Critiques about physical appearance tend to go down poorly with me (so am stepping on my own toes here) but, based on photos, how anyone (even a republic!) could think this man is healthy enough to run an entire country for four years is beyond understanding.
Marion -
Do these cranberry pecan muffins exist in real time? If so, would love to have the recipe some Saturday morning.
I’m astounded that Congressional approval is that high. Thought a few months back it was in the teens. Must have shot up after the House passed that gutsy resolution in support of xmas.
Gosh — what a great idea! A daily dose of “run for your lives — you’re doomed!” I can’t think of a better way to get the blood flowing in the morning. Particularly if your doctor has advised against caffeine…
lol!
yeah, well, i just supported their contract by sending them a half a dozen e-mails :/
From one of the best food sites on the toobz, straight to you:
Cranberry pecan muffins
I can
spendwaste hours and hours browsing Recipezaar…I think he is getting Chemo and or radiation therapy it would explain his looks and lack of energy.
You pretty much nailed it, Attaturk. With a few notable exceptions, I couldn’t be more disappointed with the Democratic leaders of Congress.
Thanks, Marion! Will try.
TCU -
Hmmmm…would also explain missing campaign days = treatment schedule.
Krugman explains it better than I ever did. He is getting numbers on possible homeowners in trouble we do need real numbers from everybody banks, hedge funds etc before the market can price in the loses.
Until then every bank and hedge is suspect Mitt should be worried we need to ask him for real numbers from Bain Capitol and does he support hedge fund bailouts.
Did Mike Wallace ever disown his around-the-twist son?
That’s actually high for him, one of the beltway boys said he was at 24% last night on Brit Hume’s sideshow of a news program.
http://www.hyerstandard.com
‘Tisn’t going to happen. Nancy is a co-conspirator.
I registered just to point out that it’s really inexcusable to post something as full of atrocious grammar and typos as this.
The “terrorist organization” rap is up to our next commander-guy / -gal in chief, but they def’nitely qualify as a “racketeer-influenced corrupt organization” from way back. *sigh* If only there was an honest DOJ to investigate / indict them….